ITC Investigation 731-TA-1229 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1229-1230 (Review) from Indonesia and China. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. Commerce initiated the underlying investigation on October 1, 2019. It links to AD/CVD case A-560-826 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1229-1230 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Documents
Full text (107,805 chars)
=== Continuation - AD - China - Indonesia === 71318 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices 6 See, e.g., Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012). 7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(l). 8 To the extent that record evidence suggests that additional Bothwell-produced merchandise imported into the United States from unaffiliated parties in third countries might have been sold during the POR, Bothwell’s statements on the record indicate that it had no knowledge of those sales. Commerce therefore will not review those sales. 1 See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 70505 (November 26, 2014) (Orders); see also Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Second Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Order, 80 FR 487 (January 6, 2015). 2 See Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 52129 (October 1, 2019). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 52067 (October 1, 2019) (Initiation). and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Rescission of Administrative Review It is Commerce’s practice to rescind an administrative review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) when there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR subject to the antidumping duty order and for which liquidation is suspended. 6 At the end of the administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the assessment rate computed for the review period. 7 Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment rate. As discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, we find that, because all of the entries associated with Bothwell’s reported sales of subject merchandise during the POR were liquidated by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Bothwell had no reviewable entries during this POR. 8 Accordingly, we are rescinding this review pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Assessment Because Commerce is rescinding this administrative review, we have not calculated a company-specific dumping margin for Bothwell. Cash Deposit Requirements As noted above, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review. Thus, we have not calculated a company-specific dumping margin for Bothwell. Therefore, entries of Bothwell’s subject merchandise continue to be subject to its company- specific cash deposit rate of 116.17 percent. This cash deposit requirement shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in these segments of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). Dated: November 3, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issue Comment: Whether Commerce Should Rescind the Administrative Review V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–24832 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–560–826, A–570–992] Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Indonesia: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People’s Republic of China (China) and the Republic of Indonesia (Indonesia) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD orders. DATES : Applicable November 9, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 26, 2014, Commerce published the amended final affirmative determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of MSG from China and the antidumping duty orders for MSG from China and Indonesia in the Federal Register. 1 On October 1, 2019, the ITC instituted, 2 and Commerce initiated,3 the five-year (sunset) reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Nov 06, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 71319Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices 4 See Monosodium Glutamate from People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 5616 (January 31, 2020.); see also Monosodium Glutamate from Indonesia: Final Results of the First Full Sunset Review, 85 FR 34419 (June 4, 2020). 5 See Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia (Review), 85 FR 68089 (October 27, 2020); (Inv. Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230). 6 See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Second Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Order, 80 FR 487 (January 6, 2015). 1 See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and Up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than- Fair-Value Investigation, 85 FR 20670 (April 14, 2020). 2 See Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and Up To 225cc, and Parts Thereof, from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 85 FR 66932 (October 21, 2020) (Preliminary Determination). and, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked. 4 On October 27, 2020, the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Orders The product covered by these Orders is MSG, whether or not blended or in solution with other products. Specifically, MSG that has been blended or is in solution with other product(s) is included in this scope when the resulting mix contains 15 percent or more of MSG by dry weight. Products with which MSG may be blended include, but are not limited to, salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and various seasonings. Further, MSG is included in these Orders regardless of physical form (including, but not limited to, in monohydrate or anhydrous form, or as substrates, solutions, dry powders of any particle size, or unfinished forms such as MSG slurry), end-use application, or packaging. MSG in monohydrate form has a molecular formula of C5H8NO4Na—H2O, a Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number of 6106– 04–3, and a Unique Ingredient Identifier (UNII) number of W81N5U6R6U. MSG in anhydrous form has a molecular formula of C5H8NO4Na, a CAS registry number of 142–47–2, and a UNII number of C3C196L9FG. Merchandise covered by the scope of these Orders is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2922.42.10.00. Merchandise subject to the Orders may also enter under HTS subheadings 2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00, 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00, 2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. The tariff classifications, CAS registry numbers, and UNII numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive.6 Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or a recurrence of dumping and of material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 3, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–24831 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–124] Certain Vertical Shaft Engines Between 99cc and Up to 225cc, and Parts Thereof, From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is postponing the deadline for issuing the final determination in the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of certain vertical shaft engines between 99cc and up to 225cc, and parts thereof (small vertical engines) from the People’s Republic of China (China) until March 5, 2021, and is extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period of not more than six months. DATES : Applicable November 9, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Whitley Herndon or Benjamin A. Luberda, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6274 or (202) 482–2185, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On April 7, 2020, Commerce initiated an LTFV investigation of imports of small vertical engines from China. 1 The period of investigation is July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. On October 21, 2020, Commerce published its Preliminary Determination in this LTFV investigation of small vertical engines from China.2 Postponement of Final Determination Section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) provide that a final determination may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the publication of the preliminary VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 Nov 06, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 68089Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). in the National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for their consideration were received by the National Park Service before October 10, 2020. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, comments are being accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Nominations submitted by State or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: ALABAMA Mobile County Midtown Historic District (Boundary Increase), 2401–2403 and 2407 Old Shell Rd., Mobile, BC100005805 CALIFORNIA Los Angeles County Pasadena Field Archery Range, 415 South Arroyo Blvd., Pasadena, SG100005799 Riverside County Desert Golf Course, 301 North Belardo Rd., Palm Springs, SG100005813 San Francisco County Whelan, John A., House, 1315 Waller St., San Francisco, SG100005794 COLORADO Denver County First Avenue Hotel, 101 North Broadway, Denver, SG100005800 CONNECTICUT Litchfield County Winsted Water Works,Winchester Rd. (north side), Old Waterbury Tpk./Rugg Brook Rd., Winchester, SG100005797 GEORGIA Fulton County Cascade Heights Commercial Historic District, Centered on the jct. of Cascade Rd. SW and Benjamin E. Hayes Dr. SW, Atlanta, SG100005817 IOWA Wapello County Agassiz School, 608 East Williams St., Ottumwa, SG100005787 MASSACHUSETTS Suffolk County Crawford Street Historic District, 5–38 Crawford St., 42 Elm Hill Ave., 621 Warren St., Boston, SG100005798 NEW JERSEY Mercer County V. Henry Rothschild-F.A. Straus and Co. Atlantic Products Corporation Mill Complex, 1 North Johnston Ave., Hamilton Township, SG100005815 OHIO Stark County St. Joseph Roman Catholic Church Complex, 2427 Tuscarawas St. West, Canton, SG100005806 PUERTO RICO San Juan Municipality Rafael Cordero Graded School, (Early Twentieth Century Schools in Puerto Rico TR), Calle Aurora Esq. Horae Prada 15, Santurce vicinity, MP100005816 SOUTH DAKOTA Roberts County Sisseton School, (Schools in South Dakota MPS), 302 East Maple St., Sisseton, MP100005818 Sisseton School, (Federal Relief Construction in South Dakota MPS), 302 East Maple St., Sisseton, MP100005818 TENNESSEE Blount County Millennium Manor, 500 North Wright Rd., Alcoa, SG100005788 Montgomery County Mt. Olive Cemetery, 951 Cumberland Dr., Clarksville, SG100005789 Rhea County First Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church, 240 1st Ave., Dayton, SG100005790 Sullivan County Kingsport Hosiery Mills, 435 Press St., Kingsport, SG100005791 Washington County Johnson City Postal Savings Bank and Post Office, 401 Ashe St., Johnson City, SG100005792 Wayne County Hughes House, 204 West Pillow St., Clifton, SG100005793 VIRGINIA Alexandria Independent City George Washington High School, 1005 Mount Vernon Ave., Alexandria, SG100005803 Craig County Bellevue, 14505 Cumberland Gap Rd. (VA 42), New Castle vicinity, SG100005801 Halifax County Oak Cliff, 10000 Huell Matthews Hwy. (US 501), Alton vicinity, SG100005804 Washington County Depot Square Historic District, Wall St. South, Depot Sq. SW, Front St. SW, Grand St. SW, Abingdon, SG100005802 Additional documentation has been received for the following resources: ARIZONA Pima County Armory Park Historic Residential District (Additional Documentation), East 12th St. to 19th St., Stone Ave. to 2nd Ave., Tucson, AD76000378 Hughes, Sam, Neighborhood Historic District (Additional Documentation), Roughly bounded by East Speedway Blvd., North Campbell Ave., East 7th St. and North, Bentley Ave., Tucson, AD94001164 KANSAS Trego County Wilcox School-District 29 & District 14 (Additional Documentation), (Public Schools of Kansas MPS), Rural Route –15 mi. south of WaKeeney on KS 283, Ransom, AD06000393 (Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60) Dated: October 14, 2020. Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program. [FR Doc. 2020–23681 Filed 10–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230 (Review)] Monosodium Glutamate From China and Indonesia Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on monosodium glutamate (‘‘MSG’’) from China and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2019 (84 FR 52129) and determined on January 6, 2020 that it would conduct full reviews (85 FR 3421, January 21, 2020). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:26 Oct 26, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM 27OCN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 68090 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Notices notice in the Federal Register on May 13, 2020 (85 FR 28663). In light of the restrictions on access to the Commission building due to the COVID–19 pandemic, the Commission conducted its hearing through written testimony and video conference on August 25, 2020. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission determined that these reviews were extraordinarily complicated and extended the review period by up to 90 days. It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on October 21, 2020. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5127 (October 2020), entitled Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 21, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–23696 Filed 10–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–736] Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Mylan Pharmaceuticals AGENCY : Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice. ACTION : Notice of application. SUMMARY : Mylan Pharmaceuticals has applied to be registered as an importer of basic class(es) of controlled substance(s). Refer to Supplemental Information listed below for further drug information. DATES : Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before November 27, 2020. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before November 27, 2020. ADDRESSES : Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for a hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on October 7, 2020, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated, 3711 Collins Ferry Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505–2362, applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic class(es) of controlled substance(s): Controlled substance Drug code Schedule Amphetamine ................... 1100 II Methylphenidate ............... 1724 II Oxycodone ....................... 9143 II Hydromorphone ................ 9150 II Methadone ........................ 9250 II Morphine ........................... 9300 II Fentanyl ............................ 9801 II The company plans to import finished dosage forms for analytical testing and distribution for clinical trials. No other activity for these drug codes is authorized for this registration. Approval of permit applications will occur only when the registrant’s business activity is consistent with what is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2). Authorization will not extend to the import of Food and Drug Administration-approved or non- approved finished dosage forms for commercial sale. William T. McDermott, Assistant Administrator. [FR Doc. 2020–23766 Filed 10–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–738] Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Bulk Manufacturer of Marihuana: API GLOBAL LLC AGENCY : Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice. ACTION : Notice of application. SUMMARY : The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is providing notice of an application it has received from an entity applying to be registered to manufacture in bulk basic class(es) of controlled substances listed in schedule I. DEA intends to evaluate this and other pending applications according to proposed regulations that, if finalized, would govern the program of growing marihuana for scientific and medical research under DEA registration. DATES : Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefor, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before December 28, 2020. ADDRESSES : Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference Docket No -. DEA–738 in all correspondence, including attachments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) prohibits the cultivation and distribution of marihuana except by persons who are registered under the CSA to do so for lawful purposes. In accordance with the purposes specified in 21 CFR 1301.33(a), DEA is providing notice that the entity identified below has applied for registration as a bulk manufacturer of schedule I controlled substances. In response, registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefor, may file written comments on or objections of the requested registration, as provided in this notice. This notice does not constitute any evaluation or determination of the merits of the application submitted. The applicant plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for product development and distribution to DEA registered researchers. If the application for registration is granted, the registrant would not be authorized to conduct other activity under this registration aside from those coincident activities specifically authorized by DEA regulations. DEA will evaluate the application for registration as a bulk manufacturer for compliance with all applicable laws, treaties, and regulations and to ensure adequate safeguards against diversion are in place. As this applicant has applied to become registered as a bulk manufacturer of marihuana, the application will be evaluated under the criteria of 21 U.S.C. 823(a). DEA proposes to conduct this evaluation in the manner described in the rule proposed at 85 FR 16292, published on March 23, 2020, if finalized. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:26 Oct 26, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM 27OCN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 28663Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Notices cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Nominations submitted by State or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: CONNECTICUT Hartford County Neiditz Building, 111 Pearl St., Hartford, SG100005238 FLORIDA Escambia County Boy Scout Building, (Florida’s New Deal Resources MPS), 1601 East La Rua St., Pensacola, MP100005239 Gadsden County Chattahoochee Historic District, North Bolivar and Decatur Sts., East Washington St., and South McDonald Ave., East Chattahoochee St., Chattahoochee, SG100005240 Highlands County Highway Park Cemetery, 202, 204, and 206 Crestmore Dr., Lake Placid vicinity, SG100005241 Holmes County Downtown Bonifay Historic District, Nebraska Ave; Oklahoma Ave.; Evans Ave.; Martin St., and Etheridge St., Bonifay, SG100005242 Volusia County Green Mound, 4400 South Peninsula Dr., Ponce Inlet, SG100005243 GEORGIA Fulton County First Presbyterian Church of Atlanta, 1328 Peachtree St. NE, Atlanta, SG100005252 Manuel’s Tavern, 602 North Highland Ave. NE, Atlanta, SG100005253 Westview Cemetery, 1680 Ralph David Abernathy Blvd. SW, Atlanta, SG100005254 MINNESOTA Blue Earth County Old Main, Mankato State Teachers College (Boundary Decrease), 301 South Fifth St., Mankato, BC100005244 Hennepin County Laurel Apartments, 15 North Fifteenth St., Minneapolis, SG100005245 Zinsmaster Baking Company Building, 2900 Park Ave., Minneapolis, SG100005246 Pennington County Thief River Falls Auditorium and Municipal Building, 123 Main Ave. North, Thief River Falls, SG100005247 Ramsey County Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association Headquarters, 1667 Snelling Ave. North, Falcon Heights, SG100005248 St. Louis County Olson, Sigurd F., Writing Shack, 106 East Wilson St., Ely, SG100005249 Winona County Winona Commercial Historic District (Boundary Increase), 102 Walnut St. and 159 East Second St., and alley behind buildings to the south, Winona, BC100005250 NORTH DAKOTA Grand Forks County Ben Franklin Elementary School, (Mid- Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 1016 South 20th St., Grand Forks, MP100005260 Lewis and Clark Elementary School, (Mid-Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 1100 13th Ave. South, Grand Forks, MP100005261 Valley Junior High School, (Mid- Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 2100 5th Ave. North, Grand Forks, MP100005262 Viking Elementary School, (Mid- Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 809 22nd Ave. South, Grand Forks, MP100005263 West Elementary School, (Mid-Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 615 North 25th St., Grand Forks, MP100005264 Wilder Elementary School, (Mid- Century Schools in Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1949–1965 MPS), 1009 North 3rd St., Grand Forks, MP100005265 WISCONSIN Milwaukee County 20th Street School, 2442 North 20th St., Milwaukee, SG100005256 Additional documentation has been received for the following resource: IOWA Scott County Ambrose Hall (Additional Documentation), 518 West Locust St., Davenport, AD77000553 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 Dated: April 27, 2020. Julie H. Ernstein, Supervisory Archeologist, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program. [FR Doc. 2020–10274 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230 (Review)] Monosodium Glutamate From China and Indonesia; Scheduling of Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on monosodium glutamate from China and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : May 8, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Beth Jones (202–205–8147), Supervisory Investigator, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On January 6, 2020, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (85 FR 3421, January 21, 2020); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:53 May 12, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 28664 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 93 / Wednesday, May 13, 2020 / Notices of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 10, 2020, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, August 25, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before August 17, 2020. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should participate in a prehearing conference to be held on August 19, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, if deemed necessary. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to these reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is August 17, 2020. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is September 2, 2020. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before September 2, 2020. On September 24, 2020, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before September 29, 2020, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 8, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–10244 Filed 5–12–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [OMB Number 1140–0002] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension Without Change of a Currently Approved Collection; Application for Restoration of Firearms Privileges— ATF Form 3210.1 AGENCY : Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION : 60-Day notice. SUMMARY : The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection (IC) is also being published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:53 May 12, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM 13MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 52129Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 20, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–20884 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230 (Review)] Monosodium Glutamate From China and Indonesia; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on monosodium glutamate (‘‘MSG’’) from China and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted October 1, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is October 31, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by December 10, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On November 26, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued antidumping duty orders on imports of MSG from China and Indonesia (79 FR 70505). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, Subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full reviews or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are China and Indonesia. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all MSG, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry to encompass the sole U.S. producer of MSG, namely Ajinomoto North America, Inc. (5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping duty orders under review became effective. In these reviews, the Order Date is November 26, 2014. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 52130 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is October 31, 2019. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is December 10, 2019. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 19–5–442, expiration date June 30, 2020. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information to be provided in response to this notice of institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 52131Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2018, except as noted (report quantity data in pounds dry weight MSG and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/ worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/ which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in pounds dry weight MSG and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/ business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in pounds dry weight MSG and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 20, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–20883 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Indonesia === 34419Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 108 / Thursday, June 4, 2020 / Notices 1 See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia: Preliminary Results of the First Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 12517 (March 3, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value (Order), 79 FR 70505 (November 26, 2014) (Order). 3 See Preliminary Results. 4 See CJ Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate (‘‘MSG’’) from Indonesia; First Sunset Review; CJ {Companies’} Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2020. 5 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate from Indonesia, First Sunset Review: Rebuttal to Case Brief of PT. Cheil Jedang Indonesia and CJ America, Inc.,’’ dated April 27, 2020. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the First Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). sheets, chemical testing specifications, productions records, invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts regarding such entries; (I) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide this Exporter Certification to the U.S. importer by the time of shipment; (J) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to provide a copy of this certification and supporting records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of Commerce (Commerce); (K) I understand that the claims made herein, and the substantiating documentation are subject to verification by CBP and/or Commerce; (L) I understand that failure to maintain the required certifications, and/or failure to substantiate the claims made herein, and/or failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to verify the claims made herein, may result in a de facto determination that all sales to which this certification applies are within the scope of the antidumping duty (AD) order on HFC blends from China. I understand that such finding will result in: (i) Suspension of all unliquidated entries (and entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements were not met; (ii) The requirement that the importer post applicable AD cash deposits equal to the rates as determined by Commerce; and (iii) the revocation of {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to certify future shipments of HFC blend R– 421A are patented Choice® R–421A; (M) This certification was completed at or prior to the time of shipment; and (N) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. government. Signature NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL TITLE DATE [FR Doc. 2020–12004 Filed 6–3–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–560–826] Monosodium Glutamate From the Republic of Indonesia: Final Results of the First Full Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that the revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from Indonesia would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable June 4, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On February 26, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the sunset review, 1 finding that dumping was likely to continue or recur if the Order 2 were revoked and determined that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping for all exporters and producers at a weighted average margin of dumping up to 6.19 percent. 3 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received a case brief from respondent, CJ Companies, on April 22, 2020.4 We received a rebuttal brief from Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America (petitioner) on April 27, 2020. 5 Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is MSG, whether or not blended or in solution with other products. Specifically, MSG that has been blended or is in solution with other product(s) is included in this scope when the resulting mix contains 15 percent or more of MSG by dry weight. Products with which MSG may be blended include, but are not limited to, salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and various seasonings. A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised for the final results of this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with this final notice, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are described in the Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review We determine that revocation of the Order on MSG from Indonesia would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping at a weighted average margin of dumping of up to 6.19 percent for all exporters and producers of subject merchandise. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to each party subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results of this sunset review, in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(A), 752(c), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 03, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 34420 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 108 / Thursday, June 4, 2020 / Notices Dated: May 28, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Issue 1: Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping Issue 2: Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely to Prevail V. Final Results of Sunset Review VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–12003 Filed 6–3–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XA216] Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION : Notice of public meetings. SUMMARY : The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold its Fishery Data Collection and Research Committee (FDCRC), Pelagic and International Standing Committee, Executive and Budget Standing Committee, and 182nd Council meetings to take actions on fishery management issues in the Western Pacific Region. DATES : The meetings will be held June 22 through 25, 2020. For specific times and agendas, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. ADDRESSES : The meetings will be held by web conference via WebEx. Instructions for connecting to the web conference and providing oral public comments will be posted on the Council website at www.wpcouncil.org. For assistance with the web conference connection, contact the Council office at (808) 522–8220. The following venues will be the host sites for the meetings: Hilton Guam Resort & Spa, Chuchuko Room, 202 Hilton Rd., Tumon Bay, Guam; Hyatt Regency Saipan, Royal Palm Ave., Micro Beach Rd., Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI); and Department of Port Administration, Airport Conference Room, Pago Pago Int’l Airport, Tafuna Village, American Samoa. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director, Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; phone: (808) 522–8220. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : All times shown are in Hawaii Standard Time. The FDCRC meeting will be held between 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. on June 22, 2020. The Pelagic and International Standing Committee will be held between 1 p.m. and 3 p.m. on June 22, 2020. The Executive and Budget Standing Committee meeting will be held between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. on June 22, 2020. The 182nd Council meeting will be held between 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. on June 23 to 25, 2020. Please note that the evolving public health situation regarding COVID–19 may affect the conduct of the June Council and its associated meetings. At the time this notice was submitted for publication, the Council anticipated convening the meeting by web conference with host site locations in Guam, CNMI and American Samoa. Council staff will monitor COVID–19 developments and will determine the extent to which in-person public participation at host sites will be allowable consistent with applicable local or federal guidelines. If public participation will be limited to web conference only or on a first-come-first- serve basis consistent with applicable guidelines, the Council will post notice on its website at www.wpcouncil.org. Agenda items noted as ‘‘Final Action’’ refer to actions that result in Council transmittal of a proposed fishery management plan, proposed plan amendment, or proposed regulations to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, under Sections 304 or 305 of the MSA. In addition to the agenda items listed here, the Council and its advisory bodies will hear recommendations from Council advisors. An opportunity to submit public comment will be provided throughout the agendas. The order in which agenda items are addressed may change and will be announced in advance at the Council meeting. The meetings will run as late as necessary to complete scheduled business. Background documents for the 182nd Council meeting will be available at www.wpcouncil.org. Written public comments on final action items at the 182nd Council meeting should be received at the Council office by 5p.m. HST, June 19, 2020, and should be sent to Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; Western Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, phone: (808) 522– 8220 or fax: (808) 522–8226; or email: info.wpcouncil@noaa.gov. Written public comments on all other agenda items may be submitted for the record by email throughout the duration of the meeting. Instructions for providing oral public comments during the meeting will be posted on the Council website. This meeting will be recorded for the purposes of generating the minutes of the meeting. Agenda for the Fishery Data Collection and Research Committee Monday, June 22, 2020, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. 1. Welcome Remarks and Introductions 2. Update on Previous FDCRC Recommendations 3. Regulations for Mandatory License and Reporting A. Guam B. CNMI 4. Budgets to Support Fishery Data Collection A. Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act Funding B. Western Pacific Fishery Information Network and Territory Science Initiative Funding 5. Data Collection Improvement Updates A. Implementation of the Electronic Reporting Suite B. Updates on the Data Collection Outreach Activities 6. Discussion on Addressing the Pacific Islands Fisheries Monitoring and Assessment Planning Summit Recommendations A. Moving Towards Electronic Self- Reporting B. Moving Shore-Based Creel to Marine Recreational Information Program C. Data Governance for the Electronic Self-Reporting System 7. Report on FDCRC-Technical Committee 8. Public Comment 9. Discussions and Recommendations Agenda for the Pelagic and International Standing Committee Monday, June 22, 2020, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. 1. Report on Impacts of COVID–19 on Fisheries 2. Status of Past Council Actions and Amendments 3. Stock Status Determination for Oceanic Whitetip Shark and Striped Marlin 4. Summary of Available Information on Sea Turtle Interactions in Foreign Pelagic Fisheries 5. Considerations for Developing Reasonable and Prudent Measures (RPMs) and/or Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives (RPAs) for the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 03, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Full Review === 3421Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 2020 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1229–1230 (Review)] Monosodium Glutamate From China and Indonesia; Notice of Commission Determinations To Conduct Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on monosodium glutamate from China and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES : January 6, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ahdia Bavari (202–205–3191), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On January 6, 2020, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested party response to its notice of institution (84 FR 52129, October 1, 2019) was adequate. The Commission also found that the respondent interested party group response concerning the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate from Indonesia was adequate and, therefore, determined to proceed with a full review of that order. The Commission found that the respondent interested party group response concerning the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate from China was inadequate, but determined to conduct a full review of this order in order to promote administrative efficiency in light of the determination to conduct a full review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate from Indonesia. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 14, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–00789 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules AGENCY : Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules. ACTION : Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY : The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules will hold a meeting on April 2 and April 3, 2020. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: http://www.uscourts.gov/ rules-policies/records-and-archives- rules-committees/agenda-books. DATES : April 2–3, 2020; 9 a.m.–5 p.m. ADDRESSES : Hilton Hotel, 600 Okeechobee Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33401. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502–1820. Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073. Dated: January 14, 2020. Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. [FR Doc. 2020–00782 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules AGENCY : Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules. ACTION : Notice of open meeting. SUMMARY : The Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules will hold a meeting on April 3, 2020. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at: http:// www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/ records-and-archives-rules-committees/ agenda-books. DATES : April 3, 2020; 8:30 a.m.–1 p.m. ADDRESSES : Hilton Hotel, 600 Okeechobee Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33401. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502–1820. Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073. Dated: January 14, 2020. Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, Judicial Conference of the United States. [FR Doc. 2020–00781 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [CPCLO Order No. 001–2020] Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records AGENCY : Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, United States Department of Justice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 Jan 17, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 52067Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. We will instruct CBP to apply the China-wide ad valorem assessment rate of 77.57 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were exported by High Den. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of this notice, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter specific rate published for the most recently completed period; (2) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, i.e., High Den, the cash deposit rate will be the China-wide rate of 77.57 percent; and (3) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non- Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties The final results of this administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). Dated: September 24, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–21291 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the Commission) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s). DATES : Applicable (October 1, 2019). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact C–570–991 ...... 701–TA–501 China ....................... Chlorinated Isocyanurates (1st Review) ... Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–570- 992 ..... 731–TA–1229 China ....................... Monosodium Glutamate (1st Review) ...... Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–560–826 ...... 731–TA–1230 Indonesia ................. Monosodium Glutamate (1st Review) ...... Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–201–844 ...... 731–TA–1227 Mexico ..................... Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Re- view). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–552–801 ...... 731–TA–1012 Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Certain Frozen Fish Fillets (3rd Review) .. Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. C–489–819 ...... 701–TA–502 Turkey ..................... Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Re- view). Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: http:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 52068 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices 1 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 2 See section 782(b) of the Act. 3 See also Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013). Answers to frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule are available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_ final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 4 See Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013). 5 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). 6 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 1 Any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. 2 Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g).3 Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. On April 10, 2013, Commerce modified two regulations related to AD/ CVD proceedings: the definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301).4 Parties are advised to review the final rule, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits will continue to be applied. Parties are also advised to review the final rule concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in AD/CVD proceedings, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. 5 Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review.6 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. Notification to Interested Parties This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: September 23, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–21292 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (Commerce) conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by Commerce discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event Commerce limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, Commerce intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties having an APO within five VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - China === 5616 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Notices 1 Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Indonesia: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 70505 (November 26, 2014) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 52067 (October 1, 2019) (Notice of Initiation). 3 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated October 15, 2019. 4 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate from China: First Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated October 31, 2019. 5 See Commerce’s Letter to the ITC, ‘‘Sunset Review Initiated on October 1, 2019,’’ dated November 22, 2019. the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: January 24, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–01840 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 2091] Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 116; Port Arthur, Texas Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign- Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign- Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ‘‘ . . . the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry; Whereas, Foreign-Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 116, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 116—Site 1 to include the entire 149-acre Port of Port Arthur facilities (encompassing the existing 6.12 acres) in Port Arthur, Texas, adjacent to the Port Arthur-Beaumont Customs and Border Protection port of entry (B–24–2019, docketed April 11, 2019); Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the Federal Register (84 FR 16002, April 17, 2019) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to expand FTZ 116 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13. Dated: January 27, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign- Trade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2020–01838 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–62–2019] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 141— Rochester, New York; Authorization of Production Activity; Eastman Kodak Company (One-Time Use Cameras); Rochester, New York On September 26, 2019, Eastman Kodak Company submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 141, in Rochester, New York. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (84 FR 54837, October 19, 2019). On January 24, 2020, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board’s decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: January 24, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–01839 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–992] Monosodium Glutamate From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, Commerce finds that the revocation of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable January 31, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 1, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the antidumping duty order on MSG from China 1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On October 15, 2019, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from Ajinomoto Health & Nutrition North America, Inc. (the domestic interested party), a U.S. producer and wholesaler of a domestic like product, within the 15-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On October 31, 2019, Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested party within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 4 We received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect to the Order covered by this sunset review. On November 22, 2019, Commerce notified the International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive adequate substantive responses from respondent interested parties. 5 As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the antidumping duty order on MSG from China. Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is MSG, whether or not blended or in solution with other products. Specifically, MSG that has been blended or is in solution with other product(s) is VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jan 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 5617Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Notices 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the First Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 7 Id. included in this scope when the resulting mix contains 15 percent or more of MSG by dry weight. Products with which MSG may be blended include, but are not limited to, salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and various seasonings. For the full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as the appendix to this notice. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on MSG from China would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at rates up to 40.41 percent. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: January 24, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of the Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–01834 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Meeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee AGENCY : International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice of a Federal Advisory Committee Meeting. SUMMARY : This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda for a meeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee (CINTAC). DATES : The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, February 20, 2020, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST). The deadline for members of the public to register to participate, including requests to make comments during the meeting and for auxiliary aids, or to submit written comments for dissemination prior to the meeting, is 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on Friday, February 14, 2020. ADDRESSES : The meeting will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Herbert C. Hoover Building, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230. Requests to register to participate (including to speak or for auxiliary aids) and any written comments should be submitted to: Mr. Jonathan Chesebro, Office of Energy & Environmental Industries, International Trade Administration, Room 28018, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230. (Fax: 202–482–5665; email: jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov). Members of the public are encouraged to submit registration requests and written comments via email to ensure timely receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mr. Jonathan Chesebro, Office of Energy & Environmental Industries, International Trade Administration, Room 28018, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20230. (Phone: 202– 482–1297; Fax: 202–482–5665; email: jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background: The CINTAC was established under the discretionary authority of the Secretary of Commerce and in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), in response to an identified need for consensus advice from U.S. industry to the U.S. Government regarding the development and administration of programs to expand United States exports of civil nuclear goods and services in accordance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations, including advice on how U.S. civil nuclear goods and services export policies, programs, and activities will affect the U.S. civil nuclear industry’s competitiveness and ability to participate in the international market. The Department of Commerce renewed the CINTAC charter on August 10, 2018. This meeting is being convened under the sixth charter of the CINTAC. Topics to be considered: The agenda for the CINTAC meeting on Thursday, February 20, 2020, is as follows: (9 a.m.–4 p.m.)—Subcommittee work, review of deliberative recommendations, and opportunity to hear from members of the public. Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting must notify Mr. Jonathan Chesebro at the contact information above by 5 p.m. EST on Friday, February 14, 2020 in order to pre-register to participate. Please specify any requests for reasonable accommodation at least five business days in advance of the meeting. Last minute requests will be accepted but may not be possible to fill. A limited amount of time will be available for brief oral comments from members of the public attending the meeting. To accommodate as many speakers as possible, the time for public comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per person, with a total public comment period of 30 minutes. Individuals wishing to reserve speaking time during the meeting must contact Mr. Chesebro VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jan 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM 31JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 731-TA-1229 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1229-1230 (Review) from Indonesia, China. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
731-TA-1229 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 731-TA-1229 resulted in AD/CVD case A-560-826. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource