Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal; Inv. Nos. 701-TA-528-529 and 731-TA-1264-1268 (Review)

=== Continuation - AD/CVD - Australia - Brazil - China - Indonesia - Portugal === 7426 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices A–570–073 and C–570–074: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From China Requestor: Valeo Group and its affiliates. The T-series aluminum sheet imported by Valeo Group and its affiliates is covered by the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from China because it is a flat aluminum product having a thickness of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 0.2 mm, is a multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet produced from a 3XXX-series core. Commerce found that an unregistered alloy (i.e., a proprietary alloy) is still covered by the scope of the orders if it corresponds to one of the one-digit alloy series identified in the scope language, i.e., series 1XXX, 3XXX, or 5XXX; October 15, 2021. Anti-Circumvention Made October 1, 2021, Through December 31, 2021 Brazil A–351–842: Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil Requestors: Domtar Corporation; Packaging Corporation of America; North Pacific Paper Company; Finch Paper LLC; and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. Certain uncoated paper rolls that are commonly, but not exclusively, known as ‘‘sheeter rolls’’ from Brazil that are further processed in the United States into individual sheets of uncoated paper are subject to the order (i.e., paper that weighs at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; and that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level of 83 +/¥1% or higher or is a colored paper (as defined in the scope of the order)). The uncoated paper rolls covered by the order are converted into sheets of uncoated paper using specialized cutting machinery prior to printing, and are typically, but not exclusively, between 52 and 103 inches wide and 50 inches in diameter. These uncoated paper rolls are classified under HTSUS category 4802.55; December 14, 2021. China A–570–943 and C–570–944: Oil Country Tubular Goods From China Requestor: Self-initiated. Imports of welded oil country tubular goods completed in Brunei or the Philippines using inputs manufactured in China are circumventing the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded oil country tubular goods from China; November 26, 2021. A–570–022 and C–570–023: Certain Uncoated Paper From China Requestors: Domtar Corporation; Packaging Corporation of America; North Pacific Paper Company; Finch Paper LLC; and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. Certain uncoated paper rolls that are commonly, but not exclusively, known as ‘‘sheeter rolls’’ from China that are further processed in the United States into individual sheets of uncoated paper are subject to the order (i.e., paper that weighs at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; and that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level of 83 +/¥1% or higher or is a colored paper (as defined in the scope of the order)). The uncoated paper rolls covered by the order are converted into sheets of uncoated paper using specialized cutting machinery prior to printing, and are typically, but not exclusively, between 52 and 103 inches wide and 50 inches in diameter. These uncoated paper rolls are classified under HTSUS category 4802.55; December 14, 2021. Indonesia A–560–828 and C–560–829: Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia Requestors: Domtar Corporation; Packaging Corporation of America; North Pacific Paper Company; Finch Paper LLC; and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. Certain uncoated paper rolls that are commonly, but not exclusively, known as ‘‘sheeter rolls’’ from Indonesia that are further processed in the United States into individual sheets of uncoated paper are subject to the order (i.e., paper that weighs at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; and that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level of 83 +/¥1% or higher or is a colored paper (as defined in the scope of the order)). The uncoated paper rolls covered by the order are converted into sheets of uncoated paper using specialized cutting machinery prior to printing, and are typically, but not exclusively, between 52 and 103 inches wide and 50 inches in diameter. These uncoated paper rolls are classified under HTSUS category 4802.55; December 14, 2021. Notification to Interested Parties Interested parties are invited to comment on the completeness of this list of completed scope inquiries and anti-circumvention determinations made during the period October 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. Any comments should be submitted to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, via email to CommerceCLU@trade.gov. This notice is published in accordance with 19 CFR 351.225(o). Dated: February 3, 2022. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2022–02651 Filed 2–8–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–602–807; A–351–842; A–570–022; A– 560–828; A–471–807; C–570–023; C–560– 829] Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Continuation of Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China (China), Indonesia, and Portugal, and the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on uncoated paper from China and Indonesia, would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, net countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. DATES : Applicable February 9, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Patrick Barton, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0012. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 3, 2016, Commerce published AD orders on uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal, and CVD orders on uncoated paper from China and VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 08, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM 09FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 7427Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices 1 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China, and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 11174 (March 3, 2016) (AD Orders); see also Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and Countervailing Duty Order (People’s Republic of China), 81 FR 11187 (March 3, 2016) (CVD Orders) (collectively, Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 3 See Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 29248 (June 1, 2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM); Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order; 86 FR 29243 (June 1, 2021), and accompanying IDM; and Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order; 86 FR 30260 (June 7, 2021), and accompanying IDM. 4 See Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal, 87 FR 6203 (February 3, 2022); see also Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264– 1268 (Review), USITC Publication 5275, January 2022). 5 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, and Indonesia: Affirmative Final Determinations of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Orders and Countervailing Duty Orders for Certain Uncoated Paper Rolls, 86 FR 71025 (December 14, 2021). Indonesia. 1 On February 1, 2021, Commerce initiated the first five-year (sunset) reviews of the Orders pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the AD Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and that revocation of the CVD Orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins and net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked. 3 On February 3, 2022, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.4 Scope of the Orders The scope of the Orders includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level 3 of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). Certain Uncoated Paper includes: (a) Uncoated free sheet paper that meets this scope definition; (b) uncoated ground wood paper produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other uncoated paper that meets this scope definition regardless of the type of pulp used to produce the paper. Specifically excluded from the scope are: (1) Paper printed with final content of printed text or graphics; and (2) lined paper products, typically school supplies, composed of paper that incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines that would make the paper unsuitable for copying or printing purposes. For purposes of this scope definition, paper shall be considered ‘‘printed with final content’’ where at least one side of the sheet has printed text and/or graphics that cover at least five percent of the surface area of the entire sheet. On December 14, 2021, Commerce determined that imports of certain uncoated paper rolls that are commonly, but not exclusively, known as ‘‘sheeter rolls’’ from Brazil, China, and Indonesia that are further processed in the United States into individual sheets of uncoated paper that would be subject to the Orders (i.e., paper that weighs at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; and that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level of 83 +/¥1% or higher or is a colored paper (as defined above)). The uncoated paper rolls covered by the scope of these Orders are converted into sheets of uncoated paper using specialized cutting machinery prior to printing, and are typically, but not exclusively, between 52 and 103 inches wide and 50 inches in diameter. For clarity, we herein refer to ‘‘subject- paper rolls’’ when referencing the certain uncoated paper rolls that may be converted into subject merchandise. Subject-paper rolls are classified under HTSUS category 4802.55. Certain importers of the subject-paper rolls that are not converted into subject merchandise may certify that the rolls will not be further processed into subject merchandise covered by the scope of these Orders. Failure to comply with the requisite certification requirement may result in the merchandise being found subject to AD and CVD duties.5 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.55.1000, 4802.55.2000, 4802.55.3000, 4802.55.4000, 4802.55.6000, 4802.55.7020, 4802.55.7040, 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the Orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal, and the continuation of the CVD orders on uncoated paper from China and Indonesia. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 08, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM 09FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 7428 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 9, 2022 / Notices 1 See Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 86 FR 56892 (October 13, 2021) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 19928 (April 15, 2005) (Order). 3 The meaning of this term is the same as that used by the American Society for Testing and Materials in its Annual Book for ASTM Standards: Volume 01.02 Aluminum and Magnesium Alloys. 4 The material is already covered by existing antidumping orders. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995); and Antidumping Duty Order: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 57936 (November 19, 2001). 5 This third exclusion for magnesium-based reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for reagent mixtures in the 2000–2001 investigations of magnesium from China, Israel, and Russia. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form from the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 (September 27, 2001); see also Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium from Israel, 66 FR 49349 (September 27, 2001); and Final Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure Magnesium from the Russian Federation, 66 FR 49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not magnesium alloys, because they are not combined in liquid form and cast into the same ingot. 6 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 56892. 7 Id., 86 FR at 56893. 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Magnesium Metal from the People’s Republic of China, 04/01/2020–03/31/ 2021: Entry Data and No Shipment Inquiry,’’ dated July 14, 2021. On June 23, 2021, Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with respect to TMI and TMM. On July 6, 2021, CBP responded that it had no evidence of shipments of magnesium metal from China exported by TMI and TMM during the POR. 9 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: February 3, 2022. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2022–02686 Filed 2–8–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–896] Magnesium Metal From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020–2021 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to find that Tianjin Magnesium International, Co., Ltd. (TMI) and Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd. (TMM) had no shipments of subject merchandise covered by the antidumping duty order on magnesium metal from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) April 1, 2020, through March 31, 2021. DATES : Applicable February 9, 2022. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Deborah Cohen, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4521. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On October 13, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. 1 No interested party submitted comments concerning the Preliminary Results or requested a hearing in this administrative review. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order 2 The product covered by the Order is magnesium metal from China, which includes primary and secondary alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight primarily the element magnesium. Primary magnesium is produced by decomposing raw materials into magnesium metal. Secondary magnesium is produced by recycling magnesium-based scrap into magnesium metal. The magnesium covered by the Order includes blends of primary and secondary magnesium. The subject merchandise includes the following alloy magnesium metal products made from primary and/or secondary magnesium including, without limitation, magnesium cast into ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other shapes; magnesium ground, chipped, crushed, or machined into rasping, granules, turnings, chips, powder, briquettes, and other shapes; and products that contain 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, magnesium, by weight, and that have been entered into the United States as conforming to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy’’ 3 and are thus outside the scope of the existing antidumping orders on magnesium from China (generally referred to as ‘‘alloy’’ magnesium). The scope of the Order excludes: (1) All forms of pure magnesium, including chemical combinations of magnesium and other material(s) in which the pure magnesium content is 50 percent or greater, but less than 99.8 percent, by weight, that do not conform to an ‘‘ASTM Specification for Magnesium Alloy;’’ 4 (2) magnesium that is in liquid or molten form; and (3) mixtures containing 90 percent or less magnesium in granular or powder form by weight and one or more of certain non-magnesium granular materials to make magnesium-based reagent mixtures, including lime, calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and colemanite. 5 The merchandise subject to this Order is classifiable under items 8104.19.00, and 8104.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined TMI and TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.6 As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received no-shipment statements from TMI and TMM,7 and the statements were consistent with the information we received from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 8 Because Commerce did not receive any comments on its preliminary finding, Commerce continues to find that TMI and TMM did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Assessment Rates Based on record evidence, we have determined that TMI and TMM had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, and, therefore, pursuant to Commerce’s assessment practice, any suspended entries entered under their case numbers will be liquidated at the China-wide entity rate. 9 Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 08, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM 09FEN1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - China === 30260 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 1 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and Countervailing Duty Order (People’s Republic of China), 81 FR 11187 (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any litigation in United States courts regarding such entries. (K) I understand that {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY} is required, upon request, to provide a copy of the exporter’s certification and any supporting records provided by the exporter to the importer, to CBP and/or Commerce. (L) I understand that the claims made herein, and the substantiating documentation, are subject to verification by CBP and/or Commerce. (M) I understand that failure to maintain the required certifications, and/or failure to substantiate the claims made herein, and/or failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to verify the claims made herein, may result in a de facto determination that all entries to which this certification applies are within the scope of the antidumping/countervailing duty order on corrosion resistant steel products from Taiwan. I understand that such finding will result in: (i) Suspension of liquidation of all unliquidated entries (and entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements were not met; (ii) the requirement that the importer post applicable antidumping duty and/or countervailing duty cash deposits (as appropriate) equal to the rates determined by Commerce; and (iii) the revocation of {NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to certify future imports of corrosion resistant steel products from Malaysia as not manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan. (N) I understand that agents of the importer, such as brokers, are not permitted to make this certification. (O) This certification was completed at or prior to the date of entry summary. (P) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. government. Signature NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL TITLE DATE Appendix IV—Exporter Certification SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: The party that made the sale to the United States should fill out the exporter certification. I hereby certify that: (A) My name is {COMPANY OFFICIAL’S NAME} and I am an official of {NAME OF COMPANY}, located at {ADDRESS}; (B) I have direct personal knowledge of the facts regarding the production and exportation of the corrosion resistant steel products identified below. ‘‘Direct personal knowledge’’ refers to facts the certifying party is expected to have in its own books and records. For example, an exporter should have direct personal knowledge of the producer’s identity and location. (C) The corrosion resistant steel products produced in Malaysia and covered by this certification were not manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate produced in Taiwan. (D) This certification applies to the following sales to {NAME OF U.S. CUSTOMER}, located at {ADDRESS OF U.S. CUSTOMER}. (repeat this block as many times as necessary): Foreign Seller’s Invoice # to U.S. Customer: Foreign Seller’s Invoice to U.S. Customer Line item #: Producer Name: Producer’s Address: Producer’s Invoice # to Foreign Seller: (If the foreign seller and the producer are the same party, put NA here.) (E) The corrosion resistant steel products covered by this certification were shipped to {NAME OF U.S. PARTY TO WHOM MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED}, located at {U.S. ADDRESS TO WHICH MERCHANDISE WAS SHIPPED}. (F) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to maintain a copy of this certification and sufficient documentation supporting this certification (i.e., documents maintained in the normal course of business, or documents obtained by the certifying party, for example, mill certificates, production records, invoices, etc.) for the later of: (1) A period of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts regarding such entries. (G) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide a copy of this Exporter Certification to the U.S. importer by the date of shipment; (H) I understand that {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to provide a copy of this certification and supporting records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of Commerce (Commerce). (I) I understand that the claims made herein, and the substantiating documentation, are subject to verification by CBP and/or Commerce. (J) I understand that failure to maintain the required certification, and/or failure to substantiate the claims made herein, and/or failure to allow CBP and/or Commerce to verify the claims made herein, may result in a de facto determination that all sales to which this certification applies are within the scope of the antidumping/countervailing duty order on corrosion resistant steel products from Taiwan. I understand that such finding will result in: (i) Suspension of all unliquidated entries (and entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements were not met; and (ii) the requirement that the importer post applicable antidumping duty and/or countervailing duty cash deposits (as appropriate) equal to the rates as determined by Commerce; and (iii) the revocation of {NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY}’s privilege to certify future exports of corrosion resistant steel products from Malaysia as not manufactured using hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate from Taiwan. (K) This certification was completed at or prior to the date of shipment. (L) I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who knowingly and willfully make material false statements to the U.S. government. Signature NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL TITLE DATE [FR Doc. 2021–11850 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–023] Certain Uncoated Paper From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revoking the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable June 7, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 3, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD Order on uncoated paper from China.1 On February 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On February 12, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from Domtar Corporation (Domtar), Finch Paper LLC (Finch Paper), and North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC), VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Jun 04, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 30261Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 3 See Domtar/Finch Paper/NORPAC’s Letter, ‘‘Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate In Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021. 4 See PCA/USW’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 16, 2021. 5 Collectively, Domtar, Finch Paper, NORPAC, PCA, and USW are referred to as the domestic interested parties. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021. 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on February 1, 2021,’’ dated March 23, 2021. 8 One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. ‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition means a paper with a hue other than white that reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a combination of such primary colors. 9 For a full description of the scope of the order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 3 Domtar, Finch Paper, and NORPAC claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of uncoated paper in the United States. On February 16, 2021, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate from Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Services Workers International Union (USW). 4 PCA claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v), as a domestic producer of uncoated paper in the United States, and USW claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(D) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(vi), as a certified union with workers engaged in the manufacture and production of the domestic like product in the United States. On March 1, 2021, Commerce received a substantive response from the domestic interested parties 5 within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 We received no substantive response from any other domestic or interested parties in this proceeding and no hearing was requested. On March 23, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.7 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this Order. Scope of the Order The scope of the Order includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level 8 of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive.9 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following rates: Manufacturers/producers/exporters Net countervailable subsidy (percent) Asia Symbol (Guangdong) Paper Co., Ltd. (AS Guangdong), Asia Symbol (Shandong) Pulp & Paper Co., Ltd. (AS Shandong), Asia Symbol (Guangdong) Omya Minerals Co., Ltd. (AS Omya), and Greenpoint Global Trading (Macao Commercial Offshore) Limited (Greenpoint) (collectively, Asia Symbol Companies) ............................................................... 7.23 Shandong Sun Paper Industry Joint Stock Co., Ltd. (Shandong Sun Paper), and Sun Paper (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. (Sun Paper HK) (collectively, Sun Paper Companies) ....................................................................................................................... 176.75 UPM (China) Co. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................................... 176.75 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7.23 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Jun 04, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 30262 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Notices 1 See Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 75 FR 69052 (November 10, 2010) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 3 The domestic interested parties are: Tenaris Bay City, Inc. and IPSCO Tubulars Inc. (collectively, Tenaris U.S.A.); United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel); Vallourec Star, LP (Vallourec); and BENTELER Steel/Tube Manufacturing Corp. (BENTELER) (collectively, domestic interested parties). 4 See Tenaris USA’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from China,’’ dated February 5, 2021; U.S. Steel’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated February 16, 2021; Vallourec’s Letter, ‘‘Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China (Second Sunset Review): Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated February 16, 2021; and BENTELER’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in Second Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from China,’’ dated February 16, 2021. 5 Id. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive Response of Domestic Producers to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,’’ dated March 3, 2021. accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: June 1, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. History of the Order IV. Scope of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–11854 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–956] Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line and pressure pipe (SSLP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable June 7, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Thomas Martin or Zachary Shaykin, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482–2638, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 10, 2010, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published in the Federal Register a notice of the AD order on seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line and pressure pipe from China. 1 On February 1, 2021, Commerce published its initiation of the second sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 From February 5, through 16, 2021, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in the sunset review in relation to the Order from domestic interested parties 3 within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 4 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 5 On March 3, 2021, the domestic interested parties filed a timely and adequate substantive response within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 Commerce did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested party with respect to the Order covered by this sunset review. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is certain seamless carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipes and redraw hollows, less than or equal to 16 inches (406.4 mm) in outside diameter, regardless of wall- thickness, manufacturing process (e.g., hot-finished or cold-drawn), end finish (e.g., plain end, beveled end, upset end, threaded, or threaded and coupled), or surface finish (e.g., bare, lacquered or coated). Redraw hollows are any unfinished carbon or alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe or ‘‘hollow profiles’’ suitable for cold finishing operations, such as cold drawing, to meet the American Society for Testing and Materials (‘‘ASTM’’) or American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) specifications referenced below, or comparable specifications. Specifically included within the scope are seamless carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) standard, line, and pressure pipes produced to the ASTM A–53, ASTM A–106, ASTM A–333, ASTM A–334, ASTM A–589, ASTM A– 795, ASTM A–1024, and the API 5L specifications, or comparable specifications, and meeting the physical parameters described above, regardless of application, with the exception of the exclusion discussed below. Specifically excluded from the scope of the order are: (1) All pipes meeting aerospace, hydraulic, and bearing tubing specifications; (2) all pipes meeting the chemical requirements of ASTM A–335, whether finished or unfinished; and (3) unattached couplings. Also excluded from the scope of the order are all mechanical, boiler, condenser and heat exchange tubing, except when such products conform to the dimensional requirements, i.e., outside diameter and wall thickness of ASTM A–53, ASTM A–106 or API 5L specifications. The merchandise covered by the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.19.1020, 7304.19.1030, 7304.19.1045, 7304.19.1060, 7304.19.5020, 7304.19.5050, 7304.31.6050, 7304.39.0016, 7304.39.0020, 7304.39.0024, 7304.39.0028, 7304.39.0032, 7304.39.0036, 7304.39.0040, 7304.39.0044, 7304.39.0048, 7304.39.0052, 7304.39.0056, 7304.39.0062, 7304.39.0068, 7304.39.0072, 7304.51.5005, 7304.51.5060, 7304.59.6000, 7304.59.8010, 7304.59.8015, 7304.59.8020, 7304.59.8025, 7304.59.8030, 7304.59.8035, 7304.59.8040, 7304.59.8045, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Jun 04, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM 07JNN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - Indonesia === 29243Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 1 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order (Indonesia) and Countervailing Duty Order (People’s Republic of China), 81 FR 11187 (March 3, 2016) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 3 The domestic interested parties are: Domtar Corporation (Domtar); Finch Paper LLC (Finch); North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC); Packaging Corporation of America (PCA); and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Services Workers International Union (USW) (collectively, domestic interested parties). 4 See Domtar, Finch, and NORPAC’s Letter, ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review Of Countervailing Duty Order On Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent To Participate In Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021; and PCA and USW’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated February 16, 2021. 5 Id. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021. 7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on February 1, 2021,’’ dated March 23, 2021. 8 One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. ‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition means a paper with a hue other than white that reflects one of the primary colors of magenta, yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a combination of such primary colors. requests received by the last day of June 2021. If Commerce does not receive, by the last day of June 2021, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: May 20, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–11462 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–560–829] Certain Uncoated Paper From Indonesia: Final Results of the Expedited First Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain uncoated paper from Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable June 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Terre Keaton Stefanova, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 3, 2016, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on certain uncoated paper from Indonesia. 1 On February 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On February 12 and 16, 2021, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from domestic interested parties 3 within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 4 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status pursuant to sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the Act, respectively, as either manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product or as a certified union with workers engaged in the production of the domestic like product in the United States. 5 On March 1, 2021, Commerce received an adequate substantive response from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 6 Commerce received no substantive response from any other interested parties with respect to the Order covered by this sunset review. On March 23, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.7 As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The scope of the Order includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level 8 of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). Certain uncoated paper includes (a) uncoated free sheet paper that meets this scope definition; (b) uncoated ground wood paper produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other uncoated paper that meets this scope definition regardless of the type of pulp used to produce the paper. Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are (1) paper printed with final content of printed text or graphics and (2) lined paper products, typically school supplies, composed of paper that incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines that would make the paper unsuitable for copying or printing purposes. For purposes of this scope definition, paper shall be considered ‘‘printed with final content’’ where at least one side of the sheet has printed text and/or graphics that cover at least five percent of the surface area of the entire sheet. On September 1, 2017, Commerce determined that imports of uncoated paper with a GE brightness of 83 +/¥1% (83 Bright paper), otherwise meeting the description of in-scope VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 28, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 29244 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 9 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 41610 (September 1, 2017). 10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). merchandise, constitute merchandise ‘‘altered in form or appearance in minor respects’’ from in-scope merchandise that are subject to this order.9 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 10 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, we determine that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following net countervailable subsidy rates: Manufacturers/producers/exporters Net countervailable subsidy (percent) PT Anugerah Kertas Utama, PT Riau Andalan Kertas, APRIL Fine Paper Macao Offshore Limited, PT Asia Pacific Rayon, PT Sateri Viscose International, A P Fine Paper Trading (Hong Kong) Limited, and APRIL International Enterprise Pte. Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 21.21 Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper TBK/Pabrik Kertas Tjiwi Kimia/PT Pindo Deli Pulp and Paper Mills .................................................... 109.14 Great Champ Trading Limited ....................................................................................................................................................... 103.99 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21.21 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective orders, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3). Dated: May 25, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidies VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–11461 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–523–808] Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate of Oman: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that sales of certain steel nails (steel nails) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) have been made below normal value during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. Further, Commerce is rescinding the administrative review, in part, with respect to Astrotech Steels Private Ltd. (Astrotech), Geekay Wires Limited (Geekay), Overseas International Steel Industry LLC & Overseas Distribution Services Inc. (Overseas), Trinity Steel Private Limited (Trinity Steel), Universal Freight Services LLC (Universal Freight Services), and WWL India Private Ltd (WWL India). Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES : Applicable June 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel nails VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 28, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 6203Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 23 / Thursday, February 3, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review)] Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on uncoated paper from China and Indonesia and the antidumping duty orders on uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on February 1, 2021 (86 FR 7734) and determined on May 7, 2021, that it would conduct full reviews (86 FR 27650, May 21, 2021). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on July 23, 2021 (86 FR 39057). The Commission conducted its hearing on November 18, 2021. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 31, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5275 (January 2022), entitled Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Investigation Nos. 701– TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 31, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–02293 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–372] Exempt Chemical Preparations Under the Controlled Substances Act Correction In Notice document 2022–01112 beginning on page 3335 in the issue of Friday, January 21, 2022, make the following correction: On page 3343, beginning on the last line of the first column, ‘‘This Order is effective [insert Date Thirty Days from the Date of Publication in the Federal Register].’’ should read ‘‘This Order is effective February 22, 2022.’’. [FR Doc. C1–2022–01112 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099–10–D DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs Proposed Extension of Existing Collection; Comment Request AGENCY : Division of Coal Mine Workers’ Compensation, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Department of Labor. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Currently, the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is soliciting comments concerning the proposed collection: Disclosure of Medical Evidence. A copy of the proposed information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addresses section of this Notice. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. DATES : Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the address section below on or before April 4, 2022. ADDRESSES : You may submit comments by mail, delivery service, or by hand to Ms. Anjanette Suggs, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room S–3323, Washington, DC 20210; by fax to (202) 354–9660; or by Email to Suggs.Anjanette@dol.gov. Please use only one method of transmission for comments (mail/delivery, fax or Email). Please note that comments submitted after the comment period will not be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre- clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). I. Background The Department’s regulations implementing the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA), 30 U.S.C. 901 et seq., may require parties to exchange all medical information about the minter they develop in connection with a claim for benefits, including information parties do not intent to submit as evidence in the claim. See 20 CFR 725.413. The rule helps protect a miner’s health, assist unrepresented parties, and promote accurate benefit determinations. The potential parties to a BLBA claim include the benefits claimant, the responsible coal mine operator and its insurance carrier, and the Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Under this rule, a party of a party’s agent who receives medical information about the minter must send a copy to all other parties within 30 days after receipt or, if a hearing before an administrative law judge has already been scheduled, at least 20 days before the hearing. The exchanged information is entered into the record of the claim only if a party submits it into evidence. The Department’s authority to engage in information collection is specified in BLBA sections 413(b), 422(2) and 426(a). see 30 U.S.C. 923(b), 932(a) and 936(a). This information collection is currently approved for use through July 31, 2022. II. Review Focus The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: * Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; * evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; * enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and * minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Feb 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 6203Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 23 / Thursday, February 3, 2022 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review)] Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on uncoated paper from China and Indonesia and the antidumping duty orders on uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on February 1, 2021 (86 FR 7734) and determined on May 7, 2021, that it would conduct full reviews (86 FR 27650, May 21, 2021). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on July 23, 2021 (86 FR 39057). The Commission conducted its hearing on November 18, 2021. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 31, 2022. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5275 (January 2022), entitled Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Investigation Nos. 701– TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: January 31, 2022. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2022–02293 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–372] Exempt Chemical Preparations Under the Controlled Substances Act Correction In Notice document 2022–01112 beginning on page 3335 in the issue of Friday, January 21, 2022, make the following correction: On page 3343, beginning on the last line of the first column, ‘‘This Order is effective [insert Date Thirty Days from the Date of Publication in the Federal Register].’’ should read ‘‘This Order is effective February 22, 2022.’’. [FR Doc. C1–2022–01112 Filed 2–2–22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099–10–D DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs Proposed Extension of Existing Collection; Comment Request AGENCY : Division of Coal Mine Workers’ Compensation, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Department of Labor. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Currently, the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is soliciting comments concerning the proposed collection: Disclosure of Medical Evidence. A copy of the proposed information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addresses section of this Notice. This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood and the impact of collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. DATES : Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the address section below on or before April 4, 2022. ADDRESSES : You may submit comments by mail, delivery service, or by hand to Ms. Anjanette Suggs, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room S–3323, Washington, DC 20210; by fax to (202) 354–9660; or by Email to Suggs.Anjanette@dol.gov. Please use only one method of transmission for comments (mail/delivery, fax or Email). Please note that comments submitted after the comment period will not be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a pre- clearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). I. Background The Department’s regulations implementing the Black Lung Benefits Act (BLBA), 30 U.S.C. 901 et seq., may require parties to exchange all medical information about the minter they develop in connection with a claim for benefits, including information parties do not intent to submit as evidence in the claim. See 20 CFR 725.413. The rule helps protect a miner’s health, assist unrepresented parties, and promote accurate benefit determinations. The potential parties to a BLBA claim include the benefits claimant, the responsible coal mine operator and its insurance carrier, and the Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Under this rule, a party of a party’s agent who receives medical information about the minter must send a copy to all other parties within 30 days after receipt or, if a hearing before an administrative law judge has already been scheduled, at least 20 days before the hearing. The exchanged information is entered into the record of the claim only if a party submits it into evidence. The Department’s authority to engage in information collection is specified in BLBA sections 413(b), 422(2) and 426(a). see 30 U.S.C. 923(b), 932(a) and 936(a). This information collection is currently approved for use through July 31, 2022. II. Review Focus The Department of Labor is particularly interested in comments which: * Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; * evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; * enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and * minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:08 Feb 02, 2022 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Full Review === 27650 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 97 / Friday, May 21, 2021 / Notices 3 On April 6, 2021, Lester Feed & Grain Co. voluntarily withdrew its status as a petitioner. Background On March 31, 2021, the Organic Soybean Processors of America, Washington, DC, American Natural Processors, LLC, Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, Lester Feed & Grain Co., Lester, Iowa, Organic Production Services, LLC, Weldon, North Carolina, Professional Proteins Ltd., Washington, Iowa, Sheppard Grain Enterprises, LLC, Phelps, New York, Simmons Grain Co., Salem, Ohio, Super Soy, LLC, Brodhead, Wisconsin, and Tri-State Crush, Syracuse, Indiana filed petitions with the Commission and Commerce, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized and LTFV imports of organic soybean meal from India.3 Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigations and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register of April 8, 2021 (86 FR 18296). In light of the restrictions on access to the Commission building due to the COVID–19 pandemic, the Commission conducted its conference through written testimony and video conference on April 21, 2021. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to §§ 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on May 17, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5198 (May 2021), entitled Organic Soybean Meal from India: Investigation Nos.731–TA–667 and 731–TA–1559 (Preliminary). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 17, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–10728 Filed 5–20–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review)] Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal; Notice of Commission Determination To Conduct Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on certain uncoated paper from China and Indonesia and the antidumping duty orders on certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES : May 7, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Ahdia Bavari (202–205–3191), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On May 7, 2021, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (86 FR 7734, February 1, 2021) were adequate. A record of the Commissioners’ votes will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 18, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–10766 Filed 5–20–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1256] Certain Portable Battery Jump Starters and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review Two Initial Determinations Granting Complainant’s Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation and Joint Motions Terminating the Investigation as to Several Respondents Based on Settlement AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review: (1) An initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 13) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) granting complainant’s unopposed motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation (‘‘NOI’’) to substitute certain corporate entities named as respondents; to add two respondents; and to withdraw certain infringement allegations; and (2) an ID (Order No. 14) granting an unopposed joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and proposed new respondent Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC (collectively, ‘‘Lowe’s’’), both of Mooresville, North Carolina based on settlement; and an unopposed joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. and proposed new respondents Ozark Purchasing, LLC; O’Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.; and O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC (collectively, ‘‘O’Reilly’’), all of Springfield, Missouri based on settlement. Respondents Lowe’s and O’Reilly are terminated from the investigation. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:15 May 20, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 7734 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices and non-aged one-person and two- person units.) This notice does not provide definitions of such terms as ‘‘income’’ or ‘‘family’’ as there is considerable variation of these terms among programs that use the poverty guidelines. The legislation or regulations governing each program define these terms and determine how the program applies the poverty guidelines. In cases where legislation or regulations do not establish these definitions, the entity that administers or funds the program is responsible to define such terms as ‘‘income’’ and ‘‘family.’’ Therefore questions such as net or gross income, counted or excluded income, or household size should be directed to the entity that administers or funds the program. Norris Cochran, Acting Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. [FR Doc. 2021–01969 Filed 1–29–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–05–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service [NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–31404; PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000] National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending Nominations and Related Actions AGENCY : National Park Service, Interior. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The National Park Service is soliciting electronic comments on the significance of properties nominated before January 16, 2021, for listing or related actions in the National Register of Historic Places. DATES : Comments should be submitted electronically by February 16, 2021. ADDRESSES : Comments are encouraged to be submitted electronically to National_Register_Submissions@ nps.gov with the subject line ‘‘Public Comment on <property or proposed district name, (County) State>.’’ If you have no access to email you may send them via U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The properties listed in this notice are being considered for listing or related actions in the National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for their consideration were received by the National Park Service before January 16, 2021. Pursuant to Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, comments are being accepted concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the National Register criteria for evaluation. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Nominations submitted by State or Tribal Historic Preservation Officers: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA District of Columbia Annie’s Paramount Steakhouse, 1519 and 1609–1611 17th St. NW, Washington, SG100006178 GEORGIA Fulton County Sperry & Hutchinson Company Warehouse, 2181 Sylvan Rd., East Point, SG100006164 IOWA Henry County Schantz, Christian K. and Margaret (Rich), House and Carpentry Shop, 116 West 2nd St., Wayland, SG100006173 Scott County WOC Broadcasting Center, 805 Brady St., Davenport, SG100006171 MISSISSIPPI Hinds County Falk, Meyer and Genevieve, House, 2037 Eastbourne Pl., Jackson, SG100006163 Lafayette County Abbeville Colored School, West side of Cty. Rd, 115, Abbeville vicinity, SG100006175 MISSOURI Cole County J.B. Bruns Shoe Co. Building, 627 West McCarty St., Jefferson City, SG100006167 St. Louis Independent City Goodwill Building, 4140 Forest Park Ave., St. Louis, SG100006165 OHIO Allen County J.M. Sealts Company Warehouse Building, The 330 North Central Ave., Lima, SG100006179 PENNSYLVANIA Allegheny County Riverview Park, Roughly bounded by Woods Run Ave., Mairdale Ave., Perrysville Ave., and Kilbuck St., Pittsburgh, SG100006181 VERMONT Bennington County Norton, Julius and Sophia, House, 300 Pleasant St., Bennington, SG100006180 VIRGINIA Lunenburg County Woodburn, 673 Meherrin River Rd., Chase City vicinity, SG100006177 Williamsburg Independent City College Terrace Historic District, 600 and 700 blks. of College Ter. and Richmond Rd., Williamsburg, SG100006176 Additional documentation has been received for the following resources: IOWA Clayton County McGregor Commercial Historic District (Additional Documentation), (Iowa’s Main Street Commercial Architecture MPS), A and 1st Sts. between Main and intersection of A and 1st Sts., McGregor, AD02001033 Keokuk County Saints Peter and Paul Roman Catholic Church Historic District (Additional Documentation), 30748–30832 242nd St., Harper vicinity, AD86002277 A request for removal has been made for the following resource: NEVADA Elko County Lamoille Organization Camp, Right Fork of Lamoille Creek, end of FS Rd. 122, Ruby Mountains Ranger District, Humboldt— Toiyabe NF, Lamoille vicinity, OT07000553 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60. Dated: January 21, 2021. Sherry A. Frear, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program. [FR Doc. 2021–02056 Filed 1–29–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA–1264–1268 (Review)] Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on certain VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 7735Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices uncoated paper from China and Indonesia and the antidumping duty orders on certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted February 1, 2021. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is March 3, 2021. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by April 14, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On March 3, 2016, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued countervailing duty orders on certain uncoated paper from China and Indonesia (81 FR 11187) and antidumping duty orders on certain uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal (81 FR 11174). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product consisting of certain uncoated paper that was coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry to include all U.S. producers of uncoated paper, including independent converters. (5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping and countervailing duty orders under review became effective. In these reviews, the Order Date is March 3, 2016. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to § 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to § 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 7736 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is March 3, 2021. Pursuant to § 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is April 14, 2021. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of § 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paper- based filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 21–5–482, expiration date June 30, 2023. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to § 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to § 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information to be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in § 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in § 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2020, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 7737Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2020 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 27, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–02087 Filed 1–29–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1047 (Third Review)] Ironing Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on ironing tables and certain parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted February 1, 2021. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is March 3, 2021. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by April 14, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On August 6, 2004, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping duty order on imports of ironing tables and certain parts thereof from China (69 FR 47868). Following the first five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective June 28, 2010, Commerce issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of ironing tables and certain parts thereof from China (75 FR 36629). Following the second five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective March 8, 2016, Commerce VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 7709Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices Paul Taylor, Commercial Officer, U.S. Embassy Jakarta (Indonesia), U.S. Department of Commerce, Phone: 62– 815–1080–0475, Email: paul.taylor@ trade.gov Gemal Brangman, Senior Advisor, Trade Missions, ITA Events Management Task Force. [FR Doc. 2021–02022 Filed 1–29–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) and suspended investigation(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the ITC) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s) and suspended investigation(s). DATES : Applicable February 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the ITC, contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s) and suspended investigation(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–602–807 ...... 731–TA–1264 .. Australia ........... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–351–842 ...... 731–TA–2165 .. Brazil ................ Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–570–888 ...... 731–TA–1047 .. China ............... Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing Tables and Parts Thereof (3rd Review). Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–570–001 ...... 731–TA–125 .... China ............... Potassium Permanganate (5th Review) ..... Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. A–570–956 ...... 731–TA–1168 .. China ............... Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Stand- ard, Line and Pressure Pipe (2nd Re- view). Thomas Martin, (202) 482–3936. C–570–957 ...... 701–TA–469 .... China ............... Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Stand- ard, Line and Pressure Pipe (2nd Re- view). Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–570–022 ...... 731–TA–1266 .. China ............... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. C–570–023 ...... 701–TA–528 .... China ............... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–560–828 ...... 731–TA–1267 .. Indonesia ......... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. C–560–829 ...... 701–TA–529 .... Indonesia ......... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. A–471–807 ...... 731–TA–1268 .. Portugal ........... Uncoated Paper (1st Review) ..................... Mary Kolberg, (202) 482–1785. Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerce’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: https:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. In accordance with section 782(b) of the Act, any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g). Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 7710 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 19 / Monday, February 1, 2021 / Notices 1 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 85 FR 45167 (July 27, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 2 See Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico: Postponement of Preliminary Detremination in the Less-Than-Fair Value Investigation, 85 FR 73459 (November 18, 2020). 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than- Fair-Value Investigation of Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). 5 See Initiation Notice. 6 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. proprietary information, until further notice. 1 Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 2 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the ITC ’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: January 14, 2021. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2021–02078 Filed 1–29–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–853] Standard Steel Welded Wire Mesh From Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and, Extension of Provisional Measures AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that standard steel welded wire mesh (wire mesh) from Mexico is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2019, through March 31, 2020. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination. DATES : Applicable February 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Alice Maldonado or Melissa Kinter, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4682 or (202) 482–1413, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce published the notice of initiation of this investigation on July 27, 2020. 1 On November 18, 2020, Commerce postponed the preliminary determination of this investigation, and the revised deadline is now January 26, 2021. 2 For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Investigation The products covered by this investigation are wire mesh from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments In accordance with the preamble to Commerce’s regulations, 4 the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. For a summary of the product coverage and rebuttal comments submitted on the record for this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6 Commerce has not modified the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. Methodology Commerce is conducting this investigation in accordance with section 731 of the Act. Commerce has calculated constructed export prices in accordance with section 772(b) of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. Furthermore, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce has preliminarily relied upon facts otherwise available with adverse inferences for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Deacero). For a full description of the methodology underlying the preliminary determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. All-Others Rate Sections 733(d)(1)(ii) and 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that, in the preliminary determination, Commerce shall determine an estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted- VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:57 Jan 29, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Australia - Brazil - China - Indonesia - Portugal === 29248 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 1 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China, and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 11174 (March 3, 2016) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 86 FR 7709 (February 1, 2021). 3 See Domtar, Finch, and NORPAC’s Letters, ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021; ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021; ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021; ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021; and ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Portugal: Domestic Industry’s Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated February 12, 2021. 4 See PCA and USW’s Letters, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia,’’ dated February 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five- Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil,’’ dated February 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 16, 2021; ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia,’’ dated February 16, 2021; and ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in the First Five-Year Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Portugal,’’ dated February 16, 2021. 5 Collectively, Domtar, Finch Paper, NORPAC, PCA, and USW are referred to as the domestic interested parties. 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021 (Substantive Response—Australia); ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021 (Substantive Response—Brazil); ‘‘First Five- Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from the People’s Republic of China: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021 (Substantive Response—China); ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Indonesia: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021 (Substantive Response—Indonesia); and ‘‘First Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping Order on Certain Uncoated Paper from Portugal: Domestic Industry’s Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 1, 2021 (Substantive Response—Portugal) (collectively, Substantive Response). Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or a recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and of material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: May 25, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2021–11465 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–602–807; A–351–842; A–570–022; A– 560–828; A–471–807] Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China (China), Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable June 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Patrick Barton, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0012. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On February 1, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders 1 on certain uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 On February 12, 2021, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from Domtar Corporation (Domtar), Finch Paper LLC (Finch), and North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 Domtar, Finch, and NORPAC claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as domestic producers of uncoated paper in the United States. On February 16, 2021, Commerce received notice of intent to participate from Packaging Corporation of America (PCA) and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Services Workers International Union (USW), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).4 PCA claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v), as a domestic producer of uncoated paper in the United States, and USW claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(D) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(vi), as a certified union with workers engaged in the manufacture and production of the domestic like product in the United States. On March 1, 2021, Commerce received a complete substantive response from the domestic interested parties 5 within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). 6 No respondent interested party submitted a substantive response within the 50-day deadline. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 28, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 29249Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 103 / Tuesday, June 1, 2021 / Notices 7 For a full description of the scope of the orders, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, and Portugal,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 8 See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 74688 (November 23, 2020) (Preliminary Results). 2 See RIL’s Letter, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India: Reliance Industries Limited’s Case Brief,’’ dated December 30, 2020. 3 Auriga Polymers Inc., DAK Americas LLC, and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America (collectively, the petitioners). 4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India: Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 6, 2021. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administration Review,’’ dated March 16, 2021. conducting expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. Scope of the Orders The scope of these orders includes uncoated paper in sheet form; weighing at least 40 grams per square meter but not more than 150 grams per square meter; that either is a white paper with a GE brightness level 3 of 85 or higher or is a colored paper; whether or not surface-decorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, perforated, or punched; irrespective of the smoothness of the surface; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Uncoated Paper). Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) categories 4802.56.1000, 4802.56.2000, 4802.56.3000, 4802.56.4000, 4802.56.6000, 4802.56.7020, 4802.56.7040, 4802.57.1000, 4802.57.2000, 4802.57.3000, and 4802.57.4000. Some imports of subject merchandise may also be classified under 4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.5000, 4802.62.6020, 4802.62.6040, 4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, 4802.69.3000, 4811.90.8050 and 4811.90.9080. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. 7 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. 8 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. A complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the AD orders on uncoated paper from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail are up to: 222.46 percent for Australia, 41.39 percent for Brazil, 149.00 percent for China, 17.46 percent for Indonesia, and 7.80 percent for Portugal. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: May 25, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation of Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–11460 Filed 5–28–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–875] Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has continued to base the dumping margin for the sole respondent under review, Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), on total adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The period of review (POR) is January 5, 2018 through June 30, 2019. DATES : Applicable June 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Paola Aleman Ordaz, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4031. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce (Commerce) published the preliminarily results of this administrative review on November 23, 2020. 1 In response to Commerce’s invitation to comment on the Preliminary Results, RIL filed comments 2 and the petitioners 3 filed rebuttal comments on December 30, 2020 and January 6, 2021, respectively.4 On March 16, 2021, Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the final results of this review from March 23, 2021 to May 24, 2021. 5 Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 28, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM 01JNN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES