Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Inv. Nos. 701-TA-499-500 and 731-TA-1215-1216, 1221-1223 (Review)

=== Continuation - AD/CVD - South Korea - Turkey - Ukraine, - Vietnam === This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. Notices Federal Register 48665 Vol. 85, No. 156 Wednesday, August 12, 2020 1 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10, 2014); see also Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Correction to the Antidumping Duty Orders with Respect to Turkey and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 79 FR 59740 (October 3, 2014); Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders and Amended Final Countervailing Duty Determination for India, 79 FR 53688 (September 10, 2014); and Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July 16, 2019) (collectively, Orders). 2 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25570 (June 3, 2019). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 1705 (February 5, 2019). 4 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from India: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 50001 (September 24, 2019), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM); see also Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 55139 (October 15, 2019), and accompanying IDM; Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 12774 (March 4, 2020), and accompanying IDM; and Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Final Results of the First Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 27206 (May 7, 2020), and accompanying IDM. 5 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216 and 1221–1223 (Review)), 85 FR 46729 (August 3, 2020); see also Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216 and 1221–1223 (Review)), USITC Pub. 5090 (July 2020). 6 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from India: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 50001 (September 24, 2019), and accompanying IDM; see also Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 55139 (October 15, 2019), and accompanying IDM; Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 12774 (March 4, 2020), and accompanying IDM; and Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Final Results of the First Five-Year Continued COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Notice of Public Meeting of the Illinois Advisory Committee, Amendment AGENCY : Commission on Civil Rights. ACTION : Notice; amendment to meeting date. SUMMARY : The Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting of the Illinois Advisory Committee on Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. CDT. This notice serves as an amendment to the initially supplied date of Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. CDT. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Carolyn Allen, (312) 353–8311, callen@ usccr.gov. Amendment: Date of Tuesday, August 4, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. to be replaced with new meeting date of Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. CDT. Dated: August 6, 2020. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2020–17588 Filed 8–11–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–857, A–580–870, A–489–816, A–823– 815, A–552–817, C–533–858, C–489–817] Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Turkey, Ukraine, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that the revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India, the Republic of Korea (Korea), the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), Ukraine, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on OCTG from India and Turkey would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping or countervailable subsidies, and of material injury to an industry in the United States. Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders. DATES : Applicable August 12, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Chelsey Simonovich, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1979. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background In 2014, Commerce published the AD orders on OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam and the CVD orders on OCTG from India and Turkey; in 2019, Commerce published the AD order on OCTG from Ukraine. 1 On February 5, 2019, the ITC instituted,2 and on June 4, 2019 Commerce initiated,3 the five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD orders on OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping or the continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies, and, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and the net subsidy rates likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked. 4 On August 3, 2020, the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.5 Scope of the Orders For purposes of these Orders and a complete description of the products covered by each order, please see the Final Results and accompanying Issues and Decision Memoranda.6 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:37 Aug 11, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 48666 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 12, 2020 / Notices Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 27206 (May 7, 2020), and accompanying IDM. 1 See Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 85 FR 38850 (June 29, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.205(e). 3 The petitioner is the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL–CIO, CLC. 4 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Vietnam: Request to Extend Deadline for Preliminary Determination,’’ dated July 24, 2020 (First Request); and Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from Vietnam: Second Request to Extend Deadline for Preliminary Determination,’’ dated August 4, 2020 (Second Request). 5 See First Request at 1; and Second Request at 1. 6 See First Request at 2; and Second Request at 2. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation the Orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping or countervailable subsidies and the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year review of the Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: August 6, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–17632 Filed 8–11–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–552–829] Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES : Applicable August 12, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Michael Romani or Thomas Schauer, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or (202) 482–0410, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On June 22, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) initiated a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of imports of passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 1 Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than August 26, 2020. Postponement of Preliminary Determination Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires Commerce to issue the preliminary determination in a CVD investigation within 65 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation. However, section 703(c)(1) of the Act permits Commerce to postpone the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement; or (B) Commerce concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must state the reasons for the request. Commerce will grant the request unless it finds compelling reasons to deny the request.2 On July 24 and August 4, 2020, the petitioner 3 submitted timely requests that Commerce postpone the preliminary CVD determination. 4 According to the petitioner, additional time is necessary ‘‘to permit Commerce to review respondents’ initial full questionnaire responses, any comments thereon and rebuttal factual information filed in response, and any supplemental questionnaire responses before determining preliminary subsidy rates.’’ 5 The petitioner further elaborates that an extension of the deadline for the preliminary results is warranted ‘‘{g}iven the number of programs under investigation, including Commerce’s first investigation of a currency undervaluation subsidy under its new rules.’’ 6 Consistent with 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner stated the reasons for its request, and Commerce finds no compelling reason to deny that request. Therefore, in accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, Commerce is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination to no later than 130 days after the date on which this investigation was initiated, until October 30, 2020. Pursuant to section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final determination of this investigation will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless postponed at a later date. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: August 4, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–17631 Filed 8–11–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:37 Aug 11, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 3419Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 2020 / Notices the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 15, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–00827 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) From India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countevailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. DATES : January 15, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Christopher Watson ((202) 205–2684), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On September 6, 2019, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (84 FR 50069, September 24, 2019); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on May 1, 2020, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on May 21, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before May 13, 2020. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should participate in a prehearing conference to be held on May 20, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, if deemed necessary. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is May 12, 2020. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is June 1, 2020. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before June 1, 2020. On June 26, 2020, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before June 30, 2020, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 Jan 17, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 3420 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 2020 / Notices 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 15, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. WORK SCHEDULE [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (review)] OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM INDIA, KOREA, TURKEY, UKRAINE, AND VIETNAM Staff Assigned Investigator .......................................................................................................................................... Christopher Watson ((202) 205–2684). Commodity-Industry Analyst ................................................................................................................ Mark Brininstool ((202) 708–1395). Economist ............................................................................................................................................ Lauren Gamache ((202) 205–3489). Accountant/Auditor ............................................................................................................................... Jennifer Brinckhaus ((202) 205–3188). Attorney ................................................................................................................................................ TBD. Statistician ............................................................................................................................................ Russell Duncan ((202) 708–4727). Dockets Case Manager ....................................................................................................................... Sheri Corley ((202) 708–4711). Supervisory Investigator ...................................................................................................................... Douglas Corkran ((202) 205–3057). Date Notice of initiation ................................................................................................................................ Monday, June 3, 2019. Commerce’s determination—India (CVD) ........................................................................................... September 24. Commerce’s determination—Turkey (CVD) ........................................................................................ October 15. Questionnaires: Drafts to supervisory, statistical, and legal review ....................................................................... January 9, 2020. Drafts to Parties ............................................................................................................................ January 16. Party comments ............................................................................................................................ January 30. To the Commission and OMB ...................................................................................................... February 6. To OARS for programming and testing ....................................................................................... February 13. Issue ............................................................................................................................................. February 18. Return ........................................................................................................................................... March 20. Fieldwork .............................................................................................................................................. As needed. Scheduled date for Commerce’s determinations (all others) .............................................................. January 29. Prehearing report: Draft to Supervisory Investigator .................................................................................................. April 17. Draft to Senior Review ................................................................................................................. April 24. To the Commission and Parties ................................................................................................... May 1. Prehearing briefs of Parties due 1 ....................................................................................................... May 12. Prehearing conference ........................................................................................................................ May 20, 9:30 a.m. Hearing ................................................................................................................................................ May 21, 9:30 a.m. Posthearing briefs of Parties due 1 ...................................................................................................... June 1. Report to the Commission: Draft to Supervisory Investigator .................................................................................................. June 4. Draft to Senior Review ................................................................................................................. June 11. To the Commission and Parties ................................................................................................... June 19. Legal issues memorandum to the Commission .................................................................................. June 24. Closing of the record and final release of data to Parties .................................................................. June 26. Final comments of Parties due 1 ......................................................................................................... June 30. Briefing and vote (suggested date) ..................................................................................................... July 8. Determinations and views posted on EDIS ......................................................................................... Wednesday, July 29, 2020. 1 If briefs contain business proprietary information, a nonbusiness proprietary version is due the following business day. [FR Doc. 2020–00861 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 Jan 17, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 25570 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 24, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–11345 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey, revocation of the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam, and termination of the suspended investigation on oil country tubular goods from Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted June 3, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is July 3, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by August 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On July 10, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) suspended an antidumping duty investigation on imports of oil country tubular goods from Ukraine (79 FR 41959, July 18, 2014). On September 10, 2014, Commerce issued countervailing duty orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey (79 FR 53688) and antidumping duty orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam (79 FR 53691). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam and whether termination of the suspended investigation concerning imports of oil country tubular goods from Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as all oil country tubular goods, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry to include all U.S. producers of oil country tubular goods, including both mills that produce oil country tubular goods and processors that engage in heat treatment. (5) The Order Dates are the dates that the antidumping and countervailing duty orders under review became effective and the date the investigation concerning Ukraine was suspended. In these reviews, the Order Date concerning the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam is September 10, 2014. The Order Date concerning the suspended investigation on oil country tubular goods from Ukraine is July 10, 2014. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 25571Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is July 3, 2019. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is August 15, 2019. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/ documents/handbook_on_filing_ procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 19–5–434, expiration date June 30, 2020. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders and termination of the suspended investigation on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 25572 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2018, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 24, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–11342 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Ukraine === 27206 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 89 / Thursday, May 7, 2020 / Notices 1 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine: Preliminary Results of the First Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 51510 (September 30, 2019) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Termination of the Suspension Agreement on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Ukraine, Rescission of Administrative Review, and Issuance of Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 33918 (July 16, 2019) (Order). 3 See Preliminary Results, 84 FR at 51511. indicates that certain materials/ components are subject to special duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is June 16, 2020. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov or (202) 482–1963. Dated: May 1, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–09763 Filed 5–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–26–2020] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 116—Port Arthur, Texas, Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC (Liquified Natural Gas Processing), Port Arthur, Texas Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC (Golden Pass LNG) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility in Port Arthur, Texas. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on April 21, 2020. The applicant indicates that it will be submitting a separate application for FTZ designation at the company’s facility under FTZ 116. The facility, which is currently undergoing expansion, will be used for liquified natural gas processing. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Golden Pass LNG from customs duty payments on the foreign- status material used in export production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status material noted below, Golden Pass LNG would be able to choose the duty rates during customs entry procedures that apply to liquified natural gas and stabilized gas condensate (duty rate ranges from duty- free to 10.5 cents/barrel). Golden Pass LNG would be able to avoid duty on foreign-status material which becomes scrap/waste. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign-status production equipment. The material sourced from abroad is gaseous natural gas (duty-free). The request indicates that gaseous natural gas is subject to special duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is June 16, 2020. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Diane Finver at Diane.Finver@trade.gov or (202) 482–1367. Dated: May 1, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–09758 Filed 5–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–823–815] Oil Country Tubular Goods From Ukraine: Final Results of the First Five- Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that the revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable May 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Lauren Caserta or Mark Hoadley, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4737 or (202) 482–3148, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On September 30, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the sunset review, 1 finding that dumping was likely to continue or recur if the Order 2 were revoked and determined that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping for all exporters and producers at weighted average margin of dumping of 7.47 percent. 3 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received a case brief from the Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of the government of Ukraine on October 30, 2019, and a case brief from Interpipe and North American Interpipe (collectively, Interpipe) on October 31, 2019. We received a rebuttal brief from Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., BENTELER Steel/Tube Manufacturing Corp., United States Steel Corporation, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Welded Tube USA Inc., Boomerang Tube, LLC, and Vallourec Star, L.P. (collectively, the domestic interested parties) on November 4, 2019. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this Order is certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from Ukraine, which are hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG products), whether or not thread VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 May 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 27207Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 89 / Thursday, May 7, 2020 / Notices 1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 67424 (November 13, 2014) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 31304 (October 1, 2019). 3 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates From China; Institution of Five-Year Review, 84 FR 52132 (October 1, 2019). protectors are attached. The scope of the Order also covers OCTG coupling stock. Excluded from the scope of this Order are: Casing or tubing containing 10.5 percent or more by weight of chromium; drill pipe; unattached couplings; and unattached thread protectors. The merchandise subject to this Order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 7306.29.81.50. The merchandise subject to this Order may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.39.00.76, 7304.39.00.80, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.15, 7304.59.80.20, 7304.59.80.25, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, 7304.59.80.70, 7304.59.80.80, 7305.31.40.00, 7305.31.60.90, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and 7306.50.50.70. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the product coverage is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised for the final results of this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with this final notice, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, and the magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to prevail if this Order were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review We determine that revocation of the Order on OCTG from Ukraine would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping at a weighted average margin of dumping of 7.47 percent for all exporters and producers of subject merchandise. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to each party subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the final results of this sunset review, in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(A), 752(c), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(3). Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Issue 1: Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping Issue 2: Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely To Prevail V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–09761 Filed 5–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–991] Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the countervailing duty order. DATES : Applicable May 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Nathan James, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5305. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On November 24, 2014, Commerce published the notice of the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isos from China. 1 On October 1, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the countervailing duty order on chlorinated isos from China, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 Also on October 1, 2019, the ITC instituted its review of the Order.3 On October 16, 2019, Commerce received a timely notice of intent to participate in this review from Bio-Lab, Inc. (Bio-Lab), Clearon Corp. (Clearon), VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 May 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - India === 50001Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2019 / Notices 9 See INEOS Europe’s Letter, ‘‘Acetone from Belgium: Request for Postponement of Final Determination and Provisional Measures Period,’’ dated August 23, 2019. 10 Id. 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 84 FR 41967 (June 4, 2019) (Notice of Initiation). Commerce postpone the final determination until not later than 135 days after the publication of this notice. 9 INEOS Europe also requested that Commerce extend provisional measures to a period not more than 6 months. 10 In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), because: (1) The preliminary determination is affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter accounts for a significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling reasons for denial exist, Commerce is postponing the final determination and extending the provisional measures from a four-month period to a period not greater than six months. Accordingly, Commerce will make its final determination no later than 135 days after the date of publication of this preliminary determination. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, Commerce will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its preliminary determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: September 17, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is all grades of liquid or aqueous acetone. Acetone is also known under the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name propan-2- one. In addition to the IUPAC name, acetone is also referred to as +-ketopropane (or beta- ketopropane), ketone propane, methyl ketone, dimethyl ketone, DMK, dimethyl carbonyl, propanone, 2-propanone, dimethyl formaldehyde, pyroacetic acid, pyroacetic ether, and pyroacetic spirit. Acetone is an isomer of the chemical formula C3H6O, with a specific molecular formula of CH3COCH3 or (CH3)2CO. The scope covers both pure acetone (with or without impurities) and acetone that is combined or mixed with other products, including, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol, benzene, diethyl ether, methanol, chloroform, and ethanol. Acetone that has been combined with other products is included within the scope, regardless of whether the combining occurs in third countries. The scope also includes acetone that is commingled with acetone from sources not subject to this investigation. For combined and commingled products, only the acetone component is covered by the scope of this investigation. However, when acetone is combined with acetone components from sources not subject to this investigation, those third country acetone components may still be subject to other acetone investigations. Notwithstanding the foregoing language, an acetone combination or mixture that is transformed through a chemical reaction into another product, such that, for example, the acetone can no longer be separated from the other products through a distillation process (e.g., methyl methacrylate (MMA) or Bisphenol A (BPA)), is excluded from this investigation. A combination or mixture is excluded from these investigations if the total acetone component (regardless of the source or sources) comprises less than 5 percent of the combination or mixture, on a dry weight basis. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry number for acetone is 67–64–1. The merchandise covered by this investigation is currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 2914.11.1000 and 2914.11.5000. Combinations or mixtures of acetone may enter under subheadings in Chapter 38 of the HTSUS, including, but not limited to, those under heading 3814.00.1000, 3814.00.2000, 3814.00.5010, and 3814.00.5090. The list of items found under these HTSUS subheadings is non- exhaustive. Although these HTSUS subheadings and CAS registry number are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Investigation IV. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures V. Scope Comments VI. Single Entity Analysis VII. Discussion of the Methodology VIII. Date of Sale IX. Product Comparisons X. Export Price and Constructed Export Price XI. Particular Market Situation XII. Normal Value XIII. Currency Conversion XIV. Verification XV. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2019–20562 Filed 9–23–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–858] Oil Country Tubular Goods From India: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable September 24, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlotte Baskin-Gerwitz, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4880. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the initiation of the five-year (sunset) review of the countervailing duty order on OCTG from India, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), as amended. 1 Commerce received notices of intent to participate in this sunset review from United States Steel Corporation, Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., Benteler Steel/Tube, Boomerang Tube, LLC, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Vallourec Star, LP, and Welded Tube USA Inc. (collectively, the domestic interested parties), within the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the domestic like product. Commerce received adequate substantive responses to the Notice of Initiation from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). Commerce received no substantive VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Sep 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM 24SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 50002 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2019 / Notices 2 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders and Amended Final Countervailing Duty Determination for India, 79 FR 53688 (September 10, 2014). response from any respondent interested parties. In accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the countervailing duty order on OCTG from India.2 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is OCTG, which are hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The scope of the order also covers OCTG coupling stock. Excluded from the scope of the order are: casing or tubing containing 10.5 percent or more by weight of chromium; drill pipe; unattached couplings; and unattached thread protectors. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 7306.29.81.50. The merchandise subject to the order may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.39.00.76, 7304.39.00.80, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.15, 7304.59.80.20, 7304.59.80.25, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, 7304.59.80.70, 7304.59.80.80, 7305.31.40.00, 7305.31.60.90, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and 7306.50.50.70. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit in Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the issues discussed in the decision memorandum is attached at the Appendix to this notice. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Commerce determines that revocation of the countervailing duty order on OCTG from India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following rates: Jindal SAW: 26.60 percent; GVN/MSL/JPL: 13.13 percent; all others: 19.87 percent. Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing the final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 18, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework . VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–20639 Filed 9–23–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Announcement of Upcoming Secretary-Led Business Development Mission to Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam, November 3–8, 2019 AGENCY : International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. The United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA) is announcing an upcoming trade missions that will be recruited, organized, and implemented by ITA. The mission is: • Secretary-Led Business Development Mission to Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam, November 3–8, 2019. A summary of the mission is found below. Application information and more detailed mission information, including the commercial setting and sector information, can be found at the trade mission website: http:// www.export.gov/IndoPacific2019. For each mission, recruitment will be conducted in an open and public manner, including publication in the Federal Register, posting on the VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Sep 23, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM 24SEN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 46729Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 149 / Monday, August 3, 2020 / Notices 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India and Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on June 3, 2019 (84 FR 25570), and determined on September 6, 2019, that it would full reviews (84 FR 50069, September 24, 2019). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on January 21, 2020 (85 FR 3419). In light of the restrictions on access to the Commission building due to the COVID–19 pandemic, and in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 1677c(a)(1), the Commission conducted its hearing by video conference on May 21, 2020 and written witness testimony; all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to participate. The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on July 29, 2020. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5090 (July 2020), entitled Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 29, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–16826 Filed 7–31–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Information Warfare Research Project Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on July 14, 2020, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Information Warfare Research Project Consortium (‘‘IWRP’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 502 Design Services, Inc., Palm Harbor, FL; Alluvionic Inc., Melbourne, FL; Arganteal, Corp, Austin, TX; Arkham Technology Limited, Irvine, CA; Ascentium, LLC, Fairfax, VA; Attollo, LLC, Cumberland, RI; Axellio Inc., Colorado Springs, CO; Black Cape, Inc., Arlington, VA; Blue Arc, LLC, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; Bowhead Professional Solutions, LLC, Springfield, VA; BridgeComm Inc., Denver, CO; Broadband Antenna Tracking Systems Inc. (BATS Wireless), Indianopolis, IN; Cape Henry Associates, Inc., Virginia Beach, VA; Channel Logistics, LLC dba Space Eyes, Camden, NJ; CIS Mobile, Ashburn, VA; Clear Align LLC, Nashua, NH, CoAspire, LLC, Fairfax, VA; Cog Systems, Inc., Lake Zurich, IL; Constellation Software Engineering dba CSEngineering, Annapolis, MD; Convergent Solutions, Inc., McLean, VA; CP Technologies, LLC, San Diego, CA; Critical Frequency Design, LLC, Melbourne, FL; Crystal Group, Inc., Hiawatha, IA; Dark Wolf Solutions, LLC, Chantilly, VA; DataDirect Networks Federal, LLC, Columbia, MD; Decision Sciences Incorporated, Ft. Walton Beach, FL; Digital Global Systems, Inc., Studio 1A, VA; Dualos, LLC, Tacoma, WA; DY4 Inc. dba Curtiss-Wright, Ashburn, VA; Dynamic Integrated Services, LLC, Pensacola, FL; Eduworks Corporation, Corvallis, OR; Eridan Communications, Inc., Mountain View, CA; Federal Data Systems LLC, Columbia, MD; Foresight Data Systems LLC, Columbia, SC; FragCity Inc., Fredericksburg, VA; Haivision Network Video Inc., Deerfield, IL; Hawks Nest Solutions, Inc. dba Marjau Systems Corporation, Tampa, FL; Honeywell International, Inc., Clearwater, FL; Hughes Network Systems, LLC, Germantown, MD; InfoGuard Staffing Partners, LLC dba Fortress Government Solutions, Orlando, FL; Intel Federal LLC, Fairfax, VA; Intelligent Waves, LLC, Reston, VA; Interdigital Communications, Inc., Wilmington, DE; Intrinsix Corp., Marlborough, MA; Irvin Technologies, Inc., Winter Springs, FL; IT Consulting Partners, LLC, Jackson, WY; Jupiter LLC, Silver Spring, MD; Key Cyber Solutions LLC, Richmond, VA; Knight Sky, LLC, Frederick, MD; Knowledge Vortex Inc., Madison, AL; Kopis Mobile LLC, Flowood, MS; Kriaanet, Inc., Quantico, VA; L3 Systems Company, Camden, NJ; MicroHealth, LLC, Vienna, VA; Milpower, Nampda, ID; MindPoint Group, LLC, Alexandria, VA; NEC Corporation of America, Arlington, VA; Netizen Corporation, Allentown, PA; Old Dominion University Research Foundation, Norfolk, VA; Omni Federal, Gainesville, VA; Omni Technologies, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD; Onoffblock Inc. DBA Xenesis, New Lenox, IL; Oteote Inc., Encinitas, CA; Pathfinder Wireless Corp., Seattle, WA; PDC America, Seneca, SC; Perspecta Risk Decision Inc., Loveland, CO; PhasorLab, Inc., Billerica, MA; Poplicus, Inc DBA Govini, Arlington, VA; Procentrix, Inc., Herndon, VA; Q Networks LLC, Menlo Park, CA; Quantitative Scientific Solutions, LLC (QS–2), Arlington, VA; QuickFlex Inc., San Antonio, TX; Red Octopus Digital Services, LLC, Arlington, VA; Research and Development Solutions, Inc. (RDSI), McLean, VA; Sabel Systems Technology Solutions, LLC, Gainesville, VA; Saildrone Inc., Alameda, CA; SecureG, Inc., Herndon, VA; Sherpa 6 Inc., Littleton, CO; Smartronix, LLC, Hollywood, MD; srcLogic, LLC, Vienna, VA; SRI International, Menlo Park, CA; Stephenson Stellar Corporation, Baton Rouge, LA; Sterling Computers Corporation, North Sioux City, SD; Systems & Technology Research (STR), Woburn, MA; Systems and Proposal Engineering Company (Spec Innovations), Manassas, VA; Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. (SPA), Alexandria, VA; Tableau Software, LLC., Seattle, WA; Tachyon Networks, LLC, San Diego, CA; Tech Wizards, Inc., King George, VA; The KeyW Corporation, Hanover, MD; Torch Research, LLC (Torch AI), Leawood, KS; Tribalco, LLC, Bethesda, MD; Two Six VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:39 Jul 31, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Full Review === 3419Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 2020 / Notices the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigations must be served on all other parties to the investigations (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These investigations are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 15, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–00827 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods (OCTG) From India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Full Five- Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty and countevailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days. DATES : January 15, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Christopher Watson ((202) 205–2684), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On September 6, 2019, the Commission determined that responses to its notice of institution of the subject five-year reviews were such that full reviews should proceed (84 FR 50069, September 24, 2019); accordingly, full reviews are being scheduled pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements are available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Participation in the reviews and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in these reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, by 45 days after publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI gathered in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A party granted access to BPI following publication of the Commission’s notice of institution of the reviews need not reapply for such access. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Staff report.—The prehearing staff report in the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on May 1, 2020, and a public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the Commission’s rules. Hearing.—The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on May 21, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission on or before May 13, 2020. A nonparty who has testimony that may aid the Commission’s deliberations may request permission to present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should participate in a prehearing conference to be held on May 20, 2020, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building, if deemed necessary. Oral testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules. Parties must submit any request to present a portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business days prior to the date of the hearing. Written submissions.—Each party to the reviews may submit a prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission’s rules; the deadline for filing is May 12, 2020. Parties may also file written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing, as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission’s rules, and posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section 207.67 of the Commission’s rules. The deadline for filing posthearing briefs is June 1, 2020. In addition, any person who has not entered an appearance as a party to the reviews may submit a written statement of information pertinent to the subject of the reviews on or before June 1, 2020. On June 26, 2020, the Commission will make available to parties all information on which they have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final comments on this information on or before June 30, 2020, but such final comments must not contain new factual information and must otherwise comply with section VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 Jan 17, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 3420 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 13 / Tuesday, January 21, 2020 / Notices 207.68 of the Commission’s rules. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. The Commission has determined that these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: January 15, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. WORK SCHEDULE [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (review)] OIL COUNTRY TUBULAR GOODS (OCTG) FROM INDIA, KOREA, TURKEY, UKRAINE, AND VIETNAM Staff Assigned Investigator .......................................................................................................................................... Christopher Watson ((202) 205–2684). Commodity-Industry Analyst ................................................................................................................ Mark Brininstool ((202) 708–1395). Economist ............................................................................................................................................ Lauren Gamache ((202) 205–3489). Accountant/Auditor ............................................................................................................................... Jennifer Brinckhaus ((202) 205–3188). Attorney ................................................................................................................................................ TBD. Statistician ............................................................................................................................................ Russell Duncan ((202) 708–4727). Dockets Case Manager ....................................................................................................................... Sheri Corley ((202) 708–4711). Supervisory Investigator ...................................................................................................................... Douglas Corkran ((202) 205–3057). Date Notice of initiation ................................................................................................................................ Monday, June 3, 2019. Commerce’s determination—India (CVD) ........................................................................................... September 24. Commerce’s determination—Turkey (CVD) ........................................................................................ October 15. Questionnaires: Drafts to supervisory, statistical, and legal review ....................................................................... January 9, 2020. Drafts to Parties ............................................................................................................................ January 16. Party comments ............................................................................................................................ January 30. To the Commission and OMB ...................................................................................................... February 6. To OARS for programming and testing ....................................................................................... February 13. Issue ............................................................................................................................................. February 18. Return ........................................................................................................................................... March 20. Fieldwork .............................................................................................................................................. As needed. Scheduled date for Commerce’s determinations (all others) .............................................................. January 29. Prehearing report: Draft to Supervisory Investigator .................................................................................................. April 17. Draft to Senior Review ................................................................................................................. April 24. To the Commission and Parties ................................................................................................... May 1. Prehearing briefs of Parties due 1 ....................................................................................................... May 12. Prehearing conference ........................................................................................................................ May 20, 9:30 a.m. Hearing ................................................................................................................................................ May 21, 9:30 a.m. Posthearing briefs of Parties due 1 ...................................................................................................... June 1. Report to the Commission: Draft to Supervisory Investigator .................................................................................................. June 4. Draft to Senior Review ................................................................................................................. June 11. To the Commission and Parties ................................................................................................... June 19. Legal issues memorandum to the Commission .................................................................................. June 24. Closing of the record and final release of data to Parties .................................................................. June 26. Final comments of Parties due 1 ......................................................................................................... June 30. Briefing and vote (suggested date) ..................................................................................................... July 8. Determinations and views posted on EDIS ......................................................................................... Wednesday, July 29, 2020. 1 If briefs contain business proprietary information, a nonbusiness proprietary version is due the following business day. [FR Doc. 2020–00861 Filed 1–17–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 Jan 17, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - Turkey === 55139Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2019 / Notices 1 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India and the Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders and Amended Affirmative Final Countervailing Duty Determination for India, 79 FR 53688 (September 10, 2014). 2 See Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Turkey: Amendment of Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 46483 (October 5, 2017). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 4 See Benteler Steel/Tube’s, Boomerang Tube, LLC’s, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc.’s, Vallourec Star, LP’s, and Welded Tube USA Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019. 5 See Maverick Tube Corporation’s and Tenaris Bay City, Inc.’s Letter, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Participate in First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey,’’ dated June 17, 2019. 6 See U.S. Steel Corporation’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (Sunset) Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 19, 2019. 7 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review,’’ dated July 3, 2019. 8 See GOT’s Letter, ‘‘Response of the Government of Turkey to the Five-Year Review (Sunset Review) of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Imports of Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated July 4, 2019. writing. Such notification will include the reason(s) for denial of the guarantee. B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements. 1. Review or Appeal Rights. A person may seek a review of an Agency decision or appeal to the National Appeals Division in accordance with 7 CFR 4279.204. 2. Exception Authority. The provisions specified in 7 CFR 4279.203 and 7 CFR 4287.303 apply to this Notice. C. Environmental Review. The Agency will review all applicant proposals that may qualify for assistance under this section in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, Environmental Policies and Procedures. The environmental review for projects that score high enough will be submitted during the Phase 2 application process and must be conducted in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, Environmental Policies and Procedures. XI. Agency Contacts For general questions about this Notice, please contact Aaron Morris, Rural Business–Cooperative Service, Energy Programs, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 6901–S, Washington, DC 20250–3225. Telephone: 202–720–1501. Email: Aaron.Morris@usda.gov. Equal Opportunity and Non- Discrimination Requirements In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/ parental status, income derived from a public assistance program. Political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARTET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD– 3027, found online at How to File a Program Discrimination Complaint and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of a complaint form, call, (866) 632–9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410; (2) Fax: (202) 690–7442; or (3) Email at: program.intake@ usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Bette B. Brand, Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service. [FR Doc. 2019–22366 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–489–817] Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aimee Phelan or Mary Kolberg, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2201 or (202) 482–1785, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On September 10, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). 1 Subsequently on October 5, 2017, Commerce published an amended order consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirming Commerce’s remand redetermination. 2 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first sunset review of the CVD order on OCTG Turkey, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 3 In June 2019, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate from the following domestic interested parties: Benteler Steel/Tube, Boomerang Tube, LLC, IPSCO Tubulars, Inc., Vallourec Star, LP, and Welded Tube USA Inc; 4 Maverick Tube Corporation and Tenaris Bay City, Inc; 5 and United States Steel Corporation. (U.S. Steel Corporation). 6 All notices of intent to participate were timely filed within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Additionally, each of these companies claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of OCTG. Commerce received an adequate substantive response to the notice of initiation from the domestic producers within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).7 On July 4, 2019, we received a timely substantive response from the government of Turkey (GOT).8 The domestic interested parties VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 55140 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2019 / Notices 9 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Rebuttal to the Substantive Response of the Government of Turkey to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews,’’ dated July 9, 2019. 10 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2019,’’ dated July 29, 2019. 11 See Memorandum ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Fourth Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). filed a timely rebuttal response to the GOT’s submission on July 9, 2019.9 However, because we did not receive a substantive response from exporters of OCTG from Turkey, we determined that the substantive response provided by the GOT was not adequate. On July 29, 2019, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.10 As a result, pursuant to 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the CVD order on OCTG from Turkey. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is OCTG, which are hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The scope of the order also covers OCTG coupling stock. Excluded from the scope of the order are: Casing or tubing containing 10.5 percent or more by weight of chromium; drill pipe; unattached couplings; and unattached thread protectors. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 7306.29.81.50. The merchandise subject to the order may also enter under the following HTSUS item numbers: 7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 7304.39.00.32, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.39.00.76, 7304.39.00.80, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.15, 7304.59.80.20, 7304.59.80.25, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, 7304.59.80.70, 7304.59.80.80, 7305.31.40.00, 7305.31.60.90, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and 7306.50.50.70. Although the HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purpose, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this sunset review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,11 which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and to all in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/. Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the CVD order on OCTG from Turkey would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Producer/exporter Net subsidy rate (percent) Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and cross-owned affiliates Borusan Istikbal Ticaret, Borusan Mannesmann Boru Yatirim Holding A.S., and Borusan Holding A.S. (collectively, Borusan) ............................................................................... 2.71 All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2.71 Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 55141Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2019 / Notices 1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 40138 (August 24, 2017) (Order). 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 40 days. 3 See Memoranda, ‘‘Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 11/29/2016–12/31/2017,’’ dated June 5, 2019; and ‘‘Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 11/29/2016–12/31/2017,’’ dated September 20, 2019. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 5 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 6 We note that cross-ownership exists between Norma (India) Ltd., USK Export Private Limited (USK), Uma Shanker Khandelwal and Co., (UMA) and Bansidhar Chiranjilal (BCL). See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8–9. Dated: October 2, 2019. P. Lee Smith, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Final Results of Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–22532 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–872] Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2016–2017 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Norma (India) Ltd. (Norma) and R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd (RNG) received countervailable subsidies during the period of review (POR), November 29, 2016 through December 31, 2017. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Applicable October 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yasmin Bordas or John McGowan, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3813 and (202) 482–3019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 24, 2017, Commerce published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on finished carbon steel flanges (steel flanges) from India. 1 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018 through the resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.2 On June 5, 2019, and September 20, 2019, Commerce extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results of this review.3 The revised deadline for these Preliminary Results is now October 9, 2019. For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 4 A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included at the Appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is steel flanges. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.5 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Companies Not Selected for Individual Review For the companies not selected for individual review, because the rates calculated for Norma and RNG were above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we applied a subsidy rate based on a weighted-average of the subsidy rates calculated for Norma and RNG using publicly-ranged sales data submitted by the respondents. This is consistent with the methodology that we would use in an investigation to establish the all-others rate, consistent with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Preliminary Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b)(4)(i), we calculated individual subsidy rates for Norma and RNG. For the period November 29, 2016 through December 31, 2017, we preliminarily determine that the following net subsidy rates exist: Company Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Norma (India) Ltd 6 ............... 6.56 R.N. Gupta & Co. Ltd ........... 4.79 Adinath International ............. 5.63 Allena Group ......................... 5.63 Alloyed Steel ......................... 5.63 Bebitz Flanges Works Pri- vate Limited ....................... 5.63 C.D. Industries ...................... 5.63 CHW Forge ........................... 5.63 CHW Forge Pvt. Ltd ............. 5.63 Citizen Metal Depot .............. 5.63 Corum Flange ....................... 5.63 DN Forge Industries ............. 5.63 Echjay Forgings Limited ....... 5.63 Falcon Valves and Flanges Private Limited .................. 5.63 Heubach International .......... 5.63 Hindon Forge Pvt. Ltd .......... 5.63 Jai Auto Pvt. Ltd ................... 5.63 Kinnari Steel Corporation ..... 5.63 M F Rings and Bearing Races Ltd .......................... 5.63 Mascot Metal Manufactures 5.63 OM Exports ........................... 5.63 Punjab Steel Works (PSW) .. 5.63 R.D. Forge ............................ 5.63 Raaj Sagar Steel .................. 5.63 Ravi Ratan Metal Industries 5.63 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:24 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - India - South Korea - Turkey - Vietnam === 12774 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 4, 2020 / Notices increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms’ workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT A SSISTANCE [2/19/2020 through 2/26/2020] Firm name Firm address Date accepted for investigation Product(s) MEDI, LLC d/b/a Eyelet Design .............. 574 East Main Street, Waterbury, CT 06702. 2/21/2020 The firm manufactures metal cans and cannisters as well as metal caps and closures. Trilap Precision Finishing, LLC ............... 649 Lawrence Street, 2nd Floor, Lowell, MA 01852. 2/24/2020 The firm manufactures small metal parts, primarily of aluminum. Columbia Gem House, Inc. d/b/a Trigem Designs. 12507 Northeast 95th Street, Vancouver, WA 98682. 2/25/2020 The firm manufacturers jewelry with pre- cious or semi-precious stones. Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Irette Patterson, Program Analyst. [FR Doc. 2020–04366 Filed 3–3–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 2093] Grant of Authority; Establishment of a Foreign-Trade Zone Under the Alternative Site Framework Jefferson County, Colorado Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign- Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign- Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ‘‘ . . . the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the FTZ Board (the Board) to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry; Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, the Jefferson County Economic Development Corporation (the Grantee), a non-profit corporation, has made application to the Board (B– 9–2019, docketed February 25, 2019), requesting the establishment of a foreign-trade zone under the ASF with a service area of Boulder, Clear Creek, Gilpin and Jefferson Counties, Colorado, adjacent to the Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport Customs and Border Protection user fee airport; Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the Federal Register (84 FR 7018–7019, March 1, 2019) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants to the Grantee the privilege of establishing a foreign-trade zone, designated on the records of the Board as Foreign-Trade Zone No. 298, as described in the application, and subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit, and to the user fee agreement for the Rocky Mountain Metropolitan Airport CBP user fee airport remaining in effect. Dated: February 20, 2020. Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary of Commerce, Chairman and Executive Officer, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2020–04364 Filed 3–3–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–857; A–580–870; A–489–816; A– 552–817] Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, the Republic of Korea, Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES : Applicable March 4, 2020. SUMMARY : As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India, the Republic of Korea (Korea), the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail are indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : Chelsey Simonovich, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1979. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:52 Mar 03, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 12775Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 4, 2020 / Notices 1 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, 79 FR 41981 (July 18, 2014); Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Negative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 41983 (July 18, 2014); Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 79 FR 41971 (July 18, 2014); Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 41973 (July 18, 2014). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 3 See Petitioners’ Letters, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from India: Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews’’ (Petitioners’ Substantive Response for India); ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from South Korea: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation’’ (Petitioners’ Substantive Response for Korea); ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Turkey: Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews’’ (Petitioners’ Substantive Response for Turkey); and ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from Vietnam: Substantive Response of the Domestic Industry to Commerce’s Notice of Initiation of Five- Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews’’ (Petitioners’ Substantive Response for Vietnam), each dated July 3, 2019. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). Background In 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register its final affirmative determinations of sales at less than fair value with respect to imports of certain OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam. 1 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the sunset reviews of the AD Orders on OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam. 2 On July 3, 2019, Commerce received complete substantive responses to the notices of initiation from domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 3 Commerce received no substantive responses from respondent interested parties. As a result, Commerce conducted an expedited, i.e., 120-day, sunset review of these AD Orders pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Scope of the Orders The merchandise subject to the AD Orders is certain OCTG. For a complete description of the products covered, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 4 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation, and the magnitude of dumping margins likely to prevail if the orders were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit in Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. A list ofthe topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as anAppendix. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed and electronic versions of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on OCTG from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted- average margins up to 11.24 percent for India, 6.49 percent for Korea, 35.86 percent for Turkey, and 111.47 percent for Vietnam. Notification to Interested Parties This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: October 2, 2019. P. Lee Smith, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the AD Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues VII. Final Results of the Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–04395 Filed 3–3–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XA063] Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting AGENCY : National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION : Notice of public meeting (webinar). SUMMARY : The Pacific Fishery Management Council’s (Council) Ad Hoc Climate and Communities Core Team (CCCT) will hold a webinar, which is open to the public. DATES : The webinar will be held Friday, March 20, 2020, from 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time, or when business for the day has been completed. ADDRESSES : A public listening station is available at the Council office (address below). To attend the webinar (1) join the meeting by using this link: https:// meetings.ringcentral.com/join, (2) enter the Meeting ID provided in the meeting announcement (see http:// www.pcouncil.org) and click JOIN, (3) you will be prompted to either download the RingCentral meetings application or join the meeting without a download via your web browser, and (4) enter your name and click JOIN. NOTE: We require all participants to use a telephone or cell phone to participate. (1) You must use your telephone for the audio portion of the meeting by dialing the TOLL number provided on your screen followed by the meeting ID and participant ID, also provided on the screen. (2) Once connected, you will be in the meeting, seeing other participants and a shared screen, if applicable. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:41 Mar 03, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM 04MRN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 25741Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 16 See THIELMANN’s Letter, ‘‘Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from Mexico: Request For Postponement of Final Determination,’’ dated April 29, 2019. exceed six months. 16 However, we find that a compelling reason to deny the request to postpone the final determination exists because THIELMANN declined to respond to our original questionnaire or otherwise participate in the investigation. THIELMANN is the sole mandatory respondent in this case, and because it declined to respond to our initial questionnaire and is not participating in the investigation, there is no need to postpone the final determination, and we are thus compelled to deny the request. In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(e)(1) and (2), because a compelling reason for denial exists we are not granting THIELMANN’s request to postpone the final determination. Therefore, we intend to issue the final determination pursuant to section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1). International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, Commerce will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its preliminary determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: May 28, 2019. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation are kegs, vessels, or containers with bodies that are approximately cylindrical in shape, made from stainless steel (i.e., steel containing at least 10.5 percent chromium by weight and less than 1.2 percent carbon by weight, with or without other elements), and that are compatible with a ‘‘D Sankey’’ extractor (refillable stainless steel kegs) with a nominal liquid volume capacity of 10 liters or more, regardless of the type of finish, gauge, thickness, or grade of stainless steel, and whether or not covered by or encased in other materials. Refillable stainless steel kegs may be imported assembled or unassembled, with or without all components (including spears, couplers or taps, necks, collars, and valves), and be filled or unfilled. ‘‘Unassembled’’ or ‘‘unfinished’’ refillable stainless steel kegs include drawn stainless steel cylinders that have been welded to form the body of the keg and attached to an upper (top) chime and/or lower (bottom) chime. Unassembled refillable stainless steel kegs may or may not be welded to a neck, may or may not have a valve assembly attached, and may be otherwise complete except for testing, certification, and/or marking. Subject merchandise also includes refillable stainless steel kegs that have been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to, attachment of necks, collars, spears or valves, heat treatment, pickling, passivation, painting, testing, certification or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope refillable stainless steel keg. Specifically excluded are the following: (1) Vessels or containers that are not approximately cylindrical in nature (e.g., box, ‘‘hopper’’ or ‘‘cone’’ shaped vessels); (2) stainless steel kegs, vessels, or containers that have either a ‘‘ball lock’’ valve system or a ‘‘pin lock’’ valve system (commonly known as ‘‘Cornelius,’’ ‘‘corny’’ or ‘‘ball lock’’ kegs); (3) necks, spears, couplers or taps, collars, and valves that are not imported with the subject merchandise; and (4) stainless steel kegs that are filled with beer, wine, or other liquid and that are designated by the Commissioner of Customs as Instruments of International Traffic within the meaning of section 332(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The merchandise covered by this investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7310.10.0010, 7310.10.0050, 7310.29.0025, and 7310.29.0050. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Investigation IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Scope Comments VI. Product Characteristics VII. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference, and Calculation of All-Others Rate A. Application of Facts Available B. Use of Adverse Inference C. Preliminary Estimated Weighted- Average Dumping Margins Based on Adverse Facts Available D. Corroboration of Secondary Information E. All Others Rate VIII. Critical Circumstances IX. Verification X. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2019–11586 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the Commission) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s). DATES : Applicable June 1, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 25742 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 1 With respect to these Sunset Reviews, Commerce is advancing their initiation from August to June 2019 to coincide with the initiation of the companion Sunset Reviews being conducted by the U.S. International Trade Commission, as well as with Commerce’s initiation of the Sunset Review for the companion Ukrainian case (A–823–815), which was already scheduled to be initiated on June 2019. 2 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 3 See section 782(b) of the Act. 4 See also Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule are available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 5 See Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013). 6 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–351–832 ...... 731–TA–953 Brazil ....................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. C–351–833 ...... 701–TA–417 Brazil ....................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–570–930 ...... 731–TA–1144 China ....................... Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe (2nd Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. C–570–931 ...... 701–TA–454 China ....................... Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe (2nd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–533–857 ...... 731–TA–1215 India ........................ Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. C–533–858 ...... 701–TA–499 India ........................ Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–560–815 ...... 731–TA–957 Indonesia ................. Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (2nd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–557–815 ...... 731–TA–1210 Malaysia .................. Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–201–830 ...... 731–TA–958 Mexico ..................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–841–805 ...... 731–TA–959 Moldova ................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–580–870 ...... 731–TA–1216 Republic of Korea ... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–821–817 ...... 731–TA–991 Russia ..................... Silicon Metal (3rd Review) ........................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–552–816 ...... 731–TA–1212 Vietnam ................... Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–549–830 ...... 731–TA–1211 Thailand .................. Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–274–804 ...... 731–TA–961 Trinidad And To- bago. Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–489–816 ...... 731–TA–1221 Turkey ..................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. C–489–817 ...... 701–TA–500 Turkey ..................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–823–815 ...... 731–TA–1222 Ukraine .................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) (Suspension Agreement). Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. With respect to the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Vietnam, Republic of Korea and Turkey, we have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews upon determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for these antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the same date would promote administrative efficiency. 1 Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerces’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: http:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.2 Any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. 3 Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g).4 Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. On April 10, 2013, Commerce modified two regulations related to AD/ CVD proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). 5 Parties are advised to review the final rule, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits will continue to be applied. Parties are also advised to review the final rule concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in AD/CVD proceedings, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments.6 Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 25743Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 7 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 49953 (July 29, 2016) (Final Determination). 2 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, India, the Republic of Korea, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and the United Kingdom and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 64432 (September 20, 2016) (Order). 3 See Hyundai Steel Company v. United States, Slip Op. 18–80 Court No., 16–00228 dated June 28, 2018 (Remand Order) at 20–22. 4 Id. at 22–31. 5 Id. at 38–43. 6 Id. at 34. 7 Id. at 22–31. 8 Id. at 34. participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 7 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: May 30, 2019. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–11655 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–881] Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results and Notice of Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On February 26, 2019, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) issued final judgment in Hyundai Steel Company. v. United States, Court No. 16–00228, sustaining the Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) final results of the redetermination pursuant to remand. Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce’s Amended Final Results and Antidumping Duty Order published on September 20, 2016 (Order). Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel). DATES : Applicable March 8, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Daniel Deku, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–5075, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce published the Final Determination on July 29, 2016,1 and issued the antidumping duty order on September 20, 2016.2 Hyundai Steel filed an action before the CIT to challenge several aspects of Commerce’s Final Determination. After review, the Court sustained Commerce’s determination that Hyundai Steel failed to demonstrate that the affiliated parties who supplied Hyundai Steel with home market movement, home market warehousing, U.S. international freight, and U.S. inland freight expenses did so on an arm’s-length basis.3 The Court further sustained Commerce’s application of adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), as amended, to the affiliated parties who provided Hyundai Steel with home market movement, home market warehousing, U.S. international freight, and U.S. inland freight. 4 Additionally, the Court sustained Commerce’s application of AFA to three product specifications reported by Hyundai Steel.5 However, the Court remanded to Commerce for further explanation or reconsideration whether it intended to apply AFA to those U.S. sales where: (1) Hyundai Steel used an unaffiliated freight provider to supply domestic inland freight; or (2) Hyundai Steel incurred no domestic inland freight charges in the U.S.6 While the Court found that Commerce appropriately assigned an AFA freight amount to U.S. sales for which Hyundai Steel secured freight services from affiliated parties, 7 the Court found Commerce offered no justification as to why Commerce applied AFA freight amounts to U.S. sales for which Hyundai Steel either: (1) Incurred no domestic inland freight or warehousing expense; or (2) the domestic inland freight or warehousing was provided by unaffiliated parties. 8 Additionally, the Court determined that the AFA adjustment applied to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES