Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from China and the United Arab Emirates; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1132 and 1134 (Second Review)

=== Commerce: China: A-570-924 === 6689Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 60253 (October 1, 2013). 2 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 10095, (February 24, 2014). 3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Brazil, China, and the United Arab Emirates, 80 FR 3623 (January 23, 2015). On the same day, the ITC also determined that revocation of the antidumping orders of PET Film from the PRC and the UAE would lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 4 See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 38081 (July 1, 2010). ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF VOTING AGE FOR EACH STATE AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: JULY 1, 2014—Continued Area Population 18 and over Arizona .................................. 5,109,792 Arkansas ............................... 2,259,350 California ............................... 29,649,348 Colorado ............................... 4,109,494 Connecticut ........................... 2,821,247 Delaware ............................... 731,367 District of Columbia .............. 543,588 Florida ................................... 15,839,713 Georgia ................................. 7,604,061 Hawaii ................................... 1,111,117 Idaho ..................................... 1,203,384 Illinois .................................... 9,892,106 Indiana .................................. 5,014,928 Iowa ...................................... 2,381,172 Kansas .................................. 2,181,355 Kentucky ............................... 3,400,843 Louisiana .............................. 3,536,183 Maine .................................... 1,071,112 Maryland ............................... 4,625,863 Massachusetts ...................... 5,354,940 Michigan ............................... 7,686,087 Minnesota ............................. 4,175,347 Mississippi ............................ 2,262,810 Missouri ................................ 4,670,966 Montana ................................ 798,555 Nebraska .............................. 1,414,894 Nevada ................................. 2,175,874 New Hampshire .................... 1,059,672 New Jersey ........................... 6,926,094 New Mexico .......................... 1,583,623 New York .............................. 15,517,321 North Carolina ...................... 7,656,415 North Dakota ........................ 570,955 Ohio ...................................... 8,955,859 Oklahoma ............................. 2,925,352 Oregon .................................. 3,112,217 Pennsylvania ........................ 10,086,316 Rhode Island ........................ 842,321 South Carolina ...................... 3,747,734 South Dakota ........................ 642,768 Tennessee ............................ 5,054,826 Texas .................................... 19,841,344 Utah ...................................... 2,038,787 Vermont ................................ 504,976 Virginia .................................. 6,457,174 Washington ........................... 5,458,809 West Virginia ........................ 1,470,179 Wisconsin ............................. 4,457,375 Wyoming ............................... 445,830 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Di- vision, Vintage 2014 Population Estimates. I have certified these estimates for the Federal Election Commission. Dated: January 29, 2015. Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce. [FR Doc. 2015–02473 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–351–841, A–520–803, A–570–924] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates: Continuation and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (the ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation for these antidumping duty orders. As a result of the ITC’s determination that revocation of the AD order on PET Film from Brazil is not likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is revoking this AD order. DATES : Effective Date: AD Brazil Revocation: November 10, 2013; AD PRC and UAE Continuation: February 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 1, 2013, the Department initiated the sunset reviews on the AD orders on PET film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 1 As a result of the reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD orders on PET Film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE would likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the order be revoked. 2 On January 23, 2015, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD order on PET Film the PRC and the UAE would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time, but that revocation of the AD order on PET Film from Brazil would not be likely to do so. 3 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film is also excluded. PET film is classifiable under subheading 3920.62.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Scope Determinations on PET Film From the PRC Since these orders were published, there was one scope determination for PET film from the PRC, with notice of the decision published on July 1, 2010. In this determination, requested by Coated Fabrics Company, the Department determined that Amorphous PET (‘‘APET’’), Glycol- modified PET (‘‘PETG’’), and coextruded APET with PETG on its outer surfaces (‘‘GAG Sheet’’), are within the scope of the antidumping duty order of PET Film from the PRC.4 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 6690 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 5 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595 (November 10, 2008). 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). 2 See Submission from Elements, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Request for a Changed Circumstance Review Regarding Shoe Cabinets,’’ dated June 2, 2014 (‘‘Elements’ Request’’). 3 See Submission from Petitioners, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture From The People’s Republic of China/Petitioners’ Response to Elements’ Letter of June 2, 2014,’’ dated June 3, 2014. 4 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, and Consideration of Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order in Part, 79 FR 41260 (July 15, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’) 5 Id. at 41262. Continuation of the Order on PET Film From the PRC and the UAE As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD order on PET Film from the PRC and the UAE. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Revocation of the Order on PET Film From Brazil As a result of the determination by the ITC that revocation of this AD order is not likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is revoking the AD order on PET Film from Brazil. Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of revocation is November 10, 2013 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the date of publication in the Federal Register of the order 5). Cash Deposit and Assessment of Duties on PET Film From Brazil The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 15 days after the publication of this notice, to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to discontinue the collection of cash deposits on entries of PET Film from Brazil, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after November 10, 2013. The Department will further instruct CBP to refund with interest all cash deposits on entries made on or after November 10, 2013. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and AD deposit requirements and assessments. The Department will complete any pending or requested administrative reviews of the order on PET Film from Brazil covering entries prior to November 10, 2013. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which, may be subject to sanctions. This five-year (sunset) review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: January 30, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–02456 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, and Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty Order in Part AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On June 2, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) received a request for revocation, in part, of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 with respect to certain shoe cabinets. We preliminarily determine that the producers accounting for substantially all of the production of the domestic like product to which the Order pertains lack interest in the relief provided by the Order with respect to certain shoe cabinets described below. Accordingly, we intend to revoke, in part, the Order as to imports of certain shoe cabinets. The Department invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Effective Date: February 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Howard Smith, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482– 5193, respectively. Background On January 4, 2005, the Department published the Order in the Federal Register. On June 2, 2014, the Department received a request on behalf of Elements International Group LLC (‘‘Elements’’) for a changed circumstances review to revoke, in part, the Order with respect to certain shoe cabinets.2 In its request, Elements stated that the American Furniture Manufacturing Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Basset Furniture Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) discussed the scope exclusion described below and are in agreement with the revocation, in part. On June 3, 2014, the Department received a letter from the Petitioners in which they stated they were in agreement with the proposed scope exclusion language in Elements’ June 2, 2014, changed circumstances review request. 3 On July 15, 2014, we published the Initiation Notice in the Federal Register.4 Because the statement submitted by Petitioners in support of Elements’ Request did not indicate whether Petitioners account for substantially all of the domestic wooden bedroom furniture production, in the Initiation Notice, we invited interested parties to submit comments concerning industry support, as well as comments and/or factual information regarding the changed circumstances review. 5 We received no comments concerning industry support. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 114 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices SUMMARY : The National Park Service is soliciting comments on the significance of properties nominated before December 14, 2019, for listing or related actions in the National Register of Historic Places. DATES : Comments should be submitted by January 17, 2020. ADDRESSES : Comments may be sent via U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW, MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The properties listed in this notice are being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for their consideration were received by the National Park Service before December 14, 2019. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Nominations submitted by State or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: ARKANSAS Baxter County Mountain Home Cemetery-Historic Section, 147 East 11th St., Mountain Home, SG100004895 Craighead County Patteson House, 2801 Harrisburg Rd., Jonesboro vicinity, SG100004898 Desha County Dante House, 501 Court St., Dumas, SG100004905 Hot Spring County Lono Gymnasium (New Deal Recovery Efforts in Arkansas MPS), 11702 AR 222, Lono, MP100004896 Phillips County Lee Grocery Store (Ethnic and Racial Minority Settlement of the Arkansas Delta MPS), 100 Main St., Elaine, MP100004897 Pulaski County Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church, 1200 Hanger St., Little Rock, SG100004893 Maumelle River Bridge (Historic Bridges of Arkansas MPS), Old AR 300 over the Maumelle River, Natural Steps vicinity, MP100004894 Downs Historic District, 4206, 4208, 4210, 4212, 4214, 4216 & 4218 Fairview Rd.; 4201 South Lookout Rd., and 4207, 4209, 4211 & 4213 Wait St., Little Rock, SG100004903 Alexander House, 24 East Palisades Dr., Little Rock, SG100004904 Saline County Bennett House, 503 First St., Benton, SG100004906 FLORIDA Bay County Panama Grammar School, 101 East Seventh St., Panama City, SG100004888 Hernando County Weeki Wachee Springs, 6131 Commercial Way, Spring Hill, SG100004890 Washington County Craven, Dr. James B. and Virginia, House, 912 FL 277, Chipley, SG100004889 GEORGIA Chatham County Abrahams, Edmund and Mildred, Raised Tybee Cottage, 4 Eighth St., Tybee Island, SG100004900 Screven County Brier Creek Battlefield, Address Restricted, Sylvania vicinity, SG100004899 ILLINOIS Champaign County Champaign Downtown Commercial District, Former ICRR & Main St.; Neil St.; Taylor, Bailey, University; and ICRR, Champaign, SG100004912 NEW JERSEY Middlesex County Freeman, Mary Wilkins, House, 207 Lake Ave., Metuchen, SG100004886 NEW YORK Chenango County North Guilford Cemetery, 158 Whites Hill Rd., North Guilford, SG100004911 Essex County Asgaard Farm, 74 Asgaard Way, Au Sable Forks, SG100004907 Kings County Lewis Avenue Congregational Church, 275 Lewis Ave., 574 Madison St., Brooklyn, SG100004908 Niagara County Forsyth-Warren Farm, 5182 Ridge Rd., Lockport vicinity, SG100004910 Ulster County Accord Historic District, Devoe Ln., Granite Rd., Main St., Scenic Rd. Schoolhouse Rd., Tobacco Rd., Tow Path Rd., Accord, SG100004909 Additional documentation has been received for the following resource: ARKANSAS Pulaski County Capitol View Neighborhood Historic District (Additional Documentation), Roughly bounded by Riverview Dr., S. Schiller St., W. Seventh St. and Woodrow St., Little Rock, AD00000813 Nomination submitted by Federal Preservation Officer: The State Historic Preservation Officer reviewed the following nominations and responded to the Federal Preservation Officer within 45 days of receipt of the nominations and supports listing the properties in the National Register of Historic Places. PUERTO RICO Rio Grande Municipality Ban˜ o de Oro (New Deal Era Constructions in the Forest Reserves in Puerto Rico), PR191, km 12.1, Rio Grande vicinity, MP100004891 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Dated: December 16, 2019. Julie H. Ernstein, Supervisory Archeologist, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program. [FR Doc. 2019–28292 Filed 12–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1132 and 1134 (Second Review)] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From China and the United Arab Emirates Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene terephthalate (‘‘PET’’) film, sheet, and strip from China and the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted January 2, 2020. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is February 3, 2020. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by March 16, 2020. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 115Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On November 10, 2008, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued antidumping duty orders on imports of PET film, sheet, and strip from China and the United Arab Emirates (73 FR 66595). Following the first five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective February 6, 2015, Commerce issued a continuation of the antidumping duty orders on imports of PET film, sheet, and strip from China and the United Arab Emirates (80 FR 6689). The Commission is now conducting second reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are China and the United Arab Emirates. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, and its full first five- year review determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Industry consisting of all U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product, except a certain producer by which the Commission determined in the original investigations that appropriate circumstances existed to exclude from the Domestic Industry as a related party. In its full first five-year reviews, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of the Domestic Like Product. (5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is February 3, 2020. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 116 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is March 16, 2020. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 19–5–453, expiration date June 30, 2020. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information to be provided in response to this notice of institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2013. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2019, except as noted (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2019 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 117Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2019 (report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country after 2013, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: December 20, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–28082 Filed 12–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1153 (Second Review)] Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof From China Institution of a Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain tow-behind lawn groomers and parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted January 2, 2020. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is February 3, 2020. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by March 16, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On August 3, 2009, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping duty order on imports of certain tow-behind lawn groomers and parts thereof from China (74 FR 38395). Following the first five- year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective February 4, 2015, Commerce issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of certain tow-behind lawn groomers and parts thereof from China (80 FR 6049). The Commission is now conducting a second review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission’s determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to this review: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by Commerce. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 54401Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 1, 2020 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). (7) Plans for assuming liability for damage to the operational and structural integrity of the Uncompahgre Project caused by construction, operation, and/ or maintenance of the hydropower development. (8) Identify the organizational structure planned for the long-term O&M of any proposed hydropower development. (9) A management plan, including schedules of these activities as applicable, to accomplish activities such as planning; NEPA, NHPA, and ESA compliance; necessary studies; LOPP project development; design, construction, safety plan, and facility testing; and the start of hydropower production. (10) An estimate of development costs. These costs will include all investment costs such as the cost of studies to determine feasibility; NEPA, NHPA, and ESA compliance; other statutory compliance; design; construction; financing as well as the amortized annual cost of the investment; annual O&M expense for the hydropower development; lease payments to the United States; expenses associated with the Reclamation project; and anticipated return on investment. If there are additional transmission expenses associated with the development of the LOPP project, these expenses must also be included. The proposal must identify proposed methods of financing the LOPP project. The proposal must include an economic analysis that compares the present worth of all benefits and costs of the hydropower development. Selection of Lessee Reclamation will evaluate proposals received in response to this published Notice. Reclamation may request additional information from individual proposing entities and/or all proposing entities after proposals are submitted, but prior to making a selection of a lessee. Reclamation will give more favorable consideration to proposals that (1) responsibly develop hydropower; (2) avoid, reduce, or minimize environmental impacts; (3) clearly demonstrate that the offeror is qualified to develop the hydropower facility and provide for long-term O&M; and (4) best share the economic benefits of the hydropower development among parties (including the United States) to the LOPP. A proposal will be deemed unacceptable if it is inconsistent with Uncompahgre Project purposes or interferes with UGWCD’s ability to use their water allocation in Taylor Park Reservoir, as determined by Reclamation. Reclamation will give preference to those entities that qualify as preference entities, as defined under Proposal Content Guidelines, item (b) of this Notice, provided that they are well qualified to develop and provide for long-term O&M of the hydropower facility. If one applicant is a preference entity and the other is not, and the preference entity’s proposed plans are not as well qualified as the non- preference entity’s plans, Reclamation will inform the preference entity of the specific reasons why its plans are not as well qualified and afford up to 30 calendar days for the preference entity to render its plans at least as well qualified as the other plans. All other applicants will be informed of this action. If the plans of the preference entity are rendered at least as well qualified within the time allowed, Reclamation will favor the preference entity. If the preference entity’s plans are not rendered at least as well qualified within the time allowed, Reclamation will favor the other applicant. Notice and Time Period To Enter Into LOPP Reclamation will notify, in writing, all entities submitting proposals of Reclamation’s decision regarding selection of the potential lessee. The selected potential lessee will be provided a maximum of 24 months from the date of selection to sign the preliminary lease, complete the requirements set forth in the preliminary lease, and to sign the LOPP. The lessee will have a maximum of 1 year from the date of the execution of the LOPP to complete final designs, specifications, etc., and an additional 1 year to begin construction. A maximum of 4 years is allowed, from the date of the preliminary lease to the beginning of construction. Maximum timeframes for construction will be determined by the Regional Director, Upper Colorado Basin—Interior Region 7. The above timeframes will only be extended for just cause resulting from actions and/or circumstances that are beyond the control of Reclamation or the lessee. Just cause and timeframe adjustments will be determined solely by the Regional Director, Upper Colorado Basin— Interior Region 7. Wayne G. Pullan, Deputy Regional Director, Upper Colorado Basin—Interior Region 7, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. 2020–19261 Filed 8–31–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4332–90–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1132 and 1134 (Second Review)] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from China and the United Arab Emirates; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip from China and the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on January 2, 2020 (85 FR 114) and determined on April 6, 2020 that it would conduct expedited reviews (85 FR 42916, July 15, 2020). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on August 26, 2020. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5110 (August 2020), entitled Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from China and the United Arab Emirates: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 1132 and 1134 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: August 26, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–19194 Filed 8–31–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–464 and 731– TA–1160 (Second Review)] Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From China; Institution of Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Aug 31, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 67Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices 5 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 82 FR 60177 (December 19, 2017). In this changed circumstances review, Commerce determined that Chengdu Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. 6 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., is the successor-in-interest to Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 81 FR 20618 (April 8, 2016). 7 For Bosun, Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd., and Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., see Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015–2016, 83 FR 17527, 17528 (April 20, 2018). For all other respondents listed above, see Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 2017, 83 FR 39673, 39674, n.10 (August 10, 2018), unchanged in Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 64331 (December 14, 2018). the non-selected separate rate respondents as follows: Exporter Weighted- average dumping margin (percent) Bosun Tools Co., Ltd .................. 82.05 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd 5 ....................... 82.05 Danyang Hantronic Import & Ex- port Co., Ltd ............................ 82.05 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd 82.05 Danyang Like Tools Manufac- turing Co., Ltd ......................... 82.05 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufac- turing Co., Ltd ......................... 82.05 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manu- facturing Co., Ltd .................... 82.05 Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd ................................... 82.05 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd ............... 82.05 Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd ........................ 82.05 Huzhou Gu’s Import & Export Co., Ltd ................................... 82.05 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Cor- poration ................................... 82.05 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufac- turer Co., Ltd ........................... 82.05 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd ......................... 82.05 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd ........................... 82.05 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd .......... 82.05 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shang- hai) Co., Ltd ............................ 82.05 Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd ......................... 82.05 Sino Tools Co., Ltd ..................... 82.05 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd .................... 82.05 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Dia- mond Tools Co., Ltd 6 ............. 82.05 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd ................................... 82.05 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd ........................................... 82.05 In the event the CIT’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise based on the revised rates listed above, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). Cash Deposit Requirements As the cash deposit rate for Danyang Hantronic Import & Export Co., Ltd., has not been subject to subsequent administrative reviews, Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to CBP adjusting the rate from 6.19 percent to 82.05 percent, effective December 26, 2019. For all other respondents listed above, because the cash deposit rates have been updated in subsequent administrative reviews,7 we will not update their cash deposit rates as a result of these amended final results. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 27, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–28327 Filed 12–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the Commission) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s). DATES : Applicable January 1, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s): DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–570–880 ..... 731–TA–1020 China ....................... Barium Carbonate (3rd Review) ............... Matthew Renkey (202) 482–2312. A–570–010 ..... 731–TA–1246 China ....................... Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (1st Review). Matthew Renkey (202) 482–2312. C–570–011 .... 701–TA–511 .. China ....................... Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (1st Review). Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. A–570–873 ..... 731–TA–986 .. China ....................... Ferrovanadium (3rd Review) .................... Mark Kolberg (202) 482–1785. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 68 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Notices 1 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 2 See section 782(b) of the Act. 3 See also Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule are available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 4 See Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013). 5 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). 6 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–570–924 ..... 731–TAA– 1132. China ....................... Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film (2nd Review). Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. A–570–939 ..... 731–TA–1153 China ....................... Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers And Parts Thereof (2nd Review). Matthew Renkey (202) 483–2312. A–791–815 ..... 731–TA–987 .. South Africa ............. Ferrovanadium (3rd Review) .................... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. A–583–853 ..... 731–TA–1247 Taiwan ..................... Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (1st Review). Matthey Renkey (202) 482–2312. A–520–803 ..... 731–TA–1134 United Arab Emir- ates. Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film (2nd Review). Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerces’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: http:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 1 Any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. 2 Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g).3 Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. On April 10, 2013, Commerce modified two regulations related to AD/ CVD proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). 4 Parties are advised to review the final rule, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits will continue to be applied. Parties are also advised to review the final rule concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in AD/CVD proceedings, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. 5 Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 6 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: December 20, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–28344 Filed 12–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:39 Dec 31, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM 02JAN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 42916 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 15, 2020 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found the joint response to its notice of institution filed on behalf of four domestic producers (DuPont Teijin Films, Dr. Vergil E. Noble Dr. Toni M. Prawl Mr. Adam Smith Mr. Boyd C. Smith Dr. Sharita Jacobs Thompson Dr. Carroll Van West Dr. Richard Guy Wilson The meeting will be open to the public. Pursuant to 36 CFR part 65, any member of the public may file, for consideration by the Committee, written comments concerning the National Historic Landmark nominations, amendments to existing designations, or proposals for withdrawal of designation. Comments should be submitted to Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register of Historic Places and National Historic Landmarks Program, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 7228, Washington, DC 20240, email nhl_info@nps.gov no later than September 1, 2020. All comments received will be provided to the Committee and the Board. Purpose of the Meeting: The Board and its Committee may consider the following nominations: Connecticut FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, Stamford, CT District of Columbia PAN AMERICAN UNION HEADQUARTERS, Washington, DC Georgia ANDALUSIA FARM (FLANNERY O’CONNOR HOME), Milledgeville, GA Massachusetts WESTERN RAILROAD STONE ARCH BRIDGES AND CHESTER FACTORY VILLAGE DEPOT, Becket, Middlefield, and Chester, MA Michigan MINONG COPPER MINING DISTRICT, Isle Royale National Park, Keweenaw County, MI Nebraska SCOUT’S REST RANCH HEADQUARTERS, North Platte, NE New York GRANT COTTAGE, Wilton, NY WEST POINT FOUNDRY ARCHEOLOGIAL SITE, Cold Spring, NY Texas LOWER PECOS CANYONLANDS ARCHEOLOGICAL DISTRICT, Val Verde County, TX Virginia PATSY CLINE HOUSE, Winchester, VA STABLER–LEADBEATER APOTHECARY SHOP, Alexandria, VA Wisconsin ROCK ISLAND SITE II, Rock Island State Park, Door County, WI Proposed Amendments to Existing Designations Connecticut HILL–STEAD, Farmington, CT (updated documentation) Hawaii KALAUPAPA LEPROSY SETTLEMENT, Kalawao, HI (updated documentation) Tennessee HERMITAGE HOTEL, Nashville, TN (updated documentation) Public Disclosure of Comments: Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Authority: 36 CFR 65.5. Alma Ripps, Chief, Office of Policy. [FR Doc. 2020–14769 Filed 7–14–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1132 and 1134 (Second Review)] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From China and the United Arab Emirates; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews. AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip from China and the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : April 6, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Alejandro Orozco (202–205–3177), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On April 6, 2020, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (85 FR 114, January 2, 2020) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of these reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on July 20, 2020, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Jul 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 42917Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 136 / Wednesday, July 15, 2020 / Notices Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics (America), Inc., and a second response filed individually by another domestic producer (Terphane LLC) to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before July 27, 2020 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by July 27, 2020. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules with respect to filing were revised effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014). The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determinations.—The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: July 9, 2020. Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2020–15197 Filed 7–14–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–656 and 731– TA–1533 (Preliminary)] Metal Lockers From China; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–656 and 731–TA–1533 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of metal lockers from China, provided for in subheadings 9403.20.00 (9403.20.0078) and 9403.90.80 (9403.90.8041) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and alleged to be subsidized by the Government of China. Unless the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 days, or in this case by August 24, 2020. The Commission’s views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by August 31, 2020. DATES : July 9, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Celia Feldpausch (202) 205–2387), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—These investigations are being instituted, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), in response to petitions filed on July 9, 2020, by List Industries, Inc., Deerfield Beach, Florida; Lyon LLC, Montgomery, Illinois; Penco Products, Inc., Greenville, North Carolina; and Tennsco Corp., Dickson, Tennessee. For further information concerning the conduct of these investigations and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207). Participation in the investigations and public service list.—Persons (other than petitioners) wishing to participate in the investigations as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in §§ 201.11 and 207.10 of the Commission’s rules, not later than seven days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Industrial users and (if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level) representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to these investigations upon the expiration of the period for filing entries of appearance. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these investigations available to authorized applicants representing interested parties (as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9)) who are parties to the investigations under the APO issued in the investigations, provided that the application is made not later than seven days after the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Conference.— In light of the restrictions on access to the Commission building due to the COVID–19 pandemic, the Commission will not be conducting an in-person Title VII (antidumping and countervailing duty) preliminary staff conference at the Commission’s headquarters. Information about the format of the conference on Thursday, July 30, 2020 will be provided separately. Requests to participate in the conference should be VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:59 Jul 14, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Commerce: United Arab Emirates: A-520-803 === 6689Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 60253 (October 1, 2013). 2 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 10095, (February 24, 2014). 3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Brazil, China, and the United Arab Emirates, 80 FR 3623 (January 23, 2015). On the same day, the ITC also determined that revocation of the antidumping orders of PET Film from the PRC and the UAE would lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 4 See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 38081 (July 1, 2010). ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF VOTING AGE FOR EACH STATE AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: JULY 1, 2014—Continued Area Population 18 and over Arizona .................................. 5,109,792 Arkansas ............................... 2,259,350 California ............................... 29,649,348 Colorado ............................... 4,109,494 Connecticut ........................... 2,821,247 Delaware ............................... 731,367 District of Columbia .............. 543,588 Florida ................................... 15,839,713 Georgia ................................. 7,604,061 Hawaii ................................... 1,111,117 Idaho ..................................... 1,203,384 Illinois .................................... 9,892,106 Indiana .................................. 5,014,928 Iowa ...................................... 2,381,172 Kansas .................................. 2,181,355 Kentucky ............................... 3,400,843 Louisiana .............................. 3,536,183 Maine .................................... 1,071,112 Maryland ............................... 4,625,863 Massachusetts ...................... 5,354,940 Michigan ............................... 7,686,087 Minnesota ............................. 4,175,347 Mississippi ............................ 2,262,810 Missouri ................................ 4,670,966 Montana ................................ 798,555 Nebraska .............................. 1,414,894 Nevada ................................. 2,175,874 New Hampshire .................... 1,059,672 New Jersey ........................... 6,926,094 New Mexico .......................... 1,583,623 New York .............................. 15,517,321 North Carolina ...................... 7,656,415 North Dakota ........................ 570,955 Ohio ...................................... 8,955,859 Oklahoma ............................. 2,925,352 Oregon .................................. 3,112,217 Pennsylvania ........................ 10,086,316 Rhode Island ........................ 842,321 South Carolina ...................... 3,747,734 South Dakota ........................ 642,768 Tennessee ............................ 5,054,826 Texas .................................... 19,841,344 Utah ...................................... 2,038,787 Vermont ................................ 504,976 Virginia .................................. 6,457,174 Washington ........................... 5,458,809 West Virginia ........................ 1,470,179 Wisconsin ............................. 4,457,375 Wyoming ............................... 445,830 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Di- vision, Vintage 2014 Population Estimates. I have certified these estimates for the Federal Election Commission. Dated: January 29, 2015. Penny Pritzker, Secretary of Commerce. [FR Doc. 2015–02473 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–351–841, A–520–803, A–570–924] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates: Continuation and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (the ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation for these antidumping duty orders. As a result of the ITC’s determination that revocation of the AD order on PET Film from Brazil is not likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is revoking this AD order. DATES : Effective Date: AD Brazil Revocation: November 10, 2013; AD PRC and UAE Continuation: February 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/ CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 1, 2013, the Department initiated the sunset reviews on the AD orders on PET film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 1 As a result of the reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD orders on PET Film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE would likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the order be revoked. 2 On January 23, 2015, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD order on PET Film the PRC and the UAE would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time, but that revocation of the AD order on PET Film from Brazil would not be likely to do so. 3 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film is also excluded. PET film is classifiable under subheading 3920.62.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Scope Determinations on PET Film From the PRC Since these orders were published, there was one scope determination for PET film from the PRC, with notice of the decision published on July 1, 2010. In this determination, requested by Coated Fabrics Company, the Department determined that Amorphous PET (‘‘APET’’), Glycol- modified PET (‘‘PETG’’), and coextruded APET with PETG on its outer surfaces (‘‘GAG Sheet’’), are within the scope of the antidumping duty order of PET Film from the PRC.4 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 6690 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices 5 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595 (November 10, 2008). 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). 2 See Submission from Elements, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Request for a Changed Circumstance Review Regarding Shoe Cabinets,’’ dated June 2, 2014 (‘‘Elements’ Request’’). 3 See Submission from Petitioners, ‘‘Wooden Bedroom Furniture From The People’s Republic of China/Petitioners’ Response to Elements’ Letter of June 2, 2014,’’ dated June 3, 2014. 4 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, and Consideration of Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order in Part, 79 FR 41260 (July 15, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’) 5 Id. at 41262. Continuation of the Order on PET Film From the PRC and the UAE As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD order on PET Film from the PRC and the UAE. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect antidumping duty cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Revocation of the Order on PET Film From Brazil As a result of the determination by the ITC that revocation of this AD order is not likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is revoking the AD order on PET Film from Brazil. Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of revocation is November 10, 2013 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the date of publication in the Federal Register of the order 5). Cash Deposit and Assessment of Duties on PET Film From Brazil The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), 15 days after the publication of this notice, to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to discontinue the collection of cash deposits on entries of PET Film from Brazil, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after November 10, 2013. The Department will further instruct CBP to refund with interest all cash deposits on entries made on or after November 10, 2013. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and AD deposit requirements and assessments. The Department will complete any pending or requested administrative reviews of the order on PET Film from Brazil covering entries prior to November 10, 2013. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which, may be subject to sanctions. This five-year (sunset) review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: January 30, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–02456 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, and Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty Order in Part AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On June 2, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) received a request for revocation, in part, of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 with respect to certain shoe cabinets. We preliminarily determine that the producers accounting for substantially all of the production of the domestic like product to which the Order pertains lack interest in the relief provided by the Order with respect to certain shoe cabinets described below. Accordingly, we intend to revoke, in part, the Order as to imports of certain shoe cabinets. The Department invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Effective Date: February 6, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Martin or Howard Smith, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482– 5193, respectively. Background On January 4, 2005, the Department published the Order in the Federal Register. On June 2, 2014, the Department received a request on behalf of Elements International Group LLC (‘‘Elements’’) for a changed circumstances review to revoke, in part, the Order with respect to certain shoe cabinets.2 In its request, Elements stated that the American Furniture Manufacturing Committee for Legal Trade and Vaughan-Basset Furniture Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) discussed the scope exclusion described below and are in agreement with the revocation, in part. On June 3, 2014, the Department received a letter from the Petitioners in which they stated they were in agreement with the proposed scope exclusion language in Elements’ June 2, 2014, changed circumstances review request. 3 On July 15, 2014, we published the Initiation Notice in the Federal Register.4 Because the statement submitted by Petitioners in support of Elements’ Request did not indicate whether Petitioners account for substantially all of the domestic wooden bedroom furniture production, in the Initiation Notice, we invited interested parties to submit comments concerning industry support, as well as comments and/or factual information regarding the changed circumstances review. 5 We received no comments concerning industry support. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:52 Feb 05, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - China - United Arab Emirates === 26927Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Notices 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595 (November 10, 2008) (the Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 FR 67 (January 2, 2020) (Notice of Initiation). 3 The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films; Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.; SKC, Inc.; and Toray Plastics (America), Inc. 4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated January 13, 2020; see also Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated January 15, 2020; Terphane’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping Order On Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, And Strip From The People’s Republic of China: Notice Of Intent To Participate,’’ dated January 15, 2020; and Terphane’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping Order On Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, And Strip from The United Arab Emirates: Notice Of Intent To Participate,’’ dated January 15, 2020. 5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 31, 2020; see also Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 31, 2020; and Terphane’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping Orders On Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, And Strip From China And The United Arab Emirates: Terphane’s Substantive Response,’’ dated February 3, 2020. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review Initiation on January 2, 2020,’’ dated February 24, 2020. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Second Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–924, A–520–803] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these expedited (120-day) sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable May 6, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Kathryn Turlo, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3870. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 10, 2008, Commerce issued the Orders on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from the People’s Republic of China (China) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). 1 On July 1, 2019, Commerce published the Notice of Initiation of the second sunset reviews of the Orders pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On January 13 and 15, 2020, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from the petitioners 3 and Terphane LLC (Terphane), respectively.4 Each filing was timely submitted within the 15-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners and Terphane each claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a producer of the domestic like product in the United States. On January 31 and February 3, 2020, Commerce received adequate substantive responses to the Notice of Initiation from the petitioners and Terphane, respectively, within the 30- day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 We received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect to either of the orders covered by these sunset reviews. On February 24, 2020, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce has conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. Scope of the Orders The products covered by the Orders is PET film and is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. A full description of the scope of the Orders is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the AD orders on PET film from China and the UAE would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping margins up to 76.72 percent for China and 4.05 percent for the UAE. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:08 May 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1 26928 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 FR 67 (January 2, 2020); see also Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Tow Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 38395 (August 3, 2009) (Order). 2 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Second Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof from The People’s Republic of China; Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated January 16, 2020. 3 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Second Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof from The People’s Republic of China; Agri-Fab’s Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated January 31, 2020 (Substantive Response). 4 For a complete description of the background of this sunset review of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 The full scope of the Order is included in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 Id. Dated: April 30, 2020. Joseph Laroski, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely To Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–09671 Filed 5–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–939] Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Certain Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on tow- behind lawn groomers and certain parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable May 6, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background After publication of the notice of initiation of this sunset review of the AD order on tow-behind lawn groomers and certain parts thereof from China, 1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Agri- Fab, Inc. (domestic interested party) filed with Commerce a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in the sunset review, 2 and a timely and adequate substantive response. 3 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order.4 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain non-motorized tow-behind lawn groomers, manufactured from any material, and certain parts thereof, from China. The lawn groomers that are the subject of this order are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) statistical reporting numbers 8432.41.0000, 8432.42.0000, 8432.80.0000, 8432.80.0010, 8432.90.0060, 8432.90.0081, 8479.89.9496, 8479.90.9496, and 9603.50.0000. These HTSUS provisions are given for reference and customs purposes only, and the description of merchandise is dispositive for determining the scope of the product included in this order. 5 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the Order and the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.6 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted- average dumping margins up to 386.28 percent. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: April 30, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely To Prevail VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:08 May 05, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM 06MYN1