ITC Investigation 701-TA-545 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and United Kingdom; Inv. No. 701-TA-545-546 and 731-TA-1291-1297 (Review) and 731-TA-808 (Fourth Review) from Japan, United Kingdom, Turkey, Brazil, Netherlands, South Korea, and Australia. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. Commerce initiated the underlying investigation on September 1, 2021. It links to AD/CVD case A-351-845 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and United Kingdom; Inv. No. 701-TA-545-546 and 731-TA-1291-1297 (Review) and 731-TA-808 (Fourth Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Parties
Documents
Full text (184,119 chars)
=== USITC Scheduling === 36343Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2022 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–545–546 and 731–TA–1291–1297 (Review) and 731–TA– 808 (Fourth Review)] Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on hot- rolled steel flat products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom and revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel flat products from Brazil and Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. DATES : June 9, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Andres Andrade ((202) 205–2078), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On December 6, 2021, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that a full review should proceed (87 FR 3123, January 20, 2022); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of these reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to these reviews. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings during this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in these reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of these reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in these reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 31, 2022, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with these reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on September 15, 2022. Information about the place and form of the hearing, including about how to participate in and/or view the hearing, will be posted on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/calendarpad/ calendar.html. Interested parties should check the Commission’s website periodically for updates. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before September 9, 2022. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should participate in a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on September 14, 2022. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 207.24 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is September 8, 2022. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is September 26, 2022. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to these reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of these reviews on or before September 26, 2022. On October 14, 2022, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before October 18, 2022, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Jun 15, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 36344 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2022 / Notices Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to these reviews must be served on all other parties to these reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 10, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–12955 Filed 6–15–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–New] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection of eComments Requested; New Collection AGENCY : Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. ACTION : 30-Day notice. SUMMARY : The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Laboratory Division, is submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES : The Department of Justice encourages public comment and will accept input until July 18, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Dr. JoAnn Buscaglia, Research Chemist, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, LPBB22@fbi.gov, 703–632–7856. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: ➢ Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, including whether the information will have practical utility; ➢ Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ➢ Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and ➢ Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection: New collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Latent Print Examiner Black Box Study 2022. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: There is no agency form number for this collection. The applicable component within the Department of Justice is the Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Affected public will consist of U.S. Federal, state, local, and tribal government employees, and contractors for these government agencies (‘‘business or other non-profit’’). Abstract: This study is being conducted to measure the accuracy and reproducibility of latent print examiners’ decisions when comparing latents to known fingerprints acquired by a search of the FBI NGI system, and to compare these results with those from published studies using the FBI IAFIS. Respondents will be latent fingerprint examiners (employees and contractors) from U.S. Federal, state, local, and tribal governments. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: An estimated 250 respondents is anticipated, though the research study will be open to all practicing latent fingerprint examiners from U.S. Federal, state, local, and tribal governments. Individuals will work at their own paces, but the project was scaled for an average of 12 hours total per individual to respond to the collection. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: 3,000 hours. If additional information is required contact: Robert Houser, Assistant Director, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: June 10, 2022. Robert Houser, Assistant Director, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2022–12957 Filed 6–15–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [AAG/A Order No. 001/2022] Privacy Act of 1974; Matching Program AGENCY : Justice Management Division, United States Department of Justice. ACTION : Notice of a new matching program. SUMMARY : The Department of Justice (DOJ) is issuing a public notice of its intent to conduct a computer matching program with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of the Treasury. Under this matching program, entitled Taxpayer Address Request (TAR), the IRS will provide information relating to taxpayers’ mailing addresses to the DOJ for purposes of enabling DOJ to locate debtors to initiate litigation and/or enforce the collection of debts VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Jun 15, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 49057Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/ business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in 1,000 gallons @ 400 GPL and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2016 and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 26, 2021. Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2021–18787 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–545–546 and 731–TA–1291–1297 (Review), and 731–TA– 808 (Fourth Review)] Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; Institution of Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on imports of hot-rolled steel flat products (‘‘hot- rolled steel’’) from Brazil and Korea and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted September 1, 2021. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is October 1, 2021. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by November 16, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lawrence Jones (202–205–3358), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Effective July 12, 1999, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) suspended the antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel imports from Russia (64 FR 38642, July 19, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:03 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 49058 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices 1999). Following first five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective May 12, 2005, Commerce issued a continuation of the suspended investigation on imports of hot-rolled steel from Russia (70 FR 32571, June 3, 2005). Following second five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective June 17, 2011, Commerce issued a continuation of the suspended investigation on imports of hot-rolled steel from Russia (76 FR 35400, June 17, 2011). Effective December 19, 2014, Commerce terminated the agreement suspending the antidumping duty investigation on hot-rolled steel from Russia and issued an antidumping duty order (79 FR 77455, December 24, 2014). Following the expedited, third five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective October 20, 2016, Commerce issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of hot-rolled steel from Russia (81 FR 72569, October 20, 2016). On October 3, 2016, Commerce issued countervailing duty orders on imports of hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Korea and antidumping duty orders on imports of hot-rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom (81 FR 67960 and 81 FR 67962). The Commission is conducting first five-year reviews of the orders concerning Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom and a fourth five-year review of the order concerning Russia pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The Commission’s determination in any expedited review will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of these five-year reviews, as defined by the Department of Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determination and its first, second, and third five-year review determinations (Russia), and in its original determinations (Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom), the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all hot-rolled steel, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determination and its first, second, and third five-year review determinations (Russia), and in its original determinations (Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom), the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all domestic producers of hot-rolled steel. (5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the Proceeding and Public Service List Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited Disclosure of Business Proprietary Information (BPI) Under an Administrative Protective Order (APO) and APO Service List Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 49059Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written Submissions Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is October 1, 2021. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing such comments is November 16, 2021. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 21–5–498, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability To Provide Requested Information Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determination in the review. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the countervailing and the antidumping duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries after October 2016. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2020, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 49060 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country after October 2016 and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 25, 2021. Katherine Hiner, Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2021–18785 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Prisons Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration Fee (COIF) AGENCY : Bureau of Prisons, Justice. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : This Notice publishes the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 and 2020 Cost of Incarceration Fee (COIF) for Federal inmates. DATES : September 1, 2021. ADDRESSES : Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First St. NW, Washington, DC 20534. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Sarah Qureshi, (202) 353–8248. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 505, allows for assessment of a fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates. We calculate the cost of incarceration fee (COIF) by dividing the number representing the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) facilities’ monetary obligation (excluding activation costs) by the number of inmate-days incurred for the fiscal year, and then by multiplying the quotient by the number of days in the fiscal year. Based on FY 2019 data, the average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Federal facility in FY 2019 was $35,347 ($107.85 per day). The average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Residential Reentry Center for FY 2019 was $39,924 ($109.38 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2019.) Based on FY 2020 data, the average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Federal facility in FY 2020 was $39,158 ($120.59 per day). The average annual COIF for a Federal inmate in a Residential Reentry Center for FY 2020 was $35,663 ($97.44 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2020.) Ken Hyle, Assistant Director/General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons. [FR Doc. 2021–18800 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–05–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Australia - Brazil - Japan - South Korea - Netherlands - Turkey - United Kingdom === 751Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 8 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 7208.37.0060, 7208.38.0015, 7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090, 7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030, 7208.39.0090, 7208.40.6030, 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000, 7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000, 7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560, 7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.30.3050, 7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 7226.11.9030, 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and 7226.91.8000. Subject merchandise may also enter under subheadings 7210.90.9000, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090, 7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075, 7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7226.99.0180, and 7228.60.6000. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive.8 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization in the event of revocation of the Order and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates: Exporters or manufacturers Net countervailable subsidy rate (percent) Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CNS) ....................................................................................................................................... 11.30 Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (Usiminas) ................................................................................................................. 11.09 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11.20 Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: December 29, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of the Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–00020 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–602–809, A–351–845, A–588–874, A–580– 883, A–421–813, A–489–826, A–412–825] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea (Korea), the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable January 6, 2022. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 752 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 2016), as amended, Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Amended Final Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination, Amended Antidumping Duty Order, Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order in Part; and Discontinuation of the 2017–18 and 2018–19 Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, in Part, 85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020) (AD Orders). 2 See Initiation Notice of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Five- Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five- Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five- Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Korea’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five- Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom’’ as amended to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB), dated September 16, 2021 and amended September 20, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021 (collectively, Notices of Intent to Participate). 4 See Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil’’; ‘‘Amendment to notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Korea’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five- year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey’’; ‘‘Amendment to Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom,’’ each dated September 20, 2021. 5 Note that some domestic interested parties are not participating in every review. See country- specific substantive responses for a specific list of the domestic interested parties participating in each county review. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: Substantive Response of the Domestic Interested Parties to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five- Year (‘Sunset’) Reviews,’’ dated September 30, 2021; ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Japan: Substantive Response of the Domestic Interested Parties to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five- Year (‘Sunset’) Reviews,’’ dated September 30, 2021; ‘‘First Five-years (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Antidumping Order on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated September 30, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Netherlands: Domestic Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated September 29, 2021; ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the United Kingdom: Domestic Industry Substantive Response,’’ dated September 29, 2021 (collectively, Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Responses). 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on September 1, 2021,’’ dated October 21, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Zachary Le Vene, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0056. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On September 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the AD orders on hot- rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom 1 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) and (ii), Commerce received notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from California Steel Industries, Steel Dynamics, Inc., Nucor Corporation, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., and United States Steel Corporation (domestic interested parties) within 15 days after the date of publication of the Initiation Notice. 3 On September 20, 2021, Commerce received a request to amend received notices to include SSAB Enterprises LLC (SSAB) in the reviews. 4 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of hot-rolled steel in the United States.5 Commerce received adequate substantive responses to the Initiation Notice from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 Commerce received no substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. On October 21, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 7 As a VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 753Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Hot- Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the AD Orders. Scope of the AD Orders The merchandise subject to the AD Orders is hot-rolled steel flat products. A full description of the scope of the AD Orders is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 8 The written description is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and the magnitude of dumping margins likely to prevail if the orders were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNotices/ListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the AD Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail would be weighted- average margins up to the following percentages: Country Weighted- average margin (percent) Australia ...................................... 29.58 Brazil ........................................... 34.28 Japan .......................................... 11.70 Korea .......................................... 11.10 The Netherlands ......................... 3.73 Turkey ......................................... 24.32 United Kingdom .......................... 33.06 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: December 29, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–00019 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program—Revisions to the Personal Body Armor Laboratory Accreditation Program AGENCY : National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) announces approval of revisions to its Personal Body Armor Laboratory Accreditation Program (LAP) for accreditation of laboratories performing tests on ballistic- and stab- resistant personal body armor. The program has been renamed as the Law Enforcement and Corrections Equipment LAP to better reflect the types of testing being performed within this accreditation program and to allow for future expansion of the program for testing of additional law enforcement and corrections equipment. DATES : Handbook 150–24, 2021 edition, is applicable 30 days after publication on the NVLAP website, https:// www.nist.gov/nvlap. ADDRESSES : Laboratories may obtain a copy of NIST Handbook 150–24, NVLAP Law Enforcement and Corrections Equipment, by visiting the NVLAP website at https://www.nist.gov/ nvlap or by sending a request to NVLAP by mail at NIST/NVLAP, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2140, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2140 or by email at nvlap@ nist.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Timothy Rasinski, Program Manager, NIST/NVLAP, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2140, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2140, Phone: (301) 975–4016 or email: timothy.rasinski@nist.gov. Information regarding NVLAP and the accreditation process can be obtained from http:// www.nist.gov/nvlap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) administers NVLAP under regulations found in 15 CFR part 285. NVLAP provides an unbiased third-party evaluation and recognition of laboratory performance, as well as expert technical assistance to upgrade that performance, by accrediting calibration and testing laboratories found competent to perform specific calibrations or tests. NVLAP is comprised of a set of LAPs which are established on the basis of requests and demonstrated need. Each LAP includes specific calibration and/or test standards and related methods and protocols assembled to satisfy the unique needs for accreditation in the field of calibration, field of testing, product or service. The NVLAP Personal Body Armor LAP was established in 2006 at the request of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Office of Science and Technology. The LAP was developed to accredit laboratories for body armor testing in support of the NIJ Compliance Testing Program (CTP). The LAP currently encompasses accreditation for ballistic- resistant body armor testing, stab- resistant body armor testing, and autoloading pistol testing. The Chief of NVLAP may approve modifications to a specific LAP when a request to modify the LAP is received. Modifications may include addition of tests, types of tests or standards that are directly relevant to the LAP. NVLAP VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 48983Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices Dated: August 26, 2021. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021–18883 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel Review: Notice of NAFTA Panel Decision AGENCY : United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice of NAFTA Panel Decision in the matter of Ammonium Sulphate from the United States of America. (Secretariat File Number: MEX–USA–2015–1904–01). SUMMARY : On July 7, 2021, a NAFTA Binational Panel issued its Decision in the matter of Ammonium Sulphate from the United States of America (Determination on Remand). The Binational Panel remanded the Secretaria de Economia’s (Economia) second Determination on Remand and ordered Economia to issue a redetermination within 90 days. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Vidya Desai, Acting United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Article 1904 of Chapter 19 of NAFTA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to provide judicial review of the trade remedy determination being challenged and then issue a binding Panel Decision. The NAFTA Binational Panel Decision is available publicly at https://can-mex- usa-sec.org/secretariat/report-rapport- reporte.aspx?lang=eng. The NAFTA Panel Decision is being announced pursuant to Rule 70 of the NAFTA Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews. For the complete Rules, please see https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/ secretariat/agreement-accord-acuerdo/ nafta-alena-tlcan/rules-regles-reglas/ article-article-articulo_ 1904.aspx?lang=eng. Dated: August 27, 2021. Vidya Desai, Acting U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 2021–18895 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable September 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–602–809 ........ 731–TA–1291 Australia. A–351–845 ........ 731–TA–1292 Brazil ....................... Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–588–874 ........ 731–TA–1293 Japan ...................... Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–421–813 ........ 731–TA–1295 Netherlands ............ Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–580–883 ........ 731–TA–1294 South Korea ............ Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–489–826 ........ 731–TA–1296 Turkey ..................... Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–412–825 ........ 731–TA–1297 United Kingdom ...... Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–821–809 ........ 731–TA–808 Russia ..................... Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products (4th Review). Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. C–351–846 ........ 701–TA–545 Brazil ....................... Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. C–580–884 ........ 701–TA–546 South Korea ............ Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products (1st Re- view). Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. A–357–818 ........ 731–TA–1105 Argentina ................ Lemon Juice (2nd Review) ...................... Jacky Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 48984 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 167 / Wednesday, September 1, 2021 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.1 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: August 16, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–18922 Filed 8–31–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology [Docket No. 210826–0169] National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) Automation of the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) AGENCY : National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) invites organizations to provide letters of interest describing products and technical expertise to support and demonstrate security platforms for the Automation of the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) project. This notice is the initial step for the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE), in collaborating with technology companies, to address cybersecurity challenges identified under the Automation of the Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) project. Participation in the project is open to all interested organizations. DATES : Collaborative activities will commence as soon as enough completed and signed letters of interest have been returned to address all the necessary components and capabilities, but no earlier than October 1, 2021. ADDRESSES : The NCCoE is located at 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville, MD 20850. Letters of interest must be submitted to applied-crypto-testing@ nist.gov or via hardcopy to National Institute of Standards and Technology, NCCoE; 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville, MD 20850. Interested parties can access the letter of interest template by visiting https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/ projects/building-blocks/applied- cryptography/cmvp-automation and completing the letter of interest webform. NIST will announce the completion of the selection of participants and inform the public that it will no longer accept letters of interest for this project at https:// www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/building- blocks/applied-cryptography/cmvp- automation. Organizations whose letters of interest are accepted will be asked to sign a consortium Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with NIST; a template CRADA can be found at: https://nccoe.nist.gov/library/ nccoe-consortium-crada-example. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 Aug 31, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM 01SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - Brazil === 750 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil and the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determinations and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 67960 (October 3, 2016) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 3 See Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; Nucor Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; United States Steel Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; Steel Dynamic Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021. 4 Id. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated September 30, 2021 (Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive Response). 6 See GOB’s Letter, ‘‘Initial Comments,’’ dated September 30, 2021. 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on September 1, 2021,’’ dated October 20, 2021. XII. Recommendation Appendix I—Grant Programs Preliminarily Determined to be Not Used by JA Solar and Risen During the POR Appendix II—Programs Preliminarily Determined Not to Confer a Measurable Benefit to JA Solar and Risen During the POR Appendix II Non-Selected Companies Under Review 1: Canadian Solar International Limited 2: Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc. 3: Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc. 4: Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 5: CSI Cells Co., Ltd. 6: CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng) Co., Ltd. 7: Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd. 8: Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 9: Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. 10: LONGi Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 11: Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 12: Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. Appendix III Intent To Rescind Review, in Part 1. Astronergy Co., Ltd. 2. Astronergy Solar 3. Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. 4. Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 5. Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 6. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 7. Chint New Energy Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd. 8. Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited 9. Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd. 10. CSI Modules (Dafeng) Co., Ltd. 11. DelSolar (Wujiang) Ltd. 12. DelSolar Co., Ltd. 13. De-Tech Trading Limited HK 14. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 15. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. 16. ERA Solar Co., Ltd. 17. ET Solar Energy Limited 18. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. 19. GCL System Integration Technology Co. Ltd 20. Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 21. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. 22. Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 23. Jiangsu High Hope Int’l Group 24. Jinko Solar International Limited 25. JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd. 26. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 27. LightWay Green New Energy Co., Ltd. 28. Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 29. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd. 30. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd. 31. ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd. 32. Renesola Zhejiang Ltd. 33. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 34. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. 35. Sunpreme Solar Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. 36. Suntimes Technology Co., Limited 37. Systemes Versilis, Inc. 38. Taimax Technologies Inc. 39. Talesun Energy 40. Talesun Solar 41. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 42. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 43. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. 44. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. 45. Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited 46. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 47. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 48. Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company [FR Doc. 2022–00021 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–351–846] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products of Brazil: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty order (CVD) on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (HRS) from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable January 6, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Macey Mayes, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4473. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 3, 2016, Commerce published in Federal Register a notice of the CVD order on HRS from Brazil. 1 On September 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 Commerce received notices of intent to participate from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., and United States Steel Corporation (collectively, domestic interested parties) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties each claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers or producers of the domestic like product.4 On September 30, 2021, Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce also received a response from the Government of Brazil (GOB). 6 However, we did not receive a substantive response from any other interested party in this proceeding. On October 20, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 7 As a result, Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order is certain hot-rolled, flat-rolled steel products, with or without patterns in relief, and whether or not annealed, painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances. The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) statistical categories 7208.10.1500, 7208.10.3000, 7208.10.6000, 7208.25.3000, 7208.25.6000, 7208.26.0030, 7208.26.0060, 7208.27.0030, 7208.27.0060, 7208.36.0030, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 751Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2022 / Notices 8 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil,’’ dated concurrently with, and herby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 7208.37.0060, 7208.38.0015, 7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090, 7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030, 7208.39.0090, 7208.40.6030, 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000, 7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000, 7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560, 7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.30.3050, 7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 7226.11.9030, 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and 7226.91.8000. Subject merchandise may also enter under subheadings 7210.90.9000, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090, 7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075, 7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7226.99.0180, and 7228.60.6000. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive.8 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of subsidization in the event of revocation of the Order and the countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/public/ FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates: Exporters or manufacturers Net countervailable subsidy rate (percent) Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CNS) ....................................................................................................................................... 11.30 Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (Usiminas) ................................................................................................................. 11.09 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11.20 Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: December 29, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of the Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–00020 Filed 1–5–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–602–809, A–351–845, A–588–874, A–580– 883, A–421–813, A–489–826, A–412–825] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea (Korea), the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable January 6, 2022. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:13 Jan 05, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Russia === 72577Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 22, 2021 / Notices 1 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from the Russian Federation, Rescission of 2013–2014 Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 77455 (December 24, 2014) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Russian Federation: Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ dated September 30, 2021. 4 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on September 1, 2021,’’ dated October 20, 2021. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from the Russian Federation,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) at 3. 6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from the Russian Federation, 64 FR 38626 (July 19, 1999). Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is January 31, 2022. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Online FTZ Information System’’ section of the Board’s website. For further information, contact Juanita Chen at juanita.chen@trade.gov. Dated: December 16, 2021. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021–27715 Filed 12–21–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–809] Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon- Quality Steel Products From the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain hot-rolled flat- rolled carbon-quality steel products (hot-rolled steel) from the Russian Federation (Russia) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the rates identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable December 22, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : James Hepburn, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1882. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 24, 2014, Commerce published the AD order on hot-rolled steel from Russia. 1 On September 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the second sunset review of the Order in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On September 16, 2021, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from Nucor Corporation, California Steel Industries, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., Steel Dynamics Inc., and United States Steel Corporation (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the 15-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act. On September 30, 2021, Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the notice of initiation from domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested parties. On October 20, 2021 Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties. 4 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C), Commerce conducted an expedited, i.e., 120-day, sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order is hot-rolled steel. These imports are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, 7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, 7208.90.00.00, 7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00, 7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30, 7211.19.75.60, 7211.19.75.90, 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00, 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scopes of the Order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 5 The written descriptions are dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 6 including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if this order was revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average margins up to 184.56.7 Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Dec 21, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 72578 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 22, 2021 / Notices Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: December 15, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Proceeding V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–27717 Filed 12–21–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XB650] Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION : Notice of a public meeting. SUMMARY : The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a three-day hybrid meeting for both in-person and virtual participation of its Standing, Reef Fish, Socioeconomic, and Ecosystem Scientific and Statistical Committees (SSC). DATES : The meeting will take place Tuesday, January 11 to Thursday, January 13, 2022, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., EST daily. ADDRESSES : Those who prefer to attend the meeting in-person may do so at the Gulf Council office. If you are unable or do not wish to travel, you may participate in the meeting via webinar. Registration information will be available on the Council’s website by visiting www.gulfcouncil.org and clicking on the ‘‘meeting tab’’. Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 4107 W. Spruce Street, Suite 200, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone: (813) 348–1630. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mr. Ryan Rindone, Lead Fishery Biologist, Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; ryan.rindone@gulfcouncil.org, telephone: (813) 348–1630. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Tuesday, January 11, 2022; 9 a.m.–5 p.m., EST The meeting will begin with Introductions and Adoption of Agenda, Approval of Verbatim Minutes and Meeting Summary from the November 18, 2021 meeting, and review of Scope of Work. The Committees will select an SSC Representative for the January 24– 27, 2022 Gulf Council Meeting. Following, Committees will review the Absolute Abundance Estimates for Red Snapper, Greater Amberjack and other Federally Managed Fish on Offshore Petroleum Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, evaluate Access-Point Angler Intercept Survey (APAIS) Intercepts for Yellowtail Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico and review the National Academics of Science Report on the Impacts of Limited Access Privilege Programs in Mixed-use Fisheries, including presentations, reports, and SSC discussion. The Committees will also review Spatial Coverage and Severity of the 2020/21 Red Tide on the West Florida Shelf, Simulation of the Effect of Marine Recreational Information Program Fishing Effort Survey (MRIP–FES) Data on Catch Advice for a Historical King Mackerel Stock Assessment and discuss Draft Essential Fish Habitat Amendment and Data; including presentations, reports, a draft amendment, and SSC discussion. Wednesday, January 12, 2022; 9 a.m.– 5 p.m., EST The Committees will receive a status update on Red Snapper Management and Outstanding Council Motion, and a summary of SSC Discussion and Recommendations on Great Red Snapper Count Report (GSRC) Report from March/April 2020 and September 2020 Meetings. The Committees will review the GRSC: Re-analysis of the Florida natural/unconsolidated bottom- type data to include the random forest design stratification; Discussion of Results of Post-stratification Analysis by SEFSC, FWC, and GRSC Teams for Florida Absolute Abundance Data; Fishery-Independent Indices Updates for Red Snapper; review Estimated Commercial and Recreational Effort over Uncharacterized Bottom in the Gulf of Mexico; including presentations, supporting documentation, and SSC discussions. Thursday, January 13, 2022; 9 a.m.–5 p.m., EST The Committees will hold a summary discussion and review potential requests for Updated SEFSC Red Snapper Interim Analysis for Catch Advice for the March 2022 SSC Meeting and review National Marine Fisheries Service’s (NMFS) Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology. Lastly, the Committees will receive public comment before addressing any items under Other Business. Meeting Adjourns The meeting will also be broadcast via webinar. You may register for the webinar by visiting www.gulfcouncil.org and clicking on the SSC meeting on the calendar. The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version along with other meeting materials will be posted on www.gulfcouncil.org as they become available. Although other non-emergency issues not on the agenda may come before the Scientific and Statistical Committees for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Actions of the Scientific and Statistical Committee will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in the agenda and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council’s intent to take-action to address the emergency. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Kathy Pereira, (813) 348–1630, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: December 16, 2021. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2021–27679 Filed 12–21–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:55 Dec 21, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - South Korea === 428 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2022 / Notices the People’s Republic of China: Decision Memorandum for the Amended Preliminary Results of the 2017–2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012). 5 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 15, 2021). 6 See Xanthan Gum from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR 64831 (November 25, 2019). 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil and the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determinations and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 67960 (October 3, 2016). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021). 3 See Cleveland-Cliffs’ Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice Of Intent To Participate In Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021; U.S. Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated September 16, 2021; CSI/SDI’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Hot-Rolled Analysis In the Amended Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Fufeng was eligible for separate rate status and assigned it a dumping margin of zero percent, which is the dumping margin that Commerce calculated for both of the respondents individually examined in the review. As noted above, no parties commented on the Amended Preliminary Results. In these amended final results of review, we are making no change to and are adopting the decisions in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Specifically, we continue to find that Fufeng is eligible for separate rate status and that it is appropriate to assign Fufeng the zero percent dumping margin that Commerce calculated for both of the respondents that it individually examined in the review. Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by the amended final results of this review. Because Fufeng’s weighted average dumping margin is zero percent, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. 4 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these amended final results of review in the Federal Register. 5 If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The cash deposit rate for Fufeng is zero percent, which will be effective for shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. For information regarding the cash deposit requirements established for other companies in this segment of the proceeding, see the Final Results.6 This cash deposit requirement, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties These amended final results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1) and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: December 29, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–28508 Filed 1–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–580–884] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable January 5, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Nathan James, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5305. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 3, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on hot-rolled steel from Korea. 1 On September 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the CVD order on hot-rolled steel from Korea, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 Commerce received timely notices of intent to participate from Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (Cleveland-Cliffs), United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), California Steel Industries (CSI), Steel Dynamics Inc. (SDI), and Nucor Corporation (Nucor) (collectively, domestic interested parties). 3 The VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Jan 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE 429Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 5, 2022 / Notices Steel Flat Products from Korea,’’ dated September 16, 2021; and Nucor’s Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated September 16, 2021. 4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ dated September 30, 2021. 5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on September 1, 2021,’’ dated October 20, 2021. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of hot-rolled steel. On September 30, 2021, Commerce received a timely and adequate substantive response from the domestic interested parties. 4 We received no substantive responses from any other interested parties, including the Government of Korea, nor was a hearing requested. On October 20, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that we did not receive an adequate substantive response from any respondent interested parties. 5 As a result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the CVD order on hot- rolled steel from Korea. Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is hot-rolled steel. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/ public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the order would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the rates listed below: Producer/exporter Subsidy rate (percent) POSCO ................................. 41.64 Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd ......... 3.98 All Others .............................. 3.89 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: December 29, 2021. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the Non-Exclusive Functions and Duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Issues Addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Countervailable Subsidies 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–28556 Filed 1–4–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: Binational Panel Review: Notice of Request for Panel Review AGENCY : United States Section, USMCA Secretariat, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION : Notice of USMCA Request for Panel Review. SUMMARY : A Request for Panel Review was filed on behalf of the Government of Canada; Conseil de l’Industrie Forestiere du Que´bec, Ontario Forest Industries Association; Canfor Corporation, Fontaine, Inc., Resolute FP Canada Inc., Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd., Tolko Industries Ltd., Gilbert Smith Forest Products, and West Fraser Mills Ltd. with the United States Section of the USMCA Secretariat on December 28, 2021, pursuant to USMCA Article 10.12. Panel Review was requested of the U.S. International Trade Administration’s Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (2019) in Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, which was published in the Federal Register on December 2, 2021. The USMCA Secretariat has assigned case number USA–CDA–2021–10.12–04 to this request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Vidya Desai, Acting United States Secretary, USMCA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, 202–482–5438. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Article 10.12 of Chapter 10 of USMCA provides a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel Review, a Binational Panel is composed to review the trade remedy determination being challenged and issue a binding Panel Decision. There are established USMCA Rules of Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational Panel Reviews), which were adopted by the three governments for panels requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of USMCA which requires Requests for Panel Review to be published in accordance with Rule 40. For the complete Rules, please see https://can- mex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreement- accord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/ rules-regles-reglas/article-article- articulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng. The Rules provide that: (a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance with Rule 44 no later than 30 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is January 27, 2022); (b) A Party, an investigating authority or other interested person who does not VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Jan 04, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JAN1.SGM 05JAN1 TKELLEY on DSK125TN23PROD with NOTICE ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 74167Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 231 / Friday, December 2, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioners Rhonda K. Schmidtlein and Randolph J. Stayin determine that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil and South Korea and the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 87 FR 67441 and 87 FR 67447, November 8, 2022. personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware that your entire protest—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee we will be able to do so. Authority: 43 U.S.C. chap. 3. Matthew J. Kurchinski, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Utah. [FR Doc. 2022–26313 Filed 12–1–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–25–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–545–546 and 731–TA–1291–1297 (Review), and 731–TA– 808 (Fourth Review)] Hot-Rolled Steel From Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on hot-rolled steel flat products (‘‘hot-rolled steel’’) from South Korea and the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission further determines that revocation of the countervailing duty and antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on September 1, 2021 (86 FR 49057) and determined on December 6, 2021 that it would conduct full reviews (87 FR 3123, January 20, 2022). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on June 16, 2022 (87 FR 36343). The Commission conducted its hearing on September 15, 2022. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on November 25, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5380 (November 2022), entitled Hot-Rolled Steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey and the United Kingdom: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–545–546 and 731–TA–1291–1297 (Review), and 731– TA–808 (Fourth Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 25, 2022. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2022–26269 Filed 12–1–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–22–052] Sunshine Act Meetings Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE : December 5, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. PLACE : Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS : Open to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED : 1. Agendas for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 731– TA–540 and 541 (Fifth Review) (Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe from South Korea and Taiwan). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on December 13, 2022. 5. Outstanding action jackets: none. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION : Tyrell Burch, Management Analyst, 202–205–2595. The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notification of this meeting was not possible. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 29, 2022. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2022–26352 Filed 11–30–22; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–683 and 731– TA–1594–1596 (Preliminary)] Paper File Folders From China, India, and Vietnam Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of paper file folders from China, India, and Vietnam provided for in subheading 4820.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by the government of India. 2 Commencement of Final Phase Investigations Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in § 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative preliminary determinations in the investigations under §§ 703(b) or 733(b) VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Dec 01, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM 02DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Full Review === 3123Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2022 / Notices summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Abstract: The regulations at 30 CFR part 250, subpart K, concern Oil and Gas Production Requirements (including the associated forms) and are the subject of this collection. This request also covers any related Notices to Lessees and Operators (NTLs) that BSEE issues to clarify, supplement, or provide additional guidance on some aspects of our regulations. The information collected under Subpart K is used in our efforts to conserve natural resources, prevent waste, and protect correlative rights, including the Government’s royalty interest. Specifically, BSEE uses the information to: • Evaluate requests to burn liquid hydrocarbons and vent and flare gas to ensure that these requests are appropriate; • determine if a maximum production or efficient rate is required; and, • review applications for downhole commingling to ensure that action does not result in harm to ultimate recovery. The forms used in this ICR are: Form BSEE–0126, Well Potential Test Report BSEE uses this information for reservoir, reserves, and conservation analyses, including the determination of maximum production rates (MPRs) when necessary for certain oil and gas completions. This requirement implements the conservation provisions of the OCS Lands Act and 30 CFR 250. The information obtained from the well potential test is essential to determine if an MPR is necessary for a well and to establish the appropriate rate. It is not possible to specify an MPR in the absence of information about the production rate capability (potential) of the well. The form asks for, in either fill in the blanks or check marks: • General information about the well and the company; • pertinent information relating to the well test; and • 24-hour rates pertaining to test production. Form BSEE–0128, Semiannual Well Test Report BSEE uses this information to evaluate the results of well tests to determine if reservoirs are being depleted in a manner that will lead to the greatest ultimate recovery of hydrocarbons. This information is collected to determine the capability of hydrocarbon wells and to evaluate and verify an operator’s approved maximum production rate if assigned. The form was designed to present current well data on a semiannual basis to permit the updating of permissible producing rates, and to provide the basis for estimates of currently remaining recoverable gas reserves. The form requires, in either fill in the blanks or check marks: • General information about the well; • volumes; • choke size; • pressures; • production method; • API oil/condensate gravity; and • date of test. Title of Collection: 30 CFR part 250, subpart K, Oil and Gas Production Requirements. OMB Control Number: 1014–0019. Form Number: BSEE–0126—Well Potential Test Report, and BSEE–0128— Semiannual Well Test Report. Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved collection. Respondents/Affected Public: Potential respondents include Federal OCS oil, gas, and sulfur lessees and/or operators and holders of pipeline rights- of-way. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: Currently there are approximately 60 Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Operators in the OCS. Not all the potential respondents will submit information in any given year, and some may submit multiple times. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 7,688. Estimated Completion Time per Response: Varies from 1 hour to 100 hours, depending on activity. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 46,466. Respondent’s Obligation: Most responses are mandatory, while others are required to obtain or retain benefits. Frequency of Collection: On occasion, weekly, monthly, semi-annual, annual, and varies by section. Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $1,077,816. An agency may not conduct, or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Kirk Malstrom, Chief, Regulations and Standards Branch. [FR Doc. 2022–00966 Filed 1–19–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–545–546 and 731–TA–1291–1297 (Review) and 731–TA– 808 (Fourth Review)] Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews; Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on hot- rolled steel flat products from Brazil and Korea, and revocation of the antidumping duty orders on hot-rolled steel flat products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES : December 6, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Andres Andrade (202–205–2078), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jan 19, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM 20JAN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 3124 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2022 / Notices Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On December 6, 2021, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response and the respondent interested party group responses from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom to its notice of institution (86 FR 49057, September 1, 2021) were adequate and determined to conduct full reviews of the orders on hot-rolled steel flat products from these countries. The Commission further found that the respondent interested party group responses from Korea and Russia were inadequate but determined to conduct full reviews concerning the orders on hot-rolled steel flat products from Korea and Russia to promote administrative efficiency considering its determinations to conduct full reviews on the orders with respect to Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. A record of the Commissioners’ votes will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 14, 2022. Jessica Mullan, Acting Supervisory Attorney. [FR Doc. 2022–01080 Filed 1–19–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligiblity To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance In accordance with the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271, et seq.) (‘‘Act’’), as amended, the Department of Labor herein presents notice of investigations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of the Act (‘‘TAA’’) for workers by (TA– W) started during the period of December 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. This notice includes instituted initial investigations following the receipt of validly filed petitions. Furthermore, if applicable, this notice includes investigations to reconsider negative initial determinations or terminated initial investigations following the receipt of a valid application for reconsideration. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. Any persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing provided such request is filed in writing with the Administrator, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, no later than ten days after publication in Federal Register. Initial Investigations The following are initial investigations commenced following the receipt of a properly filed petition. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Inv start date 98,129 ............ Plexus Corporation .................................................................................... Nampa, ID ....................................... 12/1/2021 98,130 ............ WSP USA Inc ............................................................................................ Ephrata, PA ..................................... 12/1/2021 98,131 ............ Flabeg Technical Glass ............................................................................. Naugatuck, CT ................................ 12/2/2021 98,132 ............ Marelli North Carolina USA LLC ............................................................... Sanford, NC ..................................... 12/2/2021 98,133 ............ TE Connectivity ......................................................................................... Carrollton, TX .................................. 12/2/2021 98,134 ............ Acco Brands USA LLC .............................................................................. Ogdensburg, NY .............................. 12/3/2021 98,135 ............ General Motors .......................................................................................... Rochester, NY ................................. 12/3/2021 98,136 ............ Tenneco Inc ............................................................................................... Kettering, OH ................................... 12/3/2021 98,137 ............ Meridian Medical Management ................................................................. Windsor, CT .................................... 12/6/2021 98,138 ............ Freres Lumber Company, Inc. .................................................................. Lyons, OR ....................................... 12/8/2021 98,139 ............ General Motors Toledo Transmission ....................................................... Toledo, OH ...................................... 12/8/2021 98,140 ............ Kauffman Engineering ............................................................................... Lawrenceville, IL .............................. 12/8/2021 98,141 ............ Kauffman Engineering ............................................................................... Lebanon, IN ..................................... 12/8/2021 98,142 ............ FCA US LLC ............................................................................................. Belvidere, IL .................................... 12/8/2021 98,143 ............ WSP Inc. USA ........................................................................................... New York, NY .................................. 12/9/2021 98,144 ............ Stoller ........................................................................................................ Cedar Rapids, IA ............................. 12/10/2021 98,145 ............ Texas New Mexico Newspaper Partnership/El Paso Time ...................... El Paso, TX ..................................... 12/13/2021 98,146 ............ Experis-Jefferson Wells/Manpower Group ................................................ Winston-Salem, NC ......................... 12/14/2021 98,147 ............ Oracle America Inc. ................................................................................... Hillsboro, OR ................................... 12/14/2021 98,148 ............ Philips North America LLC ........................................................................ Bothell, WA ...................................... 12/15/2021 98,149 ............ Westinghouse Electric Company LLC ...................................................... Cranberry Township, PA ................. 12/15/2021 98,150 ............ Kenworth Truck Company ......................................................................... Chillicothe, OH ................................ 12/17/2021 98,151 ............ Medline Industries, Inc. ............................................................................. Temecula, CA .................................. 12/17/2021 98,152 ............ AutoMate ................................................................................................... Albany, NY ...................................... 12/22/2021 98,153 ............ BitTitan, Inc. .............................................................................................. Bellevue, WA ................................... 12/22/2021 A record of these investigations and petitions filed are available, subject to redaction, on the Department’s website https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/ tradeact under the searchable listing or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 365–6822. Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of January 2022. Hope D. Kinglock, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2022–01019 Filed 1–19–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jan 19, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM 20JAN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Continuation - AD - Russia === 75598 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices 1 See Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon- Quality Steel Products from the Russian Federation, 64 FR 38642 (July 19, 1999) (Suspension Agreement). 2 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products from the Russian Federation, Rescission of the 2013–2014 Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 77455 (December 24, 2014) (Order). 3 Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021) (Initiation of Sunset); and Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Russia, Turkey, and the United Kingdom; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 86 FR 49057 (September 1, 2021) (Institution of Sunset). 4 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 5 See Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel from the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 72577 (December 22, 2021). 6 See Hot-Rolled Steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, 87 FR 74167 (December 2, 2022). VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–26746 Filed 12–8–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–809] Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products From the Russian Federation: Continuation of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel products (hot-rolled steel) from the Russian Federation (Russia) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of this AD order. DATES : Applicable December 9, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7924. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 19, 1999, Commerce published the Suspension Agreement on hot-rolled steel from Russia. 1 On December 24, 2014, Commerce terminated the Suspension Agreement and issued the Order.2 On September 1, 2021, Commerce initiated, and the ITC instituted, the second five-year (sunset) review of the Order,3 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 4 As a result of its review, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, Commerce determined that revocation of the Order on hot-rolled steel from Russia would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the orders be revoked. 5 On December 2, 2022, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 6 Scope of the Order For the purposes of this Order, ‘‘hot- rolled steel’’ means certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel products of a rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch or greater, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal and whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances, in coils (whether or not in successively superimposed layers) regardless of thickness, and in straight lengths, of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and of a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness. Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm and of a thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief) of a thickness not less than 4.0 mm is not included within the scope of this Order. Specifically subject to the scope of this Order are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and the substrate for motor lamination steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor lamination steels contains micro- alloying levels of elements such as silicon and aluminum. Steel products subject to the scope of this Order, regardless of definitions in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated: 1.80 Percent of manganese, or 1.50 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 0.012 percent of boron, or 0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of niobium, or 0.41 percent of titanium, or 0.15 percent of vanadium, or 0.15 percent of zirconium. All products that meet the physical and chemical description provided above are within the scope of this Order unless otherwise excluded. The following products, by way of example, are outside and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this Order: • Alloy hot-rolled steel products in which at least one of the chemical elements exceeds those listed above (including e.g., ASTM specifications A543, A387, A514, A517, and A506). • SAE/AISI grades of series 2300 and higher. • Ball bearing steels, as defined in the HTSUS. • Tool steels, as defined in the HTSUS. • Silico-manganese (as defined in the HTSUS) or silicon electrical steel with a silicon level exceeding 1.50 percent. • ASTM specifications A710 and A736. • USS Abrasion-resistant steels (USS AR 400, USS AR 500). • Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the following chemical, physical and mechanical specifications: C Mn P S Si Cr Cu Ni 0.10–0.14% 0.90% Max 0.025% Max 0.005% Max 0.30–0.50% 0.50–0.70% 0.20–0.40% 0.20% Max Width = 44.80 inches maximum; Thickness = 0.063–0.198 inches; Yield Strength = 50,000 ksi minimum; Tensile Strength = 70,000–88,000 psi. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Dec 08, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 75599Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices • Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the following chemical, physical and mechanical specifications: C Mn P S Si Cr Cu Ni Mo 0.10–0.16% 0.70–0.90% 0.025% Max 0.006% Max 0.30–0.50% 0.50–0.70% 0.25% Max 0.20% Max 0.21% Max Width = 44.80 inches maximum; Thickness = 0.350 inches maximum; Yield Strength = 80,000 ksi minimum; Tensile Strength = 105,000 psi Aim. • Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the following chemical, physical and mechanical specifications: C Mn P S Si Cr Cu Ni V(wt.) Cb 0.10–0.14% 1.30–1.80% 0.025% Max 0.005% Max 0.30–0.50% 0.50–0.70% 0.20–0.40% Max 0.20% Max 0.10% Max 0.08% Max Width = 44.80 inches maximum; Thickness = 0.350 inches maximum; Yield Strength = 80,000 ksi minimum; Tensile Strength = 105,000 psi Aim. • Hot-rolled steel coil which meets the following chemical, physical and mechanical specifications: C Mn P S Si Cr Cu Ni Nb Ca Al 0.15% Max 1.40% Max 0.025% Max 0.010% Max 0.50% 1.00% Max 0.50% Max 0.20% Max 0.005% Max Treated 0.01–0.07% Width = 39.37 inches; Thickness = 0.181 inches maximum; Yield Strength = 70,000 psi minimum for thicknesses ≤0.148 inches and 65,000 psi minimum for thicknesses >0.148 inches; Tensile Strength = 80,000 psi minimum. • Hot-rolled dual phase steel, phase- hardened, primarily with a ferritic- martensitic microstructure, contains 0.9 percent up to and including 1.5 percent silicon by weight, further characterized by either (i) tensile strength between 540 N/mm2 and 640 N/mm2 and an elongation percentage ≥26 percent for thicknesses of 2mm and above, or (ii) a tensile strength between 590 N/mm2 and 690 N/mm2 and an elongation percentage 25 percent for thicknesses of 2mm and above. • Hot-rolled bearing quality steel, SAE grade 1050, in coils, with an inclusion rating of 1.0 maximum per ASTM E 45, Method A, with excellent surface quality and chemistry restrictions as follows: 0.012 percent maximum phosphorus, 0.015 percent maximum sulfur, and 0.20 percent maximum residuals including 0.15 percent maximum chromium. • Grade ASTM A570–50 hot-rolled steel sheet in coils or cut lengths, width of 74 inches (nominal, within ASTM tolerances), thickness of 11 gauge (0.119 inches nominal), mill edge and skin passed, with a minimum copper content of 0.20 percent. The covered merchandise is classified in the HTSUS at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, 7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, 7208.90.00.00, 7210.70.30.00, 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, 7211.14.00.90, 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00, 7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30, 7211.19.75.60, 7211.19.75.90, 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, 7212.50.00.00. Certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon- quality steel covered include: Vacuum degassed, fully stabilized; high strength low alloy; and the substrate for motor lamination steel may also enter under the following tariff numbers: 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and 7226.99.00.00. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the covered merchandise is dispositive. Continuation of the Order As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, as well as material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Order. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of this order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Order no later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Dec 08, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 I I I I I I I I I I I 75600 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2022 / Notices Dated: December 5, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–26781 Filed 12–8–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID: 0648–XC600] Fisheries of the South Atlantic; National Marine Fisheries Service— Public Meetings AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION : Notice of dolphin management strategy stakeholder workshops. SUMMARY : The National Marine Fisheries Service will hold a series of in-person workshops on January 23, January 24, January 25, and January 26, 2023. DATES : The workshop will be held on Monday, January 23, 2023 from 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. EDT, on Tuesday, January 24, 2023 from 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. EDT, on Wednesday, January 25, 2023 from 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. EDT, and on Thursday, January 26, 2023 from 5:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. EDT. ADDRESSES : Meeting address: The meeting is open to members of the public. The workshop on January 23 will be held at the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Research Institute, Room 145, 217 Ft. Johnson Road, Charleston, SC 29412. The workshop on January 24 will be held at the UNCW— Center for Marine Science, 5600 Marvin Moss Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409. The workshop on January 25 will be held at the Coastal Studies Institute, Room 242, 850 NC–345, Wanchese, NC 27981. The workshop on January 26 will be held at the Brock Environmental Center, 3663 Marlin Bay Drive, Virginia Beach, VA 23455. Those interested in participating should contact Cassidy Peterson (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Cassidy Peterson, Management Strategy Evaluation Specialist, NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science Center, phone (910) 708–2686; email: Cassidy.Peterson@ noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : In collaboration with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, NMFS is embarking on a Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) to guide dolphin (i.e. dolphinfish or mahi mahi) management in the jurisdiction. The MSE will be used to develop a management procedure that best achieves the suite of management objectives for the U.S. Atlantic dolphin fishery. Stakeholder input is necessary for characterizing the management objectives of the fishery and stock, identifying any uncertainties in the system that should be built into the MSE analysis, and providing guidance on the acceptability of the proposed management procedures. Agenda items for the meeting include: developing an understanding of management procedures and management strategy evaluation, developing conceptual management objectives, and clarifying uncertainties that should be addressed within the framework. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to Cassidy Peterson (see contact information above) five (5) days prior to the meeting. Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are subject to change. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: December 6, 2022. Jennifer M. Wallace, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2022–26851 Filed 12–8–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XC556] Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental To Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to the Replacement of Pier 3 at Naval Station Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION : Notice; proposed modification of an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA); request for comments. SUMMARY : NMFS is proposing to modify an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) that was issued to the United States Navy (Navy) on March 15, 2022 in association with construction activities related to the replacement of Pier 3 at Naval Station Norfolk in Norfolk, Virginia. As a result of necessary changes to the Navy’s construction plan, NMFS is proposing to modify the Navy’s IHA to increase authorized take by Level B harassment for bottlenose dolphins and take by Level A harassment for harbor seals. NMFS is also proposing to include appropriate, additional shutdown mitigation provisions for all species in the modified IHA. The monitoring and reporting measures remain the same as prescribed in the initial IHA. NMFS will also consider public comments on the requested modification prior to making any final decision and agency responses will be summarized in the final notice of our decision. DATES : Comments and information must be received no later than December 27, 2022. ADDRESSES : Comments should be addressed to Jolie Harrison, Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. Written comments should be submitted via email to ITP.Corcoran@noaa.gov. Instructions: NMFS is not responsible for comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period. Comments, including all attachments, must not exceed a 25- megabyte file size. Attachments to comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF file formats only. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted online at https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/ incidental-take-authorizations-under- marine-mammal-protection-act without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Kim Corcoran, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401. Electronic copies of the original application and supporting documents (including Federal Register notices of the original proposed and final authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/ incidental-take-authorizations-under- marine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Dec 08, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Continuation - AD/CVD - Australia - Japan - South Korea - Netherlands - Turkey - United Kingdom === 78642 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Notices 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 2016), as amended by Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with the Amended Final Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination, Amended Antidumping Duty Order, Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order in Part; and Discontinuation of the 2017–18 and 2018–19 Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, in Part, 85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020) (AD Orders). 2 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil and the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determinations and Countervailing Duty Orders, 81 FR 67960 (October 3, 2016) (CVD Orders). 3 See Initiation Notice of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 48983 (September 1, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 4 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 87 FR 751 (January 6, 2022); Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products of Brazil: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 87 FR 750 (January 6, 2022); and Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 87 FR 428 (January 5, 2022). Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Ningbo Dongxin, that has not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the China- wide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing the preliminary results of this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B), 751(a)(3) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: December 13, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2022–27837 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–602–809, A–351–845, A–588–874, A–580– 883, A–421–813, A–489–826, A–412–825, C– 351–846, C–580–884] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders (Australia, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and United Kingdom) and Countervailing Duty Order (Korea) and Revocation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders (Brazil) AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (Korea), the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), and the United Kingdom would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders for these countries. Further, as a result of Commerce’s and the ITC’s determinations that the countervailing duty (CVD) order on hot-rolled steel from Korea would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of net countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation CVD order for Korea. Finally, as a result of the ITC’s determination that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil is not likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is revoking the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil. DATES : Applicable December 22, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Zachary Le Vene, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0056. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 3, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom (AD Orders) 1 and the CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil and Korea (CVD Orders, collectively with AD Orders, Orders).2 On September 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the Orders pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 3 Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies. Commerce also notified the ITC of the magnitude of the dumping margins and net countervailable subsidies likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked. 4 On December 2, 2022, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 78643Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Notices 5 See Hot-Rolled Steel from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, 87 FR 74167 (December 2, 2022). 6 See Notice of Amendment of Final Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To- Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585 (February 10, 2000). 7 See Notice of Amended Final Determinations: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India and the Republic of Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-To- Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from France, India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000). 8 For purposes of this scope exclusion, rolling operations such as a skin pass, levelling, temper rolling or other minor rolling operations after the hot-rolling process for purposes of surface finish, flatness, shape control, or gauge control do not constitute cold-rolling sufficient to meet this exclusion. 9 Ball bearing steels are defined as steels which contain, in addition to iron, each of the following elements by weight in the amount specified: (i) Not less than 0.95 nor more than 1.13 percent of carbon; (ii) not less than 0.22 nor more than 0.48 percent of manganese; (iii) none, or not more than 0.03 percent of sulfur; (iv) none, or not more than 0.03 percent of phosphorus; (v) not less than 0.18 nor more than 0.37 percent of silicon; (vi) not less than 1.25 nor more than 1.65 percent of chromium; (vii) none, or not more than 0.28 percent of nickel; (viii) none, or not more than 0.38 percent of copper; and (ix) none, or not more than 0.09 percent of molybdenum. 10 Tool steels are defined as steels which contain the following combinations of elements in the quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) More than 1.2 percent carbon and more than 10.5 percent chromium; or (ii) not less than 0.3 percent carbon and 1.25 percent or more but less than 10.5 percent chromium; or (iii) not less than 0.85 percent carbon and 1 percent to 1.8 percent, inclusive, manganese; or (iv) 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent, inclusive, chromium and 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent, inclusive, molybdenum; or (v) not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less than 3.5 percent molybdenum; or (vi) not less than 0.5 percent carbon and not less than 5.5 percent tungsten. 11 Silico-manganese steel is defined as steels containing by weight: (i) Not more than 0.7 percent of carbon; (ii) 0.5 percent or more but not more than 1.9 percent of manganese, and (iii) 0.6 percent or more but not more than 2.3 percent of silicon. section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the AD orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Korea, would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, and that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. 5 Scope of the Orders The products covered by these Orders are certain hot-rolled, flat-rolled steel products, with or without patterns in relief, and whether or not annealed, painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances. The products covered do not include those that are clad, plated, or coated with metal. The products covered include coils that have a width or other lateral measurement (width) of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of thickness, and regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a thickness of less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’ (e.g., products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced above: (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above unless the resulting measurement makes the product covered by the existing antidumping 6 or countervailing duty 7 orders on Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea (A–580–836; C–580–837), and (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product (e.g., the thickness of certain products with non- rectangular cross-section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies. Steel products included in the scope of these Orders are products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated: • 2.50 percent of manganese, or • 3.30 percent of silicon, or • 1.50 percent of copper, or • 1.50 percent of aluminum, or • 1.25 percent of chromium, or • 0.30 percent of cobalt, or • 0.40 percent of lead, or • 2.00 percent of nickel, or • 0.30 percent of tungsten, or • 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or • 0.10 percent of niobium, or • 0.30 percent of vanadium, or • 0.30 percent of zirconium. Unless specifically excluded, products are included in these scopes regardless of levels of boron and titanium. For example, specifically included in these scopes are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF)) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, the substrate for motor lamination steels, Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS), and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS). IF steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum. The substrate for motor lamination steels contains micro- alloying levels of elements such as silicon and aluminum. AHSS and UHSS are considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels, although AHSS and UHSS are covered whether or not they are high tensile strength or high elongation steels. Subject merchandise includes hot- rolled steel that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to pickling, oiling, levelling, annealing, tempering, temper rolling, skin passing, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of these Orders if performed in the country of manufacture of the hot-rolled steel. All products that meet the written physical description, and in which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted element levels listed above, are within the scope of these Orders unless specifically excluded. The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of these Orders: • Universal mill plates (i.e., hot- rolled, flat-rolled products not in coils that have been rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, of a thickness not less than 4.0 mm, and without patterns in relief); • Products that have been cold-rolled (cold-reduced) after hot-rolling; 8 • Ball bearing steels; 9 • Tool steels; 10 and • Silico-manganese steels.11 The products covered by these Orders are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7208.10.1500, 7208.10.3000, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 78644 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2022 / Notices 12 See Orders. 1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 76693 (December 8, 2011) (Order); and Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 5484 (February 3, 2012), wherein the scope of the Order was modified (collectively, Order). 7208.10.6000, 7208.25.3000, 7208.25.6000, 7208.26.0030, 7208.26.0060, 7208.27.0030, 7208.27.0060, 7208.36.0030, 7208.36.0060, 7208.37.0030, 7208.37.0060, 7208.38.0015, 7208.38.0030, 7208.38.0090, 7208.39.0015, 7208.39.0030, 7208.39.0090, 7208.40.6030, 7208.40.6060, 7208.53.0000, 7208.54.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0090, 7211.19.1500, 7211.19.2000, 7211.19.3000, 7211.19.4500, 7211.19.6000, 7211.19.7530, 7211.19.7560, 7211.19.7590, 7225.11.0000, 7225.19.0000, 7225.30.3050, 7225.30.7000, 7225.40.7000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.11.1000, 7226.11.9030, 7226.11.9060, 7226.19.1000, 7226.19.9000, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, and 7226.91.8000. The products covered by these Orders may also enter under the following HTSUS numbers: 7210.90.9000, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7214.91.0015, 7214.91.0060, 7214.91.0090, 7214.99.0060, 7214.99.0075, 7214.99.0090, 7215.90.5000, 7226.99.0180, and 7228.60.6000. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and U.S. Customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of these Orders is dispositive. Continuation of the AD Orders on Hot- Rolled Steel From Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom and the Continuation of the AD and CVD Orders on Hot-Rolled Steel From Korea As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the AD orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Korea would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on hot- rolled steel from Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Korea. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the AD orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Korea will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next sunset review of the AD orders on hot-rolled steel from Australia, Japan, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, and the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Korea not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Revocation of the AD and CVD Orders on Hot-Rolled Steel From Brazil As a result of the determination by the ITC that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce is revoking the AD and CVD orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil. Pursuant to section 751(d)(3) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of revocation is October 3, 2021 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the date of publication in the Federal Register of the notice of the Orders).12 Cash Deposits and Assessment of Duties on Hot-Rolled Steel From Brazil Commerce intends to notify CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation and to discontinue the collection of AD and CVD cash deposits on entries of hot- rolled steel from Brazil, entered or withdrawn from warehouse, on or after October 3, 2021. Commerce intends to further instruct CBP to refund with interest all cash deposits on unliquidated entries made on or after October 3, 2021. Entries of subject merchandise prior to the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to suspension of liquidation and AD and CVD deposit requirements and assessments. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and this notice is published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: December 15, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–27839 Filed 12–21–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–971] Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2020 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of multilayered wood flooring (wood flooring) from the People’s Republic of China (China). The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review. DATES : Applicable December 22, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Dennis McClure or Jonathan Schueler, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5973 or (202) 482–9175, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 8, 2011, Commerce issued a countervailing duty (CVD) order on wood flooring from China. 1 The American Manufacturers of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:01 Dec 21, 2022 Jkt 259001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM 22DEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 701-TA-545 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Turkey, and United Kingdom; Inv. No. 701-TA-545-546 and 731-TA-1291-1297 (Review) and 731-TA-808 (Fourth Review) from Japan, United Kingdom, Turkey, Brazil, Netherlands, South Korea, Australia. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
701-TA-545 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 701-TA-545 resulted in AD/CVD case A-351-845. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource
A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.
Open resource
Drop the Tandom Duty Calculator API into a TMS, broker software, or in-house ERP. Code samples, the response shape, and ACE reporting order, in 2026.
Open resource
Run thousands of product descriptions through HTS classification, score the confidence, and triage borderline rows. Public search endpoint plus the closed-beta three-layer Classifier.
Open resource