Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. . Nacional de Acero S.A. de C.V

during the POR.\4\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.\5\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at the calculated antidumping duty assessment rate for the review period.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4157 (January 24, 2023). \5\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \6\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1335-36 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section 751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) held that: ``While the statute does not explicitly require that an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended. . .;'' see also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018- 2019, 86 FR 36102 (July 8, 2021), and accompanying IDM at Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ``for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 38752]] In the Preliminary Results, Commerce stated its intent to rescind this review with respect to 11 companies pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) and provided interested parties with an opportunity to submit comments on this intent to rescind, including factual information to demonstrate whether there are reviewable entries during the POR for any of the parties listed below.\7\ No interested party provided comment. As a result, we are rescinding this review with respect to these 11 companies: (1) Arco Metal S.A. de C.V.; (2) Fabricaciones y Servicios de Mexico; (3) Galvak, S.A. de C.V.; (4) Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles; (5) Industrias Monterrey S.A. de C.V.; (6) Internacional de Aceros, S.A. de C.V.; (7) PEASA-Productos Especializados de Acero; (8) Talleres Acero Rey S.A. de C.V.; (9) Tuberias Aspe S.A. de C.V.; (10) Tuberia Laguna, S.A. de C.V.; and (11) Tuberias y Derivados S.A. de C.V. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 74917. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure There are no additional details or calculations to disclose for these amended final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment For the companies for which we are rescinding this review, antidumping duties shall be assessed at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue these rescission instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the publication of