ITC Investigation 1921-TA-197 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. AA1921-197, 701-TA-231, 319-320, 322, 325-328, 340, 342 and 348-350; and 731-TA-573-576, 578, 582-587, 604, 607-608, 612 and 614-618 (Review) from United Kingdom, Germany, France, Mexico, South Korea, Brazil, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, Taiwan, Japan, Poland, Sweden, Spain, Finland, Belgium, and Romania. It's in the review phase and currently in completed status. It links to AD/CVD case C-401-401 — see the linked order for the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
Phase, parties, documents, and full text from USITC IDS
Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. AA1921-197, 701-TA-231, 319-320, 322, 325-328, 340, 342 and 348-350; and 731-TA-573-576, 578, 582-587, 604, 607-608, 612 and 614-618 (Review)
ITC sunset review completed — order continued.
Documents
Full text (5,430 chars)
=== USITC Determination === 75301Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 232 / Friday, December 1, 2000 / Notices 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)). from Ukraine: Investigation No. 731– TA–894 (Preliminary). Issued: November 27, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00–30672 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigations Nos. AA1921–197 (Review), 701–TA–231, 319–320, 322, 325–328, 340, 342, and 348–350 (Review), and 731–TA– 573–576, 578, 582–587, 604, 607–608, 612, and 614–618 (Review)] Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and United Kingdom Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders and antidumping duty orders on the following certain carbon steel products from the specified countries would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time: Country Cut-to- length plate Corrosion- resistant Australia .......... 731–TA–612 Belgium ........... 701–TA– 319 731–TA– 573 Brazil ............... 701–TA– 320 731–TA– 574 Canada ............ 731–TA–614 Finland ............. 731–TA– 576 France ............. 701–TA–348 731–TA–615 Germany .......... 701–TA– 322 731–TA– 578 701–TA– 349 2 731–TA– 616 2 Japan ............... 731–TA–617 Korea ............... 701–TA–350 731–TA–618 Country Cut-to- length plate Corrosion- resistant Mexico ............. 701–TA– 325 731–TA– 582 Poland ............. 731–TA– 583 Romania .......... 731–TA– 584 Spain ............... 701–TA– 326 731–TA– 585 Sweden ........... 701–TA– 327 731–TA– 586 Taiwan ............. AA1921– 197 2 United Kingdom 701–TA– 328 3 731–TA– 587 3 2 Commissioner Askey dissenting. 3 Chairman Koplan and Commissioner Askey dissenting. The Commission determines that revocation of the countervailing duty orders and antidumping duty orders on the following certain carbon steel products from the specified countries would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time: Country Cut-to- length plate Corrosion- resistant Canada ............ 731–TA– 575 Germany .......... 701–TA– 340 4 731–TA– 604 4 Korea ............... 701–TA– 342 4 731–TA– 607 4 Netherlands ..... 731–TA– 608 4 Sweden ........... 701–TA–231 4 Commissioners Bragg and Miller dissenting. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on September 1, 1999 (64 FR 47862) and determined on December 3, 1999, that it would conduct full reviews (64 FR 71494, December 21, 1999). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of public hearings to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on April 18, 2000 (65 FR 20833). The hearings were held in Washington, DC, on September 12, 13, and 15, 2000, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these investigations to the Secretary of Commerce on November 21, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3364 (November 2000), entitled Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and United Kingdom: Investigations Nos. AA1921–197 (Review), 701–TA–231, 319–320, 322, 325–328, 340, 342, and 348–350 (Review), and 731–TA–573–576, 578, 582–587, 604, 607–608, 612, and 614– 618 (Review). Issued: November 27, 2000. By order of the Commission. Donna R. Koehnke, Secretary. [FR Doc. 00–30673 Filed 11–30–00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Sanction for Breaches of Commission Protective Order AGENCY: International Trade Commission. ACTION: Sanction for breaches of Commission protective order. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the sanction imposed by the Commission for breaches of the administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) issued in Crawfish Tail Meat From China, Inv. No. 731–TA–752 (Final). The Commission found that Steven B. Lehat, Esq., and Surjit P. Soni, Esq., breached the APO by (1) delegating primary responsibility for APO compliance to a junior attorney and then failing to provide appropriate supervision of that attorney, which resulted in two APO breaches, (2) repeatedly failing to remedy obvious flaws in their firm’s procedures for protecting business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) released to the firm under APO, and (3) failing to certify to the return or destruction of the BPI obtained under the APO. As a sanction, the Commission is issuing this public reprimand and barring them from access to BPI for a period of six months VerDate 11<MAY>2000 10:59 Nov 30, 2000 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM pfrm04 PsN: 01DEN1
Active order issued from this investigation
Investigation 1921-TA-197 is a U.S. International Trade Commission antidumping (AD) proceeding on Certain Carbon Steel Products from Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, Inv. Nos. AA1921-197, 701-TA-231, 319-320, 322, 325-328, 340, 342 and 348-350; and 731-TA-573-576, 578, 582-587, 604, 607-608, 612 and 614-618 (Review) from United Kingdom, Germany, France, Mexico, South Korea, Brazil, Canada, Australia, Netherlands, Taiwan, Japan, Poland, Sweden, Spain, Finland, Belgium, Romania. The ITC determines whether U.S. industry is materially injured (or threatened) by imports under investigation; Commerce determines whether dumping or subsidization is occurring. Both findings are required for an AD/CVD order to be issued.
1921-TA-197 is in the review phase, with status completed. Review phase — typically a sunset review (every 5 years) to determine whether revoking the order would lead to recurrence of dumping/injury. Affirmative findings keep the order in force; negative findings revoke it.
Yes — investigation 1921-TA-197 resulted in AD/CVD case C-401-401. The linked order page on this catalog has the active deposit rate, scope text, and Federal Register citation.
The USITC publishes investigation determinations and milestones on its Investigations Data Service (IDS) at ids.usitc.gov. Tandom's catalog re-syncs from IDS daily; new phases, votes, and determinations appear here within 24 hours of USITC publication.
Tandom guides relevant to AD/CVD investigations
Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.
Open resource
Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.
Open resource
Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).
Open resource
A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.
Open resource
Drop the Tandom Duty Calculator API into a TMS, broker software, or in-house ERP. Code samples, the response shape, and ACE reporting order, in 2026.
Open resource
Run thousands of product descriptions through HTS classification, score the confidence, and triage borderline rows. Public search endpoint plus the closed-beta three-layer Classifier.
Open resource