ITC Investigation 731-TA-1374 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1374-1376 (Review) from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. Commerce initiated the underlying investigation on June 1, 2023. It links to AD/CVD case A-301-803 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1374-1376 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Parties
Documents
Full text (112,885 chars)
=== Final Results - AD - Thailand - Columbia === 67239Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2023 / Notices 10 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 11 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 351.213(h). 12 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 13 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 14 See 19 CFR 352.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 15 See Order, 83 FR at 48281. proprietary information, until further notice. 10 Final Results of Review Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless this deadline is otherwise extended.11 The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future cash deposits of estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.12 Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). For an individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), upon completion of the final results, Commerce will calculate importer- specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a particular importer, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total quantity of those sales.13 To determine whether the duty assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will calculate an estimated importer-specific ad valorem rate based on the estimated entered value. Where either a respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.14 For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by an individually examined respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for Bothwell will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for an exporter not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently- completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in a review or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently- completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 116.17 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation. 15 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties These preliminary results are being issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: September 22, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Currency Conversion VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–21376 Filed 9–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–833, A–301–803] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Thailand and Colombia: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Thailand and Colombia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable September 29, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:46 Sep 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 67240 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 188 / Friday, September 29, 2023 / Notices 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 35832 (June 1, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties Letters, ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Colombia—Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 15, 2023; and ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Thailand—Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 15, 2023. 4 Id. 5 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letters, ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Colombia—Domestic Interested Party’s Substantive Response,’’ dated June 30, 2023; and ‘‘Five Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Thailand—Domestic Interested Party’s Substantive Response,’’ dated June 30, 2023. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2023,’’ dated July 25, 2023. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Thailand and Colombia,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 1 See Brass Rod from India, Israel, and the Republic of Korea: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Background On June 1, 2023, Commerce published the Initiation Notice of the sunset reviews of the AD orders on citric acid from Thailand and Colombia 1 in the Federal Register pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii), Commerce received notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively, the domestic interested parties) within 15 days after the date of publication of the Initiation Notice.3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of a domestic like product in the United States. 4 Commerce timely-received an adequate substantive response to the Initiation Notice from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 We did not receive substantive responses from any other interested parties. On July 25, 2023, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from other interested parties. 6 As a result, in accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited, i.e., 120-day sunset reviews of the Orders. Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by the Orders includes all grades and granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of packaging type. For a full description of the scope of the Orders, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail would be at rates up to 28.48 percent for Colombia and 15.71 percent for Thailand. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 22, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of Margin of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2023–21383 Filed 9–28–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–916] Brass Rod From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of brass rod from India. The period of investigation is April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES : Applicable September 29, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Dusten Hom or Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5075 or (202) 482–1785, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On May 24, 2023, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of this investigation. 1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:46 Sep 28, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM 29SEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 58764 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2024 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). by a preponderance of the evidence, that they have priority for disposition. Disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects in this notice may occur on or after August 19, 2024. If competing claims for disposition are received, the Bureau of Reclamation must determine the most appropriate claimant prior to disposition. Requests for joint disposition of the human remains and associated funerary objects are considered a single request and not competing requests. The Bureau of Reclamation is responsible for sending a copy of this notice to the lineal descendants, Indian Tribes, and Native Hawaiian organizations identified in this notice and to any other consulting parties. Authority: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3002, and the implementing regulations, 43 CFR 10.7. Dated: July 10, 2024. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2024–15897 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–23–032] Sunshine Act Meetings AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING : United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE : July 25, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. PLACE : Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS : Open to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED : 1. Agendas for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701– TA–692 and 731–TA–1628 (Final) (Pea Protein from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on August 12, 2024. 5. Outstanding action jackets: none. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION : Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202–205–2000. The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. By order of the Commission. Issued: July 17, 2024. Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2024–16059 Filed 7–17–24; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2023 (88 FR 35923) and determined on September 5, 2023 that it would conduct full reviews (88 FR 66052, September 26, 2023). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on November 21, 2023 (88 FR 81099). Since the domestic interested parties submitted a request to cancel the hearing after no other party submitted a request to appear, the public hearing in connection with these reviews, scheduled for May 16, 2024, was cancelled (89 FR 44707). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on July 16, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5524 (July 2024), entitled Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 1374–1376 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 16, 2024. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2024–15977 Filed 7–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1409] Certain Storage Containers and Toolboxes, Organizers, Component Boxes, and Coolers; Notice of Institution of Investigation AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 13, 2024, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation of Brookfield, Wisconsin and Keter Home and Garden Products Ltd. of Israel. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain storage containers and toolboxes, organizers, component boxes, and coolers by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 11,365,026 (‘‘the ’026 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,794,952 (‘‘the ’952 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 11,952,167 (‘‘the ’167 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES : The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Jul 18, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM 19JYN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Order - AD - Belgium - Colombia -Thailand === 63406 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 150 / Monday, August 5, 2024 / Notices 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018) (Orders). 2 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 88 FR 35923 (June 1, 2023). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 35832 (June 1, 2023). 4 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium: Final Results of the Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 88361 (December 21, 2023); and Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Thailand and Colombia: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 88 FR 67239 (September 29, 2023). 5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand Determination, 89 FR 58764 (July 19, 2024). 6 Id. [FR Doc. 2024–17166 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–423–813, A–301–803, A–549–833] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD orders. DATES : Applicable July 19, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 25, 2018, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD orders on citric acid from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand. 1 On June 1, 2023, the ITC instituted,2 and Commerce initiated, 3 the first sunset review of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked. 4 On July 19, 2024, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these Orders includes all grades and granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of packaging type. For a complete description of the scope of the Orders, see the appendix to this notice. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be July 19, 2024.6 Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to fifth anniversary of the date of the last determination by the ITC. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: July 30, 2024. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these Orders includes all grades and granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of packaging type. The scope also includes blends of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate; as well as blends with other ingredients, such as sugar, where the unblended form(s) of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate constitute 40 percent or more, by weight, of the blend. The scope also includes all forms of crude calcium citrate, including dicalcium citrate monohydrate, and tricalcium citrate tetrahydrate, which are intermediate products in the production of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate. The scope includes the hydrous and anhydrous forms of citric acid, the dihydrate and anhydrous forms of sodium citrate, otherwise known as citric acid sodium salt, and the monohydrate and monopotassium forms of potassium citrate. Sodium citrate also includes both trisodium citrate and monosodium citrate which are also known as citric acid trisodium salt and citric acid monosodium salt, respectively. The scope does not include calcium citrate that satisfies the standards set forth in the United States Pharmacopeia and has been mixed with a functional excipient, such as dextrose or starch, where the excipient constitutes at least 2 percent, by weight, of the product. Citric acid and sodium citrate are classifiable under 2918.14.0000 and 2918.15.1000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), respectively. Potassium citrate and crude calcium citrate are classifiable under 2918.15.5000 and, if included in a mixture or blend, 3824.99.9397 of the HTSUS. Blends that include citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate are classifiable under 3824.99.9397 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2024–17172 Filed 8–2–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:38 Aug 02, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 81099Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2023 / Notices 1 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_ filing_procedures.pdf. 2 All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. 3 Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Any written submissions on other issues must also be filed by no later than the close of business, eight calendar days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Complainant may file replies to any written submissions no later than three calendar days after the date on which any initial submissions were due, notwithstanding § 201.14(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. No other submissions will be accepted, unless requested by the Commission. Any submissions and replies filed in response to this Notice are limited to five (5) pages in length, inclusive of attachments. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3708’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic Filing Procedures 1). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary at EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All information, including confidential business information and documents for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. 3 This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 15, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–25699 Filed 11–20–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. DATES : November 15, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Celia Feldpausch 202–205–2387, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On September 5, 2023, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (88 FR 66052, September 26, 2023); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:58 Nov 20, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 81100 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 21, 2023 / Notices section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on April 25, 2024, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold an in-person hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 16, 2024. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before Wednesday, May 8, 2024. Any requests to appear as a witness via videoconference must be included with your request to appear. Requests to appear via videoconference must include a statement explaining why the witness cannot appear in person; the Chairman, or other person designated to conduct the reviews, may in their discretion for good cause shown, grant such a request. Requests to appear as remote witness due to illness or a positive COVID–19 test result may be submitted by 3 p.m. the business day prior to the hearing. Further information about participation in the hearing will be posted on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/calendarpad/ calendar.html. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference, if deemed necessary, to be held at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, May 10, 2024. Parties shall file and serve written testimony and presentation slides in connection with their presentation at the hearing by no later than 4 p.m. on Wednesday, May 15, 2024. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is May 6, 2024. Parties shall also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is May 28, 2024. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before 5:15 p.m. on May 28, 2024. On June 20, 2024, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before June 24, 2024, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 15, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–25679 Filed 11–20–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–600] USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin: Economic Impact and Operation, 2025 Report ACTION : Notice of investigation. SUMMARY : In accordance with section 202A(g)(2) of the United States-Mexico- Canada Agreement Implementation Act (‘‘USMCA Implementation Act’’), the U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) has instituted Investigation No. 332–600, USMCA Automotive Rules of Origin: Economic Impact and Operation, 2025 Report, for the purpose of preparing the 2025 report. DATES : July 1, 2025: Transmittal of Commission report to the President and Congress. ADDRESSES : All Commission offices, including the Commission’s hearing rooms, are located in the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. All written submissions should be addressed to the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Project Leader Mitch Semanik (mitchell.semanik@usitc.gov or 202– 205–2034), or Deputy Project Leaders Nathan Lotze (202–205–3231 or nathan.lotze@usitc.gov) and Aaron Woodward (202–205–2663 or aaron.woodward@usitc.gov) for information specific to this investigation. For information on the legal aspects of this investigation, contact Brian Allen (202–205–3034 or brian.allen@usitc.gov) or William Gearhart (202–205–3091 or william.gearhart@usitc.gov) of the Commission’s Office of the General Counsel. The media should contact VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:58 Nov 20, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM 21NON1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 35832 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 105 / Thursday, June 1, 2023 / Notices audiotape, American Sign Language) should contact the responsible Mission Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, a complainant should complete a Form AD–3027, USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which can be obtained online at https://www.usda.gov/forms/electronic- forms, from any USDA office, by calling (866) 632–9992, or by writing a letter addressed to USDA. The letter must contain the complainant’s name, address, telephone number, and a written description of the alleged discriminatory action in sufficient detail to inform the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature and date of an alleged civil rights violation. The completed AD–3027 form or letter must be submitted to USDA by: (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410; (2) Fax: (833) 256–1665 or (202) 690– 7442; or (3) Email: program.intake@usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Done at Washington, DC. Paul Kiecker, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2023–11677 Filed 5–31–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–35–2023] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 207, Notification of Proposed Production Activity; LEGO Manufacturing Richmond, Inc.; (LEGO® Bricks and Toy Sets); Chester and Colonial Heights, Virginia The LEGO Group submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for the LEGO Manufacturing Richmond, Inc. facilities in Chester and Colonial Heights, Virginia, within FTZ 207. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board’s regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on May 24, 2023. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/ component(s) and specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board’s website—accessible via www.trade.gov/ ftz. The proposed finished products include LEGO® construction toy sets, and plastic, molded, interlocking bricks and various shapes and figurines (duty rate is duty-free). The proposed foreign-status materials and components include: color additives in the form of plastic granulates (synthetic organic; preparations based on titanium dioxide; ultramarine; inorganic mixtures or combinations); decoration inks; ink diluents; plastic resins; self-adhesive plastic rolls; auto-adhesive stickers and paper stickers; plastic components (foil in rolls; boxes; trays; toy containers; storage bags); polyester storage bags; tissue wrapping paper; paper coated with plastic in rolls; cardboard cartons (non-corrugated; corrugated); rigid paperboard boxes; paper pulp trays; printed labels; molded paper pulp containers; advertising materials; toy set building instructions; nylon components (yarn; string; twine); metal contact plates for battery-powered toy sets; power adapters; batteries (lithium; rechargeable); sound cards; power switches; control hubs for power, sensors, and motors; micro controllers; USB cables with sleeves; sensors (motion; spatial); and, plastic, molded, interlocking bricks and various shapes and figurines (duty rate ranges from duty-free to 17.6%). The request indicates that certain materials/ components are subject to duties under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is July 11, 2023. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’ section of the Board’s website. For further information, contact Juanita Chen at juanita.chen@trade.gov. Dated: May 25, 2023. Elizabeth Whiteman, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–11618 Filed 5–31–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable June 1, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping duty and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 31, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 35833Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 105 / Thursday, June 1, 2023 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–570–904 .... 731–TA–1103 ... China ..... Activated Carbon (3rd Review) ........................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–423–813 .... 731–TA–1374 ... Belgium .. Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (1st Re- view). Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–301–803 .... 731–TA–1375 ... Columbia Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (1st Re- view). Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–549–833 .... 731–TA–1376 ... Thailand Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (1st Re- view). Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–570–866 .... 731–TA–921 ..... China ..... Folding Gift Boxes (4th Review) ....................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–588–854 .... 731–TA–860 ..... Japan ..... Tin Mill Products (4th Review) ......................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping duty and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: May 26, 2023. Scot Fullerton, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2023–11680 Filed 5–31–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Background Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct reviews to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 31, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 35923Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 105 / Thursday, June 1, 2023 / Notices occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2016, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 24, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–11465 Filed 5–31–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted June 1, 2023. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is July 3, 2023. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by August 15, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Celia Feldpausch (202–205–2387), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On July 25, 2018, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued antidumping duty orders on imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand (83 FR 35214). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of citric acid and certain citrate salts corresponding to Commerce’s scope, including crude calcium citrate, citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in all chemical and physical forms. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of citric acid and certain citrate salts. (5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping duty orders under review became effective. In these reviews, the Order Date is July 25, 2018. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 31, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 35924 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 105 / Thursday, June 1, 2023 / Notices as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is July 3, 2023. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is August 15, 2023. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 23–5–569, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. Those responding to this notice of institution are encouraged, but not required, to visit the USITC’s website at https://usitc.gov/reports/response_noi_ worksheet, where one can download and complete the ‘‘NOI worksheet’’ Excel form for the subject proceeding, to be included as attachment/exhibit 1 of your overall response. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 31, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 35925Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 105 / Thursday, June 1, 2023 / Notices imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2022, except as noted (report quantity data in pounds dry weight and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2022 (report quantity data in pounds dry weight and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2022 (report quantity data in pounds dry weight and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 25, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–11496 Filed 5–31–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 31, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Full Review === 66052 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices By order of the Commission. Issued: September 21, 2023. Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2023–20983 Filed 9–22–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–860 (Final)] Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet From Japan; Denial of Request To Institute a Section 751(b) Review Concerning the Commission’s Affirmative Determination AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has declined to institute a review pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. DATES : September 19, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Alejandro Orozco (202–205–3177), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this matter may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—In August 2000, the Commission determined that a U.S. industry was materially injured by reason of imports of tin- and chromium- coated steel sheet (‘‘TCCSS’’) from Japan found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value. Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from Japan, Inv. No. 731–TA–860 (Final), USITC Pub. 3337 (August 2000). The Commission’s affirmative determination was the subject of several appeals and three remand proceedings. Ultimately, in accordance with the Federal Circuit’s mandate, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) affirmed the Commission’s second remand determination and thus reinstated the Commission’s affirmative material injury determination. See Nippon Steel Corporation, et al. v. United States, 31 CIT 1588, 433 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2007). In the first, second, and third full five- year reviews, the Commission found that revocation of the antidumping duty order on TCCSS from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from Japan, Inv. No. 731–TA–860 (Review), USITC Pub. 3860 (June 2006); Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from Japan, Inv. No. 731–TA–860 (Second Review), USITC Pub. 4325 (May 2012); Tin- and Chromium-Coated Steel Sheet from Japan, Inv. No. 731–TA–860 (Third Review), USITC Pub. 4795 (June 2018). On August 5, 2022, a request for a changed circumstances review of the Commission’s affirmative determination regarding TCCSS from Japan was filed by the Can Manufacturers Institute (‘‘CMI’’), Silgan Containers, LLC (‘‘Silgan’’), Sonoco Product Company (‘‘Sonoco’’), Trivium Packaging USA Inc. (‘‘Trivium’’), Crown Holdings, Inc. (‘‘Crown’’), and Nippon Steel Corporation (‘‘NSC’’) (collectively, ‘‘CMI’’). CMI’s request alleges that there have been significant changed circumstances since the Commission’s affirmative determination in the third five-year review. Specifically, CMI claims that there has been a dramatic reduction in the domestic industry’s production capacity for TCCSS since 2018. CMI further contends that subject producers in Japan have reduced their TCCSS capacity since the last reviews and no longer possess excess capacity. On October 28, 2022, the Commission published a Federal Register notice inviting comments from the public on whether changed circumstances exist sufficient to warrant the institution of a changed circumstances review (87 FR 65248, Oct. 28, 2022). Comments in response to this notice were filed on December 15, 2022. The Commission received separate submissions opposing the institution of a changed circumstances review filed on behalf of Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and U.S. Steel Corporation. The Commission also received separate submissions in favor of instituting a changed circumstances review on behalf of The Consumer Brands Association (‘‘CBA’’), the Steel Tinplate Against Tariffs Coalition (‘‘STAT’’), and U.S. Representative Claudia Tenney. U.S. Representatives Salud Carbajal, Jim Costa, Mark DeSaulnier, and John Garamendi filed joint comments in support of initiating a changed circumstances review. On January 15, 2023, the Commission voted unanimously to waive its 45-day rule for determining whether to institute a changed circumstances review. On June 1, 2023, Commerce initiated, and the Commission instituted, the fourth five-year sunset review of the antidumping duty order on TCCSS from Japan. 88 FR 35832; 88 FR 35920. On September 5, 2023, the Commission voted unanimously to conduct a full review of the antidumping duty order on TCCSS from Japan. 88 FR 64464 (Sept. 19, 2023). On September 19, 2023, the Commission determined not to institute a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on TCCSS from Japan. The Commission found that conducting a changed circumstances review was unwarranted because it would be duplicative of the pending full five-year review. See Eveready Battery Co. Inc., v. United States, 77 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 1334 (Ct. Int’l Trade, Nov. 23, 1999) (finding that a request for a changed circumstances review was rendered moot by the Commission’s institution of a full five-year review); see also Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from China, 79 FR 35568–69 (June 23, 2014) (denying request for changed circumstances review because it would be duplicative of the ongoing full five-year review). Authority: This notice is published pursuant to section 207.45 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 20, 2023. Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2023–20817 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Notice of Commission Determinations to Conduct Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Sep 25, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 66053Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 26, 2023 / Notices the antidumping duty orders on citric acid and certain citrate salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES : September 5, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Alec Resch (202) 708–1448, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On September 5, 2023, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response and the respondent interested party group response from Belgium to its notice of institution (88 FR 35923, June 1, 2023) were adequate, and determined to conduct a full review of the order on imports from Belgium. The Commission also found that the respondent interested party group responses from Colombia and Thailand were inadequate but determined to conduct full reviews of the orders on imports from those countries in order to promote administrative efficiency in light of its determination to conduct a full review of the order with respect to Belgium. A record of the Commissioners’ votes will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 21, 2023. Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2023–20886 Filed 9–25–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1294] Certain High-Performance Gravity-Fed Water Filters and Products Containing the Same; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has determined that there is no violation of section 337 in the above-captioned investigation, reversing the administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) in this investigation on review. The Commission has determined to grant in part complainant’s motion to strike waived arguments and new evidence. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3042. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On January 31, 2022, the Commission instituted this investigation based on a complaint filed by Brita LP (‘‘Brita’’) of Neuchatel NE, Switzerland. 87 FR 4913 (Jan. 31, 2022). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain high-performance gravity-fed water filters and products containing the same by reason of infringement of claims 1–6, 20, 21, 23, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 8,167,141 (‘‘the ’141 patent’’). Id. The Commission’s notice of investigation named nine respondents: Mavea LLC of West Linn, Oregon and Brita GmbH of Taunusstein, Switzerland (collectively, ‘‘the Mavea Respondents’’); Ecolife Technologies, Inc. of City of Industry, California and Qingdao Ecopure Filter Co., Ltd. of Shandong Province, China (collectively, ‘‘the Aqua Crest Respondents’’); Kaz USA, Inc. and Helen of Troy Limited, both of El Paso, Texas (collectively, ‘‘PUR Respondents’’); Zero Technologies, LLC of Trevose, Pennsylvania; Culligan International Co. of Rosemont, Illinois (collectively, ‘‘ZeroWater Respondents’’); and Vestergaard Frandsen Inc. of Baltimore, Maryland (‘‘LifeStraw’’). Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in this investigation. Id. On May 3, 2022, the ALJ issued an ID granting a motion to terminate the investigation as to the Mavea Respondents based upon settlement. Order No. 13 (May 3, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 24, 2022). On June 1, 2022, the ALJ issued an ID granting a motion to terminate the investigation as to claims 20, 21, and 24 of the ’141 patent based upon withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as to these claims. Order No. 19 (June 1, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (June 21, 2022). On June 2, 2022, the ALJ held a Markman hearing. The ALJ issued a Markman Order construing the claim terms in dispute on July 20, 2022. Order No. 30 (July 20, 2022). On September 22, 2022, the ALJ issued an ID granting a motion to terminate the investigation as to the Aqua Crest Respondents based upon withdrawal of the allegations in the complaint as to these respondents. Order No. 43 (Sept. 22, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Oct. 11, 2022). The ALJ held an evidentiary hearing from August 17–19, August 22–23, and October 13, 2022, and received post- hearing briefs thereafter. On February 28, 2023, the ALJ issued the final ID finding a violation of section 337. The ID found that ‘‘because of importation stipulations of all Accused Products,’’ the importation requirement under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(B) is satisfied. ID at 12–13. The ID also found that Brita successfully proved that all of the Accused Products infringe the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Sep 25, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Belgium === 88361Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Notices 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia and Thailand: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 35214 (July 25, 2018) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 35832 (June 1, 2023). 3 See Citribel’s Letter, ‘‘Citribel N.V.’s Substantive Response,’’ dated July 3, 2023. 4 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2023,’’ dated July 25, 2023. comments will become a matter of public record. Melissa Bailey, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2023–28074 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. Comments are requested regarding; whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments regarding this information collection received by January 22, 2024 will be considered. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number, and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Title: APHIS Pest Reporting and Asian Longhorned Beetle Program. OMB Control Number: 0579–0311. Summary of Collection: Under the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701, et seq.), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to prohibit or restrict the importation, entry, or movement of plants and plant pests to prevent the introduction of plant pests into, or their dissemination within, the United States. Plant health regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Agriculture under this authority specifically address control programs for a number of pests and diseases of concern, including Asian longhorned beetle, emerald ash borer beetle, and citrus greening, to name a few. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will collect information using a Plant Protection and Quarantine pest reporting form and Asian longhorned beetle unified survey form, and other information collection activities. Need and Use of the Information: APHIS relies on the public to report sightings of plant pests or suspicious signs of pest or disease damage they may see in their local area. This reporting will be done through online forms for reporting pests, and additional information collection activities such as cooperative agreements for inspection; compliance training workshops; contracts for inspection; homeowner releases or refusals to inspect; homeowner chemical treatment releases; letters of warning of litigation and warrant; litigations and warrants; homeowner releases for tree removal; removals and monitoring; contracts for treatment; removals and disposals; disposal and marshalling yard activities; and certificate or permit cancellation appeals. Failing to collect this information could result in APHIS not receiving information about where infestations may exist, causing them to linger unreported and grow. Infestations of high-consequence pests or diseases, such as Asian longhorned beetle, emerald ash borer beetle, citrus greening, and others, could lead to significant economic damage to crops, forests, and landscapes. Description of Respondents: Individuals; Business or other for-profit; State, Local, and Tribal Governments. Number of Respondents: 16,308. Frequency of Responses: Recordkeeping: Reporting: On occasion. Total Burden Hours: 85,999. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2023–28086 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–423–813] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium: Final Results of the Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On September 22, 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued the preliminary results of the first full five-year sunset review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Belgium. We received no comment from interested parties in opposition to our preliminary results. As a result of our analysis, Commerce finds that revocation of the AD order on citric acid from Belgium would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable December 21, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On June 1, 2023, Commerce published the initiation of the sunset review of the AD order on citric acid from Belgium 1 in the Federal Register pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 As Commerce received a substantive response from Citribel nv (Citribel), 3 which claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(A) of the Act as a foreign producer and foreign exporter of citric acid, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it would conduct a full sunset review of the Order pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(2).4 On September 22, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results, finding that dumping was likely to VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Dec 20, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 88362 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 244 / Thursday, December 21, 2023 / Notices 5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium: Preliminary Results of the Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 65365 (September 22, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 6 Id., 88 FR at 65366. 7 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Domestic Industry’s Case Brief,’’ dated October 23, 2023. The domestic interested parties note that, should the final results of the 2021–2022 administrative review of the Order be finalized prior to the instant sunset final results, the affirmative decision that revocation would likely lead to the continuance of dumping could be additionally supported with a finding that dumping continued after issuance of the Order. However, because the final results of the 2021–2022 administrative review have not yet been issued at the time of signature of this notice, we continue to decline to consider the unfinalized dumping margins of the ongoing 2021–2022 administrative review for the purposes of the instant determination. 1 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 51289 (August 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 Commerce has previously determined that Interpipe Europe S.A.; Interpipe Ukraine LLC; PJSC Interpipe Niznedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant; and LLC Interpipe Niko Tube are affiliated and treated as a single entity (i.e., Interpipe). See Preliminary Results PDM at ‘‘Summary.’’ 3 See Interpipe’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief for Interpipe,’’ dated September 5, 2023; see also Vallourec’s Letter, ‘‘Letter in Lieu of Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated September 11, 2023. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July 16, 2019) (Order). continue or recur if the Order were revoked, and determined to the report to the ITC rates up to 19.30 percent as the margin of dumping likely to prevail.5 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.6 We received a case brief from Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Incorporated, and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively, the domestic interested parties), which notes their agreement with the preliminary determination that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, which they state was appropriately based on Commerce’s finding that import volumes of the subject merchandise declined significantly after issuance of the Order.7 We received no further case or rebuttal briefs from interested parties; thus, the record reflects no opposition to the Preliminary Results nor presents substantive issues which require further consideration. Accordingly, the final results remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this Order includes all grades and granulation sizes of citric acid, sodium citrate, and potassium citrate in their unblended forms, whether dry or in solution, and regardless of packaging type. For a full description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at a weighted- average dumping margin up to 19.30 percent. As noted above, Commerce received no comments in opposition to its Preliminary Results. As a result, we have not modified our analysis, and no issues and decision memorandum accompanies this Federal Register notice. We are adopting the Preliminary Results as the final results. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This five-year sunset review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(A), 752(c), and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3). Dated: December 15, 2023. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2023–28138 Filed 12–20–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–823–815] Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021– 2022 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine were sold at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR) July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. DATES : Applicable December 21, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Toni Page, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1398. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 3, 2023, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. 1 Interpipe, 2 the sole mandatory respondent, and the domestic interested party Vallourec Star, L.P. (Vallourec), each submitted comments on the Preliminary Results.3 For a description of the events since the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 4 Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 5 The products covered by the Order are OCTG from Ukraine. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in Interpipe’s case brief and Vallourec’s letter in lieu of rebuttal brief are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of these issues is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Review We have calculated the following estimated weighted-average dumping VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Dec 20, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM 21DEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Hearing Cancellation === 44707Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 21, 2024 / Notices Southern Paiute Tribe of Arizona; Tohono O’odham Nation of Arizona; Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona; White Mountain Apache Tribe of the Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai- Apache Nation of the Camp Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona; Yavapai- Prescott Indian Tribe; and the Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. Requests for Repatriation Written requests for repatriation of the human remains in this notice must be sent to the authorized representative identified in this notice under ADDRESSES. Requests for repatriation may be submitted by: 1. Any one or more of the Indian Tribes identified in this notice. 2. Any lineal descendant, Indian Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice who shows, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the requestor is a lineal descendant or a culturally affiliated Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization. Repatriation of the human remains in this notice to a requestor may occur on or after June 20, 2024. If competing requests for repatriation are received, the ASM and Arizona Capitol Museum must determine the most appropriate requestor prior to repatriation. Requests for joint repatriation of the human remains are considered a single request and not competing requests. The ASM and Arizona Capitol Museum are responsible for sending a copy of this notice to the Indian Tribes identified in this notice. Authority: Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing regulations, 43 CFR 10.10. Dated: May 9, 2024. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2024–11089 Filed 5–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1374–1376 (Review)] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Cancellation of Hearing for Full Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. DATES : May 13, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Celia Feldpausch ((202) 205–2387), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On November 15, 2023, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the full five-year reviews (88 FR 81100, November 21, 2023). On May 8, 2024, counsel for Archer-Daniels- Midland Company (‘‘ADM’’), Cargill, Incorporated (‘‘Cargill’’), and Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC (‘‘Primient’’) (collectively, the ‘‘domestic interested parties’’) filed a request to appear at the hearing. No other party submitted a request to appear at the hearing. On May 9, 2024, counsel for the domestic interested parties filed a request that the Commission cancel the scheduled hearing for these reviews given the lack of respondent interested party participation. Counsel indicated a willingness to submit written responses to any Commission questions. Consequently, the public hearing in connection with these reviews, scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 16, 2024, is cancelled. Parties to these reviews should respond to any written questions posed by the Commission in their posthearing briefs, which are due to be filed on May 28, 2024. For further information concerning these reviews see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 14, 2024. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2024–10929 Filed 5–20–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [CPCLO Order No. 002–2024] Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records AGENCY : Executive Office for United States Attorneys, United States Department of Justice. ACTION : Notice of a new system of records. SUMMARY : Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A–108, notice is hereby given that the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (hereinafter, EOUSA) and the Office of Justice Programs (hereinafter, OJP), components within the United States Department of Justice (DOJ or Department), propose to develop a new system of records notice titled Child Pornography Victims Reserve Records, JUSTICE/USA–020. EOUSA and OJP propose to establish this system of records to administer the Child Pornography Victims Reserve, as required under The Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018. DATES : In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and (11), this notice is applicable upon publication, subject to a 30-day period in which to comment on the routine uses, described below. Please submit any comments by June 20, 2024. ADDRESSES : The public, OMB, and Congress are invited to submit any comments by mail to the United States Department of Justice, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties, ATTN: Privacy Analyst, 2 Constitution Square, 145 N Street Northeast, Suite 8W.300, Washington, District of Columbia, 20530; by facsimile at 202–307–0693; or by email at privacy@usdoj.gov. To ensure proper handling, please reference the above CPCLO Order No. on your correspondence. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Karen Rolley, Attorney-Advisor, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, 175 N Street NE, Office of Legal Programs, Washington, DC 20530, karen.rolley@usdoj.gov, 202–252–5866. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Under Federal law, victims of child pornography offenses are entitled to full VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 May 20, 2024 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 731-TA-1374 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Belgium, Colombia, and Thailand; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1374-1376 (Review) from Belgium, Colombia, Thailand. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
731-TA-1374 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 731-TA-1374 resulted in AD/CVD case A-301-803. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource