Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China and India; Inv. No. 701-TA-746-747 and 731-TA-1724-1725 (Final)

=== Publication 5702 === Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India Investigation Nos. 701-TA-747 and 731-TA-1725 (Final) Publication 5702 February 2026 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 COMMISSIONERS Amy A. Karpel, Chair David S. Johanson Jason E. Kearns Catherine DeFilippo Director of Operations Staff assigned Peter Stebbins, Investigator Karl Tsuji, Industry Analyst Andres Andrade, Economist Zahra Bekkal, Accountant Jason Wang, Statistician Lane Hurewitz, Attorney Douglas Corkran, Supervisory Investigator Special assistance from Stamen Borisson, Investigator Alexis Yim, International Trade Specialist U.S. International Trade Commission Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India Investigation Nos. 701-TA-747 and 731-TA-1725 (Final) U.S. International Trade Commission Publication 5702 February 2026 CONTENTS Page i Determinations ............................................................................................................................... 1 Views of the Commission ............................................................................................................... 3 Part 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1.1 Background............................................................................................................................... 1.1 Nature and extent of subsidies and sales at LTFV ................................................................... 1.3 Subsidies ............................................................................................................................... 1.3 Sales at LTFV ......................................................................................................................... 1.4 Negligibility ............................................................................................................................... 1.4 Critical circumstances............................................................................................................... 1.5 Appendixes A. Federal Register notices .................................................................................................. A.1 B. Commerce’s final LTFV and CVD determinations ........................................................... B.1 C. Summary data ................................................................................................................. C.1 Note.—Information that would reveal confidential operations of individual firms may not be published. Such information is identified by brackets ([ ]) in confidential reports and is deleted and replaced with asterisks (***) in public reports. Zeroes, null values, and undefined calculations are suppressed and shown as em dashes (—) in tables. If using a screen reader, we recommend increasing the verbosity setting. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Investigation Nos. 701- TA-747 and 731-TA-1725 (Final) Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India DETERMINATIONS On the basis of the record1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India, provided for in subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (“LTFV”), and imports of the subject merchandise from India that have been found to be subsidized by the government of India.2 3 BACKGROUND The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 29, 2024, following receipt of petitions filed with the Commission and Commerce by IDC Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., Adel, Iowa, and Service Spring Corp., Maumee, Ohio. The final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission following notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 11, 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 90 FR 61366 and 61369 (December 31, 2025). 3 The Commission also finds that imports subject to Commerce's affirmative critical circumstances determination are not likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. 1 2025 (90 FR 24665), as revised on June 23, 2025 (90 FR 26608). The public hearing in connection with the investigations was cancelled.4 The investigation schedules became staggered when Commerce postponed the final determination for its antidumping duty investigation regarding India and aligned the final determination for its countervailing duty investigation regarding India with the corresponding AD investigation, but did not postpone the final determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations regarding China. On September 30, 2025, the Commission issued final affirmative determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China (90 FR 47820, October 2, 2025). Following notification of final determinations by Commerce that imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 735(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(a)) and were being subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)), notice of the supplemental scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigations with respect to India was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on January 12, 2026 (91 FR 1196). 4 90 FR 39420 (August 15, 2025). 2 3 Views of the Commission Based on the record in the final phase of these investigations, we determine that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs (“overhead door springs”) from India found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (“LTFV”) and subsidized by the government of India. We also find that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to imports from India that are subject to Commerce’s final affirmative critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Background The antidumping duty and countervailing duty petitions for overhead door springs from China and India were all filed on the same day, October 29, 2024, by IDC Group, Inc., Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., and Service Spring Corp. (collectively, “Petitioners”), U.S. producers of overhead door springs.1 The investigations became staggered when Commerce postponed the final determination for its antidumping duty investigation regarding India, and aligned the final determination for its countervailing duty investigation regarding India with the corresponding antidumping duty investigation, but did not postpone the final determinations in the remaining antidumping and countervailing duty investigations regarding China.2 This necessitated earlier Commission determinations in the final phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on overhead door springs from China than in these trailing 1 Petitions, EDIS Doc. 835843 (Oct. 29, 2024); see also Supplemental Confidential Staff Report: Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India, INV-YY-009, EDIS Doc. 870425 (Jan. 28, 2026) (“Supplemental CR”) at Table 1.1; Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-747 and 731-TA-1725 (Final), USITC Pub. 5702 (Feb. 2026) (“Supplemental PR”) at Table 1.1. 2 See Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 90 Fed. Reg. 61366 (Dec. 31, 2025) (“Commerce’s Final Determination – India AD”); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 90 Fed. Reg. 61369 (Dec. 31, 2025) (“Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD”); see also Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China: Determinations, 90 Fed. Reg. 47820 (Oct. 2, 2025); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances in the Countervailing Duty Investigation, 90 Fed. Reg. 35660 (July 29, 2025); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 Fed. Reg. 23316 (June 2, 2025); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination; Correction, 90 Fed. Reg. 15447 (Apr. 11, 2025). 4 antidumping and countervailing duty investigations regarding overhead door springs from India.3 The Commission reached affirmative determinations in the leading antidumping and countervailing duty investigations regarding China on September 30, 2025.4 As a result, the Commission now makes its determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of overhead door springs from India (the “trailing investigations”).5 Pursuant to the statutory provision on staggered investigations, the record for the current trailing investigations regarding overhead door springs from India closed on February 4, 2026.6 Commerce’s final antidumping and countervailing duty determinations on subject imports from India, and the Petitioners’ and Respondent Alcomex Beheer B.V., Alcomex Springs Prvt Ltd., and Alcomex Springs Inc.’s (“Alcomex’s”) supplemental final comments concerning those determinations have been added to the record.7 3 Commerce was originally scheduled to issue its final antidumping and countervailing duty determinations in the trailing investigations regarding subject imports from India no later than 135 days from June 2, 2025, or by October 15, 2025. See Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 Fed. Reg. 23316, 23318 (June 2, 2025); see also Staff Report (Post-Hearing) for the Leading Investigations, EDIS Doc. 861209 (Sept. 4, 2025) (“CR”) at Table 1.1 (background and schedule). On November 14, 2025, Commerce issued a memorandum stating that as a result of the cessation of government operations it would be tolling certain deadlines in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings by 47 days. Supplemental CR/PR at 1.1 n.3, citing Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated Nov. 14, 2025 (First Tolling Memo). Commerce subsequently issued a second memorandum stating that it would toll its deadlines by a further 21 days. Id., citing Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of all Case Deadlines,’’ dated Nov. 24, 2025 (Second Tolling Memo). Consequently, Commerce’s final determinations in the trailing investigations were extended until December 31, 2025. Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 91 Fed. Reg. 1196 (Jan. 12, 2026) (“Scheduling Notice”). The Commission’s final determinations in these trailing investigations are being made within 45 days after Commerce’s affirmative final determinations, or no later than February 17, 2026. 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(b)(2)(B), 1673d(b)(2)(B); see also Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.1. 4 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China: Determinations, 90 Fed. Reg. at 47820; Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746 and 731-TA- 1724 (Final), USITC Pub. 5675 at 1 (Sept. 2025) at 1; Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.1. 5 Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.1. See also Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 91 Fed. Reg. 1196 (Jan. 12, 2026) (“Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations”). 6 See Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.1. See also Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 91 Fed. Reg. 1196. 7 See 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(G)(iii). See also Petitioners’ Supplemental Final Comments, EDIS Doc. 869122 at 1 (Jan. 15, 2026) (“Pet. Suppl. Final Comments”); Alcomex’s Supplemental Final Comments, EDIS Doc. 869151 at 1 (Jan. 15, 2026) (“Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments”). 5 Material Injury by Reason of Cumulated Subject Imports Section 771(7)(G)(iii) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), provides that the Commission must make its material injury determinations in these trailing investigations on the basis of the same record as that in the leading investigations, except to the extent discussed above.8 Therefore, in these investigations, we adopt the findings and analyses from our determinations and views in the leading investigations with respect to the issues of domestic like product, domestic industry, negligibility,9 cumulation, conditions of competition, and material injury by reason of cumulated subject imports.10 Based on the record in the final phase of these investigations, we find that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of subject merchandise from India that Commerce has found to be sold in the United States at LTFV and subsidized by the government of India. 8 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(G)(iii). 9 In the leading investigations the Commission observed that during October 2023 to September 2024, the 12-month period preceding the filing of the petitions, subject imports from China (for both the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations) accounted for *** percent of total U.S. imports of overhead door springs. Confidential Commission Views Overhead Door Springs from China, EDIS Doc. 863606 (Nov. 13, 2025) (“Conf. Views Overhead Door Springs from China”) at 19 n.64; Overhead Door Springs from China, USITC Pub. 5675 at 16 n.64. Consequently, as imports from China clearly exceeded the three percent negligibility threshold, the Commission found that imports from China subject to the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations were not negligible. See id. In these trailing investigations, subject imports from India accounted for *** percent of total U.S. imports of overhead door springs. See Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.4. Accordingly, we find that imports from India subject to the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations are not negligible. 10 The statute additionally instructs the Commission to consider the “magnitude of the dumping margin” in an antidumping duty proceeding as part of its consideration of the impact of subject imports. 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(C)(iii)(V). In its final antidumping duty determination regarding India Commerce calculated dumping margins of 126.14 percent for Alcomex Springs Pvt. Ltd., Asha Spring and Engineering Company; Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd., Modern Engineering & Spring Company; and Reliable Springs Ltd., and 86.45 percent for “all others.” Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.3; Commerce’s Final Determination – India AD, 90 Fed. Reg. at 61367, and AD IDM at 6-7. See also Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.2; Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD, 90 Fed. Reg. at 61370 (finding a subsidy rate of 172.08 percent for all individually examined companies and “all others”), and CVD IDM at 19, 25. We take into account in our analysis the fact that Commerce has made final findings that subject imports from India are sold in the United States at LTFV, including the magnitude of the margins of dumping found by Commerce. In addition to this consideration, other factors that support our analysis from the leading investigations remain unchanged and do not require modification, for example, our analysis of the significant price effects of cumulated subject imports. See Overhead Door Springs from China, USITC Pub. 5675 at 37; Conf. Views Overhead Door Springs from China at 47. 6 Critical Circumstances A. Legal Standards On December 31, 2025, Commerce issued its final determination that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of overhead door springs from India with respect to all producers and/or exporters of overhead door springs in the antidumping duty investigation.11 On the same date, Commerce issued its final determination that critical circumstances exist with respect to Alcomex Springs Pvt. Ltd. (“Alcomex”), the non-selected respondents, and all other producers and/or exporters of subject merchandise in the countervailing duty investigation.12 Because we have determined that the domestic industry is materially injured by reason of subject imports from India in both the antidumping and countervailing duty determinations, we must further determine “whether the imports subject to the affirmative {Commerce critical circumstances} determination . . . are likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the antidumping order to be issued.”13 The statute further provides that in making these findings: the Commission shall consider, among other factors it considers relevant – (I) the timing and the volume of the imports, (II) a rapid increase in inventories of the imports, and (III) any other circumstances indicating that the remedial effect of the antidumping 11 Supplemental CR/PR at 1.5, Table 1.1. Petitioners withdrew their critical circumstances allegations with respect to subject imports from India. Pet. Prehearing Br. at 59 n.32. However, on December 31, 2025, Commerce found that critical circumstances exist in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on overhead door springs from India. Commerce’s Final Determination – India AD, 90 Fed. Reg. 61368 and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Dec. 22, 2025) (“AD IDM”) at 2; Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD, 90 Fed. Reg. at 31670 and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (“CVD IDM”) at 10. Commerce explained that “{w}hile the petitioners have withdrawn their critical circumstances allegation and, consequently, {respondent} Alcomex claims that there is no basis for Commerce to continue our analysis of critical circumstances, based on our analysis of the information submitted on the record and discussed below, we find that we have enough evidence to indicate that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of overhead door springs.” CVD IDM at 10 (footnotes omitted; bracketed material added); see also AD IDM at 2. 12 Supplemental CR/PR at 1.5—1.6, Table 1.1; Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD, 90 Fed. Reg. at 31670 and accompanying CVD IDM at 16. The non-selected respondents included Asha Spring and Engineering Company, Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd., Modern Engineering & Spring Company, and Reliable Springs Ltd. See Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD, 90 Fed. Reg. at 31670. 13 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(b)(4)(A)(i), 1673d(b)(4)(A)(i); 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(b)(4)(A)(ii), 1673d(b)(4)(A)(ii); 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(e)(2), 1673d(e)(2). 7 order will be seriously undermined.14 An affirmative critical circumstances determination by the Commission, in conjunction with an affirmative determination of material injury by reason of subject imports, would normally result in the retroactive imposition of duties for those imports subject to the affirmative Commerce critical circumstances determination for a period of 90 days prior to the suspension of liquidation.15 The Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”) Statement of Administrative Action (“SAA”) provides that the Commission is to determine “whether, by massively increasing imports prior to the effective date of relief, the importers have seriously undermined the remedial effect of the order” and specifically “whether the surge in imports prior to the suspension of liquidation, rather than the failure to provide retroactive relief, is likely to seriously undermine the remedial effect of the order.”16 Prior legislative history indicates that the critical circumstances provision was designed “to deter exporters whose merchandise is subject to an investigation from circumventing the intent of the law by increasing their exports to the United States during the period between initiation of an investigation and the preliminary determination by Commerce.”17 Accordingly, the Commission’s practice has been to base its critical circumstances determination on a comparison of import data from periods before and after the date of a petition’s filing.18 The Commission generally relies on data gathered from the periods immediately preceding and following the filing of the petition unless there is evidence that the product under investigation involves seasonality.19 The current practice is to compare the six-month periods before and after the filing of the petition, although these periods may be altered where 14 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(b)(4)(A)(ii), 1673d(b)(4)(A)(ii). 15 19 U.S.C. §§ 1671d(e)(2), 1673d(e)(2). 16 URAA SAA, H.R. Doc. 103-316, vol. I at 877 (1994). 17 ICC Industries, Inc., v. United States, 812 F.2d 694, 700 (Fed. Cir. 1987), quoting H.R. No. 317, 96 th Cong., 1 st Sess. 63 (1979). 18 See Certain Lined School Paper Supplies from China, India, and Indonesia, Inv. Nos. 701-TA- 442-443 and 731-TA-1095-1097 (Final), USITC Pub. 3884 at 47 (Sep. 2006); Carbazole Violet Pigment from China and India, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-437 and 731-TA-1060-1061 (Final), USITC Pub. 3744 at 26 (Dec. 2004); and Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam, Inv. No. 731-TA-1012 (Final), USITC Pub. 3617 at 20- 22 (Aug. 2003). 19 Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final), USITC Pub. 3922 at 35 (Jun. 2007). 8 warranted.20 The Commission is not required to examine the same periods that Commerce examined in performing the critical circumstances analysis.21 B. Background The Commission issued questionnaires in these investigations on June 9, 2025. Petitioners subsequently alleged the existence of critical circumstances in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations with respect to China and India,22 then filed a timely withdrawal of their allegations of critical circumstances at Commerce regarding imports of 20 In particular, the Commission has used five-month periods in recent investigations where timing of the first preliminary Commerce determination authorizing the imposition of provisional duties would have served to reduce subject import volume in the sixth month of the post-petition period. See Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Resin from Canada, China, India, and Oman, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-531-532 and 731-TA-1270-1273 (Final), USITC Pub. 4604 at 31-32 (Apr. 2016); Carbon and Certain Steel Wire Rod from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-512, 731-TA-1248 (Final), USITC Pub. 4509 at 25-26 (Jan. 2015) (using five- month periods because preliminary Commerce countervailing duty determination caused reduction of subject import volume in sixth month). See also Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Brazil, South Africa, and Turkey, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1319, 1326, and 1328 (Final), USITC Pub. 4664 (Jan. 2017) (using five-month periods when Commerce did not extend preliminary antidumping determinations) and Certain Orange Juice from Brazil, Inv. No. 731-TA-1089 (Final), USITC Pub. 3838 at 29 n.203 (using seven month period because the petition was filed late in the month); Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from China and Japan, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-541 and 731-TA-1284 and 1286 (Final), USITC Pub. 4619 (July 2016); Overhead Door Springs from China - Final, USITC Pub. 5675 at 49 (using five-month periods when Commerce did not extend preliminary countervailing duty determination). But see Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks from China and Mexico, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-468 (Final) & 731-TA-1166 to 1167 (Final), USITC Pub. 4182 at 24 (Sept. 2010); Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1143 (Final), USITC Pub. 462 at 24 (Feb. 2009). The Commission may also use different periods when the product is seasonal. See 1,1,1,2--Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1313 (Final), USITC Pub. 4679 at 25 (Apr. 2017) (seasonal product); Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final), USITC Pub. 3922 at 35 (June 2007) (declining to analyze different periods absent seasonality). 21 Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final), USITC Pub. 3922 at 35 (June 2007); Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Turkey, Inv. No. 731-TA-745 (Final), USITC Pub. 3034 at 34 (Apr. 1997). 22 On June 24, 2025, the Petitioners alleged that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of overhead door springs from China and India in Commerce’s antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. See Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India and the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determinations of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Less- Than-Fair Value Investigations, 90 Fed. Reg. 35662 (July 29, 2025) (citing Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India - Petitioner’s Allegation of Critical Circumstance (June 24, 2025), Case No. A- 533-936); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances in the Countervailing Duty Investigation, 90 Fed. Reg. 35660 (July 29, 2025) (citing Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India - Petitioner’s Allegation of Critical Circumstance (June 24, 2025), Case No. C-533-937). 9 overhead door springs from India, in both the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.23 Commerce issued final determinations on December 31, 2025, that critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of overhead door springs from India in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.24 Because the Petitioners had withdrawn their request for critical circumstances, and Commerce issued its affirmative finding following closure of the record, the Commission did not collect information for considering the existence of critical circumstances with respect to subject imports from India through a supplemental critical circumstances questionnaire.25 26 However, we note that there is sufficient information on the record to conduct a critical circumstances analysis, as the Commission received a U.S. 23 On July 30, 2025, the Petitioners withdrew their critical circumstances allegations on subject imports from India. Pet. Suppl. Final Comments at 3 n.6; Pet. Prehearing Br. at 59 n.32; see also Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746 and 731-TA- 1724, USITC Publication 5675 at 4.7 (Sept. 2025). 24 See Commerce’s Final Determination – India AD, 90 Fed. Reg. 61366 (Dec. 31, 2025) and AD IDM at 2; Commerce’s Final Determination – India CVD, 90 Fed. Reg. 61369 (Dec. 31, 2025) and CVD IDM at 10. Commerce explained with respect to its determination in the antidumping duty investigation that “because Commerce made a preliminary affirmative critical circumstances determination based on the petitioners’ allegation and the data and analysis {are} on the record, we continue to find that the record demonstrates that critical circumstances exist.” AD IDM at 2. It provided a similar explanation with respect to its determination in the CVD investigation. CVD IDM at 10. 25 See generally Supplemental CR/PR at 1.5-1.8, Table 1.1. We note that the Petitioners’ critical circumstances allegations (June 24, 2025) were made after the Commission issued U.S. importer questionnaires on June 9, 2025. See Commission’s generic U.S. Importers Questionnaire, EDIS Doc. 853206 (June 9, 2025) (sent to U.S. importers of subject imports from China and India). Moreover, the Commission issued supplemental critical circumstances questionnaires to U.S. importers of subject imports from China in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations (Aug. 19, 2025) after the Petitioners withdrew their critical circumstances allegations on subject imports from India (July 30, 2025) and Commerce issued its final determinations finding that critical circumstances exist on subject imports from China (Aug. 15, 2025). See Pet. Suppl. Final Comments at 3 n.6; Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part, 90 Fed. Reg. 39369 (Aug. 15, 2025) (Commerce’s China antidumping duty determination on critical circumstances); Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination in Part, 90 Fed. Reg. 39369 (Aug. 15, 2025) (Commerce’s China CVD determination on critical circumstances); Commission e-mail issuing supplemental critical circumstances questionnaires to U.S. importers of subject imports from China, EDIS Doc. 870675 (Aug. 19, 2025). 26 In addition, we note that Alcomex did not participate in the final phase of the leading investigations. See Alcomex Withdrawal of Notice of Appearance, EDIS Doc. 858102 (July 30, 2025) at 1; Alcomex Refiling Request and Explanation of Good Cause, EDIS Doc. 869222 (Jan. 16, 2026) at 3-4 (“Commerce’s unexpected decision to issue a final affirmative critical circumstances determination— despite petitioners’ withdrawal of their critical circumstances allegation—necessitates our participation to ensure the Commission has a full understanding of the record regarding critical circumstances.”). 10 importers questionnaire response from Alcomex Springs Inc. (“Alcomex”) which accounts for approximately *** percent of total imports under the primary HTS statistical reporting numbers 7320.20.5025, 7320.20.5045, and 7320.205060 during the period of investigation.27 Alcomex also accounted for between *** and *** percent of subject inventories from India during the dates presented in Table 1.6 of the supplemental staff report (i.e., March 31, 2024, to March 31, 2025), and *** percent of subject inventories from India over the entire period for which data were collected.28 C. Parties’ Arguments In these final phase investigations, no party argued that the Commission should make affirmative critical circumstances determinations.29 The Petitioners confirmed that they withdrew their earlier critical circumstances allegations in Commerce’s antidumping and countervailing duty investigations and are not pursuing critical circumstances as to India. Accordingly, they state that they “do not believe there is any basis for the Commission to make affirmative critical circumstances determinations regarding subject imports from India.”30 Respondent Alcomex argues that the Commission should not find critical circumstances as to subject imports from India in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.31 It notes that Petitioners withdrew their critical circumstances allegations in the investigations before Commerce regarding subject imports from India.32 Alcomex further contends that the record does not support an affirmative critical circumstances finding as to India.33 It asserts that substantially all the increase in the post- petition period entered *** before the petitions were filed on October 29, 2024.34 It states that *** is an end-use customer that does not resell the subject merchandise into the market, 27 Supplemental CR/PR at 1.6 n.12; Alcomex Springs Inc.’s Importer Questionnaire Response, EDIS Doc. 857297 (July 21, 2025) and staff’s critical circumstances extraction files. See also CR/PR (staff report for the leading investigations) at Table 4.1. 28 Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.6 note. 29 Pet. Suppl. Final Comments at 1-3; Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 1-3. As noted, the Petitioners withdrew their critical circumstances allegations with respect to subject imports from India in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Pet. Suppl. Final Comments at 3 n.6; CVD IDM at 10; AD IDM at 2. 30 Pet. Suppl. Final Comments at 3 n.6. 31 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 2. 32 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 2. 33 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 3. 34 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 3; see also Respondent Alcomex Postconference Brief, EDIS Doc. 837928 (Nov. 22, 2024) (“Alcomex Postconf. Br.”) at 7; Supplemental CR/PR at 1.6 n.13. 11 and that anything in ***.35 Alcomex argues that, therefore, the quantities it imported during the post-petition period were not imported to avoid duties and do not have the potential to undermine the remedial effect of the orders.36 D. Analysis At the outset, we again note that the Petitioners filed a timely withdrawal of their critical circumstances allegations and no party supports an affirmative finding of critical circumstances in these investigations. Nevertheless, the following analysis is provided. We first consider the appropriate period for comparison of pre-petition and post- petition levels of subject imports from India. The Commission frequently relies on six-month comparison periods for its critical circumstances analysis.37 However, it has relied on a shorter comparison period for both its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations when Commerce’s preliminary determination applicable to the imports from the subject country fell within the six-month post-petition period the Commission typically considers.38 That situation arises here for our critical circumstances analysis of imports from India because the petitions 35 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 3, citing Alcomex Springs Inc.’s Importer Questionnaire Response, EDIS Doc. 857297 (July 15, 2025) at 19, 22, 34 & 52. 36 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 2. 37 The Commission has relied on a shorter comparison period for both its antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigations when Commerce’s preliminary determination applicable to the imports from the subject country fell within the six-month post-petition period the Commission typically considers. See Carbon and Certain Steel Wire Rod from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-512, 731-TA-1248 (Final), USITC Pub. 4509 at 25-26 (Jan. 2015) (using five-month periods because preliminary Commerce countervailing duty determination caused reduction of subject import volume in sixth month); Wire Rod Final I, USITC Pub. 4752 at 46-47 (Jan. 2018) (regarding subject imports from Russia); Overhead Door Springs from China, USITC Pub. 5675 at 49 (using five-month periods because preliminary Commerce countervailing duty determination caused reduction of subject import volume in sixth month). The Commission may also use different periods when the product is seasonal. See 1,1,1,2-- Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1313 (Final), USITC Pub. 4679 at 25 (Apr. 2017) (seasonal product); Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final), USITC Pub. 3922 at 35 (June 2007) (declining to analyze different periods absent seasonality). See CR/PR at 2.9 (“Firms reported seasonal variations in demand with higher demand in the second and third quarters of the year and lower demand in the first and fourth quarters.”). 38 See section III.A, above. 12 were filed on October 29, 2024,39 and Commerce’s initial preliminary determination, which was in the countervailing duty investigation, was issued on April 3, 2025.40 41 In light of the foregoing, we have determined to use a five-month comparison period. Specifically, we have determined to compare the volume of subject imports five months prior to and including the filing of the petition (June 2024-October 2024) with the volume of subject imports five months after the filing of the petition (November 2024 to March 2025) in our critical circumstances analysis of imports from India subject to the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.42 All subject imports from India are subject to Commerce’s critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. We have examined both import volumes and inventory data for the relevant periods. Subject imports from India subject to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances determination in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations increased from 2.1 million pounds in the pre-petition period to 5.2 million pounds in the post-petition period, an 39 Supplemental CR/PR at 1.2, Table 1.1; Petitions, EDIS Doc. 835848 (Oct. 29, 2024) at 1; see also Conf. Commission Views Overhead Door Springs China at 48-49. Because the petition was filed at the end of October 2024, that month is included in the pre-petition period, per the Commission’s typical practice. 40 Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.1; Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 90 Fed. Reg. 14602 (Apr. 3, 2025) (“Overhead Door Springs from India – CVD Prelim. Determination”). Because Commerce’s preliminary determination in the countervailing duty investigations was made at the beginning of April 2025, that month is not included in the post-petition period, per the Commission’s typical practice. 41 Commerce’s preliminary determination with respect to the antidumping duty investigation was rendered on June 2, 2025, subsequent to five months after the filing of the petition. Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.5; Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 90 Fed. Reg. 23316, 23317 (June 2, 2025) (“Commerce’s Prelim. Affirmative Determination of Sales at LTFV – India”). However, consistent with previous cases, we used the same pre- and post-petition periods for both antidumping and countervailing duty critical circumstances analyses. Certain Pea Protein from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-692 and 731-TA-1628 (Final), USITC Pub. 5529 at 43 n.253 (Aug. 2024); Certain Corrosion-Resistance Steel Products from China, India, Italy, Korea, and Taiwan, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-534-537 and 731-TA-1274 (Final), USITC Pub. 4620 at 35-36 (Sept. 2016); Disposable Aluminum Containers, Pans, Trays, and Lids from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-727 and 731-TA- 1695 (Final), USITC Pub. 5611 at 37 n.255 (Apr. 2025); Overhead Door Springs from China, USITC Pub. 5675 at 49 n.276. See also Petitioners’ Prehearing Brief, EDIS Doc. 859256 (Aug. 11, 2025) (“Pet. Prehearing Br.”) at 59-60. 42 See Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.5 & Figure 1.1. No party addressed the relevant time periods. See section III.C, above. 13 increase of 3.1 million pounds or 143.7 percent.43 The volume of subject imports from India had an increasing trajectory prior to the filing of the petitions in October 2024 that continued through the post-petition period.44 Additionally, this increase in the volume of subject imports from India appears to be primarily attributable to the *** discussed above, which was in place *** prior to the filing of the petitions.45 This information indicates that the post-petition imports were a continuation of a pre-existing trend, rather than a strategy by the U.S. importers of rushing subject imports into the United States to avoid antidumping and countervailing duty deposit requirements.46 Although the increasing volume of subject imports from India through the post-petition period resulted in higher end-of-period inventories for such imports at the end of the post- petition period than at the end of the pre-petition period,47 those imports are in Alcomex’s inventory and ***48 and entered the U.S. market at higher prices than the imports that entered during the pre-petition period.49 In light of the foregoing, including the increased volume of subject imports from India in the post-petition being a continuation of an upward trajectory, and stemming from a supply agreement, that predated the filing of the petitions, and the higher inventory level of subject imports in the post-petition period being constituted of increasingly higher-priced imports, we do not find that these imports are likely to undermine seriously the effect of the antidumping duty or countervailing duty orders. We have also taken into account the Petitioners’ withdrawal of their critical circumstances allegations regarding the subject imports from India. Consequently, we find that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to subject imports 43 Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.5 (based on unrounded data). 44 See Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.5 & Figure 1.1. 45 See Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 3; see also Respondent Alcomex Postconference Brief, EDIS Doc. 837928 (Nov. 22, 2024) (“Alcomex Postconf. Br.”) at 7; Supplemental CR/PR at 1.6 n.13. 46 See Supplemental CR/PR at Table 1.5 & Figure 1.1. 47 See Supplemental CR/PR at Tables 1.6 and C.1. Questionnaire data show that inventories of subject merchandise subject to Commerce’s critical circumstances determinations as of the end of March 31, 2025, were *** pounds or *** percent higher than at the end of December 31, 2024 – a period two months after the petitions were filed (October 29, 2024). Id. at Table 1.6. End-of-period inventories on March 31, 2025, were equivalent to *** percent of apparent U.S. consumption during the three-month interim period. Calculated from id. at Tables 1.6 & C.1. 48 Alcomex Suppl. Final Comments at 3. 49 Prices for sales of the domestic product were generally higher in the first quarter of 2025 than the last quarter of 2024. CR/PR at Table 5.12. Moreover, prices of Indian overhead door springs increased from the third quarter of 2024 through the first quarter of 2025, and the margins of underselling declined in each of these successive quarters. Id. at Tables 5.4—5.6. 14 from India that are subject to Commerce’s final affirmative determinations of critical circumstances in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. Conclusion For the reasons stated above, we determine that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of subject imports of overhead door springs from India that are sold in the United States at LTFV and subsidized by the government of India. We also find that critical circumstances do not exist with respect to imports from India that are subject to Commerce’s final affirmative critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. 1.1 Part 1: Introduction Background These investigations result from petitions filed with the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“USITC” or “Commission”) by IDC Group, Inc. (“IDC Spring”), Minneapolis, Minnesota, Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc. (“Iowa Spring”), Adel, Iowa, and Service Spring Corp. (“Service Spring”), Maumee, Ohio (collectively, “Petitioners”), on October 29, 2024, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured and threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized and less-than-fair-value (“LTFV”) imports overhead door counterbalance torsion springs (“overhead door springs”) 1 from China and India. Table 1.1 presents information relating to the background of these investigations.2 3 1 For a complete description of the merchandise subject to this proceeding, see the section entitled “The Subject Merchandise” in Part 1 of USITC Publication 5675, September 2025. 2 Pertinent Federal Register notices are referenced in appendix A, and may be found at the Commission’s website (www.usitc.gov). 3 Appendix B presents Commerce’s final affirmative determinations with respect to subject imports from India. On November 14, 2025, Commerce issued a memorandum stating that as a result of the cessation of government operations it would be tolling certain deadlines in antidumping duty and countervailing duty proceedings by 47 days. Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated November 14, 2025 (First Tolling Memo). Commerce subsequently issued a second memorandum stating that it would toll its deadlines by a further 21 days. Commerce Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of all Case Deadlines,’’ dated November 24, 2025 (Second Tolling Memo). 1.2 Table 1.1 Overhead door springs: Information relating to the background and schedule of this proceeding Effective date Action October 29, 2024 Petitions filed with Commerce and the Commission; institution of the Commission's investigations (89 FR 87598, November 4, 2024) November 18, 2024 Commerce’s notice of initiation of LTFV investigations (89 FR 92895, November 25, 2024) November 18, 2024 Commerce’s notice of initiation of countervailing duty investigations (89 FR 92901, November 25, 2024) December 13, 2024 Commission’s preliminary determinations (89 FR 103877, December 19, 2024) April 3, 2025 Commerce’s preliminary CVD determinations with respect to China and India and alignment of final CVD determinations with final AD determinations (90 FR 14630 and 14602, April 3, 2025) June 2, 2025 Commerce’s preliminary AD determination with respect to China (90 FR 23311, June 2, 2025); Commerce’s preliminary AD determinations with respect to India, postponement of final determination, and extension of provisional measures (90 FR 23316, June 2, 2025); scheduling of final phase of Commission’s investigations (90 FR 24665, June 11, 2025) June 17, 2025 Revision to the schedule of the Commission’s final phase investigations (90 FR 26608, June 23, 2025) July 16, 2025 Commerce’s preliminary affirmative critical circumstances determinations with respect to China in the CVD investigation (90 FR 31960, July 16, 2025) July 29, 2025 Commerce’s preliminary affirmative critical circumstances determinations with respect to China and India in the LTFV investigations (90 FR 35662, July 29, 2025); Commerce’s preliminary affirmative critical circumstances determinations with respect to India in the CVD investigation (90 FR 35660, July 29, 2025) August 12, 2025 Cancellation of the Commission’s hearing (90 FR 39420, August 15, 2025) August 15, 2025 Commerce’s final AD determination with respect to China, and final affirmative critical circumstances determination, in part (90 FR 39369, August 15, 2025); Commerce’s final CVD determination with respect to China, and final affirmative critical circumstances determination, in part (90 FR 39374, August 15, 2025) September 15, 2025 Commission’s vote (China) September 30, 2025 Commission’s determination and views (China) December 31, 2025 Commerce’s final AD determination with respect to India (90 FR 61366, December 31, 2025); Commerce’s final CVD determination with respect to India (90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025) December 31, 2025 Scheduling of final phase of Commission’s trailing investigations (91 FR 1196, January 12, 2026) January 23, 2026 Commerce’s AD and CVD orders on China (91 FR 2911, January 23, 2026) February 4, 2026 Commission’s vote (India) February 17, 2026 Commission’s views (India) 1.3 The information contained in this report is intended to be used in conjunction with data presented in the Commission’s report on Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746 and 731-TA-1724, USITC Publication 5675, September 2025, and its corresponding confidential report contained in memorandum No. INV-XX-117, Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China and India (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746-747 and 731-TA-1724-1725, revised by memorandum No. INV-XX-118 (September 8, 2025).4 No new information except for Commerce’s final determination of subsidization of overhead door springs in India and Commerce’ final LTFV determinations concerning overhead door springs from India, and party comments thereon is included in the record for this proceeding.5 Nature and extent of subsidies and sales at LTFV Subsidies On December 31, 2025, Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register of its final determinations of countervailable subsidies for producers and exporters of overhead door springs from India.6 Table 1.2 presents Commerce’s findings of subsidization of overhead door springs in India. Table 1.2 Overhead door springs: Commerce’s final subsidy determinations with respect to imports from India Entity Final countervailable subsidy rate (percent) Alcomex Springs Pvt Ltd 172.08 Asha Spring and Engineering Company 172.08 Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd 172.08 Modern Engineering & Spring Company 172.08 Reliable Springs Ltd 172.08 All Others 172.08 Source: 90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025. Note: Rates are based on facts available with adverse inferences. For further information on programs determined to be countervailable, see Commerce’s associated Issues and Decision Memorandum. 4 Appendix C of this report reproduces summary data referenced in the Commission’s views. 5 Comments consistent with the statutory limitation for subsequently completed investigations were filed on behalf of petitioners IDC Group, Iowa Spring, and Service Spring and on behalf of respondents Alcomex Beheer B.V., Alcomex Springs Pvt Ltd., and Alcomex Springs Inc. 6 90 FR 45720, September 23, 2025. 1.4 Sales at LTFV On December 31, 2025, Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register of its final determination of sales at LTFV with respect to imports from India.7 Table 1.3 presents Commerce’s dumping margins with respect to imports of overhead door springs from India. Table 1.3 Overhead door springs: Commerce’s final weighted-average LTFV margins with respect to imports from India Exporter/producer Final dumping margin (percent) Alcomex Springs Pvt Ltd 126.14 Asha Spring and Engineering Company 126.14 Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd 126.14 Modern Engineering & Spring Company 126.14 Reliable Springs Ltd 126.14 All others 86.45 Source: 90 FR 61366, December 31, 2025. Note: Weighted-average dumping margins for Alcomex Springs Pvt Ltd, Asha Spring and Engineering Company, Balaji Springs Pvt. Ltd, Modern Engineering & Spring Company, and Reliable Springs Ltd are based on facts available with adverse inferences. Negligibility The statute requires that an investigation be terminated without an injury determination if imports of the subject merchandise are found to be negligible.8 Negligible imports are generally defined in the Act, as amended, as imports from a country of merchandise corresponding to a domestic like product where such imports account for less than 3 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States in the most recent 12-month period for which data are available that precedes the filing of the petition or the initiation of the investigation. However, if there are imports of such merchandise from a number of countries subject to investigations initiated on the same day that individually account for less than 3 percent of the total volume of the subject merchandise, and if the imports from those countries collectively account for more than 7 percent of the volume of all such merchandise imported into the United States during the applicable 12-month period, then 7 90 FR 61366, December 31, 2025. 8 Sections 703(a)(1), 705(b)(1), 733(a)(1), and 735(b)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a)(1), 1671d(b)(1), 1673b(a)(1), and 1673d(b)(1)). 1.5 imports from such countries are deemed not to be negligible.9 As presented in table 1.4, neither subject imports from China nor subject imports from India accounted for less than 3 percent of total imports of overhead door springs from October 2023 through September 2024. Table 1.4 Overhead door springs: U.S. imports in the twelve-month period preceding the filing of the petition, October 2023 through September 2024 Quantity in 1,000 pounds; share in percent Source of imports Quantity Share of quantity China *** *** India *** *** Subject sources *** *** Nonsubject sources *** *** All import sources 20,335 100.0 Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires, and from third-party bill of lading data (Panjiva) provided to the Commission by counsel for the petitioner, accessed on June 9, 2025. Third-party data were used to report for data not accounted for in submissions to Commission questionnaires. Zeroes, null values, and undefined calculations are suppressed and shown as “—“. Note: These data reflect Commerce’s final antidumping and countervailing duty determinations for overhead door springs from India (90 FR 61366 and 90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025), and are consistent with table 4.4 in memorandum No. INV‐XX-117, Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China and India (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746-747 and 731-TA-1724-1725, revised by memorandum No. INV-XX-118 (September 8, 2025) and Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746 and 731-TA-1724, USITC Publication 5675, September 2025. Note: Share of quantity is the share of total imports by quantity. Critical circumstances On December 31, 2025, Commerce issued its final determination that “critical circumstances” exist with respect to imports of overhead door springs from India with respect to all producers and/or exporters of overhead door springs in the antidumping duty investigation.10 On the same date, Commerce issued its final determination that critical 9 Section 771 (24) of the Act (19 U.S.C § 1677(24)). 10 90 FR 61366, December 31, 2025, referenced in app. A. When petitioners file timely allegations of critical circumstances, Commerce examines whether there is a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that (1) either there is a history of dumping and material injury by reason of dumped imports in the United States or elsewhere of the subject merchandise, or the person by whom, or for whose account, the merchandise was imported knew or should have known that the exporter was selling the subject merchandise at LTFV and that there was likely to be material injury by reason of such sales; and (2) there have been massive imports of the subject merchandise over a relatively short period. Petitioners withdrew their allegations of critical circumstances with regard to India. Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China (Final), Inv. Nos. 701-TA-746 and 731-TA-1724, USITC Publication 5675, September 2025. 1.6 circumstances exist with respect to Alcomex Springs Pvt. Ltd. (“Alcomex”), the non-selected respondents, and all other producers and/or exporters of subject merchandise in the countervailing duty investigation.11 In these investigations, if both Commerce and the Commission make affirmative final critical circumstances determinations, certain subject imports may be subject to antidumping duties retroactive by 90 days from June 2, 2025, the effective date of Commerce’s preliminary affirmative LTFV determination, and to countervailing duties retroactive by 90 days from April 3, 2025, the effective date of Commerce’s preliminary affirmative countervailing duty determination. Tables 1.5 and 1.6, as well as figure 1.1, present these data.12 13 Table 1.5 Overhead door springs: U.S. imports from India subject to Commerce’s affirmative final critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, by month Quantity in 1,000 pounds Month Relation to petition Quantity June 2024 Before 131 July 2024 Before 328 August 2024 Before 470 September 2024 Before 500 October 2024 Before 712 November 2024 After 874 December 2024 After 908 January 2025 After 1,261 February 2025 After 1,049 March 2025 After 1,126 Table continued. 11 90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025. 12 Imports from India by Alcomex Springs Private Limited (“Alcomex Springs”) accounted for *** percent of total imports under the primary HTS statistical reporting numbers 7320.20.5020, 7320.20.5045, and 7320.20.5060 during January 1, 2022, through March 31, 2025. 13 ***. Email from ***, July 18, 2025. ***. Respondent Alcomex’s postconference brief, p. 8, and Exhibit 1, Attachment A. See also ***'s purchaser questionnaire response, questions II-3 and II-4. 1.7 Table 1.5 (Continued) Overhead door springs: U.S. imports from India subject to Commerce’s affirmative final critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, by differing number of months before and after the filing of the petition Quantity in 1,000 pounds Comparison of pre- and post petition periods Cumulative before period quantity Cumulative after period quantity Difference in percent 1 month 712 874 22.8 2 months 1,212 1,782 47.1 3 months 1,682 3,044 81.0 4 months 2,010 4,092 103.6 5 months 2,141 5,218 143.7 Source: Official U.S. import statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce Census Bureau using HTS statistical reporting number 7320.20.5020, 7320.20.5045, and 7320.20.5060, accessed August 11, 2025. Imports are based on the imports for consumption data series. Figure 1.1 Overhead door springs: U.S. imports from India subject to Commerce’s final critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, by month Source: Official U.S. import statistics of the U.S. Department of Commerce Census Bureau using HTS statistical reporting number 7320.20.5020, 7320.20.5045, and 7320.20.5060, accessed August 11, 2025. Imports are based on the imports for consumption data series. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 2025 Quantity (1,000 pounds) Post-petition U.S. imports 1.8 Table 1.6 Overhead door springs: U.S. importers’ end-of-month inventories from India subject to Commerce’s affirmative final critical circumstances determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, by month Quantity in 1,000 pounds; Index in percent where December 31, 2024 = 100.0 percent. Date Quantity Index March 31, 2024 *** *** December 31, 2024 *** 100.0 March 31, 2025 *** *** Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. Available data from the questionnaire reflect end of period inventories for 2024 and the end of quarter 1 for 2025. Additional periods for inventories were not available. Note: Alcomex accounted for between *** and *** percent of subject inventories from India during the dates presented above, and accounted for *** percent of subject inventories from India over the entire period for which data were collected. A.1 APPENDIX A FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES A.3 The Commission makes available notices relevant to its investigations and reviews on its website, www.usitc.gov. In addition, the following tabulation presents, in chronological order, Federal Register notices issued by the Commission and Commerce during the current proceeding. Citation Title Link 89 FR 87598, November 4, 2024 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Notice of Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2024-11-04/pdf/2024-25551.pdf 89 FR 92895, November 25, 2024 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China and India: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2024-11-25/pdf/2024-27495.pdf 89 FR 92901, November 25, 2024 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China and India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2024-11-25/pdf/2024-27494.pdf 89 FR 103877, December 19, 2024 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2024-12-19/pdf/2024-30086.pdf 90 FR 84, January 2, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India and the People's Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing Duty Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-01-02/pdf/2024-31485.pdf 90 FR 11716, March 11, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China and India: Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair- Value Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-03-11/pdf/2025-03835.pdf 90 FR 14630, April 3, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-04-03/pdf/2025-05758.pdf 90 FR 14602, April 3, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-04-03/pdf/2025-05759.pdf A.4 90 FR 15447, April 11, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination; Correction https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-04-11/pdf/2025-06224.pdf 90 FR 23311, June 2, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-06-02/pdf/2025-09944.pdf 90 FR 23316, June 2, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-06-02/pdf/2025-09945.pdf 90 FR 24665, June 11, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-06-11/pdf/2025-10543.pdf 90 FR 26608, June 23, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-06-23/pdf/2025-11464.pdf 90 FR 31960, July 16, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Countervailing Duty Investigation https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-07-16/pdf/2025-13323.pdf 90 FR 35662, July 29, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India and the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determinations of Critical Circumstances, in Part, in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-07-29/pdf/2025-14337.pdf 90 FR 35660, July 29, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances in the Countervailing Duty Investigation https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-07-29/pdf/2025-14338.pdf 90 FR 39369, August 15, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-08-15/pdf/2025-15522.pdf A.5 90 FR 39374, August 15, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination in Part https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-08-15/pdf/2025-15525.pdf 90 FR 39420, August 15, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Cancellation of Hearing for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-08-15/pdf/2025-15532.pdf 90 FR 47820, October 2, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China; Determinations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-10-02/pdf/2025-19320.pdf 90 FR 61366, December 31, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-12-31/pdf/2025-24031.pdf 90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2025-12-31/pdf/2025-24032.pdf 91 FR 1196, January 12, 2026 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2026-01-12/pdf/2026-00347.pdf 91 FR 2911, January 23, 2026 Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2026-01-23/pdf/2026-01282.pdf B.1 APPENDIX B COMMERCE'S FINAL LTFV AND CVD DETERMINATIONS C.1 APPENDIX C SUMMARY DATA Table C.1 Overhead door springs: Summary data concerning the U.S. total market, by item and period Interim Item 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2022–24 2022–23 2023–24 2024–25 U.S. total market consumption quantity: Amount................................................... 181,447 157,640 162,044 40,745 40,328 ▼(10.7) ▼(13.1) ▲2.8 ▼(1.0) Producers' share (fn1)............................. 94.9 93.3 88.9 88.8 83.6 ▼(6.0) ▼(1.7) ▼(4.3) ▼(5.2) Importers' share (fn1): China.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** India................................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Subject sources.............................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** Nonsubject sources........................ *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** *** ▲*** ▲*** All import sources....................... 5.1 6.7 11.1 11.2 16.4 ▲6.0 ▲1.7 ▲4.3 ▲5.2 U.S. total market consumption value: Amount................................................... 352,161 251,750 241,803 60,631 61,450 ▼(31.3) ▼(28.5) ▼(4.0) ▲1.4 Producers' share (fn1)............................. 95.0 95.4 90.0 92.0 83.0 ▼(5.0) ▲0.4 ▼(5.4) ▼(9.0) Importers' share (fn1): China.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** India................................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Subject sources.............................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Nonsubject sources........................ *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** *** ▲*** ▲*** All import sources....................... 5.0 4.6 10.0 8.0 17.0 ▲5.0 ▼(0.4) ▲5.4 ▲9.0 U.S. importers' U.S. shipments of imports from (fn2): China: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Unit value........................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Ending inventory quantity.................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** India: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Unit value........................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Ending inventory quantity.................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Subject sources: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** ▲*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Unit value........................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Ending inventory quantity.................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Nonsubject sources: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** *** ▲*** ▲*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** *** ▲*** ▲*** Unit value........................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** *** ▲*** ▲*** Ending inventory quantity.................... *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** All import sources: Quantity.............................................. 9,178 10,636 17,974 4,566 6,602 ▲95.8 ▲15.9 ▲69.0 ▲44.6 Value.................................................. 17,579 11,490 24,205 4,873 10,449 ▲37.7 ▼(34.6) ▲110.7 ▲114.4 Unit value........................................... $1.92 $1.08 $1.35 $1.07 $1.58 ▼(29.7) ▼(43.6) ▲24.7 ▲48.3 Ending inventory quantity.................... 2,100 1,542 3,241 2,895 4,011 ▲54.3 ▼(26.6) ▲110.1 ▲38.6 U.S. producers': Practical capacity quantity....................... 206,427 215,248 215,248 56,362 49,811 ▲4.3 ▲4.3 — ▼(11.6) Production quantity................................. 172,240 147,322 144,995 35,921 35,722 ▼(15.8) ▼(14.5) ▼(1.6) ▼(0.6) Capacity utilization (fn1).......................... 83.4 68.4 67.4 63.7 71.7 ▼(16.1) ▼(15.0) ▼(1.1) ▲8.0 U.S. shipments: Quantity.............................................. 172,269 147,004 144,071 36,179 33,726 ▼(16.4) ▼(14.7) ▼(2.0) ▼(6.8) Value.................................................. 334,582 240,260 217,598 55,757 51,001 ▼(35.0) ▼(28.2) ▼(9.4) ▼(8.5) Unit value........................................... $1.94 $1.63 $1.51 $1.54 $1.51 ▼(22.2) ▼(15.8) ▼(7.6) ▼(1.9) Export shipments: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** Unit value........................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Table continued. C.3 Quantity=1,000 pounds; Value=1,000 dollars; Unit values, unit labor costs, and unit expenses=dollars per pound; Period changes=percent--exceptions noted; Interim period is January through March Reported data Period change comparisons Calendar year Interim Calendar year Total market Table C.1 Continued Overhead door springs: Summary data concerning the U.S. total market, by item and period Interim Item 2022 2023 2024 2024 2025 2022–24 2022–23 2023–24 2024–25 U.S. producers': Continued Ending inventory quantity........................ 8,323 6,872 6,185 6,260 7,619 ▼(25.7) ▼(17.4) ▼(10.0) ▲21.7 Inventories/total shipments (fn1)............. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** Production workers................................. 624 599 580 580 524 ▼(7.1) ▼(4.0) ▼(3.2) ▼(9.7) Hours worked (1,000s)............................ 1,179 1,140 1,073 286 258 ▼(9.0) ▼(3.3) ▼(5.8) ▼(10.0) Wages paid ($1,000)............................... 29,409 26,383 26,141 7,200 6,346 ▼(11.1) ▼(10.3) ▼(0.9) ▼(11.9) Hourly wages (dollars per hour)............... $24.94 $23.15 $24.36 $25.15 $24.63 ▼(2.3) ▼(7.2) ▲5.2 ▼(2.0) Productivity (pounds per hour)................ 146.1 129.3 135.1 125.5 138.7 ▼(7.5) ▼(11.5) ▲4.5 ▲10.5 Unit labor costs....................................... $0.17 $0.18 $0.18 $0.20 $0.18 ▲5.6 ▲4.9 ▲0.7 ▼(11.4) Net sales: Quantity.............................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Value.................................................. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Unit value........................................... $2.16 $1.82 $1.69 $1.74 $1.68 ▼(21.5) ▼(15.7) ▼(6.8) ▼(3.7) Cost of goods sold (COGS)..................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Gross profit or (loss) (fn3)....................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** SG&A expenses...................................... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▼*** ▲*** ▲*** Operating income or (loss) (fn3).............. *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Net income or (loss) (fn3)........................ *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** Unit COGS.............................................. $1.54 $1.40 $1.37 $1.41 $1.34 ▼(11.0) ▼(8.9) ▼(2.4) ▼(5.1) Unit SG&A expenses.............................. $0.20 $0.24 $0.25 $0.25 $0.27 ▲24.4 ▲16.7 ▲6.5 ▲8.2 Unit operating income or (loss) (fn3)....... $0.41 $0.18 $0.07 $0.08 $0.07 ▼(82.8) ▼(57.2) ▼(59.8) ▼(15.1) Unit net income or (loss) (fn3)................. $0.41 $0.17 $0.07 $0.08 $0.07 ▼(83.5) ▼(58.0) ▼(60.8) ▼(14.8) COGS/sales (fn1).................................... 71.5 77.3 81.0 80.9 79.7 ▲9.5 ▲5.8 ▲3.7 ▼(1.2) Operating income or (loss)/sales (fn1)..... 19.2 9.7 4.2 4.8 4.2 ▼(15.0) ▼(9.4) ▼(5.5) ▼(0.6) Net income or (loss)/sales (fn1)............... 19.1 9.5 4.0 4.7 4.2 ▼(15.1) ▼(9.6) ▼(5.5) ▼(0.5) Capital expenditures............................... *** *** *** *** *** ▼*** ▼*** ▼*** ▲*** Research and development expenses..... *** *** *** *** *** ▲*** ▲*** ▼*** ▼*** Total assets............................................ 112,130 106,325 102,067 NA NA ▼(9.0) ▼(5.2) ▼(4.0) *** fn1.--Reported data are in percent and period changes are in percentage points. Note.--Shares and ratios shown as “0.0” percent represent non-zero values less than “0.05” percent (if positive) and greater than “(0.05)” percent (if negative). Zeroes, null values, and undefined calculations are suppressed and shown as “—“. Period changes preceded by a “▲” represent an increase, while period changes preceded by a “▼” represent a decrease. Calendar year Interim Calendar year Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires, and from third-party bill of lading data (Panjiva) provided to the Commission by the (petitioner) counsel, accessed on June 9, 2025. Third-party data were used to report for data not accounted for in submissions to Commission questionnaires. 508- compliant tables for these data are contained in parts 3, 4, 6, and 7 of this report. fn2.--Value data for imports listed in the Panjiva dataset are derived by multiplying the quantity of imports from a given source and period (as reported in the third-party dataset and adjusted by responses to Commission questionnaires) by the average unit value of imports from a given source and period as reported in Commission questionnaire responses. fn3.--Percent changes only calculated when both comparison values represent profits; The directional change in profitability provided when one or both comparison values represent a loss. Quantity=1,000 pounds; Value=1,000 dollars; Unit values, unit labor costs, and unit expenses=dollars per pound; Period changes=percent--exceptions noted; Interim period is January through March Reported data Period change comparisons ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling (3) === 1196 Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2026 / Notices PROCESSING AND FILING FEE TABLE—Continued Document/action FY 2026 fee Application for assignment or sublease of record title or overriding royalty ................................................................................ 85 Onshore Oil and Gas Operations and Production (parts 3160, 3170): Application for Permit to Drill ........................................................................................................................................................ 12,850 * To record a mining claim or site location, this processing fee along with the initial maintenance fee and the one-time location fee required by statute and at 43 CFR part 3833 must be paid. Tina Roberts-Ashby, Acting Assistant Director, Office of Energy, Minerals, and Realty Management. [FR Doc. 2026–00386 Filed 1–9–26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4331–27–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–747 and 731– TA–1725 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. DATES : Effective December 31, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Peter Stebbins ((202) 205–2039), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal ((202) 205–1810). Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary ((202) 205–2000). General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Effective June 2, 2025, the Commission established a general schedule for the conduct of the final phase of its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India, following preliminary determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) that such imports were being subsidized by the governments of China and India and being sold at less than fair value. Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24665), subsequently revised on June 17, 2025 (90 FR 26608, June 23, 2025). The Commission cancelled its public hearing effective August 12, 2025 (90 FR 39420, August 15, 2025). Commerce has issued a final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations with respect to overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China (90 FR 39369 and 90 FR 39374, August 15, 2025). The Commission subsequently issued its final determinations that an industry in the United States was materially injured by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China, provided for in subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by Commerce to be sold in the United States at less than fair value, and imports of the subject merchandise from China that have been found to be subsidized by the government of China (90 FR 47820, October 2, 2025). Commerce issued a final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations with respect to imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India (90 FR 61366 and 90 FR 61369, December 31, 2025). Accordingly, the Commission currently is issuing a supplemental schedule for its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. This supplemental schedule is as follows: the deadline for filing supplemental party comments on final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations with respect to imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India is 5:15 p.m. on January 15, 2026. Supplemental party comments may address only Commerce’s final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations with respect to imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. These supplemental final comments may not contain new factual information and may not exceed five (5) pages in length. The supplemental staff report in the final phase of the current investigations will be placed in the nonpublic record on January 28, 2026, and a public version will be issued thereafter. For further information concerning this proceeding see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 8, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2026–00347 Filed 1–9–26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:06 Jan 09, 2026 Jkt 268001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === A–533–936 - India AD === Federal Register :: Request Access { "imports": { "application": "/assets/application-cc464116.js", "@hotwired/turbo-rails": "/assets/turbo.min-86bf8853.js", "@hotwired/stimulus": "/assets/stimulus.min-7ea3d58b.js", "@hotwired/stimulus-loading": "/assets/stimulus-loading-25917588.js", "controllers/application": "/assets/controllers/application-e5a449db.js", "controllers/site_feedback_controller": "/assets/controllers/site_feedback_controller-a99fc93f.js", "controllers/unblock_controller": "/assets/controllers/unblock_controller-9520f896.js" } } import "application" Request Access Due to aggressive automated scraping of FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov, programmatic access to these sites is limited to access to our extensive developer APIs. Please visit FederalRegister.gov API documentation or eCFR.gov API documentation to learn more about how to access the API. Your request has been flagged as potentially automated. If you are human user receiving this message, please complete the CAPTCHA (bot test) below and click "Request Access". You may occassionally be asked to complete the CAPTCHA again, this is normal and part of our security measures. unblock#handleSubmit"> Request Access An official website of the United States government. If you experiencing issues with the CAPTCHA or want to request a wider IP range, you can use the "Site Help" button found in the lower, right of this page to make a request. × IP Access Help This contact form is only for IP Access help. Please do not provide confidential information or personal data. * Your Name * Email * How can we help you? Upload Attachment * I am requesting technical help. site-feedback#openModal" aria-label="Open site help form"> Site Help ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Hearing Cancellation === 39420 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 156 / Friday, August 15, 2025 / Notices and BPI service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these investigations available to authorized applicants representing interested parties (as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9)) who are parties to the investigations under the APO issued in the investigations, provided that the application is made not later than seven days after the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Conference.—The Office of Investigations will hold a staff conference in connection with the preliminary phase of these investigations beginning at 9:30 a.m. on September 2, 2025. Requests to appear at the conference should be emailed to preliminaryconferences@usitc.gov (DO NOT FILE ON EDIS) on or before noon on August 28, 2025. Please provide an email address for each conference participant in the email. Information on conference procedures, format, and participation, including guidance for requests to appear as a witness via videoconference, will be available on the Commission’s Public Calendar (Calendar (USITC) | United States International Trade Commission). A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to participate by submitting a short statement. Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Written submissions.—As provided in §§ 201.8 and 207.15 of the Commission’s rules, any person may submit to the Commission on or before 5:15 p.m. on September 5, 2025, a written brief containing information and arguments pertinent to the subject matter of the investigations. Parties shall file written testimony and supplementary material in connection with their presentation at the conference no later than 4:00 p.m. on August 29, 2025. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with these investigations must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that any information that it submits to the Commission during these investigations may be disclosed to and used: (i) by the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of these or related investigations or reviews, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.12 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 12, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–15518 Filed 8–14–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–746–747 and 731–TA–1724–1725 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Cancellation of Hearing for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. DATES : August 12, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Peter Stebbins (202–205–2035), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On June 2, 2025, the Commission established a schedule for the final phase of the subject antidumping and countervailing duty investigations (90 FR 24665, June 11, 2025), and on June 17, 2025, the Commission issued a revision to this schedule (90 FR 26608, June 23, 2025). On July 30, 2025, counsel for Alcomex Beheer B.V., Alcomex Springs Pvt Ltd., and Alcomex Springs Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Alcomex’’) informed the Commission that Alcomex was withdrawing its appearance in these investigations, and no longer planned to appear at any hearing or file any briefs. On August 5, 2025, counsel for IDC Group, Inc., Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., and Service Spring Corp. (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’) filed a request that the Commission cancel the scheduled hearing for this proceeding and indicated a willingness to respond to any Commission questions in lieu of an actual hearing. On August 11, 2025, counsel for Petitioners filed a request to appear at the hearing, in the event that the Commission did not cancel the hearing, and stated that they continue to request a cancellation of the hearing, due to the reasons set forth in their August 5, 2025 submission. No other parties submitted a request to appear at the hearing. Consequently, the public hearing in connection with this proceeding, scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m. on August 15, 2025, is cancelled. Parties to this proceeding should respond to any written questions posed by the Commission in their posthearing briefs, which are due to be filed on August 22, 2025. For further information concerning this proceeding, see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Aug 14, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM 15AUN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 39421Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 156 / Friday, August 15, 2025 / Notices (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 12, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–15532 Filed 8–14–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—ODVA, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on July 14, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ODVA, Inc. (‘‘ODVA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, GP Systems GmbH, Munchen, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; Moore Industries- International, Inc., North Hills, CA; Highlight Tech Corp., Tainan City, REPUBLIC OF CHINA (TAIWAN); NDW BV, Waalwijk, KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS; Hollysys Technology Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Zhejiang HuaRay Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Laumas Elettronica s.r.l., Montechiarugolo, ITALY; and Leonton Technologies Co., Ltd., New Taipei City, REPUBLIC OF CHINA (TAIWAN), have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Industrial Indexing Systems, Inc., Victor, NY; Herkules-Resotec Elektronik GmbH, Baunatal, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; Mecco Partners, LLC, Cranberry Township, PA; and Microchip Technology Inc., Chandler, AZ, have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 6039). The last notification was filed with the Department on April 9, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16705). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025–15498 Filed 8–14–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—National Armaments Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on July 11, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), National Armaments Consortium (‘‘NAC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Temper Corp., Fonda, NY; Composite Energy Technologies, Inc., Bristol, RI; FIDELIUM LLC, Virginia Beach, VA; Two Six Labs LLC dba Two Six Technologies, Arlington, VA; Busek Co., Inc., Natick, MA; ITT Enidine, Orchard Park, NY; Kurt Manufacturing Company, Minneapolis, MN; MGCX Solutions LLC, Glen Allen, VA; GrammaTech, Ithaca, NY; CGI Federal, Inc., Fairfax, VA; AISensation LLC, Mission Viejo, CA; Onebrief, Honolulu, HI; Jabil Defense and Aerospace Services LLC, St Petersburg, FL; Synergistic, Inc., New Baltimore, MI; Star Cases LLC dba Zero Manufacturing, North Salt Lake, UT; PavCon LLC, Latrobe, PA; UT–BATTELLE LLC, Oak Ridge, TN; Elementum 3D, Inc., Erie, CO; PARADORN LLC, La Plata, MD; Teleios Defense Solutions LLC, Huntsville, AL; TEC–MASTERS, INC., Huntsville, AL; Walaris LLC, Peachtree Corners, GA; Repkon USA—Defense LLC, Tampa, FL; Velocity Magnetics, Inc., New Castle, PA; Allen Control Systems, Inc., Austin, TX; Katz Water Technologies, Inc., Houston, TX; Global Business Solutions LLC (GBSI), Pensacola, FL; RJ Lee Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA; SATCOM Direct Government LLC, Melbourne, FL; Chronos AI, Inc., Bellevue, WA; Parts Life, Inc., Moorestown, NJ; Scout AI, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Next Tier Concepts, Inc., Vienna, VA; One Kappa Corp. (Icarus, fka) dba Ikaros Industries East, Amherst, NY have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NAC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On May 2, 2000, NAC filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 30, 2000 (65 FR 40693). The last notification was filed with the Department on February 17, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16701). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025–15576 Filed 8–14–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—UHD Alliance Notice is hereby given that, on July 25, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), UHD Alliance, Inc. (‘‘UHD Alliance’’) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Sony Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN has withdrawn as a party to this venture. Also, Top Victory Investments Limited, has changed its name to MMD Hong Kong Holding Limited, Amsterdam, KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Aug 14, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM 15AUN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 24665Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 11, 2025 / Notices Issued: June 5, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–10535 Filed 6–10–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–20–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–746–747 and 731–TA–1724–1725 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the final phase of antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–746–747 and 731–TA–1724– 1725 (Final) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India, provided for in subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, preliminarily determined by the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be subsidized and sold at less-than-fair-value. DATES : June 2, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Peter Stebbins ((202) 205–2039), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Scope.—For purposes of these investigations, Commerce has defined the subject merchandise as helically- wound, overhead door counterbalance torsion steel springs and any cones, plugs or other similar fittings for mounting and creating torque in the spring (herein collectively referred to as cones) attached to or entered with and invoiced with the subject overhead door counterbalance torsion springs. Overhead door counterbalance torsion springs are helical steel springs with tightly wound coils that store and release mechanical energy by winding and unwinding along the spring’s axis by an angle, using torque to create a lifting force in the counterbalance assembly typically used to raise and lower overhead doors, including garage doors, industrial rolling doors, warehouse doors, trailer doors, and other overhead doors, gates, grates, or similar devices. The merchandise covered by this investigation covers all overhead door counterbalance torsion springs with a coil inside diameter of 15.8 millimeters (mm) or more but not exceeding 304.8 mm (measured across the diameter from inner edge to inner edge); a wire diameter of 2.5 mm to 20.4 mm; a length of 127 mm or more; and regardless of the following characteristics: • Wire type (including, but not limited to, oil-tempered wire, hard- drawn wire, music wire, galvanized or other coated wire); • Wire cross-sectional shape (e.g., round, square, or other shapes); • Coating (e.g., uncoated, oil- or water-based coatings, lubricant coatings, zinc, aluminum, zinc-aluminum, paint or plastic coating, etc.); • Winding orientation (left-hand or right-hand wind direction); • End type (including, but not limited to, looped, double looped, clipped, long length, mini warehouse, Barcol, Crawford, Kinnear, Wagner, rolling steel or barrel ends); and • Whether the overhead door counterbalance torsion springs are fitted with hardware, including but not limited to fasteners, clips, and cones (winding or stationary cones). For purposes of the diameters referenced above, where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above. The steel torsion springs included in the scope of this investigation are produced from steel in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight. Subject merchandise includes cones attached to or entered with and invoiced with the subject overhead door counterbalance torsion springs. Such cones, which are typically cast aluminum, aluminum alloy or steel (but may be made from other materials) are made to mount the subject springs to the overhead door counterbalance system and create and maintain torque in the spring. Cones or other similar fittings that are not attached to the subject springs or are not entered with and invoiced with the subject springs are not included within the scope unless entered as parts of kits as described below. Subject merchandise also includes all subject overhead door counterbalance torsion springs and cones or other similar fittings for mounting and tensioning the spring entered as a part of overhead door kits, overhead door mounting or assembly kits, or as a part of a spring-operated motor assembly or as a part of a spring winder assembly kit for torsion springs. When counterbalance torsion springs and cones or other similar fittings for attaching and tensioning the torsion spring are entered as a part of such kits, only the counterbalance spring and cones or other similar fittings in the kit are within scope. Subject merchandise also includes overhead door counterbalance torsion springs that have been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to cutting to length, attachment of hardware, cones or end-fittings, inclusion in garage door kits or garage door mounting or assembly kits, or any other processing that would not remove the merchandise from the scope of this investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope overhead door counterbalance torsion springs. All products that meet the written physical description are within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products are specifically excluded from the scope of these investigations: • Leaf springs (slender arc-shaped length of spring steel of a rectangular cross-section); • Disc springs (conical springs consisting of a convex disc with the outer edge working against the center of the disc); • Extension springs (close-wound round helical wire springs that store and release energy by resisting the external pulling forces applied to the spring’s ends in the direction of its length); • Compression springs (helical coiled springs with open wound active coils (such open winding is also known as VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Jun 10, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES 24666 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 11, 2025 / Notices pitch) that are designed to compress under load or force); and • Spiral springs (torsion springs wound as concentric spirals such as a clock spring or mainspring). Background.—The final phase of these investigations is being scheduled pursuant to sections 705(b) and 731(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 1673d(b)), as a result of affirmative preliminary determinations by Commerce that certain benefits which constitute subsidies within the meaning of section 703 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b) are being provided to manufacturers, producers, or exporters in China and India of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs, and that such products are being sold in the United States at less than fair value within the meaning of section 733 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b). The investigations were requested in petitions filed on October 29, 2024, by IDC Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota; Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., Adel, Iowa; and Service Spring Corp., Maumee, Ohio. For further information concerning the conduct of this phase of the investigations, hearing procedures, and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Participation in the investigations and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the final phase of these investigations as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days prior to the hearing date specified in this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance during the preliminary phase of the investigations need not file an additional notice of appearance during this final phase. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigations. Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in the final phase of these investigations available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the investigations, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days prior to the hearing date specified in this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the investigations. A party granted access to BPI in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the final phase of these investigations will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 7, 2025, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to § 207.22 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the final phase of these investigations beginning at 9:30 a.m. on August 21, 2025. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before August 15, 2025. Any requests to appear as a witness via videoconference must be included with your request to appear. Requests to appear via videoconference must include a statement explaining why the witness cannot appear in person; the Chair, or other person designated to conduct the investigations, may in their discretion for good cause shown, grant such a request. Requests to appear as remote witness due to illness or a positive COVID–19 test result may be submitted by 3 p.m. the business day prior to the hearing. Further information about participation in the hearing will be posted on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/calendarpad/ calendar.html. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should attend a prehearing conference, if deemed necessary, to be held at 9:30 a.m. on August 20, 2025. Parties shall file and serve written testimony and presentation slides in connection with their presentation at the hearing by no later than noon on August 20, 2025. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party who is an interested party shall submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of § 207.23 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is August 14, 2025. Parties shall also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of § 207.25 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is August 28, 2025. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the investigations may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the investigations, including statements of support or opposition to the petition, on or before August 28, 2025. On September 9, 2025, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before September 11, 2025, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with § 207.30 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to § 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Jun 10, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES 24667Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 111 / Wednesday, June 11, 2025 / Notices not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff By order of the Commission. Issued: June 6, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–10543 Filed 6–10–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Naval Surface Technology & Innovation Notice is hereby given that, on April 9, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Naval Surface Technology & Innovation (‘‘NSTIC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advanced Cooling Technologies, Inc., Lancaster, NJ; AForge LLC, Lorton, VA; Airtronics LLC, Tucson, AZ; Allen Control Systems, Inc., Alexandria, VA; Armada Systems, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Bath Iron Works Corp., Bath, ME; Boon Logic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN; Computer Conversions Corp, East Northport, NY; Decryptor, Inc., Richardson, TX; Dynamic Dimension Technologies LLC, Westminster, MD; Einhorn Engineering PLLC, Seattle, WA; E.O. Solutions Corp., Las Vegas, NV; Fisica Applied Technologies, Inc., San Leandro, CA; IMR, Inc., Prentice, WI; Industry Defense Systems LLC, Lansdale, PA; Integrity Defense Solutions, Inc., Newport News, VA; Johnson Controls Navy Systems LLC, York, PA; Kongsberg Defense & Aerospace Inc., Johnstown, PA; Lynntech, Inc., College Station, TX; Marvin Engineering Company Inc., Inglewood, CA; Nano Nuclear Energy, Inc., New York, NY; Quantum Imaging Inc., Colorado Springs, CO; Rapid Innovation & Security Experts, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO; Red River Technology LLC, Claremont, NH; RJA Technologies LLC, New York, NY; Skyward Federal, Colorado Springs, CO; Sparton De Leon Springs LLC, De Leon Springs, FL; Star Lab Corp, Washington, DC; Sterling Computers Corp, North Sioux City, SD; Tanner Research, Inc., Duarte, CA; The Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and Training Center Pros, Inc. DBA EOD Gear, Franklin, TN, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Geocent LLC, Metairie, LA, has withdrawn as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NSTIC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On October 8, 2019, NSTIC filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 12, 2019 (84 FR 61071). The last notification was filed with the Department on January 13, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 28, 2025 (90 FR 10948). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025–10570 Filed 6–10–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Pistoia Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Heiter, Orinda, CA; Matriqx, Great Shelford, UNITED KINGDOM; ThoughtWorks, Inc., Chicago, IL; Lonza, Basel, SWISS CONFEDERATION; MAIN5, Frankfurt Am Main, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Redwood City, CA; Solid Compass, Guildford, UNITED KINGDOM; Lonza Pharma & Biotech, Basel, SWISS CONFEDERATION; H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, KINGDOM OF DENMARK; John Hollerton (individual member), St Albans, UNITED KINGDOM; and Kirk Brote (individual member), Durham, NV have joined as parties to this venture. Also, Nagarro, Munich, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY; Aitia, Somerville, MA; Syneos Health, Morrisville, NC; Bioteam, Middleton, MA; and BioNTech SE, Mainz, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364). The last notification was filed with the Department on February 12, 2025. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 7, 2025 (90 FR 11552). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025–10571 Filed 6–10–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Utility Broadband Alliance, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on April 16, 2025, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Utility Broadband Alliance, Inc. (‘‘UBBA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Actalent, Tulsa, OK; Akin Gump Strauss VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:32 Jun 10, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM 11JNN1 khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling (2) === 26608 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 118 / Monday, June 23, 2025 / Notices No petitions for Commission review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The Commission vote for this determination took place on June 17, 2025. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 17, 2025. Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2025–11401 Filed 6–20–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 701–TA–746–747 and 731–TA–1724–1725 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China and India; Revised Schedule for the Subject Investigations AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. DATES : June 17, 2025. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Peter Stebbins (202–205–2039), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On June 2, 2025, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the subject investigations (90 FR 24665, June 11, 2025). The Commission is revising its schedule to address scheduling conflicts. The Commission’s revised dates in the schedule are as follows: the prehearing staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 5, 2025; prehearing briefs and requests to appear at the hearing must be filed with the Secretary to the Commission not later than 5:15 p.m. on August 11, 2025; the prehearing conference will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building on August 13, 2025, if deemed necessary; parties shall file and serve written testimony and presentation slides in connection with their presentation at the hearing by no later than noon on August 14, 2025; the hearing will be held at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building at 9:30 a.m. on August 15, 2025; the deadline for filing posthearing briefs is 5:15 p.m. on August 22, 2025. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the investigations may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the investigations, including statements of support or opposition to the petition, on or before August 22, 2025. For further information concerning this proceeding, see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 18, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–11464 Filed 6–20–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation. No. 337–TA–1454] Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution of Investigation AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 16, 2025, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Estelgia, LLC of Dover, Delaware. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on June 3, 2025. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi Devices, Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices and Components Thereof by reason of the infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,936,714 (‘‘the ’714 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,246,016 (‘‘the ’016 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,735,973 (‘‘the ’973 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,531,518 (‘‘the ’518 patent’’); U.S. Patent No, 9,775,164 (‘‘the ’164 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 9,277,591(‘‘the’591 patent’’). The complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES : The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 17, 2025, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:29 Jun 20, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination (2) === 8270 Federal Register / Vol. 91, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2026 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 90 FR 61366 and 61369 (December 31, 2025). 3 The Commission also finds that imports subject to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances determination are not likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India. 4 90 FR 39420 (August 15, 2025). 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner David S. Johanson dissenting. 3 Due to the lapse in appropriations and ensuing cessation of Commission operations, the Commission tolled its schedule for this proceeding. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–747 and 731– TA–1725 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From India; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India, provided for in subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), and imports of the subject merchandise from India that have been found to be subsidized by the government of India.2 3 Background The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 29, 2024, following receipt of petitions filed with the Commission and Commerce by IDC Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., Adel, Iowa, and Service Spring Corp., Maumee, Ohio. The final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission following notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24665), as revised on June 23, 2025 (90 FR 26608). The public hearing in connection with the investigations was cancelled. 4 The investigation schedules became staggered when Commerce postponed the final determination for its antidumping duty investigation regarding India and aligned the final determination for its countervailing duty investigation regarding India with the corresponding AD investigation, but did not postpone the final determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations regarding China. On September 30, 2025, the Commission issued final affirmative determinations in its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China (90 FR 47820, October 2, 2025). Following notification of final determinations by Commerce that imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 735(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(a)) and were being subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)), notice of the supplemental scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigations with respect to India was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on January 12, 2026 (91 FR 1196). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on February 17, 2026. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5702 (February 2026), entitled Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from India: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–747 and 731–TA–1725 (Final). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 17, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2026–03325 Filed 2–19–26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–621 and 731– TA–1447 (Review)] Ceramic Tile From China; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on ceramic tile from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on May 1, 2025 (90 FR 18694) and determined on August 4, 2025, that it would conduct expedited reviews (90 FR 45054, September 18, 2025). 3 The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on February 17, 2026. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5687 (February 2026), entitled Ceramic Tile from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 621 and 731–TA–1447 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 17, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2026–03350 Filed 2–19–26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain NAND and DRAM Memory Chips, DN 3885; the Commission is soliciting comments on VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Feb 19, 2026 Jkt 268001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination (1) === 47820 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 189 / Thursday, October 2, 2025 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 90 FR 39369 (Aug. 15, 2025); 90 FR 39374 (Aug. 15, 2025). 3 The Commission also finds that imports subject to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances determinations are not likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China. 4 The petitions alleged that an industry in the United States is materially injured and threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized and LTFV imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China and India. The investigations regarding overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from India are ongoing. 5 90 FR 39420 (Aug. 15, 2025). TABLE 2—CONCESSION CONTRACTS CONTINUED UNTIL THE EXPIRATION DATE SHOWN OR UNTIL THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A NEW CONTRACT, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST—Continued Park unit CONCID Concessioner Continuation effective date Continuation expiration date Lake Mead NRA ..................................... LAKE006–74 ................. Las Vegas Boat Harbor, Inc ................... 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 Lake Mead NRA ..................................... LAKE009–88 ................. LMNRA Guest Services, LLC ................. 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 National Mall and Memorial Parks ......... NACC003–86 ................ Guest Services, Inc ................................ 1/1/2026 12/31/2026 TABLE 3—TEMPORARY CONCESSION CONTRACT Park unit CONCID Services Effective date Blue Ridge PW ........................ BLRI008–13 ............................ Food and beverage and retail .................................................. 2/1/2026 Blue Ridge PW ........................ BLRI010–13 ............................ Boat rentals and food and beverage ....................................... 4/1/2026 Glen Canyon NRA ................... GLCA007–03 .......................... Food and beverage, marinas, retail, lodging, service stations, campgrounds, trailer village, and shower and laundry. 1/1/2026 Nicole Woody, Acting Associate Director, Business Services. [FR Doc. 2025–19359 Filed 10–1–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–746 and 731– TA–1724 (Final)] Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From China; Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China, provided for in subheading 7320.20.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), and imports of the subject merchandise from China that have been found to be subsidized by the government of China.2 3 Background The Commission instituted these investigations effective October 29, 2024, following receipt of petitions filed with the Commission and Commerce by IDC Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, Iowa Spring Manufacturing, Inc., Adel, Iowa, and Service Spring Corp., Maumee, Ohio.4 The final phase of the investigations was scheduled by the Commission following notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and sold at LTFV within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing notices in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24665) and June 23 (90 FR 26608). The public hearing in connection with the investigations was cancelled.5 The Commission made these determinations pursuant to §§ 705(b) and 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on September 30, 2025. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5675 (Sept. 2025), entitled Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–746 and 731–TA–1724 (Final). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 30, 2025. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2025–19320 Filed 10–1–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–779 and 731– TA–1765–1766 (Preliminary)] Chromium Trioxide From India and Turkey; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations. AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–779 and 731–TA–1765–1766 (Preliminary) pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports of chromium trioxide from India and Turkey, provided for in subheading 2819.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and imports of chromium trioxide from India are alleged to be subsidized by the government of India. Unless the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extends the time for initiation, the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:39 Oct 01, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1