Tandom
About
Sign inCreate a free account →
Tandom

The building blocks of global trade.

hello@tandom.ai

Proud to partner with

Microsoft for Startups

NVIDIA

Inception Program

Products

  • Tariff Calculator
  • AD/CVD Intelligence
  • HTS Classification
  • Document Intelligence
  • Entry Filing
  • Excel Plugin
  • Email Plugin

Catalogs

  • AD/CVD Catalog
  • HTS Catalog
  • Pending Investigations Directory
  • Rate Change Feed

Developers

  • API
  • AI Agent Workflows
  • MCP Connector
  • API Reference
  • API Pricing
  • API Changelog

Resources

  • Resource Center
  • Guides
  • Roadmap

Company & Legal

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Acceptable Use

© 2026 Fintora Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Tandom. All rights reserved.

Plain-English explanationScope textFrequently asked questionsLearn more
  1. AD/CVD Catalog
  2. ›
  3. Orders
  4. ›
  5. A-201-809
ADA-201-809·Belgium·revoked

Revocation Pursuant to Second Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews

Country-wide rate

0.07%

Effective

February 12, 2007

Plain-English explanation

AD/CVD case A-201-809 is a U.S. antidumping duty (AD) order on revocation pursuant to second five-year (sunset) reviews from Belgium, issued and enforced by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It carries a country-wide cash deposit rate of 0.07%, effective February 12, 2007. The order is in revoked status, with no HTS codes currently flagged in Tandom's catalog. Individual exporters and producers may receive their own case-specific rates through Commerce administrative reviews — see manufacturer rates linked from this page where available.

FR citation
2007-02-12 FR Doc. E7-2220

Tandom · AD/CVD exposure

Want to see if this case applies to your shipment?

Match by HTS, product, and supplier in seconds.

→

Scope text

Legally operative description of covered merchandise from the Federal Register

certain cut-to-length plate only. See, e.g., Countervailing Duty Order and Amendment to Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Steel Products From Belgium 58 FR 43749 (August 17, 1993). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EFFECTIVE DATE: December 15, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Scott, Jacqueline Arrowsmith, or Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2657, (202) 482-5255; (202) 482-1391, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 15, 2000, the Department published the continuation of the countervailing duty orders on CTL plate from Belgium, Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and Sweden; the antidumping duty orders on CTL plate from Belgium, Brazil, Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom; and the antidumping finding on carbon steel plate from Taiwan. See Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, 65 FR 78469 (December 15, 2000)(Continuation Notice).\2\ On November 1, 2005, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218, the Department initiated, and the Commission instituted, the sunset reviews of these countervailing and antidumping duty orders, and antidumping finding, by publishing the respective notices of initiation in the Federal Register. See Initiation of Five- Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 65884 (November 1, 2005) and Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and United Kingdom, 70 FR 62324 (October 31, 2005). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ In addition to the continuations of the CTL plate orders, this notice included in the continuations of orders on corrosion- resistant carbon steel flat products, which are not subject to the instant revocation notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As a result of the sunset reviews, the Department found that revocation of the countervailing duty orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies, and notified the Commission of the countervailing duty rates likely to prevail were the orders revoked. See Cut-to Length Carbon Steel Plate from Brazil: Final Results of Expedited Five-year (``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 71 FR 32522 (June 6, 2006); Cut-to Length Carbon Steel Plate from Mexico: Final Results of Expedited Five-year (``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 71 FR 32521 (June 6, 2006); Cut-to Length Carbon Steel Plate from Spain: Final Results of Expedited Five-year (``Sunset'') Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 71 FR 32523 (June 6, 2006). See also Cut-to Length Carbon Steel Plate from Belgium: Final Results of Full Sunset Review, 71 FR 58585 (October 4, 2006); Final Results of Full Sunset Review: Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Sweden, 71 FR 58587 (October 4, 2006). The Department also found that revocation of the antidumping duty orders and finding would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the Commission of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail were the orders and finding to be revoked. See Cut- to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Belgium, Brazil, Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and Carbon Steel Plate from Taiwan; Second Five-year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders and Antidumping Finding; Final Results, 71 FR 11577 (March 8, 2006). On December 14, 2006, the Commission determined that revocation of these countervailing and antidumping duty orders, and of the antidumping finding on carbon steel plate from Taiwan, would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. The Commission notified the Department and published its decision on January 31, 2007. See Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, 72 FR 4529 (January 31, 2007) and USITC Publication 3899 entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. AA1921-197 (Second Review); 701-TA-319, 320, 325- 327, 348, and 350 (Second Review); and 731-TA-573, 574, 576, 578, 582- 587, 612, and 614-618 (Second Review) (January 2007).

Frequently asked questions

What is AD/CVD case A-201-809?

A-201-809 is a U.S. antidumping duty (AD) order on revocation pursuant to second five-year (sunset) reviews from Belgium, issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It is part of the trade-remedy regime that levies cash deposits at entry on imports found to be sold below fair value (AD) or to benefit from foreign government subsidies (CVD).

What is the deposit rate for A-201-809?

The country-wide cash deposit rate for A-201-809 is 0.07%. This rate applies to importers of non-listed manufacturers/exporters from Belgium. Individual exporters and producers may have lower (or higher) case-specific rates from Commerce administrative reviews — see the manufacturer rates linked from this page where available.

When did A-201-809 take effect, and is it still active?

A-201-809 took effect on February 12, 2007 and is currently in revoked status. Revoked orders no longer require cash deposits — the order is closed. Importers should still verify the revocation date and any continuation/sunset history before relying on this for an entry.

How do I check if my shipment falls within the scope of A-201-809?

Two factors determine scope: (1) the product's HTS code(s) and physical characteristics — covered codes are listed on this page (0 flagged); and (2) the product's country of origin — this order applies to imports from Belgium. The order's scope text — also on this page — is the legally binding description. When borderline cases arise, importers can request a formal scope ruling from Commerce. Tandom's lookup tool matches your HTS + origin against every active order in seconds.

Where is the official Federal Register notice for A-201-809?

The official Federal Register citation for A-201-809 is 2007-02-12 FR Doc. E7-2220. The link is on this page; clicking it opens the canonical FR document on federalregister.gov, which carries the legally operative text — scope, rates, exclusions, and effective dates.

Learn more

Tandom guides relevant to this AD/CVD case

Trade compliance APIs in broker workflows

Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.

Open resource →

Find the right manufacturer or exporter rate in an AD/CVD order

Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.

Open resource →

Determine if a product is in scope of an AD/CVD order

Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).

Open resource →

Subscribe to and triage CBP CSMS messages

How to subscribe to CBP Cargo Systems Messaging Service and triage the messages that change broker filing behavior, without losing the ones that matter.

Open resource →

Real-time alerts when a CSMS message changes a duty rate

Set up alerts when a CBP CSMS message changes a duty rate on an HTS code you depend on. Built for brokers, forwarders, and importer compliance teams.

Open resource →

Check AD/CVD exposure by HTS code

A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.

Open resource →