Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India; Inv. No. 701-TA-548 and 731-TA-1298 (Review)

=== USITC Determination === 26782 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 87 / Thursday, May 5, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 738–765 Stanley Aves., 2156–2202 Linden Blvd., Brooklyn, SG100007744 Fiorentino Plaza, 2155, 2165, 2181–2189, 2211, 2215, 2219–2221 Pitkin and 320,340 Miller Aves., Brooklyn, SG100007746 Oneida County Rome Cemetery, 1500 Jervis Ave., Rome, SG100007745 OHIO Cuyahoga County Mount Auburn School, 10110 Mount Auburn Ave., Cleveland, SG100007757 Greene County Antioch College Fine Arts Building, 405 Corry St., Yellow Springs, SG100007761 Lorain County Robinson Building, 401–415 Broad St., Elyria, SG100007765 SOUTH CAROLINA Abbeville County Abbeville County Training School, (Rosenwald School Building Program in South Carolina, 1917–1932), 410 Branch St., Abbeville, MP100007749 Greenville County Greer Mill, 300 Connecticut Ave., Greer, SG100007764 Horry County Horry County Courthouse, 1201 3rd Ave., Conway, SG100007748 TEXAS Travis County Parque Zaragoza, 2608 Gonzales St., Austin, SG100007750 VIRGINIA Covington Independent City Rivermont School, 1011 North Rockbridge Ave., Covington, SG100007754 Gloucester County Timberneck (Boundary Increase), Address Restricted, Hayes vicinity, BC100007752 Page County Green Hill Cemetery, 202 East Main St., Luray, SG100007753 In the interest of preservation, a SHORTENED comment period has been requested for the following resource: OREGON Polk County Sarah Helmick State Park, 10485 Helmick Rd., Monmouth vicinity, SG100007759 Comment period: 3 days Additional documentation has been received for the following resource: VIRGINIA Gloucester County Timberneck (Additional Documentation), Address Restricted, Hayes vicinity, AD79003041 Nomination submitted by Federal Preservation Officer: The State Historic Preservation Officer reviewed the following nomination(s) and responded to the Federal Preservation Officer within 45 days of receipt of the nomination(s) and supports listing the properties in the National Register of Historic Places. NORTH CAROLINA Rowan County Salisbury VA Hospital Historic District, (United States Third Generation Veterans Hospitals, 1946–1958 MPS), 1601 Brenner Ave., Salisbury, MP100007763 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Dated: April 26, 2022. Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program. [FR Doc. 2022–09656 Filed 5–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–548 and 731– TA–1298 (Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From India Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2021 (86 FR 54470) and determined on January 4, 2022, that it would conduct expedited reviews (87 FR 17336, March 28, 2022). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 29, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5320 (April 2022), entitled Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: Investigation Nos. 701– TA–548 and 731–TA–1298 (First Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 29, 2022. Katherine Hiner, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–09600 Filed 5–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1313] Certain Botulinum Toxin Products and Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same; Institution of Investigation AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on March 30, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Medytox Inc. of the Republic of Korea. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain botulinum toxin products and processes for manufacturing or relating to same by reason of theft and conversion and misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES : The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Pathenia M. Proctor, the Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 May 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM 05MYN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Continuation - AD/CVD - India === This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. Notices Federal Register 29109 Vol. 87, No. 92 Thursday, May 12, 2022 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 54423 (October 1, 2021). COMMISSON ON CIVIL RIGHTS Notice of Public Meetings of the Missouri Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights AGENCY : U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. ACTION : Announcement of meeting. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act that the Missouri Advisory Committee (Committee) will hold a meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. Central time. The Committee will continue orientation and begin identifying potential civil rights topics for their first study of the 2022–2026 term. DATES : The meeting will take place on Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 12:00 p.m. Central Time. ADDRESSES : Public Call Information: Dial: 800–360– 9505, Confirmation Code: 2760 487 4761# Web Access: Join from the meeting link https://civilrights.webex.com/civil rights/j.php?MTID=m15979 a67d565560093063fb41ca14cbe. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : David Barreras, DFO, at dbarreras@ usccr.gov or (312) 353–8311. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Members of the public may listen to this discussion through the above call in number. An open comment period will be provided to allow members of the public to make a statement as time allows. The conference call operator will ask callers to identify themselves, the organization they are affiliated with (if any), and an email address prior to placing callers into the conference room. Callers can expect to incur regular charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, according to their wireless plan. The Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. An individual who is deaf, deafblind and hard of hear hearing may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and confirmation code. Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Regional Programs Unit, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 230 S Dearborn, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL 60604. They may also be faxed to the Commission at (312) 353–8324, or emailed to Corrine Sanders at csanders@ usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353– 8311. Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Records of the meeting will be available via www.facadatabase.gov under the Commission on Civil Rights, Mississippi Advisory Committee link. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, http:// www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. Agenda I. Welcome and roll call II. Introductions III. Discuss Civil Rights Topics IV. Public comment V. Next steps VI. Adjournment Dated: May 6, 2022 David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2022–10155 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–867, C–533–868] Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) have determined that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on welded stainless pressure pipe from India would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, net countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States. Therefore, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. DATES : Applicable May 12, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 17, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD and CVD orders on welded stainless pressure pipe from India. 1 On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the AD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the dumping margins and net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 May 11, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 29110 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2022 / Notices 3 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 87 FR 5466 (February 1, 2022), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM); see also Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 87 FR 5460 (February 1, 2022), and accompanying IDM. 4 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India, 87 FR 26782 (May 5, 2022). 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011); and Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (collectively, Orders). 2 See 3M’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Changed Circumstances Review Request,’’ dated March 23, 2022 (CCR Request). 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Letter in Support of 3M Changed Circumstances Review Request,’’ dated April 13, 2022. 4 Id. at 2–3. 5 Id. at 3. and 752(b) and (c) of the Act.3 On May 5, 2022, the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.4 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these Orders is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of this scope, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of these Orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of these Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: May 6, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–10153 Filed 5–11–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–967; C–570–968] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Changed Circumstances Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is initiating changed circumstances reviews (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (China). DATES : Applicable May 12, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mark Flessner or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6312 or (202) 482–0167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On May 26, 2011, Commerce published the AD and CVD orders on aluminum extrusions from China. 1 On March 23, 2022, 3M Company (3M) requested that Commerce initiate CCRs to revoke, in part, the Orders with respect to certain rectangular wire, pursuant to section 751(b)(l) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 3M requested that Commerce exercise its discretion to extend the effective date back by one additional day, setting an effective date of the revocation of the Orders to entries entered on or after April 30, 2021. Additionally, 3M requested that Commerce expedite the reviews by combining the notice of initiation of the CCRs and the preliminary results of the reviews pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). 3M stated that it is a U.S. importer of certain rectangular wire and, as such, is an interested party pursuant to Section 771(9)(A) of the Act. On April 13, 2022, the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (the petitioner) submitted comments in support of partially revoking the Orders with regard to the certain rectangular wire defined in the CCR Request. 3 The petitioner submitted data demonstrating that it represents ‘‘substantially all’’ of the production of the domestic like product. 4 The petitioner also supported 3M’s request that the partial revocation of the Orders with respect to the certain rectangular wire defined in the CCR Request include unliquidated entries of the certain rectangular wire that was entered on or after April 30, 2021.5 Additionally, the petitioner supported VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 May 11, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 17336 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2022 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found the joint response to its Notice of Institution filed on behalf of Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc., domestic producers of welded stainless steel pressure pipe, to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). Confidential Information’’ and consider submitting such information as a separate attachment. BOEM will not disclose such information, except as required by FOIA. Information that is not labeled as privileged or confidential may be regarded by BOEM as suitable for public release. Further, BOEM will not treat as confidential aggregate summaries of otherwise confidential information. Amanda Lefton, Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. [FR Doc. 2022–06507 Filed 3–25–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–548 and 731– TA–1298 (Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From India; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : January 4, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Alejandro Orozco (202–205–3177), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On January 4, 2022, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (86 FR 54470, October 1, 2021) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews has been placed in the nonpublic record, and will be made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews on March 24, 2022. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before March 31, 2022 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by March 31, 2022. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 22, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–06434 Filed 3–25–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Executive Office for Immigration Review Notice of Meeting—EOIR Case & Appeals System; Immigration Court Online Resource AGENCY : Executive Office for Immigration Review, Justice. ACTION : Notice of meeting. SUMMARY : The Executive Office for Immigration Review (‘‘EOIR’’) invites interested parties to attend the first of a series of public forums about its Access EOIR initiative. During the session, agency senior leadership will be available to listen to comments, compliments, and concerns from stakeholders regarding two of EOIR’s web-based initiatives: EOIR Courts & VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Mar 25, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1 jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 54470 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–548 and 731– TA–1298 (Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From India; Institution of a Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted October 1, 2021. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is November 1, 2021. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by December 14, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lawrence Jones (202–205–3358), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On November 17, 2016, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from India (81 FR 81062). The Commission is conducting a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission’s determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to this review: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department of Commerce. (2) The Subject Country in this review is India. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as consisting of welded stainless steel pressure pipe, corresponding to the scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as consisting of all domestic producers of welded stainless steel pressure pipe. (5) The Order Date is the date that the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders under review became effective. In this review, the Order Date is November 17, 2016. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 54471Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is November 1, 2021. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing such comments is December 14, 2021. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 21–5–500, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determination in the review. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2020, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 54472 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 24, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–21221 Filed 9–30–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Electronic Devices Having Wireless Communication Capabilities and Components Thereof, DN 3568; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant’s filing pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at United States International Trade Commission (USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Commission has received a complaint and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure filed on behalf of Bell Northern Research, LLC on September 27, 2021. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices having wireless communication capabilities and components thereof. The complainant names as respondents: Lenovo Group Ltd. of China; Lenovo (United States), Inc. of Morrisville, NC; Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, IL; TCL Electronics Holdings Limited of Hong Kong; TCT Mobile (US) Inc. of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 54423Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). Dated: September 29, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. History of the Order IV. Scope of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–21443 Filed 9–30–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable October 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–533–867 ......... 731–TA–1298 India ................... Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe (1st Review) .... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. A–570–898 ......... 731–TA–1082 China ................. Chlorinated Isocyanurates (3rd Review) .............. Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. A–469–814 ......... 731–TA–1083 Spain .................. Chlorinated Isocyanurates (3rd Review) .............. Jacky Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. C–533–868 ......... 701–TA–548 India ................... Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe (1st Review) .... Mary Kolberg (202) 482–1785. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 54424 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 84 FR 49987 (September 24, 2019) (2019 Agreement). 2 The Mexican signatories are predominately represented by the following associations: Asociacion Mexicana de Horticultura Protegida, A.C., Asociacion de Productores de Hortalizas del Yaqui y Mayo, Confederacion de Asociaciones Agricolas del Estado de Sinaloa, A.C., Consejo Agricola de Baja California, A.C., and Sistema Producto Tomate. 3 Id. 4 The members of the FTE are as follows: Ag-Mart Produce, Inc. dba Santa Sweets, Inc., Classie Produce, DiMare Homestead, Inc., DiMare Ruskin, Inc., Gargiulo, Inc., Kern Carpenter Farms, Lipman Family Farms, Mecca Family Farms, Inc., Michael Borek Farms, Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd., Taylor & Fulton Packing, LLC, Tomatoes of Ruskin, Inc., TomPak, LLC, and West Coast Tomato, LLC. 5 See Letter from FTE, ‘‘Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated September 25, 2020. 6 See Letter from Bioparques and Letter from NASE, both entitled ‘‘Suspension Agreement on Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico—Request for Administrative Review,’’ each dated September 30, 2020. Bioparques and NASE explained they had requested reviews primarily to review each of the company’s own sales, and ‘‘the amount of any . . . dumping margin involved in the {suspension} agreement.’’ Pursuant to section 751(a)(1)(c) of the Act, Commerce reviews ‘‘the current status of, and compliance with, any agreement by reason of which an investigation was suspended, and review the amount of any . . . dumping margin involved in the agreement, in administrative reviews. . . .’’ Because there is no dumping margin involved in the 2019 Agreement, in conducting this administrative review, we are not calculating new margins for the companies under review, as we would in an administrative review of an order. Rather, in addition to examining compliance with the terms of the agreement, generally, we are examining whether for the sales during the period of review the respondents complied with the price undertakings specified in section VI of the 2019 Agreement, i.e., not making sales below the Reference Prices established in Appendix A and eliminating the required percentage of dumping from the original investigation, i.e., 85 percent. 7 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 68841 (October 30, 2020). 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative Review of the 2019 Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico: Respondent Selection and Corrected Period of Review’’ (January 7, 2021). See also Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 8166 (February 4, 2021) at footnote 10. As the 2019 Agreement was signed on September 19, 2019, this date is the beginning of the POR. 9 Id. See also questionnaires issued individually to Bioparques, Del Campo and Productora Agricola, each dated January 7, 2021. 10 For a complete description of the Scope of the 2019 Agreement, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: September 16, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–21539 Filed 9–30–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–820] Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Preliminary Results of 2019–2020 Administrative Review AGENCY : Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the respondents selected for individual examination, Bioparques De Occidente, S.A. de C.V. and its affiliates (Bioparques), Del Campo Y Asociados SA de CV and its affiliates (Del Campo), and Productora Agricola Industrial del Noroeste, SA de CV (Productora Agricola) and its affiliates (collectively Grupo Pinos), are in compliance with the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico (2019 Agreement), for the period September 19, 2019, through August 31, 2020, and that the 2019 Agreement is meeting the statutory requirements under the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). DATES : Applicable October 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Sally C. Gannon or David Cordell, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–0408, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On September 19, 2019, Commerce signed an agreement 1 under section 734(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), with representatives of Mexican fresh tomato producers/ exporters 2 accounting for substantially all imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico, suspending the antidumping duty (AD) investigation on fresh tomatoes from Mexico. 3 On September 25, 2020, the Florida Tomato Exchange (FTE), 4 a member of the U.S. petitioning industry, filed a request for an administrative review of the 2019 Agreement.5 On September 30, 2020, Bioparques and Negocio Agricola San Enrique S.A. de C.V. (NASE) also requested reviews.6 The review of the 2019 Agreement was initiated on October 30, 2020.7 Commerce inadvertently identified the period of review (POR) as September 1, 2019, through August 31, 2020, but corrected the POR on January 7, 2021, to reflect the period from September 19, 2019 to August 31, 2020.8 On January 7, 2021, Commerce selected mandatory respondents and issued its questionnaire to the three largest respondents, listed here in alphabetical order: Bioparques, Del Campo, and Productora Agricola.9 Scope of the 2019 Agreement Merchandise covered by the 2019 Agreement is typically imported under the following heading of the HTSUS: Tomatoes imported from Mexico covered by this Agreement are classified under the following subheading of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS), according to the season of importation: 0702. The tariff classification is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of this 2019 Agreement is dispositive.10 Methodology and Preliminary Results Commerce has conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(C) of the Act, which specifies that Commerce shall ‘‘review the current status of, and compliance with, any agreement by reason of which an VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Sep 30, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - India === 5466 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 54423 (October 1, 2021). Dated: January 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order Information IV. Subsidies Valuation V. Analysis of Programs VI. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Commerce Correctly Calculated SRF’s Benefits Received for the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Program Comment 2: Whether Commerce Used the Correct Denominator to Calculate Benefits for the SEZ Program VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–01959 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Review AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Background Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct reviews to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for March 2022 Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in March 2022 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews (Sunset Reviews). Department contact Antidumping Duty Proceedings Aluminum Extrusions from China, A–570–967 (2nd Review) ...................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Pure Magnesium from China, A–570–832 (5th Review) .............................................................................. Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. R–134 from China, A–570–044 (1st Review) ............................................................................................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Stainless Sheet and Strip from China, A–570–042 (1st Review) ................................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Phosphorous Copper from South Korea, A–580–085 (1st Review) ............................................................ Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Countervailing Duty Proceedings Aluminum Extrusions from China, C–570–968 (2nd Review) ...................................................................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Stainless Sheet and Strip from China, C–570–043 (1st Review) ................................................................ Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in March 2022. Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), Commerce will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact Commerce in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if Commerce receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. Note that Commerce has modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: January 18, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–02014 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–867] Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on welded stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable February 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of the AD order 1 on WSPP from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 On October 15, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the domestic VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 5467Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 3 The Domestic Producers are Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (collectively, domestic producers). 4 See Domestic Producers’ Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,’’ dated October 15, 2021. 5 Id. at 2. 6 See Domestic Producers’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India, First Review: Domestic Producers’ Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated October 29, 2021. 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on October 1, 2021,’’ dated November 30, 2021. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice. producers 3 in the underlying investigation, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 4 The domestic producers claimed domestic interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of domestic like product in the United States. 5 On October 29, 2021, the domestic producers submitted a timely substantive response within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any other interested parties with respect to the Order covered by this sunset review, nor was a hearing requested. On November 30, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.7 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is welded stainless pressure pipe from India. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.8 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the Order were revoked. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. A complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https:// access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices/ ListLayout.aspx. A list of the issues discussed in the decision memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average margins of up to 12.66 percent. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: January 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–01957 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable February 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - India === 5460 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India: Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 81062 (November 17, 2016) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 54423 (October 1, 2021). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,’’ dated October 15, 2021. 4 Id. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘First Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Countervailing Order on Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from India: Domestic Producers’ Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated October 29, 2021. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on October 1, 2021,’’ dated November 30, 2021. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 8 Commerce determined that Sunrise Stainless Private Limited, Sun Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd., and Shah Foils Ltd. are entitled to the same subsidy rate. See Order, 81 FR at 81064. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–868] Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe From India: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on welded stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable February 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 17, 2016, Commerce published the CVD order on WSPP from India in the Federal Register.1 On October 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first five- year (sunset) review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On October 15, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as domestic producers of WSPP.4 On October 29, 2021, Commerce received a substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested parties. On November 30, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 6 Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is welded stainless pressure pipe from India. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. A list of the issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates: Producer/exporter Net countervailable subsidy rate (percent) Steamline Industries Limited (Steamline) ...................................................................................................................................... 3.13 Sunrise Stainless Private Limited/Sun Mark Stainless Pvt. Ltd./Shah Foils Ltd. (Sunrise Companies) 8 .................................... 6.22 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.65 Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: January 26, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 5461Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 1, 2022 / Notices 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 41949 (August 4, 2021) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films; Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc.; and SKC, Inc. 3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Request for Extension of Briefing Schedule,’’ dated August 25, 2021. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘2019–2020 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from India,’’ dated August 27, 2021. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated September 1, 2021. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated September 10, 2021. 7 See SRF’s Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film from India: Submission of 1st Supplemental Response of Anti-dumping Admin Review Questionnaire,’’ dated September 16, 2021 (SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR). 8 See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from India— Briefing,’’ dated November 18, 2021. 10 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 2002) (Order). 11 See Memorandum, ‘‘Jindal’s Final Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the signature of this Federal Register notice. 12 See Jindal’s Letter, ‘‘2019–2020 Administrative Review of the Ani-Dumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip (PET Film) from India: Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’ dated September 24, 2021. 13 See SRF’s September 16, 2021 SQR at 7–8. See also Memorandum, ‘‘SRF’s Final Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with the signature of this Federal Register notice. 14 See Preliminary Results PDM. VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–01956 Filed 1–31–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–824] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On August 4, 2021, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. We received no comments or requests for a hearing. We continue to find that sales of subject merchandise by Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal) and SRF Limited of India (SRF) were not made at less than normal value during the POR. DATES : Applicable February 1, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 4, 2021, Commerce published the preliminary results for this administrative review. 1 In the Preliminary Results, we invited interested parties to comment within 30 days. The petitioners 2 also requested an extension of the briefing schedule on August 25, 2021.3 Commerce issued a memorandum to all interested parties on August 27, 2021, which granted the petitioners’ request and stated that we would reset the deadlines to submit case briefs on a later date.4 On September 1, 2021, we issued a supplemental questionnaire to SRF.5 On September 10, 2021, we issued a supplemental questionnaire to Jindal.6 On September 16, 2021, SRF submitted its response to our supplemental questionnaire.7 On September 24, 2021, Jindal submitted its response to our supplemental questionnaire.8 On November 18, 2021, Commerce extended these final results and then on November 23, 2021, Commerce established the revised deadlines for the briefing schedule. 9 No interested party submitted comments or requested a hearing in this administrative review. The current deadline for these final results is January 28, 2022. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 10 The products covered by the Order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metalized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results As noted above, Commerce received no comments concerning the Preliminary Results. Jindal submitted corrected information for a movement charge, which had been inadvertently omitted in its prior filings.11 Also, in response to instructions from Commerce, Jindal separated information for discounts and rebates that were grouped together. 12 We incorporated these corrections and updated information into these final results; we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise by Jindal were not made at less than normal value during the POR. SRF submitted corrected information for its quantity discount as explained in its supplemental questionnaire.13 We also incorporated the corrections and updated information into these final results; we also continue to find that sales of subject merchandise made by SRF were not made at less than normal value during the POR. Accordingly, no decision memorandum accompanies this Federal Register notice. For further details of the issues addressed in this proceeding, see the Preliminary Results and the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.14 Final Results of Review The final weighted-average dumping margins for the period July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020, are as shown below: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Jan 31, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 tkelley on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE