Tandom
About
Sign inCreate a free account →
Tandom

The building blocks of global trade.

hello@tandom.ai

Proud to partner with

Microsoft for Startups

NVIDIA

Inception Program

Products

  • Tariff Calculator
  • AD/CVD Intelligence
  • HTS Classification
  • Document Intelligence
  • Entry Filing
  • Excel Plugin
  • Email Plugin

Catalogs

  • AD/CVD Catalog
  • HTS Catalog
  • Pending Investigations Directory
  • Rate Change Feed

Developers

  • API
  • AI Agent Workflows
  • MCP Connector
  • API Reference
  • API Pricing
  • API Changelog

Resources

  • Resource Center
  • Guides
  • Roadmap

Company & Legal

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Acceptable Use

© 2026 Fintora Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Tandom. All rights reserved.

Plain-English explanationLinked AD/CVD casesMessage bodyFrequently asked questionsLearn more
  1. AD/CVD Catalog
  2. ›
  3. CSMS
  4. ›
  5. CSMS 8198315
CSMS 8198315·Trade policy·July 17, 2018·View on csms.cbp.gov ↗

Notification of rescission of administrative review of countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from the People s Republic of China (C-570-982)

Plain-English explanation

CSMS 8198315 is a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Cargo Systems Messaging Service bulletin (trade policy), published on July 17, 2018. It carries the official CBP guidance brokers and importers must follow for the topic — "Notification of rescission of administrative review of countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from the People s Republic of China (C-570-982)". It links to 1 AD/CVD case in Tandom's catalog. CSMS messages are the operational layer between Commerce determinations and at-the-border collections: when Commerce publishes a new rate, scope ruling, or instruction, CBP turns it into a CSMS that ACE/ACS systems and brokers act on.

Linked AD/CVD cases(1)

Cases referenced or affected by this CSMS message

C-570-982

Message body

Full text as published by U.S. Customs and Border Protection

1. Commerce has rescinded the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from the People's Republic of China (C-570-982) covering the period 01/01/2017 through 12/31/2017 for the firms listed below. You are to assess countervailing duties on merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period 01/01/2017 through 12/31/2017 at the cash deposit rate required at the time of entry. Liquidate all entries for the following firms: Company: CS Wind China Co., Ltd. Case Number: C-570-982-001 Company: CS Wind Corporation Case Number: C-570-982-002 Company: CS Wind Tech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Case Number: C-570-982-003 Company: Titan Wind Energy (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (AKA Titan Wind (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.) Case Number: C-570-982-004 Company: Titan (Lianyungang) Metal Products Co., Ltd. Case Number: C-570-982-005 Note: This company's name was inadvertently misspelled as “Titan (Lianyungang) Metal Product Co., Ltd.” in the Initiation Notice, 83 FR 16298, 04/16/2018. The name was correctly spelled in message 8121304, dated 05/01/2018, which previously instructed CBP to continue the suspension of liquidation of this company's entries during this period. Company: Baotou Titan Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd. Case Number: C-570-982-006 Company: Shenyang Titan Metal Co., Ltd. Case Number: C-570-982-007 Company: Alstom Sizhou Electric Power Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: AUSKY (Shandong) Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: AVIC International Renewable Energy Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Bashi Yuexin Logistics Development Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: CATIC International Trade & Economic Development Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Chengde Tianbao Machinery Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Chengxi Shipyard Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: China WindPower Group No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: CleanTech Innovations Inc. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: CNR Wind Turbine Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Dajin Heavy Industry Corporation No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Greenergy Technology Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Guangdong No. 2 Hydropower Engineering Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Guodian United Power Technology Baoding Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Harbin Hongguang Boiler Group Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Hebei Ningqiang Group No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Hebei Qiangsheng Wind Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jiangsu Baolong Electromechanical Mfg. Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jiangsu Baolong Tower Tube Manufacture Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jiangsu Taihu Boiler Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jiangyin Hengrun Ring Farging Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jilin Miracle Equipment Manufacturing Engineering Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jilin Tianhe Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd. (f/k/a Jilin Mingmen Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd.) No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Jinan Railway Vehicles Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Nanjing Jiangbiao Group Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Nantong Dongtai New Energy Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Nantong Hongbo Windpower Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Ningxia Electric Power Group No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Ningxia Yinxing Energy Co. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Ningxia Yinyi Wind Power Generation Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Qingdao GeLinTe Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Qingdao Ocean Group No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Qingdao Pingcheng Steel Structure Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Qingdao Tianneng Electric Power Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Qingdao Wuxiao Group Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Renewable Energy Asia Group Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: SDV China Nanjing No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shandong Endless Wind Turbine Technical Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shandong Iraeta Heavy Industry No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shandong Zhongkai Wind Power Equipment Manufacturers, Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shanghai Aerotech Trading International No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shanghai GE Guangdian Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Shanghai Taisheng Wind Power Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Suihua Wuxiao Electric Power Equipment Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Vestas Wind Technology (China) No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Wuxiao Steel Tower Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Xinjiang Huitong (Group) Co., Ltd. No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. Company: Zhangjiagang Zhiyi Medical Health No case number was in place for this company during the period of review. For the companies listed above without listed case numbers, entries may have been made under C-570-982-000 or other company-specific case numbers. 2. Notice of the lifting of suspension of liquidation of entries of subject merchandise covered by paragraph 1 occurred with publication of the notice of rescission of administrative review (83 FR 30695, 06/29/2018). Unless instructed otherwise, for all other shipments of utility scale wind towers from the People's Republic of China, you shall continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties for the merchandise at the current rates. 3. There are no injunctions applicable to the entries covered by this instruction. 4. The assessment of countervailing duties by CBP on shipments or entries of this merchandise is subject to the provisions of section 778 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Section 778 requires that CBP pay interest on overpayments or assess interest on underpayments of the required amounts deposited as estimated countervailing duties. The interest provisions are not applicable to cash or bonds posted as estimated countervailing duties before the date of publication of the countervailing duty order. Interest shall be calculated from the date payment of estimated countervailing duties is required through the date of liquidation. The rate at which such interest is payable is the rate in effect under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for such period. 5. If there are any questions by the importing public regarding this message, please contact the Call Center for the Office of AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-0984. CBP ports should submit their inquiries through authorized CBP channels only. (This message was generated by OIII: JSC.) 6. There are no restrictions on the release of this information. Alexander Amdur

Frequently asked questions

What is CSMS 8198315?

CSMS 8198315 is a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Cargo Systems Messaging Service bulletin titled "Notification of rescission of administrative review of countervailing duty order on utility scale wind towers from the People s Republic of China (C-570-982)". CSMS bulletins are the operational instructions CBP issues to brokers, importers, and ACE filers covering rate changes, system updates, scope guidance, and other day-to-day customs-operations changes.

When was CSMS 8198315 published?

CBP published CSMS 8198315 on July 17, 2018. The bulletin's instructions are typically operative as of the publication date unless the body specifies a different effective date.

Which AD/CVD cases does CSMS 8198315 affect?

CSMS 8198315 references 1 AD/CVD case (C-570-982). The links on this page take you to each linked order with its current scope, rates, and history.

Is the CBP CSMS the legally binding instruction?

Yes — for at-the-border filing and entry collection. CSMS messages translate Commerce's Federal Register determinations into operational CBP instructions that ACE/ACS systems and brokers execute. The Federal Register notice is the underlying legal authority; the CSMS is the operational implementation. Both should be read together when reconciling a rate or scope change.

Learn more

Tandom guides relevant to CBP CSMS messages

Trade compliance APIs in broker workflows

Where trade compliance APIs fit in a broker's filing pipeline: HTS classification, duty calculation, AD/CVD scope match, and post-summary corrections.

Open resource →

Find the right manufacturer or exporter rate in an AD/CVD order

Cash deposit cascade, separate rates, all-others, and PRC-wide rates. Worked example on case A-570-910 (galvanized welded steel pipe from China) with three exporter-specific rates.

Open resource →

Determine if a product is in scope of an AD/CVD order

Scope text is authoritative; the HTS list is illustrative. Read scope, find past rulings, and file a 19 CFR 351.225 inquiry. Worked example on case A-570-106 (wooden cabinets from China).

Open resource →

Subscribe to and triage CBP CSMS messages

How to subscribe to CBP Cargo Systems Messaging Service and triage the messages that change broker filing behavior, without losing the ones that matter.

Open resource →

Real-time alerts when a CSMS message changes a duty rate

Set up alerts when a CBP CSMS message changes a duty rate on an HTS code you depend on. Built for brokers, forwarders, and importer compliance teams.

Open resource →

Check AD/CVD exposure by HTS code

A practical workflow for checking antidumping and countervailing duty exposure on a US entry. For brokers and ops teams who need the answer before filing.

Open resource →