Sugar from Mexico; Inv. No. 701-TA-513 and 731-TA-1249 (Review)

=== Continuation - AD/CVD - Mexico === 23945Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 84 / Thursday, April 30, 2020 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019); Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Review; Correction, 84 FR 66153 (December 3, 2019). 2 See ASC’s Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Notice of Intent to Participate’’, dated December 18, 2019; see also Imperial Sugar’s Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico, Case Nos. C–201–846 and A–201–845 (Five-Year Sunset Reviews): Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 18, 2019. 3 See ASC’s Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Suspension Agreements,’’ dated January 2, 2020; see also Imperial Sugar’s Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response of the Imperial Sugar Company to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Reviews,’’ dated January 2, 2020. 4 See Sugar From Mexico: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation, 85 FR 19438 (April 7, 2020); and Sugar From Mexico: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation, 85 FR 9454 (April 7, 2020). 5 See Sugar from Mexico; Determination, Investigation No. 701–TA–513 and 731–TA–1249 (Review), 85 FR 23063 (April 4, 2020); see also ITC Publication, Sugar from Mexico (701–TA–513 and 731–TA–1249 (Review), USITC Publication 5045 (April 2020). members of professional associations. Members will be individually advised of the capacity in which they will serve through their appointment letters. 6. Membership is open to persons who are not seated on other Census Bureau stakeholder entities (i.e., State Data Centers, Census Information Centers, Federal State Cooperative on Populations Estimates Program, other Census Advisory Committees, etc.). People who have already served one full-term on a Census Bureau Advisory Committee may not serve on any other Census Bureau Advisory Committee for three years from the termination of previous service. No employee of the federal government can serve as a member of the NAC. 7. Members will serve for a three-year term. All members will be reevaluated at the conclusion of each term with the prospect of renewal, pending NAC needs. Active attendance and participation in meetings and activities (e.g., conference calls and assignments) will be factors considered when determining term renewal or membership continuance. Members may be appointed for a second three-year term at the discretion of the Director. 8. Members will be selected on a standardized basis, in accordance with applicable Department of Commerce guidance. Miscellaneous 1. Members of the NAC serve without compensation, but receive reimbursement for NAC-related travel and lodging expenses. 2. The NAC meets once or twice a year, budget permitting, but additional meetings may be held as deemed necessary by the Director or Designated Federal Officer. NAC meetings are open to the public in accordance with the FACA. 3. Members must be able to actively participate in the tasks of the NAC, including, but not limited to, regular meeting attendance, NAC meeting discussant responsibilities, review of materials, as well as participation in conference calls, webinars, working groups, and/or special committee activities. 4. The Department of Commerce is committed to equal opportunity in the workplace and seeks diverse NAC membership. Steven D. Dillingham, Director, Bureau of the Census has approved the publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2020–09180 Filed 4–29–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–845, C–201–846] Sugar From Mexico: Continuation of Suspension of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) that termination of the Agreements Suspending the Antidumping (AD) and Countervailing (CVD) Duty Investigations on Sugar from Mexico, as amended (the Agreements), and the suspended AD and CVD investigations on sugar from Mexico would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies, and by the International Trade Commission (ITC) that termination of the suspended AD and CVD investigations would likely lead to material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing this notice of continuation of the AD and CVD Agreements on sugar from Mexico. DATES : Applicable April 30, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Sally C. Gannon or David Cordell, Bilateral Agreements Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–0408, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 3, 2019, Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the AD and CVD Agreements, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).1 On December 18, 2019, we received notices of intent to participate in the sunset reviews from the following parties (both of which are domestic interested parties) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i): Imperial Sugar Company (Imperial Sugar) and the American Sugar Coalition (ASC).2 On January 2, 2020, Commerce received complete substantive responses from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 3 Commerce received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited sunset reviews of the AD and CVD Agreements. As a result of its reviews, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act, Commerce determined that termination of the AD and CVD Agreements and suspended AD and CVD investigations on sugar from Mexico would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margin likely to prevail and the net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should the AD and CVD Agreements be terminated, in accordance with sections 752(b)(3) and (c)(3) of the Act.4 On April 24, 2020, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, the ITC published its determination that termination of the suspended AD and CVD duty investigations on sugar from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.5 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Apr 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 23946 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 84 / Thursday, April 30, 2020 / Notices 6 See Sugar from Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Investigation, 79 FR 78039 (December 29, 2014); see also Sugar from Mexico: Suspension of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR 78044 (December 29, 2014). Scope of the Agreements The merchandise subject to the AD and CVD Agreements is raw and refined sugar of all polarimeter readings derived from sugar cane or sugar beets. The chemical sucrose gives sugar its essential character. Sucrose is a nonreducing disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose linked by a glycosidic bond via their anomeric carbons. The molecular formula for sucrose is C12H22O11; the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) International Chemical Identifier (InChl) for sucrose is 1S/ C12H22O11/c13-l-4- 6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21-4)23-12(3- 15)10(20)7(17) 5(2-14)22-12/h4-11,13- 20H,1-3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11- ,12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for sucrose is CZMRCDWAGMRECN– UGDNZRGBSA–N; the U.S. National Institutes of Health PubChem Compound Identifier (CID) for sucrose is 5988; and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57– 50–1. Sugar includes products of all polarimeter readings described in various forms, such as raw sugar, estandar or standard sugar, high polarity or semi-refined sugar, special white sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible molasses, de-sugaring molasses, organic raw sugar, and organic refined sugar. Other sugar products, such as powdered sugar, colored sugar, flavored sugar, and liquids and syrups that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight are also within the scope of these AD and CVD Agreements. Merchandise covered by these AD and CVD Agreements is typically imported under the following headings of the HTSUS: 1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000, 1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000, 1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000, 1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000, 1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025, 1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010, 1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and 1702.90.4000. The scope of the AD and CVD Agreements excludes sugar imported under the Refined Sugar Re-Export Programs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, sugar products produced in Mexico that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight that originated outside of Mexico, inedible molasses (other than inedible desugaring molasses noted above), beverages, candy, certain specialty sugars, and processed food products that contain sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty sugars excluded from the scope of these AD and CVD Agreements are limited to the following: Caramelized slab sugar candy, pearl sugar, rock candy, dragees for cooking and baking, fondant, golden syrup, and sugar decorations.6 Continuation of Suspension of Investigations As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that termination of the AD and CVD Agreements and suspended AD and CVD investigations would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD Agreements. The effective date of continuation of the AD and CVD Agreements will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD Agreements not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: April 24, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–09223 Filed 4–29–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Meeting of the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board AGENCY : International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ACTION : Notice of an open meeting. SUMMARY : The United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board (Board or TTAB) will hold a meeting on Friday, May 22, 2020. The Board advises the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the U.S. travel and tourism industry. The purpose of the meeting is for Board members to consider recommendations on accelerating recovery in the travel and tourism sector following the COVID–19 pandemic. The final agenda will be posted on the Department of Commerce website for the Board at http://trade.gov/ttab at least one week in advance of the meeting. DATES : Friday, May 22, 2020, 2:30 p.m.– 3:30 p.m. EDT. The deadline for members of the public to register, including requests to make comments during the meeting and for auxiliary aids, or to submit written comments for dissemination prior to the meeting, is 5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, May 15, 2020. ADDRESSES : The meeting will be held via conference call. The call-in number and passcode will be provided by email to registrants. Requests to register (including to speak or for auxiliary aids) and any written comments should be submitted by email to TTAB@trade.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Jennifer Aguinaga, the United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, National Travel and Tourism Office, U.S. Department of Commerce; telephone: 202–482–2404; email: TTAB@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background: The Board advises the Secretary of Commerce on matters relating to the U.S. travel and tourism industry. Public Participation: The meeting will be open to the public and will be accessible to people with disabilities. Any member of the public requesting to join the meeting is asked to register in advance by the deadline identified under the DATES caption. Requests for auxiliary aids must be submitted by the registration deadline. Last minute requests will be accepted, but may not be possible to fill. There will be fifteen (15) minutes allotted for oral comments from members of the public joining the meeting. To accommodate as many speakers as possible, the time for public comments may be limited to three (3) minutes per person. Members of the public wishing to reserve speaking time during the meeting must submit a request at the time of registration, as well as the name and address of the proposed speaker. If the number of registrants requesting to make VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Apr 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 23063Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 80 / Friday, April 24, 2020 / Notices 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene from the Republic of Korea: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair- Value Investigation (85 FR 17861, March 31, 2020). to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) shall be in the amount of 100 percent of the entered value of the imported articles. The Commission’s order was delivered to the President and to the United States Trade Representative on the day of its issuance. The investigation is hereby terminated. While temporary remote operating procedures are in place in response to COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is not able to serve parties that have not retained counsel or otherwise provided a point of contact for electronic service. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission orders that the Complainant complete service for any party without a method of electronic service noted on the attached Certificate of Service and shall file proof of service on the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. By order of the Commission. Issued: April 20, 2020. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–08689 Filed 4–23–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–513 and 731– TA–1249 (Review)] Sugar From Mexico Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that termination of the suspended investigations on imports of sugar from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on November 29, 2019 (84 FR 65841) and determined on March 3, 2020 that it would conduct expedited reviews (85 FR 15224, March 17, 2020). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 21, 2020. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5045 (April 2020), entitled Sugar from Mexico: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–513 and 731–TA–1249 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 21, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–08733 Filed 4–23–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1474 (Preliminary)] Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene From Korea Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigation, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene from Korea, provided for in subheadings 3901.10.10 and 3901.20.10 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’). 2 Commencement of Final Phase Investigation Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigation. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) of an affirmative preliminary determination in the investigation under section 733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary determination is negative, upon notice of an affirmative final determination in that investigation under section 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigation need not enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigation. Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the investigation. Background On March 4, 2020, Celanese Corporation, Irving, Texas filed a petition with the Commission and Commerce, alleging that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of LTFV imports of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene from Korea. Accordingly, effective March 4, 2020, the Commission instituted antidumping duty investigation No. 731–TA–1474 (Preliminary). Notice of the institution of the Commission’s investigation and of a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on March 10, 2020 (85 FR 13922). In light of the restrictions on access to the Commission building due to the COVID–19 pandemic, the Commission conducted its conference (originally scheduled for March 24, 2020) through written questions, submissions of written testimony, written responses to questions, and postconference briefs; all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)). It completed and filed its determination in this investigation on April 20, 2020. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5048 (April 2020), entitled Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene from Korea: Investigation No. 731–TA–1474 (Preliminary). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 20, 2020. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–08691 Filed 4–23–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Apr 23, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - Mexico === 19454 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019); see also Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset Review); Correction, 84 FR 66153 (December 3, 2019). 2 See Letter, American Sugar Coalition, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Notice of Intent to Participate’’, dated December 18, 2019; Letter, Imperial Sugar Company, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico, Case Nos. C–201– 846 and A–201–845 (Five-Year Sunset Reviews): Notice of Intent to Participate’’, dated December 18, 2019. 3 See Letter, American Sugar Coalition, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Suspension Agreements,’’ dated January 2, 2020; Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response of the Imperial Sugar Company to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews’’, dated January 2, 2020. 4 See Letter to Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, from Sweetener Users Association. re: ‘‘Sugar from Mexico’’ (January 21, 2020); Letter to Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, from Sweetener Users Association, re: ‘‘Sugar from Mexico’’ (January 23, 2020); Letter, ‘‘Rejection on January 21 and January 23 Filings’’, dated February 5, 2020. 5 See Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on December 2, 2019’’, dated January 22, 2020. Common alloy sheet within the scope of the investigations includes both not clad aluminum sheet, as well as multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet. With respect to not clad aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy as designated by the Aluminum Association. With respect to multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series core, to which cladding layers are applied to either one or both sides of the core. Common alloy sheet may be made to ASTM specification B209–14, but can also be made to other specifications. Regardless of specification, however, all common alloy sheet meeting the scope description is included in the scope. Subject merchandise includes common alloy sheet that has been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of these investigations if performed in the country of manufacture of the common alloy sheet. Excluded from the scope of these investigations is aluminum can stock, which is suitable for use in the manufacture of aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans, or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum can stock is produced to gauges that range from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an H– 19, H–41, H–48, or H–391 temper. In addition, aluminum can stock has a lubricant applied to the flat surfaces of the can stock to facilitate its Start Printed Page 2159 movement through machines used in the manufacture of beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is properly classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055. Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set for the above. Common alloy sheet is currently classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3060, 7606.1l 6000, 7606.12.3096, 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3095, 7606.9.6095, 7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. Further, merchandise that falls within the scope of these investigations may also be entered into the United States under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3015, 7606.12.3025, 7606.12.3035, 7606.12.3091, 7606.91.3055, 7606.91.6055, 7606.92.3025, 7606.92.6055, 7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive. [FR Doc. 2020–07180 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–201–846] Sugar From Mexico: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that termination of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico (Agreement) and the suspended countervailing duty (CVD) investigation would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION : Sally C. Gannon, Bilateral Agreements, Office of Policy, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0162. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 3, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the agreement suspending the countervailing duty investigation on sugar from Mexico, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 1 We received notice of intent to participate in the review from the following parties, both domestic interested parties: Imperial Sugar Company and the American Sugar Coalition (ASC). 2 Commerce received complete substantive responses from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).3 We rejected untimely submissions filed by Sweetener Users Association (SUA) on January 21, 2020 and January 23, 2020.4 We received no substantive responses from any other interested parties, nor was a hearing requested. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B)–(C), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Agreement and suspended investigation. 5 Scope of the Agreement The merchandise subject to the Agreement is raw and refined sugar of all polarimeter readings derived from sugar cane or sugar beets. The chemical sucrose gives sugar its essential character. Sucrose is a nonreducing disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose linked by a glycosidic bond via their anomeric carbons. The molecular formula for sucrose is C12H22O11; the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) International Chemical Identifier (InChl) for sucrose is 1S/C12H22O11/c13-l-4- 6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21-4)23-12(3- 15)10(20)7(17) 5(2-14)22-12/h4-11,13- 20H,1-3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11- ,12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for sucrose is CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA- N; the U.S. National Institutes of Health PubChem Compound Identifier (CID) for sucrose is 5988; and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57–50–1. Sugar includes products of all polarimeter readings described in various forms, such as raw sugar, estandar or standard sugar, high polarity or semi-refined sugar, special white sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible molasses, de-sugaring molasses, organic raw sugar, and organic refined sugar. Other sugar products, such as powdered sugar, colored sugar, flavored sugar, and liquids and syrups that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight are also within the scope of this Agreement. Merchandise covered by this Agreement is typically imported under the following headings of the HTSUS: 1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000, 1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000, 1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000, 1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000, VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 19455Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices 6 See ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Investigation’’, 79 FR 78039 (December 29, 2014). 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 8 Id. 1 See Certain Corrosion Inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 85 FR 12502 (March 3, 2020). 1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025, 1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010, 1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and 1702.90.4000. The scope of the Agreement excludes sugar imported under the Refined Sugar Re-Export Programs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, sugar products produced in Mexico that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight that originated outside of Mexico, inedible molasses (other than inedible desugaring molasses noted above), beverages, candy, certain specialty sugars, and processed food products that contain sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty sugars excluded from the scope of this Agreement are limited to the following: Caramelized slab sugar candy, pearl sugar, rock candy, dragees for cooking and baking, fondant, golden syrup, and sugar decorations.6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked.7 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that termination of the Agreement and suspended countervailing duty investigation on sugar from Mexico is likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Company Net countervailable subsidy (percent) Fondo de Empresas Expropiadas del Sector Azucarero .......................... 43.93 Ingenio Tala S.A. de C.V. and certain affiliated sugar mills of Grupo Azucarero Mexico S.A. de C.V .......... 5.78 All Others .............................. 8 38.11 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: March 31, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail 3. Nature of the Subsidy VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–07200 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–123] Certain Corrosion Inhibitors From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES : Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Theodore Pearson or Nicholas Czajkowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2631 or (202) 482–1395, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On February 25, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) initiated a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of imports of corrosion inhibitors from the People’s Republic of China. 1 Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than April 30, 2020. Postponement of Preliminary Determination Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires Commerce to issue the preliminary determination in a CVD investigation within 65 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation. However, section 703(c)(1) of the Act permits Commerce to postpone the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement; or (B) Commerce concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must state the reasons for the request. Commerce will grant the request unless VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Mexico === 19438 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices 14 See Stupp Corporation et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 15–00334, Slip Op. 20–38, dated March 24, 2020. 15 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 16 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F. 3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 17 See sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Act. 18 The change to Hyundai HYSCO’s margin did not affect the calculation of the all-others rate. See First Remand Results at 13. 19 As discussed in the Final Determination, and accompanying IDM at 1, Hyundai HYSCO merged with Hyundai Steel subsequent to the period of investigation and Hyundai HYSCO no longer exists. 20 See Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 35371, 35372 (July 23, 2019). 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019); Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Review; Correction, 84 FR 66153 (December 3, 2019). 2 See Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Notice of Intent to Participate’’, dated December 18, 2019; Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico, Case Nos. C–201–846 and A– 201–845 (Five-Year Sunset Reviews): Notice of Intent to Participate’’, dated December 18, 2019. 3 See Letter, American Sugar Coalition, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Suspension Agreements,’’ dated January 2, 2020; Letter, ‘‘Sugar from Mexico: Substantive Response of the Imperial Sugar Company to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews’’, dated January 2, 2020. 4 See Letter to Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, from Sweetener Users Association. re: ‘‘Sugar from Mexico’’ (January 21, 2020); Letter to Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce, from Sweetener Users Association, re: ‘‘Sugar from Mexico’’ (January 23, 2020); Letter, ‘‘Rejection on January 21 and January 23 Filings’’, dated February 5, 2020. 5 See Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on December 2, 2019’’, dated January 22, 2020. between export price and NV, consistent with its statutory and regulatory mandates. On March 24, 2020, the CIT sustained Commerce’s Second Remand Results.14 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,15 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,16 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.17 The CIT’s March 24 2020 judgment constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with Commerce’s Final Determination, Amended Final Determination, and Order. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken and section 516A of the Act. Amended Final Determination and Amended Order Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending its Amended Final Determination and Order with respect to the weighted- average dumping margin for Hyundai HYSCO.18 The revised weighted-average dumping margin is as follows: Exporter/producer Weighted- average dumping margin (percent) Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd ..... 6.22 Cash Deposit Requirements Because there have been subsequent administrative reviews for Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel), the successor company to Hyundai HYSCO, 19 the cash deposit rate for Hyundai Steel will remain the rate established in the most recently- completed administrative review (i.e., 29.89 percent).20 Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c)(1) and (e), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 1, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–07295 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–845] Sugar From Mexico: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that termination of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico (Agreement) and the suspended antidumping duty (AD) investigation would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. The magnitude of the dumping margin likely to prevail is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Sally C. Gannon, Bilateral Agreements, Office of Policy, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0162. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 3, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the agreement suspending the antidumping investigation on sugar from Mexico, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 1 We received notice of intent to participate in the review from the following parties, both domestic interested parties: Imperial Sugar Company and the American Sugar Coalition (‘‘ASC’’). 2 Commerce received complete substantive responses from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 3 We rejected untimely submissions filed by Sweetener Users Association (SUA) on January 21, 2020 and January 23, 2020.4 We received no substantive responses from any other interested parties, nor was a hearing requested. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Agreement and suspended investigation. 5 Scope of the Agreement The merchandise subject to the Agreement is raw and refined sugar of all polarimeter readings derived from sugar cane or sugar beets. The chemical sucrose gives sugar its essential character. Sucrose is a nonreducing disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose linked by a glycosidic bond via their anomeric carbons. The molecular formula for sucrose is C12H22O11; the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) International Chemical Identifier (InChl) for sucrose is 1S/C12H22O11/c13-l-4- 6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21-4)23-12(3- 15)10(20)7(17) 5(2-14)22-12/h4-11,13- 20H,1-3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11- ,12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for sucrose is CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA- N; the U.S. National Institutes of Health PubChem Compound Identifier (CID) for sucrose is 5988; and the Chemical VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 19439Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices 6 See Sugar from Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Investigation, 79 FR 78039 (December 29, 2014). 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Investigation on Sugar from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 8 See Sugar from Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 80 FR 57341 (September 23, 2015). 1 See Calcium Hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 80 FR 5085 (January 30, 2015) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 65968 (December 2, 2019) (Notice of Initiation). 3 See IWC’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated December 17, 2019. Abstracts Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57–50–1. Sugar includes products of all polarimeter readings described in various forms, such as raw sugar, estandar or standard sugar, high polarity or semi-refined sugar, special white sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible molasses, de-sugaring molasses, organic raw sugar, and organic refined sugar. Other sugar products, such as powdered sugar, colored sugar, flavored sugar, and liquids and syrups that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight are also within the scope of this Agreement. Merchandise covered by this Agreement is typically imported under the following headings of the HTSUS: 1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000, 1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000, 1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000, 1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000, 1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025, 1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010, 1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and 1702.90.4000. The scope of the Agreement excludes sugar imported under the Refined Sugar Re-Export Programs of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, sugar products produced in Mexico that contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry weight that originated outside of Mexico, inedible molasses (other than inedible desugaring molasses noted above), beverages, candy, certain specialty sugars, and processed food products that contain sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty sugars excluded from the scope of this Agreement are limited to the following: Caramelized slab sugar candy, pearl sugar, rock candy, dragees for cooking and baking, fondant, golden syrup, and sugar decorations.6 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of the termination of the Agreement and suspended investigation, and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail, are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.7 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, we determine that termination of the Agreement and suspended antidumping investigation on sugar from Mexico is likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted- average dumping margins up to 42.14.8 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: March 31, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely To Prevail VII. Final Results of Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–07199 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–008] Calcium Hypochlorite From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on calcium hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Rachel Greenberg, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0652. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On January 30, 2015, Commerce published its antidumping duty order on calcium hypochlorite from China. 1 On December 2, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the five-year sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On December 17, 2019, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate in this review from Innovative Water Care, LLC dba Sigura (IWC) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 IWC claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a manufacturer of a domestic like product in the United States. On January 2, 2020, IWC provided a complete substantive response for this review within the 30-day deadline specified in VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 66153Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 12207 (April 1, 2019). 2 The petitioner is the National Biodiesel Board Fair Trade Coalition, which includes the National Biodiesel Board; American GreenFuels, LLC; Archer Daniels Midland Company; Ag Processing Inc a cooperative; Crimson Renewable Energy LP; High Plains Bioenergy; Integrity Biofuels, LLC; Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC; Lake Erie Biofuels dba HERO BX; Minnesota Soybean Processors; New Leaf Biofuel, LLC; Newport Biodiesel, LLC; Renewable Biofuels, LLC; Renewable Energy Group, Inc.; Western Dubuque Biodiesel, LLC; Western Iowa Energy, LLC; and World Management Group LLC dba World Energy. 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated April 26, 2019. 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 27587 (June 13, 2019). 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Biodiesel from Argentina; 2017–2019; Customs Entry Data for Respondent Selection,’’ dated July 18, 2019. 6 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Comments on CBP Data and Respondent Selection,’’ dated July 25, 2019; see also LDC’s and Vicentin’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Certification of No Shipments and Comments on U.S. Customs Entry Data for Respondent Selection,’’ dated July 25, 2019. 7 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Coalition Rebuttal Comments on CBP Data and Respondent Selection,’’ dated July 30, 2019; see also LDC’s and Vicentin’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Rebuttal Comments on U.S. Customs Entry Data for Respondent Selection,’’ dated July 30, 2019. 8 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Biodiesel from Argentina: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated September 10, 2019. Notification to Interested Parties This five-year sunset review and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 25, 2019. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26140 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–357–820] Biodiesel From Argentina: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2019 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on biodiesel from Argentina for the period October 31, 2017, through March 31, 2019. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4880. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On April 1, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the AD order on biodiesel from Argentina for the period October 31, 2017, through March 31, 2019. 1 On April 26, 2019, the petitioner 2 filed a timely request for review of 18 exporters and importers, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b). 3 Pursuant to this request, and in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of the order. 4 On July 18, 2019, Commerce placed entry data on the record for purposes of respondent selection.5 On July 25, 2019, the petitioner, LDC Argentina S.A. (LDC), and Vicentin S.A.I.C. (Vicentin), submitted comments on the respondent selection data. 6 On July 30, 2019, the petitioner, LDC, and Vicentin submitted rebuttal comments regarding the respondent selection data.7 On September 10, 2019, the petitioner filed a timely withdrawal of request for the administrative review with respect to all entities for which it had requested a review.8 Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. As noted above, the petitioner, who was the only party to file a request for review, withdrew its request by the 90-day deadline. Accordingly, we are rescinding the administrative review of the AD order on biodiesel from Argentina for the period August 28, 2017, through December 31, 2018, in its entirety. Assessment Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess AD duties on all appropriate entries of biodiesel from Argentina. AD duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated AD duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of AD or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to all parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: November 26, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–26141 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review; Correction AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On November 1, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice of initiation of five- year reviews (sunset reviews). This document serves to correct that notice. DATES : Applicable November 29, 2019. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66154 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Malaysia Intent to Participate); ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Thailand Intent to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Vietnam Intent to Participate). Also, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus). See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019. 4 See Malaysia Intent to Participate at 2; see also Thailand Intent to Participate at 2; Vietnam Intent to Participate at 2; Primus Intent to Participate at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; see also Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019. Also, Primus submitted a response, in which it agreed with the substantive responses of the other domestic interested parties. See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2019,’’ dated July 29, 2019. 7 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 55171 (October 15, 2019). 8 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 52458 (October 2, 2019). 9 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) and 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review), USITC Publication 4994, November 2019). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs and Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On November 1, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice of initiation of five-year reviews (sunset reviews). See Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019) (November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice). In that notice, Commerce inadvertently omitted the antidumping and countervailing duty suspension agreements on Sugar from Mexico (A– 201–845 and C–201–846) from the list of cases for which sunset reviews initiate in November 2019. This document serves to correct the November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice for the aforementioned items. This correction document for the initiation of sunset reviews is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: November 20, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–25653 Filed 11–29–19; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–815, A–549–830, A–552–816] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (WSSPP) from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609 and (202) 482–4162, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 21, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notices of the antidumping duty orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 1 Between June 3, 2019 and June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders.2 Between June 13, 2019 and June 18, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 4 Between July 1, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120- day) sunset reviews of the Orders.6 On October 15, 2019, the ITC exercised its discretion to extend its review period by up to 90 days to conduct expedited five- year reviews of the Orders.7 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(c)(3) of the Act. 8 On November 25, 2019 the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.9 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders are circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of these orders, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 15224 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 17, 2020 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by American Sugar Coalition and its members (the members of the American Sugar Coalition are as follows: American Sugar Cane during the period of Presidential review in the amount of five percent of the entered value of infringing articles. On September 18, 2019, ABI filed a petition for Commission review of aspects of the ID. That same day, Heineken filed a contingent petition for review. On September 26, 2019, the parties responded to each other’s petitions. On November 4, 2019, the Commission determined to review the ID in its entirety. Notice at 2 (Nov. 4, 2019) (‘‘Notice of Review’’), published at 84 FR 60452 (Nov. 8, 2019). The Commission solicited briefing on remedy, the public interest, and bonding, as well on specific issues concerning claim construction, infringement, invalidity, and the domestic industry requirement. On November 18, 2019, the parties filed opening briefs in response to the Notice of Review. On November 26, 2019, the parties filed replies to each other’s brief. Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the Markman Order, the final ID, and the parties’ submissions to the ALJ and to the Commission, the Commission has found a violation of section 337. Specifically, the Commission finds that Heineken has demonstrated the existence of a domestic industry and that asserted claims 1, 3, 7, and 10 of the ’751 patent are infringed and are not invalid. The Commission has further determined that the appropriate remedy is: (1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the entry of infringing beverage dispensing systems and components thereof; and (2) a cease and desist order directed to respondent Anheuser-Busch LLC. The Commission has determined that the public interest factors enumerated in section 337(d) and (f), 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), do not preclude the issuance of the limited exclusion order or the cease and desist order. The Commission has determined that a bond in the amount of five (5) percent of the entered value of the imported beverage containers is required during the period of Presidential review. 19 U.S.C. 1337(j)(3). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exclusion order and the cease and desist order permit ABI to import beverage containers that are used as part of ABI’s PureDraught system. The investigation is terminated. The Commission’s reasoning in support of its determinations is set forth more fully in its opinion. The Commission’s orders and opinion were delivered to the President and the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 11, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–05396 Filed 3–16–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–20–011] Sunshine Act Meetings; Cancellation of Sunshine Act Meeting Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade Commission. ORIGINAL TIME AND DATE : March 17, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION : William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202–205–2595. ACTION : In accordance with 19 CFR 201.37(a), the Commission has unanimously determined to cancel the meeting of March 17, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. which was scheduled under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Earlier notification of this cancellation was not possible. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 12, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–05591 Filed 3–13–20; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–513 and 731– TA–1249 (Review)] Sugar From Mexico; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether termination of the suspension investigation on sugar from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. DATES : March 3, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Charles Cummings ((202) 708–1666)), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On March 3, 2020, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (84 FR 65841, November 29, 2019) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on March 17, 2020, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Mar 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 15225Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 17, 2020 / Notices League; American Sugarbeet Growers Association; American Sugar Refining, Inc.; Florida Sugar Cane League; Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers, Inc.; Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida; and the United States Beet Sugar Association) and Imperial Sugar Company to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determinations the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before March 24, 2020 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by March 24, 2020. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules with respect to filing were revised effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014). The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 11, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–05395 Filed 3–16–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–20–012] Sunshine Act Meetings; Cancellation of Sunshine Act Meeting Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade Commission. ORIGINAL TIME AND DATE : March 19, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION : William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202–205–2595. ACTION : In accordance with 19 CFR 201.37(a), the Commission has unanimously determined to cancel the meeting of March 19, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. which was scheduled under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Earlier notification of this cancellation was not possible. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 12, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–05572 Filed 3–13–20; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1154] Certain Child Carriers and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the presiding administrative law judge has issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond in the above- captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting comments on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief, should the Commission find a violation. This notice is soliciting public interest comments from the public only. Parties are to file public interest submissions pursuant to Commission rules. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lynde Herzbach, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3228. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Docket Information System (‘‘EDIS’’) (https://edis.usitc.gov). Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘section 337’’) provides that if the Commission finds a violation it shall exclude the articles concerned from the United States unless the public interest factors listed in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1) prevent such action. A similar provision applies to cease and desist orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1). The Commission is soliciting comments on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation, specifically whether the Commission should issue: (1) A limited exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’) against certain child carriers and components thereof that are imported, sold for importation, and/or sold after importation by respondents: The Ergo Baby Carrier Inc. of Los Angeles, CA, Baby Tula LLC a/k/a New Baby Tula LLC of San Diego, CA, and Blue Box OpCo LLC d/b/a Infantino LLC of San Diego, CA; and/or (2) cease and desist orders (‘‘CDOs’’) against respondents: The Ergo Baby Carrier Inc. and Blue Box OpCo LLC d/ b/a Infantino LLC. The Commission is interested in further development of the record on the public interest in this investigation. Accordingly, parties are to file public interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). In addition, members of the public are hereby invited to file submissions of no more than five (5) pages, inclusive of attachments, concerning the public interest in light of the administrative law judge’s Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding issued in this investigation on March 10, 2020. Comments should address whether issuance of the LEOs and/or CDOs in this investigation, should the Commission find a violation, would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Mar 16, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 65841Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices 1 On January 16, 2015, Commerce received timely requests pursuant to sections 734(g) and 704(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1673c(g), 1671c(g)), Continued section 337 in the importation into the United States, or in the sale of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is balanced armature devices (also known as balanced armature receivers), and devices used on the ear or in the ear canal containing accused balanced armature devices (earphones, ear buds, headsets, headphones, in-ear monitors, hearing aids, hearing aid replacement receiver tubes, receiver in canal (RIC) replacement modules, and personal sound amplifiers), and components of devices used on the ear or in the ear canal containing accused balanced armature devices. (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: Knowles Corporation, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143. Knowles Electronics, LLC, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143. Knowles Electronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., No. 20, Chunxing Road, Xiangcheng District, Suzhou, 215131, Jiangsu Province, China. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Liang Li (a/k/a Ryan Li), Room 602, Building 48, Fengqing Shuian Garden, Xizhou Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou City, 215028, Jiangsu Province, China. Shenzhen Bellsing Acoustic Technology Co., Ltd., 12/f, Sanhang Science and Technology Building, 45 Gaoxin South Ninth Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, 518057, Guangdong Province, China. Suzhou Bellsing Acoustic Technology Co., Ltd., Ruiqi Building, No. 668, Fenting Avenue, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou City, 215028, Jiangsu Province, China. Bellsing Corporation, 3333 Warrenville Rd, #155, Lisle, IL 60532. Dongguan Bellsing Precision Device Co., Ltd., Fifth Industry Zone, Xieshan Village, Xiegang Town, Dongguan, 523598, Guangdong Province, China. Dongguan Xinyao Electronics Industrial Co., Ltd., d/b/a Fidue Acoustics, Liuhua West Street, Xiakou, Dongcheng District, 523115, Dongguan, Guangdong, China. Soundlink Co., Ltd., 2F–1# Building North, No. 89 Songshan Road, Shishan Industrial Complex Park, New District, 215129 Suzhou, China. Magnatone Hearing Aid Corporation d/ b/a Persona, Medical and InEarz Audio, 170 N Cypress Way, Casselberry, FL 32707. Jerry Harvey Audio LLC, 111 W. Jefferson St., Ste. 300, Orlando, FL 32801. Magic Dynamics, LLC d/b/a MagicEar, 22089 U.S. Hwy 19 N, Clearwater, FL 33765. Campfire Audio, LLC, 2400 SE Ankeny St., Portland, OR 97214. Clear Tune Monitors, Inc., 5528 Commerce Dr., Orlando, FL 32839. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the Administrative Law Judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 22, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–25852 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–513 and 731– TA–1249 (Review)] Sugar From Mexico; Institution of Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether termination of the suspension investigation on sugar from Mexico would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted November 29, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is December 30, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by February 11, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On December 19, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) suspended antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on imports of sugar from Mexico (79 FR 78039 and 78044, December 29, 2014). 1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 65842 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices to continue the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on sugar from Mexico. Commerce resumed the investigations on May 4, 2015, and on September 23, 2015, published its final affirmative antidumping and countervailing duty determinations (80 FR 57337 and 57341). On November 16, 2015, the Commission published its affirmative determinations (80 FR 70833). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether termination of the suspended investigations would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Country in these reviews is Mexico. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all sugar that is coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all U.S. producers of sugar within Commerce’s scope, including sugarcane and sugar beet farmers/ growers, as well as cane millers, cane refiners, and sugar beet processors, but did not include one firm because it did not engage in sufficient production- related activities. (5) The Order Date is the date that the investigations were suspended. In these reviews, the Order Date is December 19, 2014. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is December 30, 2019. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is February 11, 2020. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/documents/ handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 65843Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 19–5–449, expiration date June 30, 2020. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. sugarcane or sugar beet farmer/ grower, cane miller, cane refiner, and/or sugar beet processor of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the termination of the suspended investigations on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. sugarcane or sugar beet farmers/growers, cane millers, cane refiners, and sugar beet processors of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product by reason of sugar beet and/or sugarcane farming/ growing, provide the following information on your firm’s farmer/ grower operations on the Domestic Like Product during crop year (typically October–September) 2017/18: Total acres owned/leased (in number of acres), total acres of sugarcane and sugar beets harvested (in number of acres), sugar beet and sugarcane production (in short tons), an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. sugar beet and sugarcane production by U.S. sugar beet and sugarcane growers accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production (if known), and an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. acres of sugarcane and sugar beets harvested accounted for by your firm’s(s’) acres of sugarcane and sugar beets harvested (if known). If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product by reason of cane milling, cane refining, and/or sugar beet processing, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on the Domestic Like Product during crop year 2017/18 (report quantity data in short tons raw value, and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during crop year 2017/18 (report quantity data in short tons raw value, and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port) of U.S. commercial shipments of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 65844 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port) of U.S. internal consumption/ company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during crop year 2017/18 (report quantity data in short tons raw value, and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 25, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–25873 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Occupational Safety and Health Administration [Docket No. OSHA–2012–0004] The Cadmium in Construction Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements AGENCY : Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor. ACTION : Request for public comments. SUMMARY : OSHA solicits public comments concerning the proposal to extend the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval of the information collection requirements specified in the Cadmium in Construction Standard. DATES : Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by January 28, 2020. ADDRESSES : Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting comments. Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service: When using this method, you must submit your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA–2012–0004, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–3653, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are accepted during the Docket Office’s normal business hours, 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the OSHA docket number (OSHA–2012–0004) for the Information Collection Request (ICR). All comments, including any personal information you provide, such as social security numbers and dates of birth, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov. For further information on submitting comments see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at the above above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal Register notice) are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index; however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download from the website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You also may contact Theda Kenney at the below phone number to obtain a copy of the ICR. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Theda Kenney or Seleda Perryman, Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone (202) 693–2222. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : I. Background The Department of Labor, as part of a continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA’s estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES