ITC Investigation 701-TA-455 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of China, Inv. Nos. 701-455 and 731-TA-1149 (Review) from China. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. It links to AD/CVD case A-570-935 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of China, Inv. Nos. 701-455 and 731-TA-1149 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Documents
Full text (83,065 chars)
=== USITC Determination === 26454 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 89 / Thursday, May 8, 2014 / Notices 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Rhonda K. Schmidtlein was not a member of the Commission at the time of the vote. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Ross, Public Affairs Specialist, Carson City District Office, 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City, NV 89701, telephone: (775) 885–6107, email: lross@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The 15- member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Nevada. Topics for discussion at each meeting will include, but are not limited to: • May 1–2 (Carson City)—rangeland health assessments, Carson City Resource Management Plan, greater sage-grouse/Bi State conservation, recreation, drought, and fire restoration (Field trip on May 2). • August 28 (Winnemucca)— landscape vegetative management and ongoing monitoring, recreation/ wilderness management and Emergency Stabilization and Restoration. (Field trip on August 28). Managers’ reports of field office activities will be given at each meeting. The Council may raise other topics at the meetings. Final agendas will be posted on-line at the BLM Sierra Front-Northwestern Great Basin RAC Web site at http:// www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/res/resource_ advisory.html and will be published in local and regional media sources at least 14 days before each meeting. Individuals who need special assistance such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, or who wish to receive a copy of each agenda, may contact Lisa Ross no later than 10 days prior to each meeting. Erica Haspiel-Szlosek, Chief, Office of Communications. [FR Doc. 2014–10567 Filed 5–7–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [LLNV952000 L14200000.BJ0000 241A; 13– 08807; MO# 4500064561; TAS: 14X1109] Filing of Plats of Survey; NV AGENCY : Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The purpose of this notice is to inform the public and interested State and local government officials of the filing of Plats of Survey in Nevada. DATES : Effective Dates: Unless otherwise stated filing is effective at 10:00 a.m. on the dates indicated below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David D. Morlan, Chief, Branch of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office, 1340 Financial Blvd., Reno, NV 89502–7147, phone: 775–861–6490. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : 1. The Plat of Survey of the following described lands was officially filed at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada State Office, Reno, Nevada on February 13, 2014: The plat, in 1 sheet, representing the dependent resurvey of the Nevada- Oregon State Line, between Mile Post No. 177+69 chs. and Mile Post No. 179, a portion of the east boundary and a portion of the subdivision-of-section lines of section 1, and the corrective dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivision-of-section lines of section 1, Township 47 North, Range 39 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, under Group No. 908, was accepted February 11, 2014. This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Forest Service. 2. The Supplemental Plat of the following described lands was officially filed at the BLM Nevada State Office, Reno, Nevada on March 4, 2014: The supplemental plat, in 1 sheet, showing the subdivision of former lots 7 and 16, section 19, Township 19 South, Range 62 East, of the Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada, under Group No. 933, was accepted March 4, 2014. This supplemental plat was prepared to accommodate the transfer of lands to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under the provisions of Public Law 108–447 as amended by Public Law 110–161. The survey and supplemental plat listed above are now the basic record for describing the lands for all authorized purposes. These records have been placed in the open files in the BLM Nevada State Office and are available to the public as a matter of information. Copies of the surveys and related field notes may be furnished to the public upon payment of the appropriate fees. Dated: May 2, 2014. David D. Morlan, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Nevada. [FR Doc. 2014–10561 Filed 5–7–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731– TA–1149 (Review)] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From China; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the countervailing duty order and the antidumping duty on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. 2 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on December 2, 2013 (78 FR 72114) and determined on March 7, 2014 that it would conduct expedited reviews (79 FR 15776, March 21, 2014). The Commission completed and filed its determination in these reviews on May 2, 2014. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4464, May 2014, entitled Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA– 455 and 731–TA–1149 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 2, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–10554 Filed 5–7–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:18 May 07, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM 08MYN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Continuation - AD/CVD - China === 28894 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 72061 (December 2, 2013). 2 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 19052 (April 7, 2014) and Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 15313 (March 19, 2014). 3 See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From China, 79 FR 26454 (May 8, 2014); see also USITC Publication 4464 (May 2014) entitled Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From China (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731–TA– 1149 (Review)). DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–935, C–570–936] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) has determined that revocation of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that revocation of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy. The U.S. International Trade Commission (the ‘‘USITC’’) has also determined that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States. The Department is publishing this notice of the continuation of these AD and CVD orders. DATES : Effective Date: May 20, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca (AD order) or Kristen Johnson (CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4551 and (202) 482–4793, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 2, 2013, the Department initiated the first five-year (‘‘sunset’’) reviews of the AD and CVD order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). 1 As a result of its reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and that revocation of the CVD order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of subsidization, and notified the USITC of the margins of dumping and the subsidy rates likely to prevail were the orders to be revoked.2 On May 8, 2014, the USITC published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time.3 Scope of the Orders The products covered by these AD and CVD orders are circular welded carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines (welded line pipe) not more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, length, surface finish, end finish or stenciling. The term ‘‘carbon quality steel’’ includes both carbon steel and carbon steel mixed with small amounts of alloying elements that may exceed the individual weight limits for non alloy steels imposed in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Specifically, the term ‘‘carbon quality’’ includes products in which (1) iron predominates by weight over each of the other contained elements, (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or less by weight and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity by weight respectively indicated: (i) 2.00 percent of manganese, (ii) 2.25 percent of silicon, (iii) 1.00 percent of copper, (iv) 0.50 percent of aluminum, (v) 1.25 percent of chromium, (vi) 0.30 percent of cobalt, (vii) 0.40 percent of lead, (viii) 1.25 percent of nickel, (ix) 0.30 percent of tungsten, (x) 0.012 percent of boron, (xi) 0.50 percent of molybdenum, (xii) 0.15 percent of niobium, (xiii) 0.41 percent of titanium, (xiv) 0.15 percent of vanadium, or (xv) 0.15 percent of zirconium. Welded line pipe is normally produced to specifications published by the American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) (or comparable foreign specifications) including API A–25, 5LA, 5LB, and X grades from 42 and above, and/or any other proprietary grades or non-graded material. Nevertheless, all pipe meeting the physical description set forth above that is of a kind used in oil and gas pipelines, including all multiple- stenciled pipe with an API welded line pipe stencil is covered by the scope of the orders. Excluded from the scope are pipes of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines that are multiple-stenciled to a standard and/or structural specification and have one or more of the following characteristics: Is 32 feet in length or less; is less than 2.0 inches (50 mm) in outside diameter; has a galvanized and/ or painted surface finish; or has a threaded and/or coupled end finish. (The term ‘‘painted’’ does not include coatings to inhibit rust in transit, such as varnish, but includes coatings such as polyester.) The welded line pipe products that are the subject of the orders are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings 7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by the Department and the USITC that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of these orders is the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the continuation. These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:09 May 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES 28895Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 97 / Tuesday, May 20, 2014 / Notices 1 See the Department Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews of Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), for a complete description of the Scope of the Order. 2 See 19 CFR 351.309(c). 3 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 4 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 5 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Dated: May 13, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–11682 Filed 5–19–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–831] Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new shipper review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. (‘‘Merry’’) and Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingshui’’) regarding the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘the PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is November 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. We preliminarily find that Merry and Qingshui made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Effective Date: May 20, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey or Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964 or (202) 482–4340, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is all grades of garlic, whether whole or separated into constituent cloves. 1 The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 0703.20.0000, 0703.20.0010, 0703.20.0020, 0703.20.0090, 0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 0711.90.6000, 0711.90.6500, 2005.90.9500, 2005.90.9700, 0703.20.0005, 2005.99.9700 and 0703.20.0015. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description is dispositive. Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR 351.214. Export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a nonmarket economy within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s centralized electronic service system (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Department’s Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of New Shipper Reviews The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted- average dumping margins exist: Exporter Weighted- average dumping margin ($ per kg) Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd .................... $3.06 per kg Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd ....................................... 3.33 per kg Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit written comments by no later than 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.2 Rebuttals to written comments may be filed by no later than five days after the written comments are filed. 3 Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. 4 Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.5 The Department will issue the final results of this new shipper review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such comments, within 90 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of this new shipper review, the Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.6 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this new shipper review. In this new shipper review, we calculated a per-unit rate for each importer by dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. For duty- assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate against the entered quantity of the subject merchandise. If the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis, we will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Then, we will instruct VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:09 May 19, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM 20MYN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - China === 19052 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 2014 / Notices 1 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR 22515 (May 13, 2009) (‘‘Antidumping Duty Order’’). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 72061 (December 2, 2013) (‘‘Sunset Initiation’’). after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that public presentation materials or comments be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Springer. The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on December 5, 2013, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § (l0)(d))), that the portion of the meeting concerning trade secrets and commercial or financial information deemed privileged or confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the portion of the meeting concerning matters the disclosure of which would be likely to frustrate significantly implementation of an agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and l0(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public. For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202)482–2813. Dated: March 31, 2014. Yvette Springer, Committee Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–07651 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially Closed Meeting The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on May 7, 2014, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology. Agenda Public Session 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Status reports by working group chairs. 3. Public comments and Proposals. Closed Session 4. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@ bis.doc.gov no later than April 30, 2014. A limited number of seats will be available during the public session of the meeting. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email. The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on December 30, 2013, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § (10)(d)), that the portion of the meeting dealing with pre-decisional changes to the Commerce Control List and U.S. export control policies shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public. For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482–2813. Dated: March 31, 2014. Yvette Springer, Committee Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–07652 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–935] Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY : As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on circular welded carbon-quality steel line pipe (‘‘welded line pipe’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Effective Date: April 7, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori Apodaca or Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4551 or (202) 482– 5193, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On May 13, 2009, the Department published the AD order on welded line pipe from the PRC. 1 On December 2, 2013, the Department published the notice of initiation of the sunset review of this AD order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 2 On December 11 and 17, 2013, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1), the Department received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in the sunset review of the order from American Cast Iron Pipe Company (‘‘ACIPCO’’), JMC Steel Group (‘‘JMC’’), Maverick Tube Corporation (‘‘Maverick’’), Stupp Corporation (‘‘Stupp’’), Tex-Tube Company (‘‘Tex- Tube’’), TMK IPSCO, United States Steel Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’), and Welspun Tubular LLC USA (‘‘Welspun’’) (collectively ‘‘Domestic Producers’’). On January 2, 2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3), Domestic Producers filed a timely and adequate substantive response. The Department did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this AD order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines (welded line pipe), not more than 406.4 mm (16 inches) in outside diameter, regardless of wall thickness, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Apr 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 19053Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 2014 / Notices 3 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘I&D Memorandum’’). 1 See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 55676 (September 11, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’) and accompanying Decision Memorandum. 2 Id. 3 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor, through James Doyle, Office Director, from Julia Hancock, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst, ‘‘Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Administrative Review, and Aligned New Shipper Review,’’ dated January 7, 2014. length, surface finish, end finish or stenciling. The welded line pipe products that are the subject of this order are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under subheadings 7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is provided in the accompanying I&D Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 The issues discussed in the I&D Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail if the order is revoked. The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum can be accessed at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed I&D Memorandum and the electronic version of the I&D Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Reviews The Department determines that revocation of the AD order on welded line pipe from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, with the following dumping margins likely to prevail: Exporter/producer Weighted-average percentage margin Huludao Steel Pipe Industrial Co., Ltd./Huludao City Steel Pipe Industrial Co., Ltd .................................................................... 73.87 Produced by: Huludao Steel Pipe Industrial Co., Ltd./Huludao City Steel Pipe Industrial Co., Ltd. Pangang Group Beihai Steel Pipe Corporation ............................................................................................................................ 73.87 Produced by: Pangang Group Beihai Steel Pipe Corporation Jiangsu Yulong Steel Pipe Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 73.87 Produced by: Jiangsu Yulong Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Tianjin Xingyuda Import and Export Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 73.87 Produced by: Tianjin Lifengyuanda Steel Pipe Group Co., Ltd. PRC-Wide Rate ............................................................................................................................................................................. 101.10 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: March 28, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–07595 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–552–801] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011–2012 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published the Preliminary Results of the ninth administrative review, and aligned new shipper review, on certain frozen fish fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’) on September 11, 2013.1 We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments and information received, we made changes to the margin calculations for these final results. The final dumping margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Reviews’’ section of this notice. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 2011, through July 31, 2012. DATES : Effective Date: April 7, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Montoro (Golden Quality), Paul Walker (HVG) or Julia Hancock (Vinh Hoan), AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202– 482–0238, 202–482–0413 or 202–482– 1394, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background The Department published the Preliminary Results on September 11, 2013. 2 On January 7, 2014, the Department extended the final results to March 8, 2014. 3 Between January 22 and February 10, 2014, interested parties submitted case and rebuttal briefs. On February 25, 2014, the Department extended the final results to March 28, VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Apr 04, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 72114 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Notices 1 No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 14–5–301, expiration date June 30, 2014. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. 55. Helena Valley ID; Helena Valley Unit, P–SMBP; Montana: Amendment to the repayment contract to allow for delivery of water for M&I purposes within the District boundaries of up to 10,000 acre feet. 56. Savage ID; Savage Unit, P–SMBP; Montana. Intent to enter into a repayment contract to provide for a long term-water supply. 57. Nelson Dikes, Milk River Project: Consideration of contract(s) for repayment of SOD costs. Modified contract actions: 30. Purgatoire Water Conservancy District, Trinidad Project, Colorado: Consideration of a request to execute an amendatory contract. 44. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, Norman Project, Oklahoma: Amend existing contract No. 14–06–500–590 or execute a separate contract(s) to allow for importation and storage of nonproject water in accordance with the Lake Thunderbird Efficient Use Act of 2012. 47. Cornwell Ranch, Milk River Project, Montana: Consideration of a request to enter into a new long-term Warren Act excess capacity contract for conveyance on nonproject water. Completed contract actions: 4. Ruedi Reservoir, Fryingpan- Arkansas Project, Colorado: Proposed repayment contracts for the remaining water from the regulatory capacity of Ruedi Reservoir. Executed on September 5, 2013. 20. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado: Supplement to contract No. 9–07–70– W0020 to allow Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District to contract for delivery of 5,412.5 acre-feet of water annually out of Lake Granby to the 15- Mile Reach. Executed on July 23, 2013. 32. F. Clarke Jackman Jr., Boysen Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming: Renewal of a long-term water service contract. Executed on July 16, 2013. 33. Gregory and Margaret Lungren, Boysen Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming: Renewal of a long-term water service contract. Executed on July 16, 2013 41. East Bench ID, East Bench Unit, Three Forks Division, P–SMBP, Montana: Consideration of a contract amendment, pursuant to Public Law 112–139, to extend the term of contract No. 14–06–600–3593 through December 31, 2013. Executed on August 14, 2013. Dated: September 27, 2013. Roseann Gonzales, Director, Policy and Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–28760 Filed 11–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731– TA–1149 (Review)] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission; 1 to be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is January 2, 2014. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by February 13, 2014. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES : Effective Date: December 2, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background—On January 23, 2009, the Department of Commerce issued a countervailing duty order on imports of circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China (74 FR 4136). On May 13, 2009, the Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty order on imports of circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China (74 FR 22515). The Commission is conducting a review to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by the Department of Commerce. (2) The Subject Country in this review is China. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determination, the Commission defined a single Domestic Like Product consisting of circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe, 16 inches or less in outside diameter. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as producers of line pipe 16 inches or less in outside diameter. (5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping and countervailing duty orders under review became effective. In the review of the countervailing duty order, the Order Date is January 23, 2009. In the review of the antidumping duty order, the Order Date is May 13, 2009. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:41 Nov 29, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM 02DEN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES 72115Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Notices parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the reviews and public service list—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the reviews. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not considered the ‘‘same particular matter’’ as the corresponding underlying original investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was developed in consultation with the Office of Government Ethics. Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205– 3088. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the review, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the reviews. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with these reviews must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent, unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews or investigations of the same or comparable products which the Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3. Written submissions—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is January 2, 2014. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is February 13, 2014. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Regarding electronic filing requirements under the Commission’s rules, see also the Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the reviews you do not need to serve your response). Inability to provide requested information—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information To Be Provided in Response To This Notice of Institution: As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association, or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries since the Order Date. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:41 Nov 29, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM 02DEN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES 72116 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 231 / Monday, December 2, 2013 / Notices (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2012, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2012 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country; and (c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from the Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2012 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country since the Order Date, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 26, 2013. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–28791 Filed 11–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1092 (Review)] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China Institution of a Five-Year Review. AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:41 Nov 29, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM 02DEN1 emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 15776 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices Dated: February 25, 2014. J. Paul Loether, Chief, National Register of Historic Places/ National Historic Landmarks Program. CALIFORNIA Sacramento County New Helvetia Historic District, 752 Revere St., Sacramento, 14000109 San Mateo County Pilarcitos Creek Bridge, (Highway Bridges of California MPS) Main St. across Pilarcitos Cr., Half Moon Bay, 14000110 ILLINOIS St. Clair County Town of West Belleville Historic District, Roughly bounded by 16th, W. E & S. 9th Sts., Illinois Central Gulf RR, Richland Cr., Belleville, 14000111 IOWA Johnson County Bowery Street Grocery Store, 518 E. Bowery St., Iowa City, 14000112 Polk County Des Moines Fire Department Headquarters— Fire Station No. 1 and Shop Building, 900 Mulberry St., 100 9th St., Des Moines, 14000113 KANSAS Decatur County Norcatur City Hall, (New Deal-Era Resources of Kansas MPS) 107 N. Decatur Ave., Norcatur, 14000114 Dickinson County Birchmore, John W., House, 1204 N. Buckeye Ave., Abilene, 14000116 Doniphan County Minier, Abram M., House, (Highland, Doniphan County, Kansas MPS) 307 South Ave., Highland, 14000115 Johnson County Lone Elm Campground Swale, (Santa Fe Trail MPS) 21151 W. 167th St., Olathe, 14000121 Lincoln County Sylvan Grove Union Pacific Depot, (Railroad Resources of Kansas MPS) 131 S. Main St., Sylvan Grove, 14000118 Neosho County Truitt, James and Ella, House, 305 N. Steuben Ave., Chanute, 14000117 Rice County Little Arkansas River Crossing, (Santa Fe Trail MPS) NE. of jct. Ave. P & 30th Rd., Windom, 14000122 Rush County Sand Creek Tributary Stone Arch Bridge, (Masonry Arch Bridges of Kansas TR) 2 mi. W, 1.4 mi. N. of La Crosse, La Crosse, 14000120 Washington County Lowe Center School—District 115, (Public Schools of Kansas MPS) SW. corner Indian & 27th Rds., Morrowville, 14000119 MICHIGAN Delta County Escanaba Central Historic District, Roughly 200–1800 blks. Ludington St., Escanaba, 14000123 Ingham County Genesee Street School, 835 W. Genesee St., Lansing, 14000124 Kalamazoo County Sparks—Anderson House, 7653 W. Main St., Oshtemo Township, 14000125 Shiawassee County Owosso Downtown Historic District, Roughly bounded by Shiawassee R., Comstock, Water, Park and Mason Sts., Owosso, 14000126 NEW YORK Franklin County Northbrook Lodge, 58 Northbrook Rd., Paul Smiths, 14000127 Onondaga County Odd Fellows Lodge and Temple, 212 Ash St., 823 N. Townsend St., Syracuse, 14000128 Orange County New York, Ontario & Western Railway Company Middletown Station, 2 Low Ave., Middletown, 14000129 Rensselaer County Howard—Odmin—Sherman Farmstead, 393 Croll Rd., Pittstown, 14000130 Rockland County Shadowcliff, 521 N. Broadway, Upper Nyack, 14000131 Saratoga County Jonesville Cemetery, Ushers & Longkill Rds., Jonesville, 14000132 VERMONT Rutland County Watkins School, 26 Watkins Ave., Rutland, 14000133 WYOMING Lincoln County La Barge Bluffs Petroglyphs, Address Restricted, La Barge, 14000134 [FR Doc. 2014–06185 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–51–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–455 and 731– TA–1149 (Review)] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews Concerning the Countervailing and Antidumping Duty Orders on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From China AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing and antidumping duty orders on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES : Effective Date: March 7, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William English (202–205–2388), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On March 7, 2014, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (78 F.R. 72114, December 2, 2013) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:18 Mar 20, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 15777Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff did not participate in these adequacy determinations. 3 The Commission has the authority to toll statutory deadlines during a period when the government is closed. Because the Commission was closed on December 10, 2013, and on January 21, February 13, and March 3, 2014 due to inclement weather in Washington, DC, the statutory deadline may be tolled by up to four days. 4 The Commission has found the responses submitted by the domestic interested parties to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 1 Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 2 United States International Trade Commission (USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov. 3 Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2 3 Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on April 4, 2014, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution, 4 and any party other than an interested party to the reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before April 9, 2014, and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by April 9, 2014. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 18, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–06178 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest AGENCY : U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled Certain Sulfentrazone, Sulfentrazone Compositions, and Processes for Making Sulfentrazone, DN 3004; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or complainant’s filing under section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.8(b)). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The public version of the complaint can be accessed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at EDIS,1 and will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at United States International Trade Commission (USITC) at USITC.2 The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at EDIS.3 Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Commission has received a complaint and a submission pursuant to section 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure filed on behalf of FMC Corporation on March 05, 2014. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain sulfentrazone, sulfentrazone compositions, and processes for making sulfentrazone. The complaint names as respondents Beijing Nutrichem Science and Technology Stock Co., Ltd. of Beijing; Summit Agro USA, LLC of Cary, NC; Summit Agro North America Holding Corporation of New York, NY; and Jiangxi Heyi Chemicals Co. Ltd. of China. The complainant requests that the Commission issue a temporary exclusion order and a temporary cease and desist order, a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. Proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, inclusive of attachments, on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments should address whether issuance of the relief specifically requested by the complainant in this investigation would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the requested remedial orders; (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:18 Mar 20, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - China === 15313Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices 25 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 26 See section 782(b) of the Act. 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 72061 (December 2, 2013). via Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and Countervailing Duty (‘‘CVD’’) Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303. 25 This notice serves as a reminder that any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.26 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the Department will maintain and make available a public service list for this sunset review. Because changes to the representation of interested parties may have changed since this sunset review was initially conducted, to facilitate the timely update of the service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to this reopened segment file an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of this notice. We urge interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under APO immediately following publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Department’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 306. This five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: March 14, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–06081 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–936] Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On December 2, 2013, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated a sunset review of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on circular welded carbon quality steel line pipe (‘‘line pipe’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested parties and an inadequate response from respondent interested parties (in this case, no response), the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of this CVD order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B) and (C). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the CVD order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Effective Date: March 19, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On December 2, 2013, the Department initiated a sunset review of the CVD order on line pipe from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. 1 The Department received a notice of intent to participate in the review on behalf of United States Steel Corporation (‘‘US Steel’’), Maverick Tube Corporation (‘‘Maverick’’), American Cast Iron Pipe Company (‘‘ACIPCO’’), JMC Steel Group, Stupp Corporation, Tex-Tube Company, TMK IPSCO, and Welspun Tubular LLC USA, (collectively, ‘‘the domestic industry’’) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of these companies claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of the domestic like product. The Department received adequate substantive responses collectively from the domestic industry within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a substantive response from any government or respondent interested party to the proceeding. Because the Department received no response from the respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited review of this CVD order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded carbon quality steel pipe of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines (welded line pipe). The welded line pipe products that are the subject of this order are currently classifiable in the HTSUS under subheadings 7306.19.10.10, 7306.19.10.50, 7306.19.51.10, and 7306.19.51.50. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. For a full description of the scope, see ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this final notice, and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this expedited sunset review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file electronically via the Enforcement and Compliance Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:28 Mar 18, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 15314 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices Final Results of Review We determine that revocation of the CVD order on line pipe from the PRC would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the rates listed below: Producers/exporters Net countervailable subsidy (percent) Huludao Companies ......... 33.43 Liaoning Northern Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. ................ 40.05 All Others Rate ................. 36.74 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Exporter Weighted- average margin (Percent) Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) ....................... 25.76 Dated: March 11, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–05972 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [Application No. 14–00001] Export Trade Certificate of Review ACTION : Notice of Application for an Export Trade Certificate of Review for Willians Global Trade Concierge, LLC Application no. 14–00001. SUMMARY : The Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, has received an application for an Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice summarizes the application and requests comments relevant to whether the Certificate should be issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at etca@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. An Export Trade Certificate of Review protects the holder and the members identified in the Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct specified in the Certificate and carried out in compliance with its terms and conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the Secretary to publish a notice in the Federal Register identifying the applicant and summarizing its proposed export conduct. Request for Public Comments Interested parties may submit written comments relevant to the determination whether a Certificate should be issued. If the comments include any privileged or confidential business information, it must be clearly marked and a nonconfidential version of the comments (identified as such) should be included. Any comments not marked as privileged or confidential business information will be deemed to be nonconfidential. An original and five (5) copies, plus two (2) copies of the nonconfidential version, should be submitted no later than 20 days after the date of this notice to: Export Trading Company Affairs, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 7025–X, Washington, DC 20230. Information submitted by any person is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). However, nonconfidential versions of the comments will be made available to the applicant if necessary for determining whether or not to issue the Certificate. Comments should refer to this application as ‘‘Export Trade Certificate of Review, application number 14–00001.’’ A summary of the current application follows. Summary of the Application Applicant: Willians Global Trade Concierge, LLC, 5051 Brown Street, Philadelphia, PA 19139. Contact: Janean Campbell, Owner. Application No.: 14–00001. Date Deemed Submitted: February 27, 2014. Summary: Willians Global Trade Concierge, LLC (‘‘WGTC’’) seeks a Certificate of Review to engage in the Export Trade Activities and Methods of Operation described below in the following Export Trade and Export Markets: Export Trade Products: All Products. Services: All services related to the export of Products. Technology Rights: All intellectual property rights associated with Products or Services, including, but not limited to: patents, trademarks, services marks, trade names, copyrights, neighboring (related) rights, trade secrets, know- how, and confidential databases and computer programs. Export Trade Facilitation Services (as They Relate to the Export of Products): Export Trade Facilitation Services, including but not limited to: Consulting and trade strategy, arranging and coordinating delivery of Products to the port of export; arranging for inland and/ or ocean transportation; allocating Products to vessel; arranging for storage space at port; arranging for warehousing, stevedoring, wharfage, handling, inspection, fumigation, and freight forwarding; insurance and financing; documentation and services related to compliance with customs’ requirements; sales and marketing; export brokerage; foreign marketing and analysis; foreign market development; overseas advertising and promotion; Products-related research and design based upon foreign buyer and consumer preferences; inspection and quality control; shipping and export management; export licensing; provisions of overseas sales and distribution facilities and overseas sales staff; legal; accounting and tax assistance; development and application of management information systems; trade show exhibitions; professional services in the area of government relations and assistance with federal and state export assistance programs (e.g., Export Enhancement and Market Promotion programs, invoicing (billing) foreign buyers; collecting (letters of credit and other financial instruments) payment for Products; and arranging for payment of applicable commissions and fees. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:28 Mar 18, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 701-TA-455 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe from the People's Republic of China, Inv. Nos. 701-455 and 731-TA-1149 (Review) from China. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
701-TA-455 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 701-TA-455 resulted in AD/CVD case A-570-935. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource
A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.
Open resource
Drop the Tandom Duty Calculator API into a TMS, broker software, or in-house ERP. Code samples, the response shape, and ACE reporting order, in 2026.
Open resource
Run thousands of product descriptions through HTS classification, score the confidence, and triage borderline rows. Public search endpoint plus the closed-beta three-layer Classifier.
Open resource