ITC Investigation 701-TA-564 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey; Inv. No. 701-TA-564 and 731-TA-1338-1340 (Review) from Japan, Turkey, and Taiwan. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. Commerce initiated the underlying investigation on June 1, 2022. It links to AD/CVD case A-489-829 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey; Inv. No. 701-TA-564 and 731-TA-1338-1340 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Parties
Documents
Full text (113,016 chars)
=== Continuation - AD/CVD - Turkey - Taiwan - Japan === 8797Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2023 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 33123 (June 1, 2022); see also Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017); Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 32531 (July 14, 2017); Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 45809 (October 2, 2017) (collectively, Orders). 2 See RTAC’s Letters, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate—Taiwan,’’ ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate—Turkey,’’ ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate—Japan,’’ all dated June 15, 2022, and ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in CVD Sunset Review,’’ dated June 15, 2022. 3 See RTAC’s Letters, ‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of CVD Sunset Review Initiation,’’ dated June 30, 2022 (RTAC’s CVD Substantive Response); ‘‘Substantive Response of Domestic Producers to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 30, 2022 (Substantive Response Turkey); ‘‘Substantive Response of Domestic Producers to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 30, 2022 (Substantive Response Taiwan); and ‘‘Substantive Response of Domestic Producers to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 30, 2022 (Substantive Response Japan). 4 See GOT’s Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response of the Government of the Republic of Tu¨ rkiye in the First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duly Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar,’’ dated June 30, 2022 (GOT’s Substantive Response). 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2022,’’ dated July 21, 2022. 6 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan; Final Results of First Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 87 FR 60120 (October 4, 2022); and Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 87 FR 60376 (October 5, 2022). 7 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey Investigation Nos. 701–TA–564 and 731– TA–1338–1340 (Review), 88 FR 5918 (January 30, 2023). decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is March 22, 2023. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’ section of the Board’s website. For further information, contact Juanita Chen at juanita.chen@trade.gov. Dated: February 6, 2023. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2023–02818 Filed 2–9–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–829, A–583–859, A–588–876, C–489– 830] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have determined that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), Taiwan, and Japan, and the countervailing duty (CVD) order on rebar from Turkey would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping as well as net countervailable subsidies and materials injury to an industry in the United States. Therefore, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. DATES : Applicable February 10, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jose Rivera, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0842. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On June 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the AD and CVD orders. 1 Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the Rebar Trade Action Coalition (RTAC) and its individual members, Nucor Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and Byer Steel (collectively, domestic interested party) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).2 On June 30, 2022, Commerce received a substantive response from the domestic interested party within the 30- day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 3 We also received a substantive response from the Government of Turkey (GOT). 4 However, we did not receive a substantive response from any other respondent interested party in this proceeding, and no party requested a hearing. On July 21, 2022, Commerce notified the ITC that it did not receive adequate substantive responses from respondent interested parties.5 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and subsidization. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins and subsidy rates likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 751(c), and 752(b) and (c) of the Act. 6 On January 30, 2023, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.7 Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these Orders is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further processed in the subject countries or a third country, including but not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the Orders if performed in the country of manufacture of the rebar. Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also excluded from the scope is deformed steel wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test. At the time of the filing of the petition, there was an existing CVD order on steel reinforcing bar from the Republic of Turkey. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey, 79 FR 65926 (November 6, 2014) (2014 Turkey CVD Order). The scope of this CVD Order with regard to rebar from Turkey covers only rebar produced and/or exported by those companies that are excluded from the 2014 Turkey CVD Order. At the time of the issuance of the 2014 Turkey CVD Order, Habas was the only excluded Turkish rebar producer or exporter. The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Feb 09, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 8798 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 2023 / Notices 1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand, 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 13252 (March 9, 2022). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021,’’ dated September 23, 2022. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057, 7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the Orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on rebar from Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan, and the CVD order on rebar from Turkey. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: February 6, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2023–02853 Filed 2–9–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–549–820] Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2021 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Thailand was sold in the United States at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) of January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Applicable February 10, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–2285, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On January 28, 2004, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on PC strand from Thailand. 1 On March 9, 2022, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the Order, covering one producer/exporter, The Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd. (SIW).2 Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), on September 23, 2022, Commerce determined that it was not practicable to complete the preliminary results of this review within 245 days and extended the deadline for the preliminary results of this review until January 31, 2023.3 For a detailed description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is PC strand from Thailand. Products subject to the Order are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021: Exporter/producer Weighted- average dumping margin (percent) The Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd ........................................... 2.18 Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review to interested parties with an administrative protective order within five days of the date of publication of the preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Feb 09, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 33206 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices entered a park profile into the system may review their own profile data. POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR RETENTION AND DISPOSAL OF RECORDS : Records in this system are retained in accordance with the NPS Records Schedule for Resource Management and Lands (Item 1), which has been approved by NARA (Job No. N1–79–08– 1) for records documenting the acquisition, planning, management, and protection of lands and natural and cultural resources under the stewardship of NPS. The disposition of the RPRS data set has a permanent retention. ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL SAFEGUARDS: Access to records in the RPRS system is limited to authorized personnel who have a need to access the records in the performance of their official duties, and each user’s access is restricted to only the functions and data necessary to perform that person’s job responsibilities. System administrators and authorized users are trained and required to follow established internal security protocols and must complete all security, privacy, and records management training and sign the DOI Rules of Behavior. The records contained in this system are safeguarded in accordance with 43 CFR 2.226 and other applicable security and privacy rules and policies. During normal hours of operation, paper records are maintained in locked file cabinets under the control of authorized personnel. Computer servers on which RPRS electronic records are stored are in a secured DOI controlled facility with physical, technical, and administrative levels of security to prevent unauthorized access to the DOI network and information assets. The electronic data are protected through techniques of user identification, passwords, database permissions and software controls. These security measures include establishing different access levels for different types of users. Backup tapes are encrypted and stored in a locked and controlled room in a secure, off-site location. Computerized records systems follow the National Institute of Standards and Technology privacy and security standards as developed to comply with the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a; Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.; Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014, 44 U.S.C. 3551 et seq.; and the Federal Information Processing Standards 199: Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems. Security controls include user identification, passwords, database permissions, encryption, firewalls, audit logs, and network system security monitoring, and software controls. Investigator’s Annual Report submissions are checked in and reviewed to prevent disclosure of content that may impact park resources and operations. Access to NPS specific permissions in the RPRS are limited to authorized NPS users. NPS security features restricted access to that data which is identified as not suitable for public access to NPS employees and authorized NPS contractors. NPS staff are provided permission to view all RPRS data except for unpublished Investigator’s Annual Reports. Park account data is limited to that data which relates to a single unit of the National Park System (i.e., park profile information, applications submitted to the unit, permits issued by the unit, Investigator’s Annual Reports related to permits issued by the unit, unit specific administrative data). Access to park accounts is limited to persons designated by the Park Superintendent. Administrative accounts provide permissions to administrate park account data as appropriate for the administrator’s role of providing permissions to authorized individuals, and access to query or process the service-wide data. RPRS provides a help desk to disseminate information on security and privacy policies applicable to RPRS. NPS staffs are required to take an annual training session on privacy and records management and an annual training session on security. A Privacy Impact Assessment was conducted to ensure that Privacy Act requirements are met and appropriate privacy controls were implemented to safeguard the personally identifiable information contained in the system. RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: An individual requesting records on himself or herself should send a signed, written inquiry to the applicable System Manager identified above. The request must include the specific bureau or office that maintains the record to facilitate location of the applicable records. The request envelope and letter should both be clearly marked ‘‘PRIVACY ACT REQUEST FOR ACCESS.’’ A request for access must meet the requirements of 43 CFR 2.238. CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: An individual requesting corrections or the removal of material from his or her records should send a signed, written request to the applicable System Manager as identified above. The request must include the specific bureau or office that maintains the record to facilitate location of the applicable records. A request for corrections or removal must meet the requirements of 43 CFR 2.246. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: An individual requesting notification of the existence of records on himself or herself should send a signed, written inquiry to the applicable System Manager as identified above. The request must include the specific bureau or office that maintains the record to facilitate location of the applicable records. The request envelope and letter should both be clearly marked ‘‘PRIVACY ACT INQUIRY.’’ A request for notification must meet the requirements of 43 CFR 2.235. EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. HISTORY: None. Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, Department of the Interior. [FR Doc. 2022–11394 Filed 5–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–564 and 731– TA–1338–1340 (Review)] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (‘‘rebar’’) from Turkey and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted June 1, 2022. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is July 1, 2022. Comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 33207Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by August 15, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Stamen Borisson (202–205–3125), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On July 14, 2017, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued a countervailing duty order on imports of rebar from Turkey (82 FR 32531) and antidumping duty orders on imports of rebar from Japan and Turkey (82 FR 32532). On October 2, 2017, Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on imports of rebar from Taiwan (82 FR 45809). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product as consisting of rebar that is coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all U.S. producers of rebar. (5) The Order Dates are the dates that the orders under review became effective. In these reviews, the Order Dates are July 14, 2017 with respect to the orders on imports of rebar from Japan and Turkey and October 2, 2017 with respect to the order on imports of rebar from Taiwan. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is July 1, 2022. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 33208 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is August 15, 2022. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 22–5–531, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information to be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2021, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 33209Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices calendar year 2021 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2021 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 25, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–11628 Filed 5–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–552 and 731– TA–1308 (Review)] Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From India; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on new pneumatic off-the- road tires from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES : May 9, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ahdia Bavari (202–205–3191), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On May 9, 2022, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (87 FR 5505, February 1, 2022) were adequate. A record of the Commissioners’ votes will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 25, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–11642 Filed 5–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Turkey - Taiwan - Japan === 60120 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2022 / Notices 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017); and Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 45809 (October 2, 2017) (collectively Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 33123 (June 1, 2022). 3 The domestic interested parties are the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members. The Individual members are Nucor Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and Byer Steel. 4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate—Turkey,’’ dated June 15, 2022 (Participation Notice Turkey); ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate -Taiwan,’’ dated June 15, 2022 (Participation Notice Taiwan); and ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate—Japan,’’ dated June 15, 2022 (Participation Notice Japan). 5 See Participation Notice Turkey at 2; Participation Notice Taiwan at 2; and Participation Notice Japan at 2. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Substantive Response,’’ dated June 30, 2022; ‘‘Substantive Response, dated June 30, 2022; and ‘‘Substantive Response, dated June 30, 2022. 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2022,’’ dated July 21, 2022. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of First Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). a. Full Organization Legal Name: b. Submitter First Name: c. Submitter Last Name: d. Submitter City: e. Submitter State: f. Submitter Phone Number (optional, submitter determines BCl or Public): g. Submitter Email (optional, submitter determines BCl or Public): 2. If applicable, please provide contact information of third-party representative a. Third Party Firm/Association Name: b. Third Party First Name: c. Third Party Last Name: d. Third Party City: e. Third Party State: f. Third Party Phone Number (optional, can be submitted as CBI): g. Third Party Email (optional, can be submitted as CBI): 3. 8- or 10-digit HTSUS item number- Use numerical characters only with no special characters (Example: 12345678). The U.S. International Trade Commission’s HTS Online Reference Tool (https:// hts.usitc.gov/) is a useful tool for helping to determine the U.S. tariff classification of your product. 4. Product Description (e.g., product characteristics, function, application, principal or end use within the critical sector, etc.) 5. What is the relevant supply chain sector 6. Provide relevant industrial economic subsector (if any) Commerce is particularly interested in how products are used within a supply chain. Please refer back to the Federal Register notice associated with Docket ID ITA–2022–0010 on https:// www.regulations.gov for additional submission information. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with an information collection subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 unless the information collection has a currently valid OMB Control Number. The approved OMB Control Number for this information collection is 0625–0143. Without this approval, we could not conduct this information collection. Public reporting for this information collection is estimated to be approximately 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the information collection. All responses to this information collection are voluntary. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden to the International Trade Administration, Attn: Tobias Reynolds at SupplyChainsHS@trade.gov. [FR Doc. 2022–21418 Filed 10–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–489–829, A–583–859, A–588–876] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan; Final Results of First Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), Taiwan, and Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On June 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the AD orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Turkey, Taiwan, and Japan 1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 On June 15, 2022, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the domestic interested parties 3 for the Orders within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).4 The domestic interested parties claimed domestic interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of domestic like product in the United States. 5 On June 30, 2022, the domestic interested parties submitted a timely substantive responses for each sunset review within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any other interested parties with respect to the Orders covered by these sunset reviews. On July 21, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties in any of these sunset reviews. 7 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of these Orders. Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to these Orders is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been subjected to an elongation test. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 8 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the Issues and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Oct 03, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 60121Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 4, 2022 / Notices 1 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Gray Portland Cement and Clinker from Japan, 56 FR 12156 (March 22, 1991), as amended by Antidumping Duty Order and Amendment to Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Gray Portland Cement and Clinker from Japan, 56 FR 21658 (May 10, 1991), and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Order: Gray Portland Cement and Clinker from Japan, 60 FR 39150 (August 1, 1995) (Order). 2 See Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Japan: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 32682 (July 17, 2017); see also Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Japan: Final Results of Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 12561 (March 6, 2017). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 33123 (June 1, 2022) (Notice of Initiation). 4 See Committee’s Letter, ‘‘The Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated June 16, 2022. 5 See Committee’s Letter, ‘‘The Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2022. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2022,’’ dated July 21, 2022. 7 Commerce has made two scope rulings regarding subject merchandise. See Scope Rulings, 57 FR 19602 (May 7, 1992) (classes G and H of oil well cement are within the scope of the Order); see also Scope Rulings, 58 FR 27542 (May 10, 1993) (‘‘Nittetsu Super Fine’’ cement is not within the scope of the Order). Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if these Orders were revoked. A list of the issues discussed in the decision memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. A complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https:// access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices/ ListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average margins of up to 4.17 percent for Turkey, up to 32.01 percent for Taiwan, and up to 209.46 percent for Japan. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 28, 2022. Abdelali Elouaradia, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–21519 Filed 10–3–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–815] Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker From Japan: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker (cement and clinker) from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Eliza Siordia, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3878. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On May 10, 1991, Commerce published its antidumping duty order on cement and clinker from Japan. 1 On July 17, 2017, Commerce published the continuation notice from the most recent sunset review of the Order.2 On June 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the five-year sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).3 On June 16, 2022, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate in this review from the Committee for Fairly Traded Japanese Cement (Committee) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 4 The Committee claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(E) of the Act, as a trade or business association, a majority of whose members manufacture, produce or wholesale a domestic like product in the United States. On July 1, 2022, the Committee provided a complete substantive response for this review within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 We received no substantive responses from other interested parties, nor was a hearing requested. On July 21, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The products covered by the Order are cement and cement clinker from Japan. Cement is a hydraulic cement and the primary component of concrete. Cement clinker, an intermediate material produced when manufacturing cement, has no use other than grinding into finished cement. Microfine cement was specifically excluded from the Order. Cement is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) subheading 2523.29 and cement clinker is currently classifiable under HTS subheading 2523.10. Cement has also been entered under HTS subheading 2523.90 as ‘‘other hydraulic cements.’’ The HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written product description remains dispositive as to the scope of the product covered by the Order.7 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Oct 03, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM 04OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - Turkey === 60376 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2022 / Notices 3 The Director, Office of Export Enforcement, is the authorizing official for issuance of denial orders pursuant to amendments to the Regulations (85 FR 73411, November 18, 2020). 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 32531 (July 14, 2017) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 FR 33123 (June 1, 2022). 3 See RTAC’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated June 15, 2022. 4 See RTAC Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 30, 2022. 5 See GOT’s Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response of the Government of the Republic of Tu¨ rkiye in the First received a written submission from Peterson. Based upon my review of the record and consultations with BIS’s Office of Exporter Services, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided to deny Peterson’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Peterson’s conviction. The Office of Exporter Services has also decided to revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which Peterson had an interest at the time of his conviction. 3 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: First, from the date of this Order until November 14, 2024, John James Peterson, with a last known address of 49 S Dixie Hwy., Deerfield Beach, FL 33441, and when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (‘‘the Denied Person’’), may not directly or indirectly participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, license exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or from any other activity subject to the Regulations. Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export, reexport, or transfer (in- country) to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, pursuant to Section 1760(e) of ECRA and Sections 766.23 and 766.25 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Peterson by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order. Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of the Regulations, Peterson may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of part 756 of the Regulations. Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to Peterson and shall be published in the Federal Register. Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until November 14, 2024. John Sonderman, Director, Office of Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 2022–21599 Filed 10–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–489–830] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revoking the countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of the Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jose Rivera, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0842. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 14, 2017, Commerce published the CVD order on rebar from Turkey. 1 On June 1, 2022, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the Order.2 Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members, Nucor Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and Byer Steel (RTAC) (domestic interested parties) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 On June 30, 2022, Commerce received a substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 4 We also received a substantive response from the Government of Turkey (GOT). 5 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Oct 04, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES 60377Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 192 / Wednesday, October 5, 2022 / Notices Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duly Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar,’’ dated June 30, 2022. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2022’’ dated July 21, 2022. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). However, we did not receive a substantive response from any other respondent interested party in this proceeding, and no party requested a hearing. On July 21, 2022, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 6 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is steel concrete reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form (rebar) from Turkey. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via the Enforcement and Compliance Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decisions Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. Final Results of the Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order on rebar from Turkey would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following rates: Producer and exporter Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S ........................................................................................................... 15.99 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: September 29, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely To Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–21627 Filed 10–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Membership of the International Trade Administration Performance Review Board AGENCY : International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice of Membership on the International Trade Administration Performance Review Board. SUMMARY : The International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of Commerce (DOC), announces the appointment of those individuals who have been selected to serve as members of ITA Performance Review Board. The Performance Review Board is responsible for (1) reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior Executive Service (SES) members and (2) making recommendations to the appointing authority on other performance management issues, such as pay adjustments and bonuses. The appointment of these members to the Performance Review Board will be for a period of twenty-four (24) months. DATES : The period of appointment for those individuals selected for ITA’s Performance Review Board begins on October 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Christine Covington, U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Human Resources Management, Office of Executive Resources, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW, Room 50021, Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482–2613. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the International Trade Administration (ITA), Department of Commerce (DOC), announces the appointment of those individuals who have been selected to serve as members of the ITA Performance Review Board. The Performance Review Board is responsible for (1) reviewing performance appraisals and ratings of Senior Executive Service (SES) members and (2) making recommendations to the appointing authority on other Performance management issues, such as pay adjustments and bonuses. The Appointment of these members to the Performance Review Board will be for a period of twenty-four (24) months. The name, position title, and type of appointment of each member of the Performance Review Board are set forth below: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Oct 04, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM 05OCN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 33123Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices 13 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 14 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 15 For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 16 See Order. Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Commerce will calculate importer- specific antidumping duty assessment rates when a respondent’s weighted- average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where the respondent reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to each importer to the total entered value of those sales. Where the respondent did not report entered value, we will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to each importer to the total quantity of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).13 We will also calculate an estimated ad valorem importer-specific assessment rate with which to assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer- specific ad valorem assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either the respondent’s ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,14 we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by the POSCO single entity for which the POSCO single entity did not know that the merchandise it sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.15 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the POSCO single entity will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1) (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not covered in this review but covered in a prior completed segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently- completed segment for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will continue to be 7.10 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation. 16 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: May 25, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Recommendation VI. [FR Doc. 2022–11766 Filed 5–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable June 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 33124 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2022 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–588–815 ........ 731–TA–461 Japan ................ Cement and Cement Clinker (5th Review) ............. Thomas Martin (202) 482–3936. A–588–876 ........ 731–TA–1338 Japan ................ Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Review) ......... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. A–583–859 ........ 731–TA–1339 Taiwan .............. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Review) ......... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. A–489–829 ........ 731–TA–1340 Turkey .............. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Review) ......... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. C–489–830 ........ 701–TA–564 Turkey ............... Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (1st Review) ......... Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: May 9, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–11764 Filed 5–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID: 0648–XB900] Notice of Intent To Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Identification of Aquaculture Opportunity Areas in Federal Waters of the Gulf of Mexico and To Conduct Public Scoping Meetings AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice of intent to prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement and conduct public scoping meetings. SUMMARY : In compliance with Section 7 of Executive Order 13921, ‘‘Promoting American Seafood Competitiveness and VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:08 May 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 5918 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2023 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). Estate. The information collection related to the Osage Mineral Estate is described below in (b)(1). ONRR uses the production, royalty, and other information collected in this ICR to ensure that a lessee properly pays royalty and other mineral revenues due on oil, gas, and geothermal resources produced from Federal and Indian lands. ONRR shares the data with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and Tribal and State governments for their land and lease management responsibilities. The requirement to report accurately and timely is mandatory. (b) Information Collections: This ICR covers the paperwork requirements under 30 CFR part 1210, subparts B, C, and D; part 1212, subpart B and proposed regulations under 25 CFR part 226, subparts F and I as follows: (1) Osage Mineral Estate Royalty and Production Reporting: The proposed regulations at 25 CFR part 226, subparts F and I require a lessee to submit information to ONRR specific to the Osage Mineral Estate’s royalties, rental, bonuses, and other payment information, including sales volumes and values. Lessees are required to submit this information by using one of the forms identified by ONRR. ONRR uses the information collected to ensure companies properly pay royalties based on accurate production accounting on oil, gas, and geothermal resources that they produce from leases of the Osage Mineral Estate. (2) Royalty Reporting: Regulations at 30 CFR part 1210, subparts B and D and part 1212, subpart B, require a lessee to report and remit royalty on oil, gas, and geothermal resources, and to make, retain, and, upon request, provide for inspection accurate and complete records demonstrating proper royalty and other payment. A lessee submits form ONRR–2014, Report of Sales and Royalty Remittance, monthly to report royalty on oil, gas, and geothermal leases. Each line contains the royalty owed and the basic elements necessary to calculate the royalty, such as lease number, agreement number, unit number, product code, sales type, sales volume, sales value, processing allowances, transportation allowances, royalty value prior to allowances, and royalty value less allowances. A lessee also uses the form to report certain rents. (3) Production Reporting: Regulations at 30 CFR part 1210, subparts C and D and part 1212, subpart B, require an operator to submit production reports if it operates a Federal or Indian oil and gas lease or federally approved unit or communitization agreement, and to make, retain, and, upon request, provide for inspection accurate and complete records for demonstrating royalty payment. An operator uses the following forms for production accounting and reporting: (i) Form ONRR–4054, Oil and Gas Operations Report: An operator submits this report monthly. Part A tracks the oil and gas volume produced from each Federal or Indian well. Part B tracks disposition of the oil and gas. Part C tracks the oil and gas inventory on the property. ONRR compares the production information with the sales and other royalty data that a lessee submits on form ONRR–2014 to ensure that the lessee paid and reported the proper royalty on the reported oil and gas production. ONRR also uses the information from parts A, B, and C to track all oil and gas from the point of production to the point of first sale or other disposition. (ii) Form ONRR–4058, Production Allocation Schedule Report: Unless certain conditions are met, an operator must submit this report if it operates an offshore facility measurement point (FMP) handling production from a Federal oil and gas lease or federally approved unit agreement that is commingled (with approval) with production from any other source prior to measurement for royalty determination. The report is filed monthly to allocate the production to each source. ONRR uses the data to verify accurate production and royalty reporting. Title of Collection: Royalty and Production Reporting. OMB Control Number: 1012–0004. Form Numbers: ONRR–2014, ONRR– 4054, and ONRR–4058. Type of Review: Revision to a currently approved collection. Respondents/Affected Public: Businesses. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 3,490 oil, gas, and geothermal reporters. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 12,827,063 lines of data. Estimated Completion Time per Response: Varies between 1 and 7 minutes per line, depending on the activity. The average completion time is 1.72 minutes per line. The average completion time is calculated by first multiplying the estimated annual burden hours from the table below (369,379) by 60 to obtain the total annual burden minutes. Then the total annual burden minutes (22,162,740) is divided by the estimated annual number of lines submitted from the table below (12,827,063). Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 369,379 hours. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Frequency of Collection: Monthly. Total Estimated Annual Non-Hour Burden Cost: ONRR identified no ‘‘non- hour cost’’ burden associated with this collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). Howard Cantor, Acting Director, Office of Natural Resources Revenue. [FR Doc. 2023–01000 Filed 1–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4335–30–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–564 and 731– TA–1338–1340 (Review)] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (‘‘rebar’’) from Turkey and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on rebar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2022 (87 FR 33206) and determined on September 6, 2022 that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 77636, December 19, 2022). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 24, 2023. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5400 (January 2023), entitled Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Japan, Taiwan, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jan 27, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 5919Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 19 / Monday, January 30, 2023 / Notices and Turkey: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 564 and 731–TA–1338–1340 (Review). By the order of the Commission. Issued: January 24, 2023. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–01756 Filed 1–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–480 and 731– TA–1188 (Second Review)] High Pressure Steel Cylinders From China; Termination of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission instituted the subject five-year reviews on November 1, 2022 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order and antidumping duty order on high pressure steel cylinders from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On January 20, 2023, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the orders effective December 5, 2022, because no domestic interested party responded to the sunset review notice of initiation by the applicable deadline. Accordingly, the subject reviews are terminated. DATES : December 5, 2022 (effective date of revocation of the order). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Andres Andrade (202–205–2078), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). Authority: This review is being terminated under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 and pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). This notice is published pursuant to § 207.69 of the Commission’s rules (19 CFR 207.69). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 24, 2023. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2023–01776 Filed 1–27–23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1291] Certain Replacement Automotive Lamps; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that on January 24, 2023, the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting comments from the public only. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Robert Needham, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides that, if the Commission finds a violation, it shall exclude the articles concerned from the United States: unless, after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and United States consumers, it finds that such articles should not be excluded from entry. (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)). The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation, specifically: a limited exclusion order against certain replacement automotive lamps of TYC Brother Industrial Co., Ltd, Genera Corporation (dba TYC Genera), LKQ Corporation, and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. Parties are to file public interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). The Commission is interested in further development of the record on the public interest in this investigation. Accordingly, members of the public are invited to file submissions of no more than five (5) pages, inclusive of attachments, concerning the public interest in light of the administrative law judge’s recommended determination on remedy and bonding issued in this investigation on January 24, 2023. Comments should address whether issuance of the recommended limited exclusion order in this investigation would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) explain how the articles potentially subject to the recommended limited exclusion order are used in the United States; (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the recommended limited exclusion order; (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the recommended limited exclusion order within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) explain how the recommended limited exclusion order would impact consumers in the United States. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business on February 23, 2023. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above. The Commission’s paper filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jan 27, 2023 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 77636 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. reimbursable share of costs to rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet Gates under the O&M program. Completed contract actions: 8. Benton ID, Yakima Project, Washington: Replacement contract to, among other things, withdraw Benton ID from the Sunnyside Division Board of Control; provide for direct payment of Benton ID’s share of total operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement costs incurred by the United States in operation of storage division; and establish Benton ID responsibility for operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement for irrigation distribution system. Contract executed on April 7, 2021. 14. Quincy-Columbia Basin ID, Columbia Basin Project, Washington: Long-term contract to renew master water service contract No. 14–06–100– 9166, as supplemented, to authorize the District to deliver project water to up to 10,000 First Phase Continuation Acres located within the District, and to deliver additional project water to land irrigated under the District’s repayment contract during the peak period of irrigation water use annually. Contract executed on October 7, 2021. California-Great Basin—Interior Region 10: Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, California 95825–1898, telephone 916–978–5250. New contract actions: 49. San Luis Canal Company, Central California ID, Firebaugh Canal Water District, Columbia Canal Company (collectively San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors), CVP, California: Amend 1968 Second Amended Contract for Exchange of Waters. Modified contract actions: 9. Tuolumne Utilities District (formerly Tuolumne Regional WD), CVP, California: Long-term water service contract for up to 6,000 acre-feet from New Melones Reservoir, and possibly a long-term contract for storage of non-project water in New Melones Reservoir. 11. San Luis WD, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment of 4,449 acre-feet of the District’s CVP supply to Santa Nella County WD for M&I use. Discontinued contract action: 4. Redwood Valley County WD, SRPA, California: Restructuring the repayment schedule pursuant to Public Law 100–516. Christopher Beardsley, Director, Policy and Programs. [FR Doc. 2022–27431 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4332–90–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–540–541 (Fifth Review)] Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From South Korea and Taiwan Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain welded stainless steel pipe from South Korea and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on May 2, 2022 (87 FR 25668) and determined on August 5, 2022, that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 64112, October 21, 2022). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on December 14, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5395 (December 2022), entitled Welded Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 731– TA–540–541 (Fifth Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 14, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–27452 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–564 and 731– TA–1338–1340 (Review)] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar (Rebar) From Japan, Taiwan and Turkey; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar from Japan, Taiwan and Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : September 6, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Stamen Borisson (202–205–3125), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On September 6, 2022, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (87 FR 33206, June 1, 2022) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews has been placed in the nonpublic record, and will be made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews on December 16, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:38 Dec 16, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM 19DEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 77637Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2022 / Notices 2 The Commission has found the response filed on behalf of the Rebar Trade Action Coalition and its individual members, Nucor Corporation, Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial Metals Company, Byer Steel, and Steel Dynamics, Inc., domestic producers of rebar, to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 1 Respondent holds a DEA Certificate of Registration no. AR1001306 at the registered address of 903 Saint Andrews Blvd. Suite B, Charleston, SC 29407–7194. OSC/ISO, at 1–2. 2 Neither party filed exceptions. 3 The parties entered into 46 stipulations, all of which are incorporated into this Decision. RD, at 2– 10. On January 29, 2020, Respondent entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with DEA, which remains in effect for three years, and which prohibited Respondent from prescribing Schedule II controlled substances, required Respondent to maintain proper medical files on all patients to whom Respondent issued controlled substance prescriptions, and required Respondent to maintain medical records in a readily retrievable manner. The Agency agrees with the ALJ’s consideration of the violations of the MOA in the Sanctions section. See RD, at n.12. 2022. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in § 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, 2 and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before December 23, 2022 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to these reviews by December 23, 2022. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: December 13, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–27374 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Hearing of the Judicial Conference AGENCY : Judicial Conference of the United States. ACTION : Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules; Notice of cancellation of open hearing. SUMMARY : The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on January 13, 2023. The announcement for this hearing was previously published in the Federal Register on August 5, 2022. DATES : January 13, 2023. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502–1820, RulesCommittee_Secretary@ ao.uscourts.gov. (Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073) Dated: December 14, 2022. Shelly L. Cox, Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff. [FR Doc. 2022–27434 Filed 12–16–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 2210–55–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. 21–35] Allan Alexander Rashford, M.D.; Decision and Order On September 23, 2021, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA or Government) issued an Order to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension of Registration (OSC/ISO) to Allan Alexander Rashford, M.D. (Respondent) of Charleston, South Carolina. 1 OSC/ ISO, at 1. A hearing was held before DEA Administrative Law Judge Paul E. Soeffing (the ALJ) who, on April 5, 2022, issued his Recommended Rulings, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (RD).2 Having reviewed the entire record, the Agency adopts and hereby incorporates by reference the entirety of the ALJ’s rulings, credibility findings, findings of fact, conclusions of law, sanctions analysis, and recommended sanction in the RD and summarizes and expands upon portions thereof herein. I. Findings of Fact Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), 824(a)(4), the Government seeks revocation of Respondent’s DEA registration because Respondent allegedly committed acts rendering his continued registration inconsistent with the public interest, including: (1) improperly prescribing controlled substances; (2) failing to maintain medical records; and (3) engaging in unlawful electronic prescribing practices. OSC/ISO, at 1. Respondent issued the controlled substance prescriptions at issue in this case to Patients W.G., P.L., T.E., D.P., N.R., and L.C. without maintaining any medical records. RD, at 28.3 According to the credible, unrebutted, expert testimony of Dr. Gene Kennedy, Respondent issued all of these controlled substance prescriptions outside the usual course of professional practice and beneath the applicable standard of care due to Respondent’s lack of medical records. Id. at 28 (citing Tr. 118–31, 344). The record showed that Respondent could not produce any records for these six patients. RD, at 28 (citing Tr. 249–50; 323). In addition, Dr. Kennedy credibly testified that the controlled substance prescriptions for L.P. and P.B. were issued outside the usual course of professional practice and beneath the applicable standard of care because Respondent’s partial medical records did not adequately support his prescribing. RD, at 29–31. Finally, the record established that Respondent permitted his wife and son VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:38 Dec 16, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM 19DEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 701-TA-564 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Japan, Taiwan, and Turkey; Inv. No. 701-TA-564 and 731-TA-1338-1340 (Review) from Japan, Turkey, Taiwan. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
701-TA-564 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 701-TA-564 resulted in AD/CVD case A-489-829. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource
A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.
Open resource
Drop the Tandom Duty Calculator API into a TMS, broker software, or in-house ERP. Code samples, the response shape, and ACE reporting order, in 2026.
Open resource
Run thousands of product descriptions through HTS classification, score the confidence, and triage borderline rows. Public search endpoint plus the closed-beta three-layer Classifier.
Open resource