ITC Investigation 701-TA-654 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia; Inv. No. 701-TA-655 and 731-TA-1531 (Final) (Remand) from Russia. It's in the remand phase and currently in completed status. It links to AD/CVD case A-821-826 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia; Inv. No. 701-TA-655 and 731-TA-1531 (Final) (Remand)
ITC investigation (remand/completed).
Parties
Full text (14,199 chars)
=== USITC Notice of Remand Proceedings === 76853Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices substations. The proposed additional testing will further assess the site conditions and gather information necessary for the engineering design of turbine and substation foundations well-suited for the lease area if BOEM approves the project. BOEM decided to prepare an EA for this proposed action regarding Beacon Wind’s amended SAP to support and inform agency decision-making (40 CFR 1501.3). This notice starts the scoping process for the EA and solicits information regarding additional important environmental issues and alternatives that should be considered in the EA (43 CFR 46.305). Additionally, BOEM will use the scoping process to identify and eliminate from detailed analysis issues that are not significant or that have been analyzed by prior environmental reviews (40 CFR 1501.9(f)(1)). BOEM will use responses to this notice and the EA public input process to satisfy the public involvement requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (see 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3)). Consequently, BOEM is seeking information from the public on the identification and, if applicable, the assessment, of potential impacts to cultural resources and historic properties that might be impacted by the proposed site assessment activities and foundation testing. The EA analyses will also support compliance with other environmental laws and statutes (e.g., Coastal Zone Management Act, Endangered Species Act, Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, and Marine Mammal Protection Act). Cooperating Agencies: BOEM invites Tribal Nations and Federal, State, and local government agencies to consider becoming cooperating agencies in the preparation of this EA. CEQ regulations for implementing NEPA define cooperating agencies as those with ‘‘jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved in a proposal (or a reasonable alternative)’’ (40 CFR 1508.1(e)). Potential cooperating agencies should consider their authority and capacity to assume the responsibilities of a cooperating agency. Upon request, BOEM will provide potential cooperating agencies with a draft memorandum of agreement that includes a schedule with critical action dates and milestones, mutual responsibilities, designated points of contact, and expectations for handling pre-decisional information. Agencies should also consider the ’’Factors for Determining Whether to Invite, Decline or End Cooperating Agency Status’’ in CEQ’s memo, ‘‘Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the [NEPA],’’ dated January 30, 2002. A copy of this document is available at: https:// www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/ nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/G- CEQ-CoopAgenciesImplem.pdf. As the lead agency, BOEM will not provide financial assistance to cooperating agencies. Even if an organization is not a cooperating agency, opportunities will exist to provide information and comments to BOEM during the normal public input phases of the NEPA process. Public Participation A. Comments Tribal Nations, Federal and State agencies, local governments, and other interested parties are requested to comment on important issues to be considered in the EA. For information on how to submit comments and deadline, see the DATES and ADDRESSES sections above. B. Privileged and Confidential Information BOEM will protect privileged and confidential information submitted in comments when required by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Exemption 4 of FOIA applies to trade secrets and commercial and financial information that is privileged or confidential. If you wish to protect the confidentiality of such information, clearly label it ‘‘Contains Confidential Information’’ and request that BOEM treat it as confidential. BOEM will not disclose such information if BOEM determines under 30 CFR 585.114(b) that it qualifies for a FOIA exemption. Consider submitting such information as a separate attachment. BOEM will not treat as confidential any aggregate summaries of such information or comments not containing such privileged or confidential information. Information that is not labeled as privileged or confidential may be regarded by BOEM as suitable for public release. C. Personally Identifiable Information BOEM does not consider anonymous comments. Please include your name and address as part of your comment. BOEM makes all comments, including names, addresses, and other personally identifiable information included in the comment, available for public review online. Individuals may request that BOEM withhold their names, addresses, or other personally identifiable information included in their comment from the public record; however, BOEM cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so because comment submissions are subject to FOIA. If your submission is requested under FOIA, your information will only be withheld if a determination is made that one of the FOIA exemptions to disclosure applies. Such a determination will be made in accordance with the Department’s FOIA regulations and applicable law. In order for BOEM to withhold from disclosure your personally identifiable information, you must identify any information contained in your comments that, if released, would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of your privacy. You also must briefly describe any possible harmful consequences of the disclosure of information, such as embarrassment, injury, or other harm. All submissions from organizations or businesses and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses will be made available for public inspection in their entirety. D. Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 307103(a)) After consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, BOEM is required to withhold the location, character, or ownership of historic resources if it determines that disclosure may, among other things, cause a significant invasion of privacy, risk harm to the historic resources, or impede the use of a traditional religious site by practitioners. Tribal entities and other parties providing information on historic resources should designate information that they wish to be held as confidential and provide the reasons why BOEM should do so. Authority: NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4332); 40 CFR 1501.5; 43 CFR 46.305. Karen Baker, Chief, Office of Renewable Energy Programs, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. [FR Doc. 2023–24610 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4340–98–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–655 and 731– TA–1531 (Final) (Remand)] Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe From Russia AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice of remand proceedings. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Nov 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00135 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 76854 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices SUMMARY : The U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby gives notice of the procedures it intends to follow to comply with the court- ordered remand of its final determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe (‘‘SSLPP’’) from Russia. For further information concerning the conduct of these remand proceedings and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. DATES : November 1, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lawrence Jones ((202) 205–3358), Office of Investigations, or Madeline Heeren ((202) 708–1529), Office of General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for Investigation Nos. 701–TA–655 and 731–TA–1531 (Final) may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—In April 2021, the Commission determined that an industry in the United States was materially by reason of imports of SSLPP from Czechia that were sold in the United States at less than fair value. Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Czech Republic (Czechia), Inv. No. 731– TA–1529 (Final), USITC Pub. No. 5183 (April 2021). In August 2021, the Commission determined that an industry in the United States was materially injured by reason of imports of SSLPP from Korea, Russia, and Ukraine that were sold in the United States at less than fair value and subsidized by the governments of Russia and Ukraine. Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Korea, Russia, and Ukraine, Inv. Nos. 701–TA–654–655 and 731– TA–1530–1532 (Final), USITC Pub. No. 5222 (August 2021). Respondent, PAO TMK, contested the Commission’s determination regarding Russia before the U.S. Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’). The CIT remanded the Commission’s determination for the agency to reconsider its calculation of in-scope imports from Germany and Mexico by addressing (1) the Customs data for Germany and Mexico in light of the Commission’s determination that only Company A imported in-scope imports from Germany and only Company B imported in-scope imports from Mexico, and (2) evidence proffered by TMK that claims Company C imported in-scope imports from Germany, contrary to the Commission’s decision that Company A was the only importer of in-scope imports from Germany. PAO TMK v. United States, Slip Op. 23–150 (Ct. Int’l Trade, Oct. 12, 2023). Participation in the remand proceedings.—Only those persons who were interested parties that participated in the investigations (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary’s service list) and also parties to the appeal may participate in the remand proceedings. Such persons need not file any additional appearances with the Commission to participate in the remand proceedings, unless they are adding new individuals to the list of persons entitled to receive business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) under administrative protective order. BPI referred to during the remand proceedings will be governed, as appropriate, by the administrative protective order issued in the investigations. The Secretary will maintain a service list containing the names and addresses of all persons or their representatives who are parties to the remand proceedings, and the Secretary will maintain a separate list of those authorized to receive BPI under the administrative protective order during the remand proceedings. Written submissions.—The Commission is not reopening the record and will not accept the submission of new factual information for the record. The Commission will permit the parties to file comments concerning how the Commission could best comply with the court’s remand instructions. The comments must be based solely on the information in the Commission’s record. The Commission will reject submissions containing additional factual information or arguments pertaining to issues other than those on which the court has remanded this matter. The deadline for filing comments is December 1, 2023. Comments must be limited to no more than fifteen (15) double-spaced and single-sided pages of textual material, inclusive of attachments and exhibits. Parties are advised to consult with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for provisions of general applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission. All written submissions must conform to the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s website at http:// edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, will not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be served on all other parties to the investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 2, 2023. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–24605 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–598] Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensities of the U.S. Steel and Aluminum Industries at the Product Level; Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Intensity Questionnaire AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:30 Nov 06, 2023 Jkt 262001 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 701-TA-654 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia; Inv. No. 701-TA-655 and 731-TA-1531 (Final) (Remand) from Russia. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
701-TA-654 is in the remand phase, with status completed. Remand phase — the investigation has been sent back from a court (CIT or CAFC) for reconsideration. Outcomes depend on the specific court directive.
Yes — investigation 701-TA-654 resulted in AD/CVD case A-821-826. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource