Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-454 and 731-TA-1144 (Second Review) and Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1210-1212 (Review)

=== Commerce: China: C-570-931 === 66883Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2019 / Notices 4 See also the Enforcement and Compliance website at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 6 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. 7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009) (AD Order). 2 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 11712 (March 19, 2009) (CVD Order). 3 The AD Order and CVD Order are collectively referred to as the Orders. 4 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Continued location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders. 4 Commerce no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative reviews. 5 Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless Commerce specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity. 6 In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity’s entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS website at http://access.trade.gov.7 Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. Commerce will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation’’ for requests received by the last day of December 2019. If Commerce does not receive, by the last day of December 2019, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: December 2, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–26349 Filed 12–5–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–930, C–570–931] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order and countervailing duty (CVD) order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD order and the CVD order. DATES : Applicable December 6, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric B. Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, and Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6071 and (202) 482–0835, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 17, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD order on WSSP from China. 1 On March 19, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on WSSP from China. 2 On June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the second sunset reviews of the Orders 3 and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders. 4 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Dec 05, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66884 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2019 / Notices Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (AD Notice to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (CVD Notice to Participate). 6 See Primus Pipe’s Letters, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s AD Notice to Participate); and ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s CVD Notice to Participate). 7 See AD Notice to Participate at 2; Primus Pipe’s AD Notice to Participate at 2; CVD Notice to Participate at 2; and Primus Pipe’s CVD Notice to Participate at 2. 8 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019; and ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019. 9 See Primus Pipe’s Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 10 See Letter from Erin Begnal, Director, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, to Nannette Christ, Director, Office of Investigations, July 29, 2019. 11 See Explanation of Commission Determinations on Adequacy, EDIS Doc. 691660 (September 6, 2019). 12 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 52462 (October 2, 2019); see also Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 52460 (October 2, 2019). 13 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1210–1212 and 701– TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) (November 2019). On June 13, 2019, Commerce received notices of intent to participate in the sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).5 On June 18, 2019, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate in the AD and CVD sunset review from Primus Pipe. 6 The domestic interested parties and Primus Pipe claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product.7 On June 28, 2019, Commerce received complete and adequate substantive responses from the domestic interested parties filed within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 8 On July 5, 2019, Primus Pipe expressed its support for the substantive response filed by the domestic interested parties and incorporated them by reference. 9 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.10 On September 6, 2019, the ITC determined to conduct an expedited five-year review of the Orders.11 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSP from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or countervailable subsidies. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(b)(3) and (c)(3) of the Act. 12 On November 25, 2019, the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.13 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only, the written description of the scope of these orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders on WSSP from China. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of these Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: December 2, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26359 Filed 12–5–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Dec 05, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Commerce: China: A-570-930 === 66883Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2019 / Notices 4 See also the Enforcement and Compliance website at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 5 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 6 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. 7 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009) (AD Order). 2 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 11712 (March 19, 2009) (CVD Order). 3 The AD Order and CVD Order are collectively referred to as the Orders. 4 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Continued location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders. 4 Commerce no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative reviews. 5 Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless Commerce specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity. 6 In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity’s entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS website at http://access.trade.gov.7 Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. Commerce will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation’’ for requests received by the last day of December 2019. If Commerce does not receive, by the last day of December 2019, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: December 2, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–26349 Filed 12–5–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–930, C–570–931] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order and countervailing duty (CVD) order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD order and the CVD order. DATES : Applicable December 6, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric B. Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, and Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6071 and (202) 482–0835, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 17, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD order on WSSP from China. 1 On March 19, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on WSSP from China. 2 On June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the second sunset reviews of the Orders 3 and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders. 4 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Dec 05, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66884 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2019 / Notices Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (AD Notice to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (CVD Notice to Participate). 6 See Primus Pipe’s Letters, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s AD Notice to Participate); and ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s CVD Notice to Participate). 7 See AD Notice to Participate at 2; Primus Pipe’s AD Notice to Participate at 2; CVD Notice to Participate at 2; and Primus Pipe’s CVD Notice to Participate at 2. 8 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019; and ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019. 9 See Primus Pipe’s Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 10 See Letter from Erin Begnal, Director, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, to Nannette Christ, Director, Office of Investigations, July 29, 2019. 11 See Explanation of Commission Determinations on Adequacy, EDIS Doc. 691660 (September 6, 2019). 12 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 52462 (October 2, 2019); see also Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 52460 (October 2, 2019). 13 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1210–1212 and 701– TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) (November 2019). On June 13, 2019, Commerce received notices of intent to participate in the sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).5 On June 18, 2019, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate in the AD and CVD sunset review from Primus Pipe. 6 The domestic interested parties and Primus Pipe claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product.7 On June 28, 2019, Commerce received complete and adequate substantive responses from the domestic interested parties filed within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 8 On July 5, 2019, Primus Pipe expressed its support for the substantive response filed by the domestic interested parties and incorporated them by reference. 9 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.10 On September 6, 2019, the ITC determined to conduct an expedited five-year review of the Orders.11 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) and (c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSP from China would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or countervailable subsidies. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(b)(3) and (c)(3) of the Act. 12 On November 25, 2019, the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.13 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only, the written description of the scope of these orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders on WSSP from China. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of these Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: December 2, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26359 Filed 12–5–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Dec 05, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM 06DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Commerce: Malaysia: A-557-815 === 66154 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Malaysia Intent to Participate); ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Thailand Intent to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Vietnam Intent to Participate). Also, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus). See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019. 4 See Malaysia Intent to Participate at 2; see also Thailand Intent to Participate at 2; Vietnam Intent to Participate at 2; Primus Intent to Participate at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; see also Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019. Also, Primus submitted a response, in which it agreed with the substantive responses of the other domestic interested parties. See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2019,’’ dated July 29, 2019. 7 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 55171 (October 15, 2019). 8 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 52458 (October 2, 2019). 9 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) and 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review), USITC Publication 4994, November 2019). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs and Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On November 1, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice of initiation of five-year reviews (sunset reviews). See Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019) (November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice). In that notice, Commerce inadvertently omitted the antidumping and countervailing duty suspension agreements on Sugar from Mexico (A– 201–845 and C–201–846) from the list of cases for which sunset reviews initiate in November 2019. This document serves to correct the November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice for the aforementioned items. This correction document for the initiation of sunset reviews is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: November 20, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–25653 Filed 11–29–19; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–815, A–549–830, A–552–816] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (WSSPP) from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609 and (202) 482–4162, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 21, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notices of the antidumping duty orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 1 Between June 3, 2019 and June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders.2 Between June 13, 2019 and June 18, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 4 Between July 1, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120- day) sunset reviews of the Orders.6 On October 15, 2019, the ITC exercised its discretion to extend its review period by up to 90 days to conduct expedited five- year reviews of the Orders.7 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(c)(3) of the Act. 8 On November 25, 2019 the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.9 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders are circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of these orders, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66155Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 42898 (August 19, 2019). to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of these Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26038 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–469–814] Chlorinated Isocyanurates From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Ercros S.A. (Ercros) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than fair value during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 19, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 No party submitted case briefs on the Preliminary Results. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine triones. There are three primary chemical compositions of chlorinated isocyanurates: (1) Trichloroisocyanuric acid (Cl3(NCO)3), (2) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (dihydrate) (NaCl2(NCO)3 2H2O), and (3) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (anhydrous) (NaCl2(NCO)3). Chlorinated isocyanurates are available in powder, granular, and tableted forms. The order covers all chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are currently classifiable under subheadings 2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, and 2933.69.6050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The tariff classification 2933.69.6015 covers sodium dichloroisocyanurates (anhydrous and dihydrate forms) and trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff classifications 2933.69.6021 and 2933.69.6050 represent basket categories that include chlorinated isocyanurates and other compounds including an unfused triazine ring. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results No parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results; therefore we have made no changes to our calculations, and the final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results. Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine that, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018, the following dumping margin exists: Manufacturer/exporter Weight- average dumping margin (percent) Ercros ......................................... 0.00 Assessment Rates Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Since Ercros’ weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Determination === 64922 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices 1 Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_ filing_procedures.pdf. 2 All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. 3 Electronic Document Information System (EDIS): https://edis.usitc.gov. 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at United States International Trade Commission (USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The Commission has received a complaint and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure filed on behalf of Viavi Solutions Inc. on November 18, 2019. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices with optical filters and optical sensor systems and components thereof. The complaint names as respondents: Optrontec Inc. of Korea; LG Electronics, Inc. of Korea; LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of Korea; and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, NJ. The complainant requests that the Commission issue a limited exclusion and cease and desist orders. Proposed respondents, other interested parties, and members of the public are invited to file comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should address whether issuance of the relief specifically requested by the complainant in this investigation would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the requested remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the requested remedial orders; (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the requested exclusion order and/or a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) explain how the requested remedial orders would impact United States consumers. Written submissions on the public interest must be filed no later than by close of business, eight calendar days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. There will be further opportunities for comment on the public interest after the issuance of any final initial determination in this investigation. Any written submissions on other issues must also be filed by no later than the close of business, eight calendar days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Complainant may file replies to any written submissions no later than three calendar days after the date on which any initial submissions were due. Any submissions and replies filed in response to this Notice are limited to five (5) pages in length, inclusive of attachments. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to § 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3419’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/ or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic Filing Procedures 1). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All information, including confidential business information and documents for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes of this Investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel,2 solely for cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. 3 This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of §§ 201.10 and 210.8(c) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 19, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–25440 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review) and 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China and the antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 Nov 22, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM 25NON1 64923Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on June 3, 2019 (84 FR 25567) and determined on September 6, 2019 that it would conduct expedited reviews (84 FR 55171, October 15, 2019). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on November 19, 2019. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4994 (November 2019), entitled Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 1210–1212 (Review) and 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 19, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–25442 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in the Permian Strata of Texas and New Mexico: Implications for Exploitation of the Permian Basin—Phase 2 Notice is hereby given that, on October 29, 2019, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Cooperative Research Group on Mechanical Stratigraphy and Natural Deformation in the Permian Strata of Texas and New Mexico: Implications for Exploitation of the Permian Basin— Phase 2 (‘‘Permian Basin—Phase 2’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ConocoPhillips Company, Houston, TX, has been added as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Permian Basin—Phase 2 intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On August 15, 2019, Permian Basin— Phase 2 filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2019 (84 FR 48377). Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2019–25446 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Medical CBRN Defense Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on October 24, 2019, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Medical CBRN Defense Consortium (‘‘MCDC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Chembio Diagnostics Systems, Inc., Medford, NY; Emory University, Atlanta, GA; ICON Government and Public Health Solutions, Inc., Hinckley, OH; Infectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI), Seattle, WA; and Scarab Genomics, LLC, Madison, WI, have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and MCDC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513). The last notification was filed with the Department on July 24, 2019. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 16, 2019 (84 FR 42012). Suzanne Morris, Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics UnitAntitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2019–25448 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1103–0102] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; COPS Progress Report AGENCY : Community Oriented Policing Services, Department of Justice. ACTION : 60-Day notice. SUMMARY : The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES : The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 60 days for public comment January 24, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Lashon M. Hilliard, Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 145 N Street NE, Washington, DC 20530, 202–514–6563. Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or sent to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 Nov 22, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM 25NON1 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Scheduling === 55171Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2019 / Notices 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corp., Webco Industries Inc., and Primus Pipe & Tube to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). public comment via conference call from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Mountain Time. The call-in information is: Telephone Number 1–888–417–0376, Passcode 1509140. Public comments can also be made in-person at the meeting site; or emailed to the DFO at Jennifer.davis@bie.edu; or faxed to (602) 240–8597 Attention: Jennifer Davis, DFO; or mailed or hand delivered to the Bureau of Indian Education, Attention: Jennifer Davis, DFO, 2600 N Central Ave., Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85004. Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix 5; 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. Dated: September 23, 2019. Tara Sweeney, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. 2019–22451 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4337–15–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs [201A2100DD/AAKC001030/ A0A501010.999900253G] Indian Gaming; Extension of Tribal- State Class III Gaming Compact (Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota and the State of South Dakota) AGENCY : Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compact between the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota and the State of South Dakota. DATES : The extension takes effect on October 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219–4066. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota and the State of South Dakota have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact to February 15, 2020. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compact. Dated: September 27, 2019. Tara Sweeney, Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. 2019–22452 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4337–15–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA- 1210–1212 (Review) and 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of expedited reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China, and the antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES : September 6, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abu Kanu (202–205–2597), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On September 6, 2019, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (84 FR 25567, June 3, 2019) of the subject five-year reviews was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting full reviews. 1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct expedited reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of these reviews will be placed in the nonpublic record on October 11, 2019, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for these reviews. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to these reviews and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to these reviews may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the reviews. Comments are due on or before October 18, 2019 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year reviews nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the reviews by October 18, 2019. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its reviews, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules with respect to filing were revised effective July 25, 2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014). The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 55172 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2019 / Notices 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 84 FR 37998, August 5, 2019. 3 Commissioners Randolph J. Stayin and Amy A. Karpel did not participate in this investigation. 4 The Commission also finds that imports subject to Commerce’s affirmative critical circumstances determination are not likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the antidumping duty order on Thailand. 5 83 FR 62345, December 3, 2018. 6 Commerce issued preliminary negative determinations on its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations for glycine from Thailand (83 FR 54717 and 83 FR 44861). 7 Due to the lapse in appropriations and ensuing cessation of Commission operations, the Commission published its revised schedule on February 12, 2019. 8 84 FR 18489, 84 FR 18482, 84 FR 18487, and 84 FR 18484, respectively. 9 84 FR 29238, June 21, 2019. 10 On August 5, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register its final affirmative determination of sales at less than fair value and of critical circumstances for glycine from Thailand (84 FR 37998) as well as its final negative countervailing duty determination and final negative critical circumstances determination for glycine from Thailand (84 FR 38007). Consequently, effective August 5, 2019, the Commission terminated its countervailing duty investigation concerning glycine from Thailand (84 FR 43618, August 21, 2019). Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s procedures with respect to filings. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to these reviews must be served on all other parties to these reviews (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Determination.—The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B). Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 8, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–22340 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1415 (Final)] Glycine From Thailand Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigation, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of imports of glycine from Thailand, provided for in subheadings 2922.49.43 and 2922.49.80 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’).2 3 4 Background The Commission, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)), instituted this investigation effective March 28, 2018, following receipt of petitions filed with the Commission and Commerce by Chattem Chemicals Inc., Chattanooga, Tennessee, and GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Lafayette, Indiana. Effective October 31, 2018, the Commission established a general schedule 5 for the conduct of the final phase of its antidumping and countervailing duty investigations on glycine from China, India, Japan, and Thailand, following notification of preliminary determinations by Commerce that imports of glycine from China and India were subsidized within the meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.1671b(b)) and that imports of glycine from India and Japan were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). 6 Notice of the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigations and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on December 3, 2018 (83 FR 62345).7 The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on April 30, 2019 and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. On May 1, 2019, Commerce published its final affirmative determinations for its countervailing duty investigations for glycine from China and India and also for its antidumping duty investigations for glycine from India and Japan. 8 On April 24, 2019, Commerce postponed until further notice the issuance of the final determination regarding glycine from Thailand. (See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Jeffrey Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Postponement of the Final Determinations in the Less-Than- Fair Value and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Glycine from Thailand,’’ April 24, 2019.) The Commission issued its affirmative determinations for its countervailing duty investigations for glycine from China and India and its antidumping duty investigations for India and Japan on June 14, 2019.9 Following notification of a final determination by Commerce that imports of glycine from Thailand were being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 735(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(a)), 10 notice of the supplemental scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s antidumping duty investigation with respect to glycine from Thailand was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing notice in the Federal Register of August 23, 2019 (84 FR 44334). The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 735(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It completed and filed its determination in this investigation on October 8, 2019. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4977 (October 2019), entitled Glycine from Thailand: Investigation No. 731–TA– 1415 (Final). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 9, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–22421 Filed 10–11–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1021 (Third Review)] Malleable Iron Pipe Fittings From China; Scheduling of an Expedited Five-Year Review AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:25 Oct 11, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM 15OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Initiation === 25741Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 16 See THIELMANN’s Letter, ‘‘Refillable Stainless Steel Kegs from Mexico: Request For Postponement of Final Determination,’’ dated April 29, 2019. exceed six months. 16 However, we find that a compelling reason to deny the request to postpone the final determination exists because THIELMANN declined to respond to our original questionnaire or otherwise participate in the investigation. THIELMANN is the sole mandatory respondent in this case, and because it declined to respond to our initial questionnaire and is not participating in the investigation, there is no need to postpone the final determination, and we are thus compelled to deny the request. In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(e)(1) and (2), because a compelling reason for denial exists we are not granting THIELMANN’s request to postpone the final determination. Therefore, we intend to issue the final determination pursuant to section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1). International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, Commerce will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its preliminary determination. If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: May 28, 2019. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation are kegs, vessels, or containers with bodies that are approximately cylindrical in shape, made from stainless steel (i.e., steel containing at least 10.5 percent chromium by weight and less than 1.2 percent carbon by weight, with or without other elements), and that are compatible with a ‘‘D Sankey’’ extractor (refillable stainless steel kegs) with a nominal liquid volume capacity of 10 liters or more, regardless of the type of finish, gauge, thickness, or grade of stainless steel, and whether or not covered by or encased in other materials. Refillable stainless steel kegs may be imported assembled or unassembled, with or without all components (including spears, couplers or taps, necks, collars, and valves), and be filled or unfilled. ‘‘Unassembled’’ or ‘‘unfinished’’ refillable stainless steel kegs include drawn stainless steel cylinders that have been welded to form the body of the keg and attached to an upper (top) chime and/or lower (bottom) chime. Unassembled refillable stainless steel kegs may or may not be welded to a neck, may or may not have a valve assembly attached, and may be otherwise complete except for testing, certification, and/or marking. Subject merchandise also includes refillable stainless steel kegs that have been further processed in a third country, including but not limited to, attachment of necks, collars, spears or valves, heat treatment, pickling, passivation, painting, testing, certification or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope refillable stainless steel keg. Specifically excluded are the following: (1) Vessels or containers that are not approximately cylindrical in nature (e.g., box, ‘‘hopper’’ or ‘‘cone’’ shaped vessels); (2) stainless steel kegs, vessels, or containers that have either a ‘‘ball lock’’ valve system or a ‘‘pin lock’’ valve system (commonly known as ‘‘Cornelius,’’ ‘‘corny’’ or ‘‘ball lock’’ kegs); (3) necks, spears, couplers or taps, collars, and valves that are not imported with the subject merchandise; and (4) stainless steel kegs that are filled with beer, wine, or other liquid and that are designated by the Commissioner of Customs as Instruments of International Traffic within the meaning of section 332(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The merchandise covered by this investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7310.10.0010, 7310.10.0050, 7310.29.0025, and 7310.29.0050. These HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Period of Investigation IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Scope Comments VI. Product Characteristics VII. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference, and Calculation of All-Others Rate A. Application of Facts Available B. Use of Adverse Inference C. Preliminary Estimated Weighted- Average Dumping Margins Based on Adverse Facts Available D. Corroboration of Secondary Information E. All Others Rate VIII. Critical Circumstances IX. Verification X. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2019–11586 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (Commerce) is automatically initiating the five-year reviews (Sunset Reviews) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (AD/CVD) order(s) listed below. The International Trade Commission (the Commission) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Reviews which covers the same order(s). DATES : Applicable June 1, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commerce official identified in the Initiation of Review section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205–3193. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its Procedures for Conducting Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 25742 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 1 With respect to these Sunset Reviews, Commerce is advancing their initiation from August to June 2019 to coincide with the initiation of the companion Sunset Reviews being conducted by the U.S. International Trade Commission, as well as with Commerce’s initiation of the Sunset Review for the companion Ukrainian case (A–823–815), which was already scheduled to be initiated on June 2019. 2 See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). 3 See section 782(b) of the Act. 4 See also Certification of Factual Information to Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule). Answers to frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule are available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 5 See Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013). 6 See Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). Initiation of Review In accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty order(s): DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Commerce contact A–351–832 ...... 731–TA–953 Brazil ....................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. C–351–833 ...... 701–TA–417 Brazil ....................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–570–930 ...... 731–TA–1144 China ....................... Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe (2nd Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. C–570–931 ...... 701–TA–454 China ....................... Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe (2nd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–533–857 ...... 731–TA–1215 India ........................ Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. C–533–858 ...... 701–TA–499 India ........................ Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–560–815 ...... 731–TA–957 Indonesia ................. Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (2nd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–557–815 ...... 731–TA–1210 Malaysia .................. Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–201–830 ...... 731–TA–958 Mexico ..................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–841–805 ...... 731–TA–959 Moldova ................... Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–580–870 ...... 731–TA–1216 Republic of Korea ... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–821–817 ...... 731–TA–991 Russia ..................... Silicon Metal (3rd Review) ........................ Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. A–552–816 ...... 731–TA–1212 Vietnam ................... Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–549–830 ...... 731–TA–1211 Thailand .................. Welded Stainless Steel, Pressure Pipe (1st Review). Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312. A–274–804 ...... 731–TA–961 Trinidad And To- bago. Carbon and Certain Alloy, Steel Wire Rod (3rd Review). Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–489–816 ...... 731–TA–1221 Turkey ..................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. C–489–817 ...... 701–TA–500 Turkey ..................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) Joshua Poole, (202) 482–1293. A–823–815 ...... 731–TA–1222 Ukraine .................... Oil Country Tubular Goods (1st Review) (Suspension Agreement). Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255. With respect to the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, Vietnam, Republic of Korea and Turkey, we have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews upon determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for these antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the same date would promote administrative efficiency. 1 Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Commerces’s regulations, Commerce’s schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on Commerce’s website at the following address: http:// enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/. All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with Commerce’s regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.2 Any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information. 3 Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 351.303(g).4 Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. On April 10, 2013, Commerce modified two regulations related to AD/ CVD proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). 5 Parties are advised to review the final rule, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits will continue to be applied. Parties are also advised to review the final rule concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in AD/CVD proceedings, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1309frn/2013-22853.txt, prior to submitting factual information in these segments.6 Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), Commerce will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 25743Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2019 / Notices 7 See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 49953 (July 29, 2016) (Final Determination). 2 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil, India, the Republic of Korea, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and the United Kingdom and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 64432 (September 20, 2016) (Order). 3 See Hyundai Steel Company v. United States, Slip Op. 18–80 Court No., 16–00228 dated June 28, 2018 (Remand Order) at 20–22. 4 Id. at 22–31. 5 Id. at 38–43. 6 Id. at 34. 7 Id. at 22–31. 8 Id. at 34. participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. Commerce’s regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, Commerce will automatically revoke the order without further review. 7 If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, Commerce’s regulations provide that all parties wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that Commerce’s information requirements are distinct from the Commission’s information requirements. Consult Commerce’s regulations for information regarding Commerce’s conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult Commerce’s regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at Commerce. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: May 30, 2019. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–11655 Filed 6–3–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–881] Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results and Notice of Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Investigation AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : On February 26, 2019, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) issued final judgment in Hyundai Steel Company. v. United States, Court No. 16–00228, sustaining the Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) final results of the redetermination pursuant to remand. Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) in Timken Co., v United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce’s Amended Final Results and Antidumping Duty Order published on September 20, 2016 (Order). Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel). DATES : Applicable March 8, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney or Daniel Deku, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482–5075, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background Commerce published the Final Determination on July 29, 2016,1 and issued the antidumping duty order on September 20, 2016.2 Hyundai Steel filed an action before the CIT to challenge several aspects of Commerce’s Final Determination. After review, the Court sustained Commerce’s determination that Hyundai Steel failed to demonstrate that the affiliated parties who supplied Hyundai Steel with home market movement, home market warehousing, U.S. international freight, and U.S. inland freight expenses did so on an arm’s-length basis.3 The Court further sustained Commerce’s application of adverse facts available (AFA), pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), as amended, to the affiliated parties who provided Hyundai Steel with home market movement, home market warehousing, U.S. international freight, and U.S. inland freight. 4 Additionally, the Court sustained Commerce’s application of AFA to three product specifications reported by Hyundai Steel.5 However, the Court remanded to Commerce for further explanation or reconsideration whether it intended to apply AFA to those U.S. sales where: (1) Hyundai Steel used an unaffiliated freight provider to supply domestic inland freight; or (2) Hyundai Steel incurred no domestic inland freight charges in the U.S.6 While the Court found that Commerce appropriately assigned an AFA freight amount to U.S. sales for which Hyundai Steel secured freight services from affiliated parties, 7 the Court found Commerce offered no justification as to why Commerce applied AFA freight amounts to U.S. sales for which Hyundai Steel either: (1) Incurred no domestic inland freight or warehousing expense; or (2) the domestic inland freight or warehousing was provided by unaffiliated parties. 8 Additionally, the Court determined that the AFA adjustment applied to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Jun 03, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - China === 52462 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Domestics’ Notice to Participate). 4 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate). 5 See Domestics’ Notice to Participate at 2; see also Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate at 2 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019. 7 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 8 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 9 Id. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy B. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail C. Nature of the Subsidy VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–21442 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review Correction In notice document 2019–13985 beginning on page 31295 in the issue of Monday, July 1, 2019, make the following correction: On page 31296, in the table, under the Antidumping Duty Proceedings heading, the sixth entry ‘‘In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502’’ should read ‘‘IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502’’. [FR Doc. C1–2019–13985 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301–00–D DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–930] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 2, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0835. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 17, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the antidumping duty order on WSPP from China. 1 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of this sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 On June 13, 2019, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 3 On June 18, 2019, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus Pipe). 4 The domestic interested parties and Primus Pipe claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product.5 On June 28, 2019, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), the domestic interested parties filed a timely and adequate substantive response. 6 On July 5, 2019, Primus Pipe expressed its support for the substantive response filed by the domestic interested parties and incorporated them by reference. 7 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.8 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the Order and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. 9 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 52463Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1), 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted- average dumping margins up to 55.21 percent. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping B. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–21446 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Proposed Voluntary Product Standard 20–15, American Softwood Lumber Standard AGENCY : National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce. ACTION : Notice and request for comments. SUMMARY : The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is soliciting public comment on revisions to Voluntary Product Standard (PS) 20– 15, American Softwood Lumber Standard. This standard, prepared by the American Lumber Standard Committee, serves the procurement and regulatory needs of numerous federal, state, and local government agencies by providing for uniform, industry-wide grade-marking and inspection requirements for softwood lumber. The implementation of the standard also allows for uniform labeling and auditing of treated wood and wood packaging materials. As part of a five- year review process, NIST is seeking public comment and invites interested parties to review the revised standard and submit comments. DATES : Written comments regarding the proposed revision should be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on November 1, 2019. Written comments in response to this notice should be submitted according to the instructions in the ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION sections below. Submissions received after that date may not be considered. ADDRESSES : An electronic copy (in PDF) of the current standard and proposed revisions can be obtained at the following website https://www.nist.gov/ standardsgov/voluntary-product- standards-program. Written comments on the standard should be submitted to David F. Alderman, Standards Services Division, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2100, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2100; fax (301) 975–4715. Electronic comments may be submitted via email to david.alderman@nist.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David F. Alderman, Standards Services Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, telephone (301) 975– 4019; fax: (301) 975–4715, email: david.alderman@nist.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The proposed revision of the standard has been developed and is being processed in accordance with Department of Commerce provisions in 15 CFR part 10, Procedures for the Development of Voluntary Product Standards, as amended (published June 20, 1986). Under 15 CFR, part 10, the American Lumber Standard Committee (Committee) acts as the Standing Committee for PS 20–15. The Committee is responsible for maintaining, revising, and interpreting the standard and is comprised of producers, distributors, users, and others with an interest in the standard. Voluntary Product Standard (PS) 20– 15 establishes standard sizes and requirements for developing and coordinating the lumber grades of the various species of lumber, the assignment of design values, and the preparation of grading rules applicable to each species. Its provisions include implementation of the standard through an accreditation and certification program; establishment of principal classifications and lumber sizes for yard, structural, and factory/shop use; classification, measurement, grading, and grade-marking of lumber; definitions of terms and procedures to provide a basis for the use of uniform methods in the grading inspection, measurement, and description of softwood lumber; commercial names of the principal softwood species; definitions of terms used in describing standard grades of lumber; and commonly used industry abbreviations. The standard also includes the organization and functions of the Committee, the Board of Review, and the National Grading Rule Committee. NIST invites public comments on the current standard, PS 20–15, which is available at https://www.nist.gov/ standardsgov/voluntary-product- standards-program. Attachments will be accepted in plain text, Microsoft Word, or Adobe PDF formats. Comments containing references, studies, research, and other empirical data that are not widely published should include copies or electronic links of the referenced materials. All submissions, including attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. NIST reserves the right to publish comments publicly, unedited and in VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - CVD - China === 52460 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). 8 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. 9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c) 13 See 19 CFR 310(d). 14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 15 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). purposes only; the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213. Preliminary Results of Review Neither of the companies subject to this review filed an SRA. Thus, Commerce preliminarily determines that these companies have not demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate status. As such, Commerce preliminarily determines that the companies subject to review are part of the China-wide entity. In addition, Commerce no longer considers the non- market economy (NME) entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative review. 7 Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless Commerce specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity. 8 In this administrative review, no party requested a review of the China-wide entity. Moreover, we have not self-initiated a review of the China-wide entity. Because no review of the China-wide entity is being conducted, the China-wide entity’s entries are not subject to the review and the rate applicable to the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of this review. The China-wide entity rate is 234.51 percent. Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), within 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.9 ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit in room B8024 of the main Commerce building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.10 Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a brief summary of the argument, and a table of authorities. 11 Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to Commerce within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.12 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230. 13 Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by this review. 14 We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the companies under review that we determine in the final results to be part of the China-wide entity at the China-wide entity rate of 234.51 percent. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this review in the Federal Register.15 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For companies that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter- specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity (i.e., 234.51 percent); and (4) for all non- Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: September 24, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–21441 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–931] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 52461Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 1 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 11712 (March 19, 2009) (Order). 2 See Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 79 FR 32911 (June 9, 2014). 3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 4 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Domestics’ Notice to Participate). 5 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate). 6 See Domestics’ Notice to Participate at 2; see also Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate at 2. 7 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019. 8 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 9 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 10 Id. 11 Id. countervailing duty (CVD) order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 2, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6071. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 19, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the CVD order on WSPP from China. 1 On August 12, 2014, at the conclusion of the first sunset review, Commerce issued a notice of continuation of the Order.2 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of this second sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).3 On June 13, 2019, Commerce received a notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries (collectively, domestic interested parties).4 On June 18, 2019, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus Pipe). 5 The domestic interested parties and Primus Pipe claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 6 On June 28, 2019, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), the domestic interested parties filed a timely and adequate substantive response. 7 On July 5, 2019, Primus Pipe stated its support for the substantive response filed by the domestic interested parties. 8 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from the Government of China or a respondent interested party to this proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope is dispositive.9 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.10 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a net countervailable subsidy at the following rates: 11 Producers/exporters Net countervailable subsidy ad valorem rate (percent) Winner Stainless Steel Tube Co. Ltd. (Winner)/Winner Steel Products (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (WSP)/Winner Machinery En- terprises Company Limited (Winner HK) (collectively, the Winner Companies) ....................................................................... 1.10 Froch Enterprise Co. Ltd. (Froch) (also known as Zhangyuan Metal Industry Co. Ltd.) ............................................................. 299.16 All Others ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1.10 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 52462 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 11351 (March 17, 2009) (Order). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Domestics’ Notice to Participate). 4 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic, Stainless Pressure Pipe from China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019 (Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate). 5 See Domestics’ Notice to Participate at 2; see also Primus Pipe’s Notice to Participate at 2 6 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China, Second Review: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated June 28, 2019. 7 See Primus Pipe’s Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 8 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 9 Id. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy B. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates Likely to Prevail C. Nature of the Subsidy VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–21442 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review Correction In notice document 2019–13985 beginning on page 31295 in the issue of Monday, July 1, 2019, make the following correction: On page 31296, in the table, under the Antidumping Duty Proceedings heading, the sixth entry ‘‘In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502’’ should read ‘‘IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502’’. [FR Doc. C1–2019–13985 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1301–00–D DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–930] Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order on circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe (WSPP) from the People’s Republic of China (China) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 2, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0835. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On March 17, 2009, Commerce published in the Federal Register the antidumping duty order on WSPP from China. 1 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of this sunset review of the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 2 On June 13, 2019, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). 3 On June 18, 2019, Commerce also received a notice of intent to participate in the sunset review from Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus Pipe). 4 The domestic interested parties and Primus Pipe claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product.5 On June 28, 2019, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i), the domestic interested parties filed a timely and adequate substantive response. 6 On July 5, 2019, Primus Pipe expressed its support for the substantive response filed by the domestic interested parties and incorporated them by reference. 7 Commerce did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order. Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005; 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010; 7306.40.1015; 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.8 Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the Order and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Order were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. 9 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Commerce: Thailand: A-549-830 === 66154 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Malaysia Intent to Participate); ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Thailand Intent to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Vietnam Intent to Participate). Also, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus). See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019. 4 See Malaysia Intent to Participate at 2; see also Thailand Intent to Participate at 2; Vietnam Intent to Participate at 2; Primus Intent to Participate at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; see also Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019. Also, Primus submitted a response, in which it agreed with the substantive responses of the other domestic interested parties. See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2019,’’ dated July 29, 2019. 7 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 55171 (October 15, 2019). 8 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 52458 (October 2, 2019). 9 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) and 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review), USITC Publication 4994, November 2019). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs and Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On November 1, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice of initiation of five-year reviews (sunset reviews). See Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019) (November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice). In that notice, Commerce inadvertently omitted the antidumping and countervailing duty suspension agreements on Sugar from Mexico (A– 201–845 and C–201–846) from the list of cases for which sunset reviews initiate in November 2019. This document serves to correct the November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice for the aforementioned items. This correction document for the initiation of sunset reviews is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: November 20, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–25653 Filed 11–29–19; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–815, A–549–830, A–552–816] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (WSSPP) from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609 and (202) 482–4162, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 21, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notices of the antidumping duty orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 1 Between June 3, 2019 and June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders.2 Between June 13, 2019 and June 18, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 4 Between July 1, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120- day) sunset reviews of the Orders.6 On October 15, 2019, the ITC exercised its discretion to extend its review period by up to 90 days to conduct expedited five- year reviews of the Orders.7 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(c)(3) of the Act. 8 On November 25, 2019 the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.9 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders are circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of these orders, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66155Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 42898 (August 19, 2019). to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of these Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26038 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–469–814] Chlorinated Isocyanurates From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Ercros S.A. (Ercros) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than fair value during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 19, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 No party submitted case briefs on the Preliminary Results. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine triones. There are three primary chemical compositions of chlorinated isocyanurates: (1) Trichloroisocyanuric acid (Cl3(NCO)3), (2) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (dihydrate) (NaCl2(NCO)3 2H2O), and (3) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (anhydrous) (NaCl2(NCO)3). Chlorinated isocyanurates are available in powder, granular, and tableted forms. The order covers all chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are currently classifiable under subheadings 2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, and 2933.69.6050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The tariff classification 2933.69.6015 covers sodium dichloroisocyanurates (anhydrous and dihydrate forms) and trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff classifications 2933.69.6021 and 2933.69.6050 represent basket categories that include chlorinated isocyanurates and other compounds including an unfused triazine ring. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results No parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results; therefore we have made no changes to our calculations, and the final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results. Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine that, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018, the following dumping margin exists: Manufacturer/exporter Weight- average dumping margin (percent) Ercros ......................................... 0.00 Assessment Rates Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Since Ercros’ weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Commerce: Vietnam: A-552-816 === 66154 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25567 (June 3, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Malaysia Intent to Participate); ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Thailand Intent to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Vietnam Intent to Participate). Also, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus). See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019. 4 See Malaysia Intent to Participate at 2; see also Thailand Intent to Participate at 2; Vietnam Intent to Participate at 2; Primus Intent to Participate at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; see also Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019. Also, Primus submitted a response, in which it agreed with the substantive responses of the other domestic interested parties. See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 6 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2019,’’ dated July 29, 2019. 7 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 55171 (October 15, 2019). 8 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 52458 (October 2, 2019). 9 See Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Determination, 84 FR 64922 (November 25, 2019); see also Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review) and 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review), USITC Publication 4994, November 2019). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs and Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : On November 1, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice of initiation of five-year reviews (sunset reviews). See Initiation of Five- Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687 (November 1, 2019) (November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice). In that notice, Commerce inadvertently omitted the antidumping and countervailing duty suspension agreements on Sugar from Mexico (A– 201–845 and C–201–846) from the list of cases for which sunset reviews initiate in November 2019. This document serves to correct the November 2019 Sunset Reviews Initiation Notice for the aforementioned items. This correction document for the initiation of sunset reviews is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: November 20, 2019. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2019–25653 Filed 11–29–19; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–815, A–549–830, A–552–816] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (WSSPP) from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609 and (202) 482–4162, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 21, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notices of the antidumping duty orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 1 Between June 3, 2019 and June 4, 2019, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders and the ITC instituted its review of the Orders.2 Between June 13, 2019 and June 18, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 4 Between July 1, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce received no substantive response from respondent interested parties. Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, Commerce conducted expedited (120- day) sunset reviews of the Orders.6 On October 15, 2019, the ITC exercised its discretion to extend its review period by up to 90 days to conduct expedited five- year reviews of the Orders.7 As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. Commerce, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping rates likely to prevail should these Orders be revoked, in accordance with sections 752(c)(3) of the Act. 8 On November 25, 2019 the ITC published its determination that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act.9 Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders are circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of these orders, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 66155Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices 1 See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 42898 (August 19, 2019). to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A–269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the Orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year (sunset) reviews of these Orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the return, destruction, or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. Notification to Interested Parties These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: November 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–26038 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–469–814] Chlorinated Isocyanurates From Spain: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Ercros S.A. (Ercros) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than fair value during the period of review (POR), June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. DATES : Applicable December 3, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On August 19, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 No party submitted case briefs on the Preliminary Results. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are derivatives of cyanuric acid, described as chlorinated s-triazine triones. There are three primary chemical compositions of chlorinated isocyanurates: (1) Trichloroisocyanuric acid (Cl3(NCO)3), (2) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (dihydrate) (NaCl2(NCO)3 2H2O), and (3) sodium dichloroisocyanurate (anhydrous) (NaCl2(NCO)3). Chlorinated isocyanurates are available in powder, granular, and tableted forms. The order covers all chlorinated isocyanurates. Chlorinated isocyanurates are currently classifiable under subheadings 2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, and 2933.69.6050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The tariff classification 2933.69.6015 covers sodium dichloroisocyanurates (anhydrous and dihydrate forms) and trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff classifications 2933.69.6021 and 2933.69.6050 represent basket categories that include chlorinated isocyanurates and other compounds including an unfused triazine ring. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results No parties submitted comments on the Preliminary Results; therefore we have made no changes to our calculations, and the final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results. Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine that, for the period June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018, the following dumping margin exists: Manufacturer/exporter Weight- average dumping margin (percent) Ercros ......................................... 0.00 Assessment Rates Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Since Ercros’ weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:27 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM 03DEN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === USITC Institution === 25567Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country after 2013, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 24, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–11343 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1210–1212 (Review) and 701–TA–454 and 731–TA–1144 (Second Review)] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China and the antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted June 3, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is July 3, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by August 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On March 17, 2009, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping duty order on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China (74 FR 11351). On March 19, 2009, Commerce issued a countervailing duty order on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China (74 FR 11712). Following first five-year reviews by Commerce and the Commission, effective July 23, 2014, Commerce issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China (79 FR 42760). Effective August 12, 2014, Commerce issued a continuation of the countervailing duty order on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China (79 FR 47089). On July 21, 2014, Commerce issued antidumping duty orders on imports of welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (79 FR 42289). The Commission is now conducting second reviews of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders concerning welded stainless steel pressure pipe from China and first reviews of the antidumping duty orders concerning welded stainless steel pressure pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are China, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations and its expedited first five-year review determinations concerning China, the Commission defined one Domestic Like Product consisting of small-diameter welded stainless steel pressure pipe with an outside diameter not greater than 14 inches, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. In its original determinations concerning Malaysia, Thailand, and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 25568 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices Vietnam, the Commission defined one Domestic Like Product as welded stainless steel pressure pipe, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations and its expedited first five-year review determinations concerning China, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all U.S. producers of small diameter welded stainless steel pressure pipe with an outside diameter not greater than 14 inches. In its original determinations concerning Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as all U.S. producers of welded stainless steel pressure pipe. (5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the proceeding. Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation. The Commission’s designated agency ethics official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this matter, contact Charles Smith, Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 205–3408. Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.—Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the Secretary will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO. Certification.—Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is accurate and complete to the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that information submitted in response to this request for information and throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. Written submissions.—Pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules, each interested party response to this notice must provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such responses is July 3, 2019. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such comments is August 15, 2019. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s website at https://www.usitc.gov/ documents/handbook_on_filing_ procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing. Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to serve your response). No response to this request for information is required if a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) number is not displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 19–5–435, expiration date June 30, 2020. Public reporting burden for the request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Inability to provide requested information.—Pursuant to section 207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any interested party that cannot furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time, provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in making its determinations in the reviews. Information To Be Provided in Response to This Notice of Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/ worker group, or trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more than one Subject Country; or produce Subject VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 25569Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices Merchandise in more than one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so, please ensure that your response to each question includes the information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms. (1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of the certifying official. (2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose members are interested parties under the statute), or another interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of your association. (3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by the Commission. (4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry. (5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)). (6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2013. (7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm). (8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or other markets. (9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product, provide the following information on your firm’s operations on that product during calendar year 2018, except as noted (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); (c) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); (d) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and (e) The value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal year ends). (10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) imports; (b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and (c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country. (11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in any Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm’s(s’) operations on that product during calendar year 2018 (report quantity data in short tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association. (a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) production; (b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) The quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in each Subject Country after 2013, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 25570 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 106 / Monday, June 3, 2019 / Notices production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: May 24, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–11345 Filed 5–31–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–499–500 and 731–TA–1215–1216, 1221–1223 (Review)] Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam; Institution of Five-Year Reviews AGENCY : United States International Trade Commission. ACTION : Notice. SUMMARY : The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey, revocation of the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam, and termination of the suspended investigation on oil country tubular goods from Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES : Instituted June 3, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is July 3, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by August 15, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background.—On July 10, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) suspended an antidumping duty investigation on imports of oil country tubular goods from Ukraine (79 FR 41959, July 18, 2014). On September 10, 2014, Commerce issued countervailing duty orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey (79 FR 53688) and antidumping duty orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam (79 FR 53691). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders on imports of oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam and whether termination of the suspended investigation concerning imports of oil country tubular goods from Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct of this proceeding may be found in the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to conduct full or expedited reviews. The Commission’s determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts available, which may include information provided in response to this notice. Definitions.—The following definitions apply to these reviews: (1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by Commerce. (2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are India, Korea, Turkey, Ukraine, and Vietnam. (3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as all oil country tubular goods, coextensive with Commerce’s scope. (4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of the product. In its original determinations, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry to include all U.S. producers of oil country tubular goods, including both mills that produce oil country tubular goods and processors that engage in heat treatment. (5) The Order Dates are the dates that the antidumping and countervailing duty orders under review became effective and the date the investigation concerning Ukraine was suspended. In these reviews, the Order Date concerning the countervailing duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India and Turkey and the antidumping duty orders on oil country tubular goods from India, Korea, Turkey, and Vietnam is September 10, 2014. The Order Date concerning the suspended investigation on oil country tubular goods from Ukraine is July 10, 2014. (6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or through its selling agent. Participation in the proceeding and public service list.—Persons, including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission’s rules, no later than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Secretary will VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 May 31, 2019 Jkt 247001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── === Final Results - AD - Malaysia - Thailand - Vietnam === 52458 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 1 See Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 42289 (July 21, 2014) (Orders). 2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019). 3 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Malaysia Intent to Participate); ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Thailand Intent to Participate); and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 13, 2019 (Vietnam Intent to Participate). Also, Commerce received a timely and complete notice of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus). See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated June 18, 2019. 4 See Malaysia Intent to Participate at 2; see also Thailand Intent to Participate at 2; Vietnam Intent to Participate at 2; Primus Intent to Participate at 2. 5 See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; see also Domestic Interested Parties’ Letters, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Thailand: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019; and ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Vietnam: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 1, 2019. Also, domestic interested party Primus Pipe & Tube, Inc. (Primus), submitted a response, in which it agreed with the substantive responses of the other domestic interested parties. See Primus’ Letter, ‘‘Welded Stainless Steel Pipe Sunset Review: 2nd Review for China AD/CVD; 1st Review for Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia; Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated July 5, 2019. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing this determination and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(e), 351.221(b), and 351.221(c)(3). Dated: September 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–21443 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–557–815, A–549–830, A–552–816] Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe From Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on welded stainless steel pressure pipe (WSSPP) from Malaysia, Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, at the levels identified in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice. DATES : Applicable October 2, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett or Magd Zalok, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609 or (202) 482–4162, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On July 21, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notices of the antidumping duty orders on WSSPP from Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. 1 On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 Between June 13, 2019 and June, 18, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from Bristol Metals, LLC, Felker Brothers Corporation, and Webco Industries, Inc. (collectively, domestic interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic interested parties claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as manufacturers in the United States of the domestic like product. 4 Between July 1, 2019 and July 5, 2019, the domestic interested parties filed timely and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). 5 Commerce did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders. Scope of the Orders The merchandise covered by these orders are circular welded austenitic stainless pressure pipe not greater than 14 inches in outside diameter. For purposes of these orders, references to size are in nominal inches and include all products within tolerances allowed by pipe specifications. This merchandise includes, but is not limited to, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) A–312 or ASTM A– 778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. ASTM A–358 products are only included when they are produced to meet ASTM A–312 or ASTM A–778 specifications, or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. Excluded from the scope are: (1) Welded stainless mechanical tubing, meeting ASTM A–554 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; (2) boiler, heat exchanger, superheater, refining furnace, feedwater heater, and condenser tubing, meeting ASTM A– 249, ASTM A–688 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications; and (3) specialized tubing, meeting ASTM A269, ASTM A–270 or comparable domestic or foreign specifications. The subject imports are normally classified in subheadings 7306.40.5005, 7306.40.5040, 7306.40.5062, 7306.40.5064, and 7306.40.5085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 7306.40.1010, 7306.40.1015, 7306.40.5042, 7306.40.5044, 7306.40.5080, and 7306.40.5090. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written description of the scope of these investigations is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation of the Orders and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked, is provided in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.6 A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 52459Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 2816 (February 8, 2019). 2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Request for Tenth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated February 28, 2019. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 18777 (May 2, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 4 See Initiation Notice. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘10th Administrative Review of Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Customs Data of U.S. Imports,’’ dated July 18, 2019. 6 Based on a recommendation by CBP, on September 6, 2017, the Department added HTS 7326.20.0090 to the scope. See Memorandum, ‘‘Request from Customs and Border Protection to Update the ACE AD/CVD Case Reference File, Uncovered Innersprings from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–928) and South Africa (A–791– 821),’’ dated September 6, 2017. access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Sunset Reviews Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted- average margins up to 167.11 percent for Malaysia, 24.01 percent for Thailand, and 16.25 percent for Vietnam. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Dated: September 25, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Orders IV. History of the Orders V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping B. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews VIII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2019–21445 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–928] Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 AGENCY : Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY : The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the two companies subject to this administrative review are part of the China-wide entity because neither filed a separate rate application (SRA). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2018 through January 31, 2019. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES : Applicable October 2, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone at (202) 482–2243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : Background On February 8, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units (innersprings) from the People’s Republic of China (China). 1 In response, on February 28, 2019, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (the petitioner) requested a review of two companies, Jietai Machinery Ltd. (HK) (Jietai) and Green Asia Parts, LTD. (Green Asia).2 Commerce initiated a review for both companies on May 2, 2019.3 The deadline for interested parties to submit an SRA or separate rate certification (SRC) was June 3, 2019. 4 No party submitted an SRA or an SRC. On July 18, 2019, Commerce placed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data on the record of this review demonstrating that neither Jietai nor Green Asia had entries during the POR.5 We asked interested parties to file comments on this data and submit comments by July 25, 2019. No party filed comments. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together in sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full, full long, queen, California king and king) and units used in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. All uncovered innerspring units are included in the scope regardless of width and length. Included within this definition are innersprings typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76 inches in width and 68 inches to 84 inches in length. Innersprings for crib mattresses typically range from 25 inches to 27 inches in width and 50 inches to 52 inches in length. Uncovered innerspring units are suitable for use as the innerspring component in the manufacture of innerspring mattresses, including mattresses that incorporate a foam encasement around the innerspring. Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring units are included in this definition. Non-pocketed innersprings are typically joined together with helical wire and border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings are included in this definition regardless of whether they have border rods attached to the perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are individual coils covered by a ‘‘pocket’’ or ‘‘sock’’ of a nonwoven synthetic material or woven material and then glued together in a linear fashion. Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 9404.29.9010 and have also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000, 9404.29.9005, 9404.29.9011, 7326.20.0070, 7326.20.0090, 7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or 7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 6 The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Oct 01, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM 02OCN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES