ITC Investigation 731-TA-1314 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Phosphor Copper from South Korea; Inv. No. 731-TA-1314 (Review) from South Korea. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. Commerce initiated the underlying investigation on March 1, 2022. It links to AD/CVD case A-580-885 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Phosphor Copper from South Korea; Inv. No. 731-TA-1314 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Parties
Documents
Full text (78,857 chars)
=== USITC Institution === 11467Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 87 FR 1110 and 87 FR 1117 (January 10, 2022). 3 Commissioner David S. Johanson dissenting. 4 The Commission also finds that imports subject to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances determination are not likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on R–125 from China. 5 As revised by 86 FR 72619 (December 22, 2021). INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–662 and 731– TA–1554 (Final)] Pentafluoroethane (R–125) From China Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of pentafluoroethane (‘‘R–125’’) from China, provided for in subheading 2903.44.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), and to be subsidized by the government of China. 2 3 4 Background The Commission instituted these investigations effective January 12, 2021, following receipt of petitions filed with the Commission and Commerce by Honeywell International, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina. The final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission following notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of R–125 from China were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on September 7, 2021 (86 FR 50171).5 The Commission conducted its hearing on December 14, 2021. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on February 23, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5281 (February 2022), entitled Pentafluoroethane (R–125) from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–662 and 731–TA–1554 (Final). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 24, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–04253 Filed 2–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1314 (Review)] Phosphor Copper From Korea; Institution of a Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on phosphor copper from Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted March 1, 2022. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is March 31, 2022. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by May 13, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Nitin Joshi (202–708–1669), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On April 24, 2017, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping duty order on imports of phosphor copper from Korea (82 FR 18893). The Commission is conducting a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission’s determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to this review: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Country in this review is Korea. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determination, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of phosphor copper, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as consisting of all domestic producers of phosphor copper. (5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping duty order under review became effective. In this review, the Order Date is April 24, 2017. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Feb 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 11468 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Notices consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is March 31, 2022. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing such comments is May 13, 2022. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 22–5–519, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determination in the review. Information To be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Feb 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 11469Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 1, 2022 / Notices (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2021, except as noted (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2021 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2021 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 23, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–04208 Filed 2–28–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:01 Feb 28, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01MRN1.SGM 01MRN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - South Korea === 40502 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ dated March 30, 2022 (Substantive Response). 5 See Commerce’s Letter to U.S. International Trade Commission, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022 Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 7 Id. 8 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 76 FR 18521 (April 4, 2011) (Final Determination); see also Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325 (March 22, 2016) (Final Results 2013 Review). Kong Ah International Company Limited was included among the cross-owned companies comprising the Gyang Ya Group in the Final Determination. However, other members of the Gyang Ya Group were subsequently reviewed as mandatory respondents in the Final Results 2013 Review, while Kong Ah International Company Limited was not. Therefore, the rates for the additional programs found to be countervailable for the individually examined Guang Ya Group Companies in the Final Results 2013 Review are not the rates for Kong Ah International Company Limited. Rather, for additional programs found to be countervailable in the Final Results 2013 Review, we have used the average of the rates of the companies individually examined. 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 4 On April 20, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that we did not receive a substantive response from the Government of China or any respondent interested party to the proceeding.5 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum extrusions. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum.6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are listed in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b)(1) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a net countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Producer/exporter Net countervailable subsidy rate (percent) Dragonluxe Limited .............................................................................................................................................................................. 374.15 Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co. Ltd., Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Hong Kong, and Yongji Guanghai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 12.04 Kong Ah International Company Limited ............................................................................................................................................ 25.82 8 Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd., Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya Shaped Aluminum HK Holding Ltd ....... 20.18 Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd./Liaoning Zhongwang Group .................................................................................. 374.15 Miland Luck Limited ............................................................................................................................................................................. 374.15 All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 22.96 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: June 29, 2022. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rate Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–14488 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Internatonal Trade Administration [A–580–885] Phosphor Copper From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on phosphor copper from the Republic of Korea (Korea) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at levels identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable July 7, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Jul 06, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 40503Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 1 See Phosphor Copper From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 18893 (April 24, 2017) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 87 FR 11416 (March 1, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated March 8, 2022. 4 Id. at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ March 24, 2022. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 7 A ‘‘master alloy’’ is a base metal, such as copper, to which a relatively high percentage of one or two other elements is added. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Phosphor Copper from Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 8362. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On April 24, 2017, Commerce published the AD order on phosphor copper from Korea. 1 On March 1, 2022, Commerce published the Initiation Notice of the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On March 8, 2022, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Metallurgical Products Company (the domestic interested party), filed in proper form, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 3 The domestic interested party claimed interested party status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a manufacturer in the United States of the domestic like product.4 On March 24, 2022, the domestic interested party filed a complete substantive response within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party with respect to this proceeding. Further, no hearing was requested. On April 20, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission of the lack of a substantive response.6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is master alloys 7 of copper containing between five percent and 17 percent phosphorus by nominal weight, regardless of form (including but not limited to shot, pellet, waffle, ingot, or nugget), and regardless of size or weight. Subject merchandise consists predominantly of copper (by weight), and may contain other elements, including but not limited to iron (Fe), lead (Pb), or tin (Sn), in small amounts (up to one percent by nominal weight). Phosphor copper is frequently produced to JIS H2501 and ASTM B–644, Alloy 3A standards or higher; however, merchandise covered by the order includes all phosphor copper, regardless of whether the merchandise meets, fails to meet, or exceeds these standards. Merchandise covered by the Order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheading 7405.00.1000. This HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.8 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the weighted-average dumping margin likely to prevail is up to 8.43 percent. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: June 29, 2022. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Appendix I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–14417 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–840] Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that producers and/or exporters of certain frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from India made sales at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) February 1, 2020, through January 31, 2021. DATES : Applicable July 7, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Terre Keaton Stefanova or Adam Simons, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or (202) 482–6172, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Jul 06, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM 07JYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 19069Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2022 / Notices 1 In the sunset initiation notice that published on March 1, 2022, Commerce inadvertently listed the wrong case number for the antidumping duty order on Phosphorous Copper from South Korea. Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 11416 (March 1, 2022). The correct case number for Phosphorous Copper from South Korea is A–580– 885. This serves as a correction notice. 2 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and (d)(2), and 777(i) the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: March 28, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–06929 Filed 3–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable April 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): 1 DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–570–822 ........ 731–TA–624 China ................ Helical Spring Lock Washers (5th Review) ........ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–570–045 ........ 731–TA–1316 China ................ HEDP (1st Review) ............................................. Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3639. A–570–815 ........ 731–TA–538 China ................ Sulfanilic Acid (5th Review) ................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–533–806 ........ 731–TA–561 India .................. Sulfanilic Acid (5th Review) ................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–580–886 ........ 731–TA–1315 South Korea ..... Ferrovanadium (1st Review) ............................... Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3639. A–583–820 ........ 731–TA–625 Taiwan .............. Helical Spring Lock Washers (5th Review) ........ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. C–570–046 ....... 701–TA–558 China ................ HEDP (1st Review) ............................................. Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3639. C–533–807 ....... 701–TA–318 India .................. Sulfanilic Acid (5th Review) ................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.2 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Mar 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 19070 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2022 / Notices 3 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- Length Plate from the Republic of Korea: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 24103 (May 25, 2017) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 68220 (December 1, 2021). 3 See SSAB’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review,’’ dated December 15, 2021; see also Cleveland-Cliffs’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated December 16, 2021; Nucor’s Letter, ‘‘Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated December 16, 2021. 4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ dated January 3, 2022. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on December 1, 2021,’’ dated January 20, 2022. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- Length Plate from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 3 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: March 11, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–06923 Filed 3–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–580–888] Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- Length Plate From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain carbon and alloy steel cut-to- length plate (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable April 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1537. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On May 25, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on CTL plate from Korea. 1 On December 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 Commerce received timely notices of intent to participate in this review from SSAB Enterprises, LLC (SSAB) on December 15, 2021, and from Cleveland- Cliffs Inc. (Cleveland-Cliffs) and Nucor Corporation (Nucor) (collectively, domestic interested parties) on December 16, 2021, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of CTL plate. On January 3, 2022, Commerce received a complete substantive response for the review from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 4 On January 20, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 5 As a result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The products covered by the Order are CTL plate. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the rates listed below: Producer/exporter Subsidy rate (percent) POSCO ................................. 4.35 All Others .............................. 4.35 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:45 Mar 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM 01APN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Continuation - AD - South Korea === 65747Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2022 / Notices 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Phosphor Copper from the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 18893 (April 24, 2017) (Order). 2 See Phosphor Copper from Korea; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 87 FR 11467 (March 1, 2022). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 11416 (March 1, 2022) (Sunset Initiation). In the Sunset Initiation, Commerce inadvertently listed the wrong case number for Order. Commerce noted the correct case number, A–580–885, in a subsequent sunset initiation notice. See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 19069 (April 1, 2022). 4 See Phosphor Copper from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 87 FR 40502 (July 7, 2022) (Expedited Final Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 5 See Phosphor Copper from Korea, 87 FR 64522 (October 25, 2022). 6 A ‘‘master alloy’’ is a base metal, such as copper, to which a relatively high percentage of one or two other elements is added. and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: October 19, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–23744 Filed 10–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–885] Phosphor Copper From the Republic of Korea: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on phosphor copper from the Republic of Korea (Korea) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD order. DATES : Applicable November 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 8362. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On April 24, 2017, Commerce published the AD order on phosphor copper from Korea. 1 On March 1, 2022, the ITC instituted,2 and Commerce initiated, the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).3 As a result of its review, Commerce determined that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margin likely to prevail should the Order be revoked. 4 On October 25, 2022, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is master alloys 6 of copper containing between five percent and 17 percent phosphorus by nominal weight, regardless of form (including but not limited to shot, pellet, waffle, ingot, or nugget), and regardless of size or weight. Subject merchandise consists predominantly of copper (by weight), and may contain other elements, including but not limited to iron (Fe), lead (Pb), or tin (Sn), in small amounts (up to one percent by nominal weight). Phosphor copper is frequently produced to JIS H2501 and ASTM B–644, Alloy 3A standards or higher; however, merchandise covered by the Order includes all phosphor copper, regardless of whether the merchandise meets, fails to meet, or exceeds these standards. Merchandise covered by the Order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheading 7405.00.1000. This HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive. Continuation of the Order As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Order would likely lead to a continuation or a recurrence of dumping, as well as material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of the APO is a sanctionable violation. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Oct 31, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM 01NON1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 65748 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 210 / Tuesday, November 1, 2022 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). Notification to Interested Parties This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: October 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–23742 Filed 10–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Background Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct reviews to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for December 2022 Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in December 2022 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews (Sunset Review). Department contact Antidumping Duty Proceedings Biodiesel from Argentina, A–357–820 (1st Review) ......................................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Biodiesel from Indonesia, A–560–830 (1st Review) ......................................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Belarus, A–822–806 (1st Review) ........................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Italy, A–475–836 (1st Review) .............................................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Korea, A–580–891 (1st Review) ........................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Russia, A–821–824 (1st Review) ......................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from South Africa, A–791–823 (1st Review) ................................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Spain, A–469–816 (1st Review) ........................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Turkey, A–489–831 (1st Review) ......................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine, A–823–816 (1st Review) ........................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from United Arab Emirates, A–520–808 (1st Review) .................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from United Kingdom, A–412–826 (1st Review) ........................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, A–122–857 (1st Review) ................................................................. Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. Hardwood Plywood from China, A–570–051 (1st Review) .............................................................................. Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. Multilayered Wood Flooring from China, A–570–970 (2nd Review) ................................................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Tool Chests and Cabinets from China, A–570–056 (1st Review) .................................................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Tool Chests and Cabinets from Vietnam, A–552–821 (1st Review) ................................................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Countervailing Duty Proceedings Biodiesel from Argentina, C–357–821 (1st Review) ......................................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Biodiesel from Indonesia, C–560–831 (1st Review) ......................................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Italy, C–475–837 (1st Review) .............................................. Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Turkey, A–489–832 (1st Review) ......................................... Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, C–122–858 (1st Review) ................................................................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Hardwood Plywood from China, C–570–052 (1st Review) .............................................................................. Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. Multilayered Wood Flooring from China, C–570–971 (2nd Review) ................................................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Tool Chests and Cabinets from China, C–570–057 (1st Review) ................................................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in December 2022. Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Review are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), Commerce will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact Commerce in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if Commerce receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. Note that Commerce has modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: October 19, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–23739 Filed 10–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Oct 31, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01NON1.SGM 01NON1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 64522 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 205 / Tuesday, October 25, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 1 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_ filing_procedures.pdf. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1314 (Review)] Phosphor Copper from South Korea Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on phosphor copper from South Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on March 1, 2022 (87 FR 11467) and determined on June 6, 2022 that it would conduct an expedited review (87 FR 57517, September 20, 2022). The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on October 19, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5377 (October 2022), entitled Phosphor Copper from South Korea: Investigation No. 731–TA– 1314 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 19, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–23103 Filed 10–24–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Video Processing Devices and Products Containing the Same, DN 3650; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant’s filing pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Katherine M. Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at United States International Trade Commission (USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Commission has received a complaint and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure filed on behalf of VideoLabs Inc. on October 20, 2022. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of regarding certain video processing devices and products containing the same. The complainant names as respondent: HP Inc. of Palo Alto, CA. The complainant requests that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order and impose a bond upon respondent’s alleged infringing articles during the 60-day Presidential review period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j). Proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should address whether issuance of the relief specifically requested by the complainant in this investigation would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the requested remedial orders; (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the requested exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) explain how the requested remedial orders would impact United States consumers. Written submissions on the public interest must be filed no later than by close of business, eight calendar days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Any written submissions on other issues must also be filed by no later than the close of business, eight calendar days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Complainant may file replies to any written submissions no later than three calendar days after the date on which any initial submissions were due. No other submissions will be accepted, unless requested by the Commission. Any submissions and replies filed in response to this Notice are limited to five (5) pages in length, inclusive of attachments. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above. Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3650’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic Filing Procedures 1). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:52 Oct 24, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 57517Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 181 / Tuesday, September 20, 2022 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found the response submitted by Metallurgical Products Company, a domestic producer, to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). Geography, 1787 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, telephone (970) 491– 5497, email J.Pedersen-Guzman@ colostate.edu, by October 20, 2022. After that date, if no additional requestors have come forward, transfer of control of the human remains and associated funerary objects to the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ynez Reservation, California may proceed. The Department of Anthropology and Geography, Colorado State University is responsible for notifying the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ynez Reservation, California and the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (previously listed as San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, California) that this notice has been published. Dated: September 14, 2022. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2022–20296 Filed 9–19–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1314 (Review)] Phosphor Copper From South Korea; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on phosphor copper from South Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : June 6, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Nitin Joshi (202–708–1669), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On June 6, 2022, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (87 FR 11467, March 1, 2022) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review has been placed in the nonpublic record, and was made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review on September 16, 2022. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in § 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, 2 and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before September 23, 2022 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five- year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by September 23, 2022. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined this review is extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 14, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–20252 Filed 9–19–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1313 (Review)] 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R–134a) From China; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:48 Sep 19, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20SEN1.SGM 20SEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 731-TA-1314 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Phosphor Copper from South Korea; Inv. No. 731-TA-1314 (Review) from South Korea. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
731-TA-1314 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 731-TA-1314 resulted in AD/CVD case A-580-885. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource